JDK 8 Warnings Cleanup Day -- Dec. 1st, 2011
Michael Barker
mikeb01 at gmail.com
Wed Nov 30 01:59:02 PST 2011
Might be easier for us to skip j.u.c and work on the other subpackages
of java.util.
java.util.jar
java.util.logging
java.util.prefs
java.util.regex
java.util.zip
Regards,
Michael Barker.
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Chris Hegarty <chris.hegarty at oracle.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 30/11/2011 09:34, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>
>> On 30/11/2011 09:03, Michael Barker wrote:
>>>
>>> .....
>>
>> java.util.concurrent.** is maintained by Doug Lea in an upstream CVS and
>> we (Chris Hegarty in recent times) periodically pull the updates into
>> OpenJDK to keep us in sync. We don't want the code in OpenJDK to diverge
>> so typically any changes go into the upstream CVS first. So for j.u.c I
>> would suggest sending a follow-up to core-libs-dev. Both Doug and Chris
>> are on that list and I'm sure something can be worked out.
>
> Right, we can still propose a patch and discuss it on core-libs-dev, but we
> really would prefer to have agreement with Doug that he will apply the same
> to his upstream CVS. We really don't want to diverge what we have in OpenJDK
> to that of Doug's CVS. This is the typical process we follow for j.u.c.
>
> Thanks,
> -Chris.
>
>>
>> -Alan.
>
More information about the jdk8-dev
mailing list