Shouldn't Optional be Serializable?
Pete Poulos
pete.poulos at gmail.com
Tue Sep 17 14:44:31 PDT 2013
Previous message:
hg: jdk8/jdk8/nashorn: Added tag jdk8-b107 for changeset f35e1255024b
Next message:
Shouldn't Optional be Serializable?
Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
Shouldn't java.util.Optional be Serializable? Is there a good reason for it not be? Thanks, Pete
Previous message:
hg: jdk8/jdk8/nashorn: Added tag jdk8-b107 for changeset f35e1255024b
Next message:
Shouldn't Optional be Serializable?
Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the jdk8-dev mailing list