>=2 reviewers imply at least two have "reviewer" role?

[Phil Race]

On 6/25/2013 1:52 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote:
>
>>> in that case, I'd suggest that we go for the stricter interpretation, and require two jdk7u reviewers.
>> BTW this could mean that the original 8 fix which is back ported may need additional review.
> Yes. Do you think that would be challenging in general?
>

Not challenging, just something to remember.

-phil.