[7u6] Request for approval for CR 7174645 Could not enable access bridge in Win XP - 32 bit

Kelly O'Hair kelly.ohair at oracle.com
Mon Jun 11 07:13:44 PDT 2012


I can be the reviewer.

-kto

On Jun 11, 2012, at 1:36 AM, Edvard Wendelin wrote:

> It looks good to me, but you'll need a formal Reviewer before you push.
> 
> Cheers,
> Edvard
> 
> On 06/09/2012 12:20 AM, Ragini Prasad wrote:
>> Resending for approval with updated webrev with /MD flag.
>> 
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~raginip/7174645/webrev.01/
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Ragini.
>> 
>> On 6/8/2012 10:22 AM, Ragini Prasad wrote:
>>> Thanks for pointing it out.
>>> 
>>> It has dawned on me that I was using the debug version to link with.
>>> 
>>> I'll modify the Makefile to use flag /MD instead of /MDd and I realize that I wont need the /MT.
>>> 
>>> Will resend for code review approval.
>>> Ragini.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 6/8/2012 10:02 AM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>>>> We ship the msvcr100.dll with the jdk.
>>>> 
>>>> Artem is right, we never use the debug runtime msvcr100d.dll because we can't redistribute it, and we
>>>> don't statically link any runtimes  for lots of reasons.
>>>> 
>>>> We should be using the /MD and rely on msvcr100.dll shipped with the jdk/jre   unless there is a critical reason not to.
>>>> (the only exception I know about here are the launchers placed in the system32 directory, where we can't guarantee a
>>>> msvcr100.dll library is available or the right one).
>>>> 
>>>> -kto
>>>> 
>>>> On Jun 8, 2012, at 8:32 AM, Ragini Prasad wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Artem,
>>>>> /MT flag links the MSVC***.dll statically.
>>>>> This is the Makefile (open) for utility (in closed) we added Registry manipulation which needs the MSVC*** dll to be present on the host machine, as this dll may not be present, hence the need to do the static linking.
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Ragini.
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 6/8/2012 2:02 AM, Artem Ananiev wrote:
>>>>>> Hi, Ragini, Pete,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> as far as I understand, the fix is to replace /MDd with /MT, so we don't link to debug version of MS runtime, correct? Could you provide more details, why you link to the static version of the runtime (/MT), instead of dynamic one (/MD)? The only place in JDK where we use that is java/javaw launcher, all other libs are linked with /MD.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Artem
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 6/7/2012 9:49 PM, Ragini Prasad wrote:
>>>>>>> Requesting for approval to push the changes related to Makefile into open.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 7174645 : Could not enable access bridge in Win XP - 32 bit
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Webrev:
>>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~raginip/7174645/webrev.00/
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Reviewed by:
>>>>>>> Peter Brunet
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Ragini.




More information about the jdk7u-dev mailing list