JDK 8 Warnings Cleanup Day -- Dec. 1st, 2011

[Phil Race]

Apologies .. I read your comment opposite to your meaning.
Yes, you are right. Less merges if AWT changes go to the AWT forest.

-phil.

On 11/29/2011 11:45 AM, Phil Race wrote:
> I'd be surprised if there was any merge effort unless folks work on 
> the same files.
> If client folks do client files and core folks don't then that would 
> avoid it.
> And any merge effort would seem to me to be the same anyway, just 
> where/when it occurs.
>
> Am I overlooking something ?
>
> -phil.
>
> On 11/29/2011 2:31 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> On 29/11/2011 02:10, Xiomara Jayasena wrote:
>>> :
>>>
>>> 3.       Pull this repo to base your changes on it: 
>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk
>>>
>> The AWT/Swing folks might want to chime in here but I suspect they 
>> may prefer to have fixes for the client area (java.awt.**, 
>> javax.swing.** etc) to be based on jdk8/awt rather than the TL 
>> forest. It's no big deal if they are pushed to jdk8/tl but it may 
>> reduce the merge effort if the client area changes are pushed via the 
>> jdk8/awt forest.
>>
>> -Alan
>