Should 7u40 b31 be delayed by a day ?

Seán Coffey sean.coffey at oracle.com
Tue Jun 25 09:58:41 PDT 2013


Apologies for noise. Didn't mean to cc jdk7u-dev OpenJDK mailing list on 
this issue  (since it concerns build logistics) -

I'll pay better attention next time!

regards,
Sean.

On 25/06/2013 17:08, Lana Steuck wrote:
> > it looks like master forest is ok.
>
> I see that hotspot has integrated into 7u40 Master (jdk7u/jdk7u40).
>
> Just to double-check, are we sure that all the repos in Master 
> (jdk7u/jdk7u40) are fine (-gate and their read-only repos in sync)?
>
> Thanks,
> - Lana
>
> On 06/25/2013 07:45 AM, Seán Coffey wrote:
>> The setup of 7u40 stabilization forest has been met with several 
>> issues :
>>
>> * b30 delayed due to deploy request
>> * Installer sync changes broke b31 (weds night)
>> * Hudson crashed on re-attempting to build31 (thurs night)
>>
>> and now we've got mercurial configuration issues which have blocked 
>> 7u40 fix pushes since yesterday. (ops team are working this)
>>
>> Given that, would it be wise to push b31 out by a day ? (assuming 
>> mercurial issues are resolved today)
>> This does not affect the hsx, deploy or install teams who work from 
>> different team forests since it looks like master forest is ok.
>>
>> regards,
>> Sean.
>




More information about the jdk7u-dev mailing list