Warnings Cleanup in java.util.<various>

[Stuart Marks]

Hi Mike,

Thanks for pulling together the London JUG on short notice to bring up folks on 
building OpenJDK to the point of being able to generate patches! That's a great 
accomplishment.

Sorry for the trouble with the attachments. As you notice, most everything 
except text attachments is stripped (though I believe some of the OpenJDK lists 
will pass zip attachments).

I've filed bug 7117249 to track these changes. David Holmes mentioned that he 
thought the change in LogManager from Enumeration to Iterator might be out of 
scope for warnings cleanup. He might be right. I saw some questions from 
Martijn about other aspects of this code as well. I'll bring in somebody who's 
more familiar with the logging area to look this over, and then we'll figure 
out what to do.

Thanks again.

s'marks

On 12/1/11 4:11 PM, Michael Barker wrote:
> Trying once more with a .txt extension.  If that fails I'll inline the patch.
>
> Mike.
>
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 12:06 AM, Michael Barker<mikeb01 at gmail.com>  wrote:
>> Looks like the list software has stripped off the attachments from my
>> previous mail (my outbox shows them attached).
>>
>> Here's a second attempt.
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 11:58 PM, Michael Barker<mikeb01 at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Here is the output of our (unfortunately short) hack session.  There
>>> are warnings fixed in 4 files.  A patch is included in each.  Mostly
>>> just generics and deprecation warnings.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Michael Barker.
>>> Contributor/UserId: mikeb2701