[7u communication] 7u6 Stabilization forest proposal

[Edvard Wendelin]

Hi,

John has now been kind enough to create the forests for 7u6. There was a build problem for B17, so they had to re-spin the build, hence B18.  7u6 [1]  and 7u6-dev [2] are created of out jdk7u#jdk7u6-b18.

Please use jdk7u6-dev [2] for fixes targeted to 7u6.

Cheers,
Edvard

[1] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u6
[2] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u6-dev

On Jun 28, 2012, at 11:15 AM, Edvard Wendelin wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Due to July 4th being a public holiday in the US and how that affects integration schedules, I'd like to propose that we move the creation of the forest to July 5th and the jdk7u6-b17 tag instead.
> 
> Sorry for the late notice, but it was feedback we got after the first email was sent out.
> 
> Thanks,
> Edvard
> 
> On 06/28/2012 01:28 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>> 
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I'd like to propose the following stabilisation forests for 7u6 to be
>>> created on July 2nd:
>>> 
>>> hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u6 based on
>>> hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u/ tag jdk7u6-b16
>>> hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u6-dev based on
>>> hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u/  tag jdk7u6-b16
>>> 
>>> Build 16 is scheduled for June28th. jdk7u6-dev is the development
>>> forest open for fixes that has passed the critical approval process.
>>> [1] See my email on the end game update for more details. After July
>>> 2nd, the next build in jdk7u will be for jdk 7u8.
>>> 
>>> If you have any objections or concerns, let me know before the end of
>>> this week.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Edvard
>>> 
>>> [1]
>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk7u-dev/2012-February/001900.html
>> Good to see a clear tag for the branch point this time! :-)