[7u6] Request for approval for CR 7157855: jvisualvm.1 not included in binaries

David Holmes david.holmes at oracle.com
Wed Aug 22 02:29:49 PDT 2012


On 22/08/2012 6:30 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> On 21/08/2012 9:37 PM, Seán Coffey wrote:
>>> Looks fine to me but best to get an official jdk8 reviewer.
>>
>> Looks fine to me too.
>>
>
> Thanks David.  Is there a preferred tree for me to push this to?

Not from me.

David
-----

>
>>> I presume the filter-out option on macosx becomes a no-op (on
>>> OpenJDK
>>> builds) some lines later : (Images.gmk)
>>>
>>> 264 JDK_MAN_PAGES := $(filter-out jvisualvm.1, $(JDK_MAN_PAGES))
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>>> On the subject of dual Makefile maintenance, are there plans to
>>> eventually remove
>>> the older/legacy makefile structure on 8? I haven't been monitoring
>>> that
>>> topic too closely.
>>
>> Yes. At some point "real soon now" we should make the switch to using
>> the new build system for our official builds. Some of the work for 8
>> is
>> only being done in the context of the new build system.
>>
>
> I need to look at moving our builds to using the new system.
>
>> David
>> ----
>>
>>> regards,
>>> Sean.
>>>
>>> On 21/08/2012 12:13, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>>>> Ah good catch. I didn't realise this was duplicated in the new
>>>> build
>>>> system.
>>>>
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/jvisualvm/webrev.02/
>>>>
>>>> should deal with both cases.
>>>>
>>>> If this is ok, is there a preferred forest to push to? I've been
>>>> testing against
>>>> build, but can easily push it somewhere else.
>>>
>>
>



More information about the jdk7u-dev mailing list