Request for Review: Warnings cleanup in java.lang.*, java.util.**

Martijn Verburg martijnverburg at gmail.com
Fri Dec 2 04:22:10 PST 2011


FYI - The London JUG did have java.util.regex listed, but we didn't
have time to produce a patch for that area, so no clash there -
Cheers, M

On 2 December 2011 12:18, Alan Bateman <Alan.Bateman at oracle.com> wrote:
>
> cc'ing core-libs-dev as that is the place to discuss these changes. I see on
> the sign-up sheet [1] that omajid has signed up for java.lang, maybe you are
> working together? I'll leave it to Stuart to say whether he wants to
> refactor/other changes separated from the warnings changes.
>
> One thing I'm curious about is @SuppressWarnings("BooleanConstructorCall")
> as it suggests that some other compiler, or maybe an extension in the
> NetBeans javac?
>
> -Alan
>
> [1]
> http://wikis.sun.com/display/OpenJDK/JDK8+warning+cleanup+day+%282011-12-01%29
>
>
> On 02/12/2011 11:06, David Schlosnagle wrote:
>>
>> I didn't have a chance to sign-up or submit during the official
>> warnings cleanup day, but I'm hoping that you'll still accept patches.
>> I do not have a bug number for this change.
>>
>> The webrev [1] below should resolve 208 warnings in the java.lang.*
>> and java.util.** packages. I tried to stick to fixing warnings, but
>> OCD kicked in while editing in NetBeans, so there are a few additional
>> IDE warnings fixed as well for the modified files. For example, adding
>> @Override on the relevant methods, removals of dead stores, conversion
>> to Strings in switch, StringBuffer ->  StringBuilder where localized (I
>> realize lock elision in HotSpot and JRockit should make them
>> practically equivalent, but NetBeans still complains and I assume
>> there is still some unnecessary synchronization overhead).
>> ConditionalSpecialCasing.java also has some slight refactoring to
>> utilize the updated parameterized types.
>>
>> Additionally, there was one change to
>> java.util.regex.Pattern#subFlag() that I'd like someone to review more
>> carefully as it was previously falling through the last case, but I
>> believe the last case should have had a break; to properly handle
>> other flags.
>>
>> *** 3006,3015 ****
>> --- 3014,3024 ----
>>               case 'x':
>>                   flags&= ~COMMENTS;
>>                   break;
>>               case 'U':
>>                   flags&= ~(UNICODE_CHARACTER_CLASS | UNICODE_CASE);
>> +                 break;
>>               default:
>>                   return;
>>               }
>>
>> If you want any of the additional cleanup removed from the patch or
>> other changes, please let me know.
>>
>> [1]: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/23832908/openjdk/2011-12-01/index.html
>>
>> Files modified:
>>     java/lang/Boolean.java
>>     java/lang/Byte.java
>>     java/lang/Character.java
>>     java/lang/Class.java
>>     java/lang/ConditionalSpecialCasing.java
>>     java/lang/Double.java
>>     java/lang/Float.java
>>     java/lang/Integer.java
>>     java/lang/Long.java
>>     java/lang/Short.java
>>     java/lang/System.java
>>     java/lang/ThreadLocal.java
>>     java/lang/Void.java
>>     java/util/IllegalFormatConversionException.java
>>     java/util/Locale.java
>>     java/util/regex/Matcher.java
>>     java/util/regex/Pattern.java
>>     java/util/regex/PatternSyntaxException.java
>>     java/util/regex/UnicodeProp.java
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Dave
>
>


More information about the jdk8-dev mailing list