jdk8-b119: HotSpot
Alejandro E Murillo
alejandro.murillo at oracle.com
Tue Dec 3 14:24:38 PST 2013
hs25-b61 has been integrated into jdk8-b119.
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/rev/9e90215673be
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/corba/rev/379fc7609beb
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/hotspot/rev/ce42d815dd21
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jaxp/rev/69a930376c70
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jaxws/rev/172b8e056ff2
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/rev/e4499a6529e8
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/langtools/rev/43a80d75d06e
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/nashorn/rev/c3343930c73c
Component : VM
Status : 0 major failures, 0 minor failures
Date : 12/03/2013 at 18:00 MSK
Tested By : VM SQE &dmitry.fazunenko at oracle.com
Cost(total man-days): 1
Workspace : 2013-11-29-191220.amurillo.hs25-b61-snapshot
Bundles : 2013-11-29-191220.amurillo.hs25-b61-snapshot
Platforms :
Others
Tests :/net/sqenfs-1.sfbay/export1/comp/vm/testbase/
Logs :http://surl.us.oracle.com/pit_jdk8_b119_failures
Browsers : NA
Patches : NA
Number of Tests Executed : 356323 passed tests, 10059 failed tests (88 new failures)
Bug verification status:
======================================
Tested, Pass:
Tested, Pass (partial fixes):
Tested, Fail:
Untested bug fixes:
Setup is not available:
8016839: JSR292: AME instead of IAE when calling a method
8026065: InterfaceMethodref for invokespecial must name a direct superinterface
8028128: Add a type safe alternative for working with counter based data
8028160: [TESTBUG] Exclude failing (runtime) jtreg tests using @ignore
8028520: JVM should not throw VerifyError when a private method overrides a final method
8028815: new hotspot build - hs25-b61
Build change only:
New bugs filed:
Bugs in PIT build:
JDK-8029450, INTJDK-7607766, INTJDK-7607762, JDK-8029380, JDK-8029379, JDK-8029381, JDK-8029383, JDK-8029378
Bugs in earlier promoted build:
Number of PIT requested: 1
Integration target J2SE build number: JDK8 b119
Issues and Notes:
This is PIT for HS25 b61 for JDK8 b119.
There are many new failures 260, but none of them is critical. We just don't have enough time to properly mark them all.
--
Alejandro
More information about the jdk8-dev
mailing list