Question on 8024648 : 8016131 breaks Zero port
Andrew
gnu.andrew at redhat.com
Fri Jan 17 13:34:51 PST 2014
----- Original Message -----
> Omair, Andrew,
>
> Are one of you handling this fix for 7u forest ? It's still marked as
> unresolved.
>
We're both pretty snowed under with the security updates at the moment.
I don't think it'd be a matter of just blindly backporting a fix. I'd need
to make sure Zero builds on 7u60 as changes have no doubt gone in since,
which have probably broken things further.
What's the forest for u60 at the moment? Has it forked? How do I go about
actually getting fixes in?
> regards,
> Sean.
>
> On 17/12/2013 17:35, Seán Coffey wrote:
> > Correct - and in the case of hotspot fixes, you can push them over to
> > alejandro.murillo at oracle.com
> >
> > regards,
> > Sean.
> >
> > On 17/12/2013 17:31, Andrew wrote:
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8024648
> >>>
> >>> Andrew, Omair,
> >>>
> >>> I was cleaning up some 7u60 bug records today. Have you got plans to
> >>> contribute a fix for JDK-8024648 ? It looks like JDK-8022188 would
> >>> resolve the issue also but neither fix is in the jdk7u-dev codebase
> >>> yet.
> >>>
> >>> regards,
> >>> Sean.
> >>>
> >> I was under the impression that HotSpot fixes were brought in via
> >> bulk import
> >> and we weren't allowed to commit individual fixes?
> >
>
>
--
Andrew :)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
More information about the jdk7u-dev
mailing list