From sean.coffey at oracle.com  Fri Dec 20 18:40:51 2013
From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=)
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 18:40:51 +0000
Subject: [8u communication] Setting up the JDK 8 Updates Project
Message-ID: <52B48F33.9040904@oracle.com>

As per my recent email [1], the JDK 8 Updates project has been approved.

A new jdk8u-dev at openjdk.java.net mailing has been created and comprises
of members who have contributed or reviewed at least one changeset in the
JDK 8, JDK 7u, HSX or Nashorn Projects.

You can subscribe, unsubscribe, and adjust your subscription options here:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/jdk8u-dev .

I wanted to give an update on next steps around setting up the Project.

* Work is already underway in getting the census updated to include the
the JDK 8 Updates Project.
Just to remind people, the initial Authors/Committers/Reviewers will be
anyone who holds a role in the JDK 8, JDK 7u, HSX, or Nashorn Projects
and has contributed or reviewed at least one changeset in those Projects.
The most senior role across those Projects will be granted in this Project.

* An 8u Project page [2] is being set up and should become available soon.
As per Project proposal, I suggest we follow a process close to the JDK 7
Updates one to start out with. We can discuss and propose changes if
necessary as the Project ramps up.

* Iris is going to help with creation of the jdk8u forests.
For now, I suggest we go with this structure :

jdk8u/jdk8u - Master
  - jdk8u/jdk8u-dev - Corelibs/Client/Other integrations
  - jdk8u/hs-dev - Hotspot integrations

I suggest that we tag the new forests with a 'jdk8u-b00' tag to help 
identify
the clone from the JDK 8 forest. jdk8-b121 is the latest promoted build
for JDK 8. I suggest we clone from that snapshot. Regular syncs with JDK 8
will have to occur until JDK 8 is released.

* The JDK 7 Updates maintainers [3] will also become the maintainers for
this Project. With a team of maintainers, I don't believe we need a
Technical Lead role for this Project.

Regards,
Sean.

[1] 
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/announce/2013-December/000158.html
[2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8u/
[3] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk7u/


From david.buck at oracle.com  Mon Dec 23 20:22:18 2013
From: david.buck at oracle.com (david buck)
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 05:22:18 +0900
Subject: [8u-dev] backport request: 6571600 JNI use results in
	UnsatisfiedLinkError looking for libmawt.so
Message-ID: <52B89B7A.5030105@oracle.com>

Hi!

This is a request to backport the flowing fix to JDK8.

[ JDK-6571600 JNI use results in UnsatisfiedLinkError looking for 
libmawt.so ]
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-657160

The root cause of this issue is a name conflict with JNI_OnLoad provided 
by awt_LoadLibrary.c and code loaded manually by the user (usually their 
own JNI libraries). The fix is to use a different name for calling 
dladdr that is much less likely to conflict with any names used by 
customer code.

The fix is exactly the same in JDK8 as JDK9. I have of course tested the 
fix on JDK8 as well. The JDK9 fix can be found here:

http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/35dfaa9954c2

I understand that the 8u-dev forest is not yet available. Assuming I get 
approval to backport to 8, I will push my fix to the appropriate 8u-dev 
repository as soon as it is available.

Cheers,
-Buck