[8u-communication] JDK 8u20 released today!
David Holmes
david.holmes at oracle.com
Wed Aug 20 04:19:28 UTC 2014
On 20/08/2014 6:25 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> I'd like to announce that JDK 8u20 has become available for download
>> today [0]. Thanks to all those who have contributed towards it.
>>
>> OpenJDK 8u20 source code is available via the 8u20 stabilization forest
>> [1]. I plan to update the OpenJDK 8u project page with latest status and to
>> also ask the OpenJDK ops team to mark the 8u20 forests as read-only.
>>
>> If you're packaging this release, it could be useful to let subscribed
>> members know about it via communication on this mailing list. Please
>> continue to contribute fixes back to the jdk8u-dev forest [2] which is
>> already gathering changes for the next non-CPU JDK8u release.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Sean.
>>
>> [0] http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/index.html
>> [1] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u20/
>> [2] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev
>>
>
> Zero appears to be broken:
>
> hotspot/src/share/vm/interpreter/bytecodeInterpreter.cpp:2852:114: error: form\
> at '%lx' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'void*' [-Werror=format=]
> tty->print_cr("Exception <%s> (" INTPTR_FORMAT ")", except_oop->print_value_string(), (void*)except_oop());
> ^
> hotspot/src/share/vm/interpreter/bytecodeInterpreter.cpp:2856:47: error:
> format '%d' expects argument of type 'int', but argument 3 has type 'address {aka unsigned char*}' [-Werror=format=]
> continuation_bci, THREAD);
> ^
> hotspot/src/share/vm/interpreter/bytecodeInterpreter.cpp:2856:47: error: format '%d' expects argument of type 'int', but argument 4 has type 'intptr_t {aka long int}' [-Werror=format=]
> hotspot/src/share/vm/interpreter/bytecodeInterpreter.cpp:2856:47: error: format '%lx' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'JavaThread*' [-Werror=format=]
> /hotspot/src/share/vm/interpreter/bytecodeInterpreter.cpp:2868:112: error: format '%lx' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'void*' [-Werror=format=]
> tty->print_cr("Exception <%s> (" INTPTR_FORMAT ")", except_oop->print_value_string(), (void*)except_oop());
> ^
> hotspot/src/share/vm/interpreter/bytecodeInterpreter.cpp:2872:27: error: format '%d' expects argument of type 'int', but argument 3 has type 'address {aka unsigned char*}' [-Werror=format=]
> THREAD);
> ^
> hotspot/src/share/vm/interpreter/bytecodeInterpreter.cpp:2872:27: error: format '%lx' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'JavaThread*' [-Werror=format=]
>
> 8048169: Change 8037816 breaks HS build on PPC64 and CPP-Interpreter platforms
> fixes that but doesn't seem to be in u20.
Unfortunately the need for a 8u backport was not mentioned in the review
thread:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2014-June/014453.html
Did anyone flag this since 8048169 was pushed? I can't seem to find any
email thread on it.
I think we have a hole in the process when the "bug tail" for a
backported fix is not also identified as needing an urgent backport.
> With that applied, it fails further
> on in frame_zero.cpp. I don't see a fix for that in 9 either.
See review thread:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2014-August/014825.html
Not sure if it has been been pushed anywhere yet.
David
-----
More information about the jdk8u-dev
mailing list