From dalibor.topic at oracle.com Wed May 6 19:09:21 2015 From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (dalibor topic) Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 21:09:21 +0200 Subject: [7u communication] Adjusting hgupdater defaults after 7u80 In-Reply-To: <55119AF8.3010102@oracle.com> References: <55119AF8.3010102@oracle.com> Message-ID: <554A66E1.7030201@oracle.com> This change has now been implemented. cheers, dalibor topic On 24.03.2015 18:12, dalibor topic wrote: > In order to enable a future Project Lead to differentiate future changes > backported to this OpenJDK Project from those backported to (for > example) future Oracle JDK 7 updates, the hgupdater settings for the > active forests need to be adjusted. > > I propose that hgupdater is adjusted to > * set 'fixVersion' to 'openjdk7u' for the forests: > jdk7u/jdk7u > jdk7u/jdk7u-dev > > on the automatically created backports entries after 7u80 GA. > > Let me know if you have any feedback by Friday, March 27th. > > cheers, > dalibor topic -- Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment From dalibor.topic at oracle.com Wed May 6 19:19:49 2015 From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (dalibor topic) Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 21:19:49 +0200 Subject: [7u communication] Adjusting push rights to the jdk7u/jdk7u master forest Message-ID: <554A6955.1070102@oracle.com> In order to enable a future Project Lead to push their changes to the jdk7u/jdk7u master forest, the limited set of Committers with such rights needs to be adjusted. [0] I propose that the set of Committers with push rights to the jdk7u/jdk7u forest is adjusted to be the same as for jdk7u/jdk7u-dev. In other words, all Committers to this Project would then be able to push to the master forest, just like with the development forest. Let me know if you have any feedback by Tuesday, May 12th. cheers, dalibor topic [0] https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/jdk7u/JDK+7+Updates%3A+Repository+Management -- Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment From sadhak001 at gmail.com Wed May 6 21:50:52 2015 From: sadhak001 at gmail.com (Mani Sarkar) Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 22:50:52 +0100 Subject: OpenJDK7 build and contributions Message-ID: Hi, Does EOL of Java 7 mean this mailing list and the hg repo won't be active anymore? Are you still accepting contributions for OpenJDK7 - who can contribute and what kinds of contributions are accepted? I also have tried to build OpenJDK7 on Ubuntu and builds fine but when building on Fedora I get this error: Linking vm... /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lstdc++ collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status I also get this message: If you ever happen to want to link against installed libraries in a given directory, LIBDIR, you must either use libtool, and specify the full pathname of the library, or use the `-LLIBDIR' flag during linking and do at least one of the following: - add LIBDIR to the `LD_LIBRARY_PATH' environment variable during execution - add LIBDIR to the `LD_RUN_PATH' environment variable during linking - use the `-Wl,-rpath -Wl,LIBDIR' linker flag - have your system administrator add LIBDIR to `/etc/ld.so.conf' Are both these caused by LD_LIBRARY_PATH not set to where stdc++ library is placed ? This is causing the hotspot repo to break from building, all other repos build fine. What's a proper fix ? Cheers, Mani -- @theNeomatrix369 * | **Blog ** | *LJC Associate & LJC Advocate (@adoptopenjdk & @adoptajsr programs) *Meet-a-Project - *MutabilityDetector * | **Bitbucket * * | **Github * * | **LinkedIn * *Come to Devoxx UK 2015:* http://www.devoxx.co.uk/ *Don't chase success, rather aim for "Excellence", and success will come chasing after you!* From ivan at azulsystems.com Thu May 7 09:47:19 2015 From: ivan at azulsystems.com (Ivan Krylov) Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 12:47:19 +0300 Subject: OpenJDK7 build and contributions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <554B34A7.5020307@azulsystems.com> Hi Mani, I think it is reasonable to expect that OpenJDK7 will follow the footsteps of OpenJDK6. Oracle will select a company that would declared as the maintainer of the project. For OpenJDK6 the maintainer is Red Hat. That company will set the policies for updates, etc. In my understanding, at this moment jdk7 is in a transition state, basically - locked, until further announcements. If you are already a JDK member - you can go ahead a file a bug already. The bug can get voted and someone interested will eventually fix it. I could copy-paste the description that you gave, provided that you specify the Fedora release number, versions of the kernel and tools (g++, ld, etc.). Kindly let us know if you see the same with openjdk8 or not. Thanks, Ivan On 07/05/2015 00:50, Mani Sarkar wrote: > Hi, > > Does EOL of Java 7 mean this mailing list and the hg repo won't be active > anymore? Are you still accepting contributions for OpenJDK7 - who can > contribute and what kinds of contributions are accepted? > > I also have tried to build OpenJDK7 on Ubuntu and builds fine but when > building on Fedora I get this error: > > Linking vm... > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lstdc++ > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status > > > I also get this message: > > If you ever happen to want to link against installed libraries > in a given directory, LIBDIR, you must either use libtool, and > specify the full pathname of the library, or use the `-LLIBDIR' > flag during linking and do at least one of the following: > - add LIBDIR to the `LD_LIBRARY_PATH' environment variable > during execution > - add LIBDIR to the `LD_RUN_PATH' environment variable > during linking > - use the `-Wl,-rpath -Wl,LIBDIR' linker flag > - have your system administrator add LIBDIR to `/etc/ld.so.conf' > > > Are both these caused by LD_LIBRARY_PATH not set to where stdc++ library is > placed ? This is causing the hotspot repo to break from building, all other > repos build fine. > > What's a proper fix ? > > Cheers, > Mani > From dalibor.topic at oracle.com Thu May 7 13:55:20 2015 From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (dalibor topic) Date: Thu, 07 May 2015 15:55:20 +0200 Subject: OpenJDK7 build and contributions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <554B6EC8.9010700@oracle.com> On 06.05.2015 23:50, Mani Sarkar wrote: > Hi, > > Does EOL of Java 7 mean this mailing list and the hg repo won't be active > anymore? Not necessarily. A future Project Lead may decide to continue to use this mailing list and this project's forests. > Are you still accepting contributions for OpenJDK7 No. The JDK 7 Project in OpenJDK has finished its work with the JDK 7 GA back in 2011. If you mean this Project, then the answer is no, as well. This Project has accomplished what it set out to do in June 2011. Current activity in this Project is focused on enabling a successful transition of Project Leads. A future Project Lead can set the technical direction anew and decide which contributions, if any, to accept. > - who can > contribute and what kinds of contributions are accepted? In order to contribute to OpenJDK Projects, Contributors must meet the requirements outlined in the Bylaws: http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#contributor . The technical direction of a Project is set by its Project Lead. A future Project Lead will be able to set it - in the future. You'll need to come back and ask again then in order to understand what kinds of contributions would be acceptable then. > Linking vm... > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lstdc++ > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status You're missing the C++ standard library. > What's a proper fix ? Installing the C++ standard library, I assume. See http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13195110/usr-bin-ld-cannot-find-lstdc . cheers, dalibor topic -- Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 Oracle | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment From dalibor.topic at oracle.com Thu May 7 14:10:11 2015 From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (dalibor topic) Date: Thu, 07 May 2015 16:10:11 +0200 Subject: OpenJDK7 build and contributions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <554B7243.5040800@oracle.com> On 06.05.2015 23:50, Mani Sarkar wrote: > Hi, > > Does EOL of Java 7 mean this mailing list and the hg repo won't be active > anymore? Ah, I just noticed that this questions is about the EOL of Java 7, instead of the end of public updates - two very different things. Looking at http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html , I think that 2022 is simply too far away to be able to accurately say today whether this mailing list or Mercurial repositories associated with this Project will be active at that time. cheers, dalibor topic -- Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 Oracle | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment From dalibor.topic at oracle.com Thu May 7 14:29:54 2015 From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (dalibor topic) Date: Thu, 07 May 2015 16:29:54 +0200 Subject: OpenJDK7 build and contributions In-Reply-To: <554B34A7.5020307@azulsystems.com> References: <554B34A7.5020307@azulsystems.com> Message-ID: <554B76E2.5090705@oracle.com> On 07.05.2015 11:47, Ivan Krylov wrote: > Oracle will select a company that would declared as the maintainer of > the project. For OpenJDK6 the maintainer is Red Hat. > That company will set the policies for updates, etc. Not quite. It's important to get the terminology right. A Projects has a Project Lead, who is an individual which may or may not work for a given company. The Project Lead is responsible for "directing and coordinating the Project?s activities" [0]. When a Project is created, or when its Project Lead resigns or departs, candidates for a new Project Lead may be nominated by the Group Leads of a Project?s Sponsoring Groups. In the case of this Project, the sponsoring Group is the Build Group, and its Group lead is of course an individual. The Project Lead for the JDK 6 Project is Andrew Haley. cheers, dalibor topic [0] http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#project-lead -- Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 Oracle | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment From ivan at azulsystems.com Thu May 7 15:10:35 2015 From: ivan at azulsystems.com (Ivan Krylov) Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 18:10:35 +0300 Subject: OpenJDK7 build and contributions In-Reply-To: <554B76E2.5090705@oracle.com> References: <554B34A7.5020307@azulsystems.com> <554B76E2.5090705@oracle.com> Message-ID: <554B806B.9020706@azulsystems.com> Thank you for this clarification. Ivan On 07/05/2015 17:29, dalibor topic wrote: > On 07.05.2015 11:47, Ivan Krylov wrote: >> Oracle will select a company that would declared as the maintainer of >> the project. For OpenJDK6 the maintainer is Red Hat. >> That company will set the policies for updates, etc. > > Not quite. It's important to get the terminology right. > > A Projects has a Project Lead, who is an individual which may or may > not work for a given company. The Project Lead is responsible for > "directing and coordinating the Project?s activities" [0]. > > When a Project is created, or when its Project Lead resigns or > departs, candidates for a new Project Lead may be nominated by the > Group Leads of a Project?s Sponsoring Groups. In the case of this > Project, the sponsoring Group is the Build Group, and its Group lead > is of course an individual. > > The Project Lead for the JDK 6 Project is Andrew Haley. > > cheers, > dalibor topic > > [0] http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#project-lead From dalibor.topic at oracle.com Tue May 19 16:08:11 2015 From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (dalibor topic) Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 18:08:11 +0200 Subject: [7u communication] Adjusting push rights to the jdk7u/jdk7u master forest In-Reply-To: <554A6955.1070102@oracle.com> References: <554A6955.1070102@oracle.com> Message-ID: <555B5FEB.70200@oracle.com> There was no feedback. I have asked the ops to make the change. cheers, dalibor topic On 06.05.2015 21:19, dalibor topic wrote: > In order to enable a future Project Lead to push their changes to the > jdk7u/jdk7u master forest, the limited set of Committers with such > rights needs to be adjusted. [0] > > I propose that the set of Committers with push rights to the jdk7u/jdk7u > forest is adjusted to be the same as for jdk7u/jdk7u-dev. > > In other words, all Committers to this Project would then be able to > push to the master forest, just like with the development forest. > > Let me know if you have any feedback by Tuesday, May 12th. > > cheers, > dalibor topic > > [0] > https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/jdk7u/JDK+7+Updates%3A+Repository+Management > -- Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 Oracle | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment From John.E.Gregg at wellsfargo.com Tue May 19 21:31:41 2015 From: John.E.Gregg at wellsfargo.com (John.E.Gregg at wellsfargo.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 21:31:41 +0000 Subject: Backporting sun.security.ssl.ClientHandshaker change to jdk7u? Message-ID: Hi all, On April 10 a change was committed to jdk8u that I'd like to see backported to jdk7u. The change set is a large one: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/ea62ea52af27. I don't know anything about the background of the change. The checkin comment just says "Merge." I don't know where it was merged from but it seems to be a bundle of unrelated changes. The substance of the change to sun.security.ssl.ClientHandshaker is to make the triple handshake fix check all subject alternate names of types "IP address" and "DNS" and not just the first of each. The current behavior, introduced in in 1.7.0_71 I think, is unnecessarily restrictive. I believe the change is just a single file. Thanks John Gregg From sean.coffey at oracle.com Tue May 19 21:47:18 2015 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?windows-1252?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 22:47:18 +0100 Subject: Backporting sun.security.ssl.ClientHandshaker change to jdk7u? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <555BAF66.5040807@oracle.com> John, the change you're referring to seems to be https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8075750 It's fixed for 7u85 which is an upcoming JDK release. Regards, Sean. On 19/05/2015 22:31, John.E.Gregg at wellsfargo.com wrote: > Hi all, > > On April 10 a change was committed to jdk8u that I'd like to see backported to jdk7u. The change set is a large one: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/ea62ea52af27. I don't know anything about the background of the change. The checkin comment just says "Merge." I don't know where it was merged from but it seems to be a bundle of unrelated changes. > > The substance of the change to sun.security.ssl.ClientHandshaker is to make the triple handshake fix check all subject alternate names of types "IP address" and "DNS" and not just the first of each. The current behavior, introduced in in 1.7.0_71 I think, is unnecessarily restrictive. I believe the change is just a single file. > > Thanks > > > John Gregg > > > From John.E.Gregg at wellsfargo.com Wed May 20 02:56:53 2015 From: John.E.Gregg at wellsfargo.com (John.E.Gregg at wellsfargo.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 02:56:53 +0000 Subject: Backporting sun.security.ssl.ClientHandshaker change to jdk7u? In-Reply-To: <555BAF66.5040807@oracle.com> References: <555BAF66.5040807@oracle.com> Message-ID: For my own education, where would I find the fix in Mercurial? I looked in jdk7u and jdk7u-dev but don't see it. For jdk8, I see it in jdk8u. Thanks John -----Original Message----- From: Se?n Coffey [mailto:sean.coffey at oracle.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 4:47 PM To: Gregg, John E.; jdk7u-dev at openjdk.java.net Subject: Re: Backporting sun.security.ssl.ClientHandshaker change to jdk7u? John, the change you're referring to seems to be https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8075750 It's fixed for 7u85 which is an upcoming JDK release. Regards, Sean. On 19/05/2015 22:31, John.E.Gregg at wellsfargo.com wrote: > Hi all, > > On April 10 a change was committed to jdk8u that I'd like to see backported to jdk7u. The change set is a large one: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/ea62ea52af27. I don't know anything about the background of the change. The checkin comment just says "Merge." I don't know where it was merged from but it seems to be a bundle of unrelated changes. > > The substance of the change to sun.security.ssl.ClientHandshaker is to make the triple handshake fix check all subject alternate names of types "IP address" and "DNS" and not just the first of each. The current behavior, introduced in in 1.7.0_71 I think, is unnecessarily restrictive. I believe the change is just a single file. > > Thanks > > > John Gregg > > > From david.buck at oracle.com Wed May 20 03:25:48 2015 From: david.buck at oracle.com (david buck) Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 12:25:48 +0900 Subject: Backporting sun.security.ssl.ClientHandshaker change to jdk7u? In-Reply-To: References: <555BAF66.5040807@oracle.com> Message-ID: <555BFEBC.8070508@oracle.com> Hi John! As Oracle is no longer directly contributing changes for JDK7 to OpenJDK [0], the backport work done for the upcoming 7u85 release of Oracle JDK is not available in any of the public Mercurial repositories. Oracle JDK 7u85 will be available for Oracle's support customers [1]. For OpenJDK, the community has the option of backporting the change from JDK8 [2] to JDK7 and pushing it into the public Mercurial repository. Cheers, -Buck [0] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk7u-dev/2014-April/008910.html [1] http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html [2] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/rev/518f0c5574ef On 2015/05/20 11:56, John.E.Gregg at wellsfargo.com wrote: > For my own education, where would I find the fix in Mercurial? I looked in jdk7u and jdk7u-dev but don't see it. For jdk8, I see it in jdk8u. > > Thanks > > John > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Se?n Coffey [mailto:sean.coffey at oracle.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 4:47 PM > To: Gregg, John E.; jdk7u-dev at openjdk.java.net > Subject: Re: Backporting sun.security.ssl.ClientHandshaker change to jdk7u? > > John, > > the change you're referring to seems to be > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8075750 > > It's fixed for 7u85 which is an upcoming JDK release. > > Regards, > Sean. > > On 19/05/2015 22:31, John.E.Gregg at wellsfargo.com wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> On April 10 a change was committed to jdk8u that I'd like to see backported to jdk7u. The change set is a large one: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/ea62ea52af27. I don't know anything about the background of the change. The checkin comment just says "Merge." I don't know where it was merged from but it seems to be a bundle of unrelated changes. >> >> The substance of the change to sun.security.ssl.ClientHandshaker is to make the triple handshake fix check all subject alternate names of types "IP address" and "DNS" and not just the first of each. The current behavior, introduced in in 1.7.0_71 I think, is unnecessarily restrictive. I believe the change is just a single file. >> >> Thanks >> >> >> John Gregg >> >> >> > From dalibor.topic at oracle.com Wed May 20 10:55:18 2015 From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (dalibor topic) Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 12:55:18 +0200 Subject: Backporting sun.security.ssl.ClientHandshaker change to jdk7u? In-Reply-To: <555BFEBC.8070508@oracle.com> References: <555BAF66.5040807@oracle.com> <555BFEBC.8070508@oracle.com> Message-ID: <555C6816.2090101@oracle.com> Keep in mind that this Project is currently not accepting further contributions as it has accomplished what it set out to do in June 2011. Current activity in this Project is focused on enabling a successful transition of Project Leads. A future Project Lead can set the technical direction anew and decide which contributions, if any, to accept. cheers, dalibor topic On 20.05.2015 05:25, david buck wrote: > Hi John! > > As Oracle is no longer directly contributing changes for JDK7 to OpenJDK > [0], the backport work done for the upcoming 7u85 release of Oracle JDK > is not available in any of the public Mercurial repositories. > > Oracle JDK 7u85 will be available for Oracle's support customers [1]. > For OpenJDK, the community has the option of backporting the change from > JDK8 [2] to JDK7 and pushing it into the public Mercurial repository. > > Cheers, > -Buck > > [0] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk7u-dev/2014-April/008910.html > > [1] http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html > > [2] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/rev/518f0c5574ef > > On 2015/05/20 11:56, John.E.Gregg at wellsfargo.com wrote: >> For my own education, where would I find the fix in Mercurial? I >> looked in jdk7u and jdk7u-dev but don't see it. For jdk8, I see it in >> jdk8u. >> >> Thanks >> >> John >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Se?n Coffey [mailto:sean.coffey at oracle.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 4:47 PM >> To: Gregg, John E.; jdk7u-dev at openjdk.java.net >> Subject: Re: Backporting sun.security.ssl.ClientHandshaker change to >> jdk7u? >> >> John, >> >> the change you're referring to seems to be >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8075750 >> >> It's fixed for 7u85 which is an upcoming JDK release. >> >> Regards, >> Sean. >> >> On 19/05/2015 22:31, John.E.Gregg at wellsfargo.com wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> On April 10 a change was committed to jdk8u that I'd like to see >>> backported to jdk7u. The change set is a large one: >>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/ea62ea52af27. I >>> don't know anything about the background of the change. The checkin >>> comment just says "Merge." I don't know where it was merged from but >>> it seems to be a bundle of unrelated changes. >>> >>> The substance of the change to sun.security.ssl.ClientHandshaker is >>> to make the triple handshake fix check all subject alternate names of >>> types "IP address" and "DNS" and not just the first of each. The >>> current behavior, introduced in in 1.7.0_71 I think, is unnecessarily >>> restrictive. I believe the change is just a single file. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> >>> John Gregg >>> >>> >>> >> -- Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 Oracle | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment From dalibor.topic at oracle.com Wed May 20 10:56:24 2015 From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (dalibor topic) Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 12:56:24 +0200 Subject: [7u communication] Adjusting push rights to the jdk7u/jdk7u master forest In-Reply-To: <555B5FEB.70200@oracle.com> References: <554A6955.1070102@oracle.com> <555B5FEB.70200@oracle.com> Message-ID: <555C6858.6090500@oracle.com> This change has now been implemented. On 19.05.2015 18:08, dalibor topic wrote: > There was no feedback. I have asked the ops to make the change. > > cheers, > dalibor topic > > On 06.05.2015 21:19, dalibor topic wrote: >> In order to enable a future Project Lead to push their changes to the >> jdk7u/jdk7u master forest, the limited set of Committers with such >> rights needs to be adjusted. [0] >> >> I propose that the set of Committers with push rights to the jdk7u/jdk7u >> forest is adjusted to be the same as for jdk7u/jdk7u-dev. >> >> In other words, all Committers to this Project would then be able to >> push to the master forest, just like with the development forest. >> >> Let me know if you have any feedback by Tuesday, May 12th. >> >> cheers, >> dalibor topic >> >> [0] >> https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/jdk7u/JDK+7+Updates%3A+Repository+Management >> >> > -- Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 Oracle | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment From sadhak001 at gmail.com Fri May 22 03:34:24 2015 From: sadhak001 at gmail.com (Mani Sarkar) Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 04:34:24 +0100 Subject: OpenJDK7 build and contributions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks Dalibor, Ivan for chipping in and giving a better idea of how things will flow for OpenJDK7 since its EOL. Cheers, Mani On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:50 PM, Mani Sarkar wrote: > Hi, > > Does EOL of Java 7 mean this mailing list and the hg repo won't be active > anymore? Are you still accepting contributions for OpenJDK7 - who can > contribute and what kinds of contributions are accepted? > > I also have tried to build OpenJDK7 on Ubuntu and builds fine but when > building on Fedora I get this error: > > Linking vm... > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lstdc++ > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status > > > I also get this message: > > If you ever happen to want to link against installed libraries > in a given directory, LIBDIR, you must either use libtool, and > specify the full pathname of the library, or use the `-LLIBDIR' > flag during linking and do at least one of the following: > - add LIBDIR to the `LD_LIBRARY_PATH' environment variable > during execution > - add LIBDIR to the `LD_RUN_PATH' environment variable > during linking > - use the `-Wl,-rpath -Wl,LIBDIR' linker flag > - have your system administrator add LIBDIR to `/etc/ld.so.conf' > > > Are both these caused by LD_LIBRARY_PATH not set to where stdc++ library > is placed ? This is causing the hotspot repo to break from building, all > other repos build fine. > > What's a proper fix ? > > Cheers, > Mani > > -- > @theNeomatrix369 * | **Blog > ** | *LJC Associate & LJC Advocate > (@adoptopenjdk & @adoptajsr programs) > *Meet-a-Project - *MutabilityDetector > * | **Bitbucket > * * | **Github > * * | **LinkedIn > * > *Come to Devoxx UK 2015:* http://www.devoxx.co.uk/ > > *Don't chase success, rather aim for "Excellence", and success will come > chasing after you!* > -- @theNeomatrix369 * | **Blog ** | *LJC Associate & LJC Advocate (@adoptopenjdk & @adoptajsr programs) *Meet-a-Project - *MutabilityDetector * | **Bitbucket * * | **Github * * | **LinkedIn * *Come to Devoxx UK 2015:* http://www.devoxx.co.uk/ *Don't chase success, rather aim for "Excellence", and success will come chasing after you!* From dalibor.topic at oracle.com Fri May 22 17:43:25 2015 From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (dalibor topic) Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 19:43:25 +0200 Subject: Maintainer Resignation Message-ID: <555F6ABD.70606@oracle.com> I resign as a Maintainer in this Project. The Project's wiki page has been updated accordingly. cheers, dalibor topic -- Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 Oracle | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment From dalibor.topic at oracle.com Fri May 22 17:43:39 2015 From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (dalibor topic) Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 19:43:39 +0200 Subject: JDK 7 Updates Project Lead Resignation Message-ID: <555F6ACB.9060700@oracle.com> With this message I resign as the Project Lead of the JDK 7 Updates Project. The Project's wiki page has been updated accordingly. A new Project Lead will be registered in the Census once the Group Lead of the Build Group nominates one, notifying this mailing list and the Registrar. cheers, dalibor topic -- Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 Oracle | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment From srinivas.n2k at gmail.com Mon May 25 13:05:00 2015 From: srinivas.n2k at gmail.com (Srinivas) Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 18:35:00 +0530 Subject: MaxMetaSpaceSize and MetaSpaceSize Message-ID: Would like to know if there are any guide lines for tuning MaxMetaSpaceSize and MetaSpaceSize parameters while working with Java8. From david.holmes at oracle.com Tue May 26 01:24:46 2015 From: david.holmes at oracle.com (David Holmes) Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 11:24:46 +1000 Subject: MaxMetaSpaceSize and MetaSpaceSize In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5563CB5E.4090701@oracle.com> On 25/05/2015 11:05 PM, Srinivas wrote: > Would like to know if there are any guide lines for tuning > MaxMetaSpaceSize and MetaSpaceSize parameters while working with > Java8. bcc'd the java7 mailing list and cc'd hotspot-runtime. David From tim.bell at oracle.com Thu May 28 18:54:03 2015 From: tim.bell at oracle.com (Tim Bell) Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 11:54:03 -0700 Subject: New lead for the JDK 7 Update Releases Project: Andrew Haley Message-ID: <5567644B.1040402@oracle.com> Dalibor Topic has resigned as lead for the JDK 7 Updates Project [1]. Under the bylaws for Project Roles [2], a new Project Lead may be nominated by the Group Leads of the Project's sponsoring groups. The Build Infrastructure Group is sponsor of the project. As Group Lead, I would like to nominate Andrew Haley as the new Project Lead. As the Build Infrastructure Group is the only sponsoring group for this project, I believe that the nomination is automatically approved. -Tim [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk7u-dev/2015-May/010308.html [2] http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#project-lead From gnu.andrew at redhat.com Fri May 29 00:30:44 2015 From: gnu.andrew at redhat.com (Andrew Hughes) Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 20:30:44 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Backporting sun.security.ssl.ClientHandshaker change to jdk7u? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <724666948.7310998.1432859444367.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> ----- Original Message ----- > Hi all, > > On April 10 a change was committed to jdk8u that I'd like to see backported > to jdk7u. The change set is a large one: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/ea62ea52af27. I don't > know anything about the background of the change. The checkin comment just > says "Merge." I don't know where it was merged from but it seems to be a > bundle of unrelated changes. > > The substance of the change to sun.security.ssl.ClientHandshaker is to make > the triple handshake fix check all subject alternate names of types "IP > address" and "DNS" and not just the first of each. The current behavior, > introduced in in 1.7.0_71 I think, is unnecessarily restrictive. I believe > the change is just a single file. The actual change is: changeset: 10570:518f0c5574ef user: robm date: Mon Mar 23 17:05:01 2015 +0000 summary: 8072385: Only the first DNSName entry is checked for endpoint identification http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/rev/518f0c5574ef https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8072385 has it marked as fixed in 7u85, which implies that it should be committed to the 7u tree. This should now be possible, now the project has active leadership again. > > Thanks > > > John Gregg > > > > -- Andrew :) Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) PGP Key: ed25519/35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net) Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04 C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222 PGP Key: rsa4096/248BDC07 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net) Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07