Result: New JDK8 Committer: Oleg Pekhovskiy

[Dmeetry Degrave]

Artem, it seems not all votes have reached alias. If someone replied 
from @oracle.com and was subscribed with old @sun.com, such replies 
haven't passed to mail list.

thanks,
dmeetry

On 03/13/2012 01:22 AM, Artem Ananiev wrote:
>
> On 3/12/2012 1:26 PM, David Holmes wrote:
>> On 13/03/2012 3:48 AM, Artem Ananiev wrote:
>>>
>>> Voting for Oleg Pekhovskiy [1] is now closed.
>>>
>>> Yes: 9
>>> Veto: 0
>>> Abstain: 9
>>
>> I only see 6 emails with a Yes vote in the archive and no abstains.
>
> "Abstain" value is a copy-paste typo :(
>
> People who publicly voted "Yes": Alexander Zuev, Sergey Bylokhov, Kelly
> O'Hair, Alexey Utkin, Anthony Petrov, Pavel Porvatov, Alexander
> Potochkin, Dalibor Topic. One more person voted "Yes" privately, without
> jdk8-dev in CC. So the right values should be:
>
> Yes: 8
> Veto: 0
> Abstain: 0
>
> Thanks,
>
> Artem
>
>> Doesn't change the result but ...
>>
>> David
>> -----
>>
>>> According to the Bylaws definition of Lazy Consensus, this is
>>> sufficient to approve the nomination.
>>>
>>> Artem
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8-dev/2012-February/000821.html
>>>
>>>