[7u40] Request for approval: 8019381: HashMap.isEmpty is non-final, potential issues for get/remove

Seán Coffey sean.coffey at oracle.com
Tue Jul 16 10:56:58 PDT 2013


Thanks Neil.

Approval was given for jdk7u40-dev integration. I'll pull this fix back 
to that forest but noticed a testcase issue during test runs.

The import java.util.function.BiFunction class doesn't exist in jdk7u 
and hence, the testcase will need updating. I've logged a new bug for that :
8020625: [TESTBUG] java/util/HashMap/OverrideIsEmpty.java doesn't 
compile for jdk7u

Shi Jun - do you want to supply a new patch for this issue ?

regards,
Sean.

On 16/07/2013 14:45, Neil Richards wrote:
> Now pushed to jdk7u-dev/jdk [1].
>
> Regards,
> Neil
>
> [1] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/b0b15e373002
>
>
> On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 13:56 +0800, Shi Jun Zhang wrote:
>> On 7/13/2013 4:27 AM, Seán Coffey wrote:
>>> Shi Jun,
>>>
>>> this is approved for jdk7u40-dev integration. Please push the fix when
>>> you get time.
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> Sean.
>>>
>>> On 11/07/13 04:06, Shi Jun Zhang wrote:
>>>> On 7/11/2013 2:18 AM, Seán Coffey wrote:
>>>>> Shi Jun Zhang,
>>>>>
>>>>> Let me get QA approval for this issue and I'll get back to you
>>>>> shortly. Is this a must fix request for 7u40 ?
>>>>>
>>>>> regards,
>>>>> Sean.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/07/13 09:34, Shi Jun Zhang wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd like to request for approval to push the following change into
>>>>>> 7u40.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Changeset in jdk 8
>>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/ed111451b77a
>>>>>>
>>>>>> webrev for jdk7u
>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zhangshj/jdk7u/8019381/webrev.00/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Reviewed by chegar, mduigou
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Review thread
>>>>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2013-June/018450.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There are some differences between webrev for jdk7u and jdk8. The
>>>>>> reason is that some change in jdk8 which invokes isEmpty() is only
>>>>>> fixed in jdk8 and not back ported to jdk7u. The jtreg test is
>>>>>> modified accordingly.
>>>>>>
>>>> Hi Sean,
>>>>
>>>> It's not a must fix for 7u40, I think it's OK to put it in later
>>>> release.
>>>>
>> Thanks, Sean.
>>
>> I will ask Neil to push the change.
>>
>> Hi Neil,
>>
>> Could you help to push the changeset into 7u?
>>




More information about the jdk7u-dev mailing list