From sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com Mon Dec 1 12:02:19 2014 From: sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com (A. Sundararajan) Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 17:32:19 +0530 Subject: [8u40] approval request for 8044146: jdk.nashorn.api.scripting package javadoc should be included in jdk docs Message-ID: <547C58CB.3060300@oracle.com> Please approve bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8066146 8u-dev webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8066146/8u40/webrev.00/ jdk9 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-November/003922.html I had to adjust paths in makefile slightly for jdk8u40. CC'ing jdk9 reviewers as well... Thanks, -Sundar From marcus.lagergren at oracle.com Mon Dec 1 12:18:45 2014 From: marcus.lagergren at oracle.com (Marcus Lagergren) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 13:18:45 +0100 Subject: [8u40] approval request for 8044146: jdk.nashorn.api.scripting package javadoc should be included in jdk docs In-Reply-To: <547C58CB.3060300@oracle.com> References: <547C58CB.3060300@oracle.com> Message-ID: <78D82267-A42E-47F8-8E1A-34A4BE74136E@oracle.com> +1 > On 01 Dec 2014, at 13:02, A. Sundararajan wrote: > > Please approve > > bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8066146 > 8u-dev webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8066146/8u40/webrev.00/ > jdk9 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-November/003922.html > > I had to adjust paths in makefile slightly for jdk8u40. CC'ing jdk9 reviewers as well... > > Thanks, > -Sundar From james.laskey at oracle.com Mon Dec 1 12:54:20 2014 From: james.laskey at oracle.com (Jim Laskey (Oracle)) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 08:54:20 -0400 Subject: [8u40] approval request for 8044146: jdk.nashorn.api.scripting package javadoc should be included in jdk docs In-Reply-To: <547C58CB.3060300@oracle.com> References: <547C58CB.3060300@oracle.com> Message-ID: <83CA035C-A967-46FC-B5D4-D47EE06988F7@oracle.com> +1 On Dec 1, 2014, at 8:02 AM, A. Sundararajan wrote: > Please approve > > bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8066146 > 8u-dev webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8066146/8u40/webrev.00/ > jdk9 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-November/003922.html > > I had to adjust paths in makefile slightly for jdk8u40. CC'ing jdk9 reviewers as well... > > Thanks, > -Sundar From hannes.wallnoefer at oracle.com Mon Dec 1 12:44:30 2014 From: hannes.wallnoefer at oracle.com (Hannes Wallnoefer) Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 13:44:30 +0100 Subject: [8u40] approval request for 8044146: jdk.nashorn.api.scripting package javadoc should be included in jdk docs In-Reply-To: <547C58CB.3060300@oracle.com> References: <547C58CB.3060300@oracle.com> Message-ID: <547C62AE.4060004@oracle.com> +1 Am 2014-12-01 um 13:02 schrieb A. Sundararajan: > Please approve > > bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8066146 > 8u-dev webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8066146/8u40/webrev.00/ > jdk9 review thread: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-November/003922.html > > I had to adjust paths in makefile slightly for jdk8u40. CC'ing jdk9 > reviewers as well... > > Thanks, > -Sundar From martijnverburg at gmail.com Mon Dec 1 15:23:33 2014 From: martijnverburg at gmail.com (Martijn Verburg) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 15:23:33 +0000 Subject: Official and community supported build platforms for JDK 8 and 9 In-Reply-To: <80D05DC7-C7F3-4169-A49C-92DE0ED4668E@reini.net> References: <546F82E0.9070909@oracle.com> <80D05DC7-C7F3-4169-A49C-92DE0ED4668E@reini.net> Message-ID: Likewise - is it possible to get edit access? Cheers, Martijn On 21 November 2014 at 20:46, Patrick Reinhart wrote: > Hi Magnus, > > > A recurring theme in the build-dev list is confusion on which platforms > it is possible to build OpenJDK. Unfortunately, information about this has > not been easy to gather. It has also not been clear what kind of build > issues the Build Team will respond to and with what kind of urgency. > > > > To help address this, I?ve created a publicly available wiki page: > https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Build/Supported+build+platforms > > Nice work, that belongs on my shortcut list from now on. > > > Support for building on different platforms come in two varieties: > official support and community support. > > > > Oracle defines a number of official build platforms, with carefully > specified versions of operating systems, compilers and other build tools. > If you report a failure to build on any of these platforms, the report will > be processed with high priority from the build team in Oracle. Under normal > circumstances, a build on any of these platforms will always succeed. > > > > In addition to the official build platforms, OpenJDK can normally be > built on many more platforms. For these platforms, there is no guarantee > that the build will succeed. The Oracle build team can help to solve some > problems encountered, but only on a best-effort basis. In addition to the > Oracle build team, the OpenJDK community at large is welcome to help with > making OpenJDK compile on these platforms. > > > > The official and community supported build platforms are listed on the > wiki page. Note that build support is different for different versions of > the JDK. We welcome updates from the community to the list of community > supported platforms. If you have succeeded (or not!) in building OpenJDK on > a platform that is substantially different from the ones already listed, > please document your experience in the list. > > I?m able to fluently build JDK 8u and JDK 9 on Fedora 21 x64 > > > The list of community supported platforms on the wiki is currently much > shorter than the number of platforms I expect OpenJDK to build on. Once > again, please help us by filling in the wiki! > > > > /Magnus > > I would like to help improve also documentations for the community? > > Patrick From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Mon Dec 1 15:51:51 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 15:51:51 +0000 Subject: [8u40] approval request for 8044146: jdk.nashorn.api.scripting package javadoc should be included in jdk docs In-Reply-To: <547C58CB.3060300@oracle.com> References: <547C58CB.3060300@oracle.com> Message-ID: <547C8E97.2070402@oracle.com> Approved. Please add a suitable noreg keyword. -Rob On 01/12/14 12:02, A. Sundararajan wrote: > Please approve > > bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8066146 > 8u-dev webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8066146/8u40/webrev.00/ > jdk9 review thread: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-November/003922.html > > I had to adjust paths in makefile slightly for jdk8u40. CC'ing jdk9 > reviewers as well... > > Thanks, > -Sundar From iris.clark at oracle.com Mon Dec 1 19:02:33 2014 From: iris.clark at oracle.com (Iris Clark) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 11:02:33 -0800 (PST) Subject: Official and community supported build platforms for JDK 8 and 9 In-Reply-To: References: <546F82E0.9070909@oracle.com> <80D05DC7-C7F3-4169-A49C-92DE0ED4668E@reini.net> Message-ID: Hi, Martijn. > Likewise - is it possible to get edit access? https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Build/Supported+build+platforms That wikispace is owned by the Build Group, so all Members of that Group as listed in the Census [0] should be able to edit the page. Thanks, iris [0] http://openjdk.java.net/census#build -----Original Message----- From: Martijn Verburg [mailto:martijnverburg at gmail.com] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 7:24 AM To: Patrick Reinhart Cc: jdk8-dev; build-dev; jdk9-dev at openjdk.java.net Subject: Re: Official and community supported build platforms for JDK 8 and 9 Likewise - is it possible to get edit access? Cheers, Martijn From sven.reimers at gmail.com Mon Dec 1 19:39:30 2014 From: sven.reimers at gmail.com (Sven Reimers) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 20:39:30 +0100 Subject: EA builds of 8u40 and 9 for arm (RaspberryPi) Message-ID: Hi guys, hope this is the correct mailing list to ask.. (not cross-posting for 9 at the moment...) I was looking for ea builds of 8u40 and 9 for arm (RaspberryPi) on jdk8.java.net and jdl9.java.net, but I can't find them there... Any chance they get published once again? Thanks -Sven -- Sven Reimers * Senior Expert Software Architect * NetBeans Dream Team Member: http://dreamteam.netbeans.org * Community Leader NetBeans: http://community.java.net/netbeans Desktop Java: http://community.java.net/javadesktop * JUG Leader JUG Bodensee: http://www.jug-bodensee.de * Duke's Choice Award Winner 2009 * Blog: https://www.java.net//blog/sven * XING: https://www.xing.com/profile/Sven_Reimers8 * LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/svenreimers Join the NetBeans Groups: * XING: http://www.xing.com/group-20148.82db20 * NUGM: http://haug-server.dyndns.org/display/NUGM/Home * LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=1860468 http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=107402 http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=1684717 * Oracle: https://mix.oracle.com/groups/18497 From iris.clark at oracle.com Mon Dec 1 21:47:24 2014 From: iris.clark at oracle.com (Iris Clark) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 13:47:24 -0800 (PST) Subject: EA builds of 8u40 and 9 for arm (RaspberryPi) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1287db3c-6244-4db0-b404-c09490da4b1f@default> Hi, Sven. Traffic on this mailing list has substantially dropped since JDK 8 shipped in March 2014. To get your message to a wider audience, I recommend that you send it to jdk8u-dev [0] where discussion about the JDK 8 Update release occurs. See the complete list of OpenJDK mailing lists is on this page [1] for other possibilities. Thanks, Iris Clark [0] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/jdk8u-dev [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo -----Original Message----- From: Sven Reimers [mailto:sven.reimers at gmail.com] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 11:40 AM To: jdk8-dev at openjdk.java.net Subject: EA builds of 8u40 and 9 for arm (RaspberryPi) Hi guys, hope this is the correct mailing list to ask.. (not cross-posting for 9 at the moment...) I was looking for ea builds of 8u40 and 9 for arm (RaspberryPi) on jdk8.java.net and jdl9.java.net, but I can't find them there... Any chance they get published once again? Thanks -Sven -- Sven Reimers * Senior Expert Software Architect * NetBeans Dream Team Member: http://dreamteam.netbeans.org * Community Leader NetBeans: http://community.java.net/netbeans Desktop Java: http://community.java.net/javadesktop * JUG Leader JUG Bodensee: http://www.jug-bodensee.de * Duke's Choice Award Winner 2009 * Blog: https://www.java.net//blog/sven * XING: https://www.xing.com/profile/Sven_Reimers8 * LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/svenreimers Join the NetBeans Groups: * XING: http://www.xing.com/group-20148.82db20 * NUGM: http://haug-server.dyndns.org/display/NUGM/Home * LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=1860468 http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=107402 http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=1684717 * Oracle: https://mix.oracle.com/groups/18497 From damien.wojtowicz at gmail.com Thu Dec 18 08:10:25 2014 From: damien.wojtowicz at gmail.com (Damien W) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 09:10:25 +0100 Subject: Research of informations about java.util.Random Message-ID: Hello, I found on Javadoc (java.util.Random) the linear congruential generator formula which is: seed = (seed * 0x5DEECE66DL + 0xBL) & ((1L << 48) - 1) I'd like to know why these numbers were chosen (0x5DEECE66D, 0xB), why are they in hexadecimal and why is there a bit-to-bit comparison. Best regards, Damien Wojtowicz From martinrb at google.com Thu Dec 18 18:00:13 2014 From: martinrb at google.com (Martin Buchholz) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 10:00:13 -0800 Subject: Research of informations about java.util.Random In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: LMGTFY: Donald Knuth, The Art of Computer Programming, Volume 3, Section 3.2.1.) On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 12:10 AM, Damien W wrote: > Hello, > > I found on Javadoc (java.util.Random) the linear congruential generator > formula which is: > > seed = (seed * 0x5DEECE66DL + 0xBL) & ((1L << 48) - 1) > > I'd like to know why these numbers were chosen (0x5DEECE66D, 0xB), why > are they in hexadecimal and why is there a bit-to-bit comparison. > > Best regards, > > Damien Wojtowicz