[7u-dev] Request for approval: 7121403: [TESTBUG] runtime/7051189/Xchecksig.sh fails on 64bit solaris

Vladimir Kempik vladimir.kempik at oracle.com
Wed Apr 30 10:32:59 UTC 2014


Hello

Did you mean 8-na on 8035156 ? than yeah, it should get 8-na probably

7121403 and 8023393 are already in 8 and 9.

Thanks. Vladimir

On 30.04.2014 13:04, Seán Coffey wrote:
> Is this applicable for JDK 8 ? I don't see an 8-na label.
>
> regards,
> Sean.
>
> On 29/04/14 16:39, Vladimir Kempik wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> please approve an identical backport of the fix to jdk7u-dev.
>>
>> There is a testbug with Xchecksig.sh in jdk7u, 
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035156.
>>
>> After we have updated testlibrary in jdk7, this bug can be fixed by 
>> simple backport of https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7121403 
>> to jdk7.
>>
>> The original commit fixed two bugs, 8023393 and 7121403:
>>
>> 7121403: [TESTBUG] runtime/7051189/Xchecksig.sh fails on 64bit solaris
>> 8023393: Need to suppress info message if -Xcheck:jni used with 
>> libjsig.dylab on Mac OSX
>> Summary: Rewrite 7051189 test in Java, port Linux fix for 7051189 to 
>> Mac OSX.
>>
>> The bug:
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7121403
>> and
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8023393
>> The review thread:
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-runtime-dev/2013-August/008743.html 
>>
>>
>> The jdk8u changeset:
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/hotspot/rev/3a57fa7a4cd0
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Vladimir
>>
>



More information about the jdk7u-dev mailing list