[7u communication] Request to create 7u40 stabilization forests

[John Coomes]

Seán Coffey (sean.coffey at oracle.com) wrote:
> Mandy,
> 
> ops team are aware of the issue and investigating. Hope to get an update 
> from them shortly.

Due to a configuration error on the server, the normal auto-push from
jdk7u/jdk7u40-dev-gate/* to jdk7u/jdk7u40-dev/* went to an incorrect
destination.  That has been corrected, and the last push (by Abhijit)
to each of

	jdk7u40-dev-gate
	jdk7u40-dev-gate/corba
	jdk7u40-dev-gate/jaxp
	jdk7u40-dev-gate/jaxws
	jdk7u40-dev-gate/jdk

was rolled back on the servers.  Abhijit will redo his push later
tonight, and then jdk7u40-dev will be open for normal business.
Look for push notifications from Abhijit.

-John

> On 24/06/13 23:31, Mandy Chung wrote:
> > Sean, Iris,
> >
> > Looks like the jdk7u40-dev-gate and jdk7u40-dev have different heads 
> > that I can't push the changeset via the gate repo:
> >
> > $ hg push
> > pushing to ssh://mchung@hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u40-dev-gate/jdk
> > searching for changes
> > abort: push creates new remote head 3e0468ae745a!
> > (you should pull and merge or use push -f to force)
> >
> > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u40-dev-gate/jdk/
> > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u40-dev/jdk
> >
> > Can you check that out please?
> >
> > Mandy
> >
> > On 6/24/13 1:39 PM, Seán Coffey wrote:
> >> Thanks Iris!
> >>
> >> Can I ask people with approved phase 2 approval requests to push 
> >> their fixes into the jdk7u40-dev forest ? b31 starts on Tuesday night 
> >> pacific time and Lana wishes to take a PIT snapshot at 08:30 PDT on 
> >> Tuesday morning.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Sean.
> >>
> >> On 24/06/13 21:16, Iris Clark wrote:
> >>> Hi, Sean.
> >>>
> >>> Done:
> >>>
> >>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u40/
> >>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u40-gate/
> >>>
> >>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u40-dev/
> >>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u40-dev-gate/
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> iris
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Iris Clark
> >>> Sent: Monday, June 24, 2013 10:51 AM
> >>> To: Seán Coffey; OpenJDK jdk7u-dev; ops at openjdk.java.net
> >>> Subject: RE: [7u communication] Request to create 7u40 stabilization 
> >>> forests
> >>>
> >>> Hi, Sean.
> >>>
> >>> I'll take care of this today.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> iris
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Seán Coffey
> >>> Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2013 12:55 AM
> >>> To: OpenJDK jdk7u-dev; ops at openjdk.java.net
> >>> Subject: [7u communication] Request to create 7u40 stabilization 
> >>> forests
> >>>
> >>> With the promotion of 7u40 b30 complete and the related tags added 
> >>> to the jdk7u forest, I'd like to request that the following 7u40 
> >>> stabilization forests be created :
> >>>
> >>> hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u40 based on 
> >>> hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u/ tag jdk7u40-b30 
> >>> hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u40-dev based on 
> >>> hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u/  tag jdk7u40-b30
> >>>
> >>> All new fixes for 7u40 should be pushed to the jdk7u40-dev forest 
> >>> once it becomes available. I plan to update the jdk7u OpenJDK 
> >>> project page to indicate that 7u40 is in stabilization phase and 
> >>> that jdk7u-dev is now accepting 7u60 fixes.
> >>>
> >>> regards,
> >>> Sean.
> >>
> >
>