From bbouters at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 15:15:39 2015 From: bbouters at redhat.com (Brian Bouterse) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 11:15:39 -0400 Subject: openJDK bug filing? Message-ID: <55DDD81B.2060005@redhat.com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 I have a bug that I would like to file. I think openJDK bugs are tracker here [0], but I do not know how to login to that system to make a bug. I see here [1] that self-service account creation is not available. How can I file a bug so I can then discuss it on this dev lis t? [0]: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK [1]: https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/general/JBS+Overview Thanks, Brian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJV3dgXAAoJEK48cdELyEfygwQH/1pbh1j9nhiv/31ny6UYM3Xl W/grQk5ZNsb2Zh6z5cNRaJyelNJhzkGl3dLKETi+gMjIXrC8GwntbBt4Wml3hXjS 7iMCq3GWWw6u2F31WBV0HINmN4RXPKd+vXG3ABLz6tVaR49QpYo3K4jVP3ZZpeWO q+vkN7ItLdZQTyhg7/46DcVl+XAM/QVWUQnCZwLwb6IIWhR6+XTHDjSMMr0D/IxW HHMG7iXvDCw7IZ5OYFnpVbaafrKjfxlX/DlrZ3El+Qvt0Ggs5yL+pNnDoYm0ana7 Zl1GUl1sRXCtVXiEwpprFrr+mIDsGwCgCohi2aRoia3H8Q4BgxycK/vCCHbeTHM= =g4Is -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From dalibor.topic at oracle.com Wed Aug 26 15:40:05 2015 From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (dalibor topic) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 17:40:05 +0200 Subject: openJDK bug filing? In-Reply-To: <55DDD81B.2060005@redhat.com> References: <55DDD81B.2060005@redhat.com> Message-ID: <55DDDDD5.60003@oracle.com> Quoting from [1] "Users without an account can also use bugs.sun.com to submit an issue." cheers, dalibor topic On 26.08.2015 17:15, Brian Bouterse wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > I have a bug that I would like to file. I think openJDK bugs are > tracker here [0], but I do not know how to login to that system to > make a bug. I see here [1] that self-service account creation is not > available. How can I file a bug so I can then discuss it on this dev lis > t? > > [0]: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK > [1]: https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/general/JBS+Overview > > Thanks, > Brian > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2 > > iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJV3dgXAAoJEK48cdELyEfygwQH/1pbh1j9nhiv/31ny6UYM3Xl > W/grQk5ZNsb2Zh6z5cNRaJyelNJhzkGl3dLKETi+gMjIXrC8GwntbBt4Wml3hXjS > 7iMCq3GWWw6u2F31WBV0HINmN4RXPKd+vXG3ABLz6tVaR49QpYo3K4jVP3ZZpeWO > q+vkN7ItLdZQTyhg7/46DcVl+XAM/QVWUQnCZwLwb6IIWhR6+XTHDjSMMr0D/IxW > HHMG7iXvDCw7IZ5OYFnpVbaafrKjfxlX/DlrZ3El+Qvt0Ggs5yL+pNnDoYm0ana7 > Zl1GUl1sRXCtVXiEwpprFrr+mIDsGwCgCohi2aRoia3H8Q4BgxycK/vCCHbeTHM= > =g4Is > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > -- Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment From neugens at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 16:13:27 2015 From: neugens at redhat.com (Mario Torre) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 18:13:27 +0200 Subject: openJDK bug filing? In-Reply-To: <55DDD81B.2060005@redhat.com> References: <55DDD81B.2060005@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1440605607.5250.69.camel@galactica.localdomain> On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 11:15 -0400, Brian Bouterse wrote: > I have a bug that I would like to file. I think openJDK bugs are > tracker here [0], but I do not know how to login to that system to > make a bug. I see here [1] that self-service account creation is not > available. How can I file a bug so I can then discuss it on this dev lis > t? > > [0]: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK > [1]: https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/general/JBS+Overview Unfortunately the situation is a bit chaotic if you lack Jira super powers. For *JDK 8 and 9, what Dalibor suggested is an option, although is not an optimal solution at all... like none of the alternatives unfortunately. If the bug is specific to 7 or 6, you would need to file in the IcedTea bug system (again, in case you don't have Jira powers), which is even more confusing for end users because those external trackers are not really related. You could have better luck filing the issue with the relative downstream Java and let the maintainers propagate the bug upstream, that means, again, bugs.sun.com if you are using an Oracle JDK, or Red Hat bugzilla if your using a Red Hat package, or even IcedTea directly, etc... Another alternative which still require some substantial work from OpenJDK members is to try to make a case and get somebody file the bug for you, in this case the mailing list is a better place. If it's a security bug, discussing on the mailing list is not the best approach, you should contact Oracle and let them guide you. But if you have a patch you may try to submit to the relevant mailing list for discussing the fix directly, it doesn't make things magically easier, but it helps a little bit. Cheers, Mario From bbouters at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 18:01:55 2015 From: bbouters at redhat.com (Brian Bouterse) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 14:01:55 -0400 Subject: openJDK bug filing? In-Reply-To: <1440605607.5250.69.camel@galactica.localdomain> References: <55DDD81B.2060005@redhat.com> <1440605607.5250.69.camel@galactica.localdomain> Message-ID: <55DDFF13.2090306@redhat.com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Thanks Mario and Dalibor for the replies. Is there someone out there who is willing to file this poorly written bug: PyCharm is unusable with openJDK 1.8.0 on fedora 22. It works great with the Oracle JDK and it worked well enough with openJDK 1.7.x. I'm using the latest patched fedora 22, openJDK 1.8.0, and PyCharm 4.5.3 (the latest as of this writing). Before upgrading to fedora 22 I was using fedora 20 which came with openJDK 1.7.x, and things worked well enough. Not nearly as well the Oracle JDK, but well enough. After upgrading to openJDK 1.8.0 pyCharm (same version as before) is completely unusable. The program regularly sits at between 150 - 500% of my cpu and freezes for minutes at a time. It's all CPU bound although the application appears to be doing nothing useful. - From the PyCharm logs, PyCharm support indicates that the threads of PyCharm are significantly slower for "read actions from the file system and loading classes from the classpath". PyCharm starts 50+ threads which isn't great, but the same PyCharm (and its threads) worked on the openJDK 1.7.x. What changed in between 1.7.x and 1.8.0 that could have made this unusable? What can be done to fix this? Anyone who installs f22, installs the latest pycharm will find it totally unusable. This is a very easy bug to reproduce. If no one is willing to file this for me then I'll eventually file it at bugs.sun.com . Thanks! Brian On 08/26/2015 12:13 PM, Mario Torre wrote: > On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 11:15 -0400, Brian Bouterse wrote: >> I have a bug that I would like to file. I think openJDK bugs are >> tracker here [0], but I do not know how to login to that system >> to make a bug. I see here [1] that self-service account creation >> is not available. How can I file a bug so I can then discuss it >> on this dev lis t? >> >> [0]: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK [1]: >> https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/general/JBS+Overview > > Unfortunately the situation is a bit chaotic if you lack Jira > super powers. > > For *JDK 8 and 9, what Dalibor suggested is an option, although is > not an optimal solution at all... like none of the alternatives > unfortunately. > > If the bug is specific to 7 or 6, you would need to file in the > IcedTea bug system (again, in case you don't have Jira powers), > which is even more confusing for end users because those external > trackers are not really related. > > You could have better luck filing the issue with the relative > downstream Java and let the maintainers propagate the bug upstream, > that means, again, bugs.sun.com if you are using an Oracle JDK, or > Red Hat bugzilla if your using a Red Hat package, or even IcedTea > directly, etc... > > Another alternative which still require some substantial work from > OpenJDK members is to try to make a case and get somebody file the > bug for you, in this case the mailing list is a better place. > > If it's a security bug, discussing on the mailing list is not the > best approach, you should contact Oracle and let them guide you. > > But if you have a patch you may try to submit to the relevant > mailing list for discussing the fix directly, it doesn't make > things magically easier, but it helps a little bit. > > Cheers, Mario > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJV3f8OAAoJEK48cdELyEfylqUH+gIMEri1GpAWv7Q3QT57crnD CQjLAWA9X+rMUVldNtn5Q4vGi9S0pjK0bAvdFOyA3RVhgR9HSI7dFLp7bbk2WaLJ IIXYzvyeQ5S4zyFKTbHfP3GdVQJ8/Xq/nEjjQpGuI9TZFkf68uc2Eqb93m8aLjHB ZaEdH5Nx1FrGj3lnqbCVReQy79g6FiG/nwLcOZmh7x+VwaMwaw9CSwtGmXIv6gs1 uiAvRMxzJhYxNTzhWBZ7e9TBDjmTLoOHbHPMbu8qQw+tUroPJWsW3lBJMEM2jfzZ 36vXmlN3gJtkkgYFR48C3KyGsSyMz4UtLq5tmNMAsgdCKnlG60WDfGiaRbzd/po= =BEtH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From aph at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 18:34:14 2015 From: aph at redhat.com (Andrew Haley) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 19:34:14 +0100 Subject: openJDK bug filing? In-Reply-To: <55DDFF13.2090306@redhat.com> References: <55DDD81B.2060005@redhat.com> <1440605607.5250.69.camel@galactica.localdomain> <55DDFF13.2090306@redhat.com> Message-ID: <55DE06A6.8020304@redhat.com> On 08/26/2015 07:01 PM, Brian Bouterse wrote: > Thanks Mario and Dalibor for the replies. Is there someone out there > who is willing to file this poorly written bug: > > PyCharm is unusable with openJDK 1.8.0 on fedora 22. It works great > with the Oracle JDK and it worked well enough with openJDK 1.7.x. If you create a Fedora bug with the best info you can about how to reproduce it we will then copy that info to an OpenJDK bug. Thanks, Andrew.