Result: New JDK8 Committer: Oleg Pekhovskiy

[David Holmes]

Hi Dmeetry,

On 13/03/2012 10:01 AM, Dmeetry Degrave wrote:
> Artem, it seems not all votes have reached alias. If someone replied
> from @oracle.com and was subscribed with old @sun.com, such replies
> haven't passed to mail list.

Yes, this has been discussed on a side channel. It seems that per the 
rules those votes can not be counted. Not that it makes any difference 
to the result.

Just something to be aware of when conducting a CFV.

David
-----

> thanks,
> dmeetry
>
> On 03/13/2012 01:22 AM, Artem Ananiev wrote:
>>
>> On 3/12/2012 1:26 PM, David Holmes wrote:
>>> On 13/03/2012 3:48 AM, Artem Ananiev wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Voting for Oleg Pekhovskiy [1] is now closed.
>>>>
>>>> Yes: 9
>>>> Veto: 0
>>>> Abstain: 9
>>>
>>> I only see 6 emails with a Yes vote in the archive and no abstains.
>>
>> "Abstain" value is a copy-paste typo :(
>>
>> People who publicly voted "Yes": Alexander Zuev, Sergey Bylokhov, Kelly
>> O'Hair, Alexey Utkin, Anthony Petrov, Pavel Porvatov, Alexander
>> Potochkin, Dalibor Topic. One more person voted "Yes" privately, without
>> jdk8-dev in CC. So the right values should be:
>>
>> Yes: 8
>> Veto: 0
>> Abstain: 0
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Artem
>>
>>> Doesn't change the result but ...
>>>
>>> David
>>> -----
>>>
>>>> According to the Bylaws definition of Lazy Consensus, this is
>>>> sufficient to approve the nomination.
>>>>
>>>> Artem
>>>>
>>>> [1]
>>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8-dev/2012-February/000821.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>