RFR: 8022746: List of spelling errors in API doc

[sergey malenkov]

   * <p>A well-formed locale key has the form
   * <code>[0-9a-zA-Z]{2}</code>.  A well-formed locale type has the
   * form <code>"" | [0-9a-zA-Z]{3,8} ('-' [0-9a-zA-Z]{3,8})*</code> (it
- * can be empty, or a series of subtags 3-8 alphanums in length). A
+ * can be empty, or a series of subtags 3-8 alphanumerics in length).  A
   * well-formed locale attribute has the form
   * <code>[0-9a-zA-Z]{3,8}</code> (it is a single subtag with the same
   * form as a locale type subtag).

This is the only place where I have replaced alphanums with 
alphanumerics, because the second word is used later in the class 
specification. For example:

      * <p><b>Note:</b> The <code>Locale</code> class does not provide any
      * syntactic restrictions on variant, while BCP 47 requires each 
variant
      * subtag to be 5 to 8 alphanumerics or a single numeric followed by 3
      * alphanumerics.  The method <code>setVariant</code> throws

I'll revert the change if you want.

Thanks,
SAM

On 22.10.2013 21:34, Naoto Sato wrote:
> Hi Sergey,
>
> I looked at the changes wrt i18n, and found one change in Locale class:
>
> 221  * can be empty, or a series of subtags 3-8 alphanumerics in 
> length).  A
>
> where you modified "alphanums" to "alphanumerics". In fact it's not a 
> typo, as "alphanum" is defined in BCP 47 standard.
>
> Naoto
>
> On 10/22/13 5:22 AM, sergey malenkov wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Could you please review the following huge fix:
>> fix:http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~malenkov/8022746.8.0/
>> bug:https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8022746
>>
>> I've replaced all typos with correct words in all documentations and
>> comments.  Our technical writer has already checked it.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> SAM
>