LJC OpenJDK Warnings hack day

[Otávio Gonçalves de Santana]

So.
I can help in core too.

Em 19 de abril de 2012 19:43, Martijn Verburg
<martijnverburg at gmail.com>escreveu:

> Hi Chris,
>
> Thanks!  Hopefully Q's will be kept to a minimum, but I'll probably ask
> about the sorts of review rules that would make you say "That's not a
> trivial change" or "it's more dangerous than you first think" and add them
> to our pre-review list.  We'll pre-review and bundle up the patches, so it
> won't be on the day that we pass them on.
>
> Cheers,
> Martijn
>
> On 19 April 2012 23:49, Chris Hegarty <chris.hegarty at oracle.com> wrote:
>
> > I'll help with reviewing/pushing any changes in the core/net area, or any
> > area where the changes are straight forward and non controversial (and
> the
> > area owner agrees).
> >
> > Martijn,
> >  I'm based in Dublin Ireland. Will be online in your timezone if you need
> > to bounce any ideas/questions.
> >
> > -Chris.
> >
> >
> > On 19/04/12 13:32, Martijn Verburg wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks Stuart,
> >>
> >> This is very much appreciated!  We're more than happy to have patches
> >> reviewed as and when is convenient for you time and workload wise.  As
> >> discussed with Cecilia, Tomas et al (they were in London a few days ago)
> >> we're going to set up a pre-review group and try (we're still learning)
> to
> >> apply the same sorts of rules that an OpenJDK committer would. This
> should
> >> triage the patches into sensible sets and punt anything that doesn't
> meet
> >> the 'Do no harm" nature of these fixes.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Martijn
> >>
> >> On 19 April 2012 01:44, Stuart Marks<stuart.marks at oracle.com>  wrote:
> >>
> >>  Hi Martijn,
> >>>
> >>> Great to hear that the LJC is continuing this activity. We are as well;
> >>> I've updated the warnings page [1] to have the latest statistics
> >>> including
> >>> the work that my colleague Kurchi Hazra has done.
> >>>
> >>> I think the only area that has pending warnings changes are the
> java.text
> >>> ones that Deepak Bhole produced some months ago that were reviewed by
> >>> John
> >>> Rose. I still have to revisit and review these changes. Other than
> that,
> >>> any area should be fair game.
> >>>
> >>> I can lurk around on IRC during the event to help answer questions that
> >>> might arise, and I can help review changes and push if they're in or
> near
> >>> my area (core libraries). There are still a lot of warnings though in
> AWT
> >>> (thousands...) so any changes there would be better coordinated with
> the
> >>> AWT folks.
> >>>
> >>> Looking forward to the event!
> >>>
> >>> s'marks
> >>>
> >>> [1] https://wikis.oracle.com/****display/OpenJDK/JDK8+Warnings+****<
> https://wikis.oracle.com/**display/OpenJDK/JDK8+Warnings+**>
> >>> Cleanup+Day+%282011-12-01%29<h**ttps://wikis.oracle.com/**
> >>> display/OpenJDK/JDK8+Warnings+**Cleanup+Day+%282011-12-01%29<
> https://wikis.oracle.com/display/OpenJDK/JDK8+Warnings+Cleanup+Day+%282011-12-01%29
> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 4/18/12 2:49 AM, Martijn Verburg wrote:
> >>>
> >>>  Hi all,
> >>>>
> >>>> Just to follow up on this, we'll likely co-ordinate via the wiki as
> per
> >>>> last time, it seemed to work very well (thanks Stuart for setting that
> >>>> up
> >>>> last time).
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>> Martijn
> >>>>
> >>>> On 17 April 2012 23:53, Martijn Verburg<martijnverburg at gmail.****com<
> >>>> martijnverburg at gmail.com>**>
> >>>>
> >>>>  wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>  Hi all,
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> FYI - We'll be holding another compiler warnings squashing day on the
> >>>>> 23rd
> >>>>> of April, 1830+ BST.  A few of the 'instructors' (we use the term
> >>>>> loosely
> >>>>> as we're all still learning) will pop up on IRC, but we hope to keep
> >>>>> our
> >>>>> chatter down to a minimum.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> As before we'll package up the patches in sensible groupings and peer
> >>>>> pre-review the patches before sending them in.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If there's anything we can do in particular to minimise the impact on
> >>>>> you
> >>>>> folks, please let me know.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>> Martijn
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
>