Request for Approval: 6425769: Allow specifying an address to bind JMX remote connector

[Severin Gehwolf]

On Mon, 2016-02-22 at 13:16 -0500, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > > Also, not sure why you need two URLs here? What is the difference between
> > > webrev (the one I review) and 'HG export'?
> > 
> > Convenience. If you don't use the hg-exports, that's fine by me. Some
> > people prefer that over webrev patches. I didn't mean to confuse
> > people.
> 
> Ok, I'm just not sure how they are different; the exported hg patch is
> in the webrev, isn't it?

It's not for me. At least I can't find it if it's there as you claim.
Example:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-8145982/jdk7.00/jdk.patch
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-8145982/jdk7-exports/JDK-8145982.export.jdk.patch

The former is from the webrev. The latter the HG-exported one. The
former does *not* include the commit message and it has this weird diff
context format with "old/new":

--- old/test/sun/management/jmxremote/bootstrap/JMXInterfaceBindingTest.java	2016-02-19 14:31:05.245490870 +0100
+++ new/test/sun/management/jmxremote/bootstrap/JMXInterfaceBindingTest.java	2016-02-19 14:31:05.158492043 +0100

Not sure how to convince webrev.ksh to do hg-exports.

Cheers,
Severin