Java DirectByteBuffer and OOM
Seán Coffey
sean.coffey at oracle.com
Tue Aug 18 10:04:49 UTC 2015
Biju,
Why don't you pull the patch into your own forest and build a local copy
? I could be a few weeks/months before this fix becomes public in an
Oracle JDK release. Oracle jdk7u releases are no longer public. Last
public one was 7u80.
Regards,
Sean.
On 18/08/2015 00:21, Biju G.S Nair wrote:
> Hi Ivan,
> Since our applications are getting killed under load due to OOM, it will
> be very helpful if we can get this patch back ported so that we can use
> them immediately. I am not familiar with the process of how patches are
> prioritized. Please let me know if I can do anything to get priority for
> this patch.
>
> Thanks,
> Biju
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Biju G.S Nair <gs.biju at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thank you Ivan for looking into the request. Hope the merge is pretty
>> straight forward.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Biju
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Ivan Gerasimov <ivan.gerasimov at oracle.com
>>> wrote:
>>> Hi Biju!
>>>
>>> I'll see if I can backport that change to jdk8u.
>>>
>>> Sincerely yours,
>>> Ivan
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10.08.2015 19:57, Biju G.S Nair wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks Andrew for the response.
>>>>
>>>> Hi JDK8 development team,
>>>> Could you please back port and merge the patch
>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6857566 in JDK 8. This will
>>>> help
>>>> in resolving OOM issues in our applications which is using
>>>> DirectByteBuffer. This will also help the JDK 7 dev team to merge the
>>>> patch
>>>> into their code base and that is the version we are using.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Biju
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Biju
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 08/10/2015 04:25 PM, Biju G.S Nair wrote:
>>>>>> Hi There,
>>>>>> Our application is failing with unexpected OOM when using Java
>>>>>> DirectByteBuffer and the fix
>>>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6857566 currently merged to
>>>>>>
>>>>> JDK 9
>>>>>
>>>>>> which includes a scaling sleep time should help us and may be others as
>>>>>> well who are using JDK 7. Is there a way this patch can be back ported
>>>>>>
>>>>> and
>>>>>
>>>>>> merged into JDK 7 since the fix seems to be pretty straight forward.
>>>>>> That
>>>>>> will be very helpful and your response is much appreciated.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, but it should be back-ported to JDK8u. It's not at all
>>>>> conventional
>>>>> to skip a JDK release.
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrew.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
More information about the jdk7u-dev
mailing list