[8u20] request for approval to backport JDK-8033136: RoundEnvironment.getElementsAnnotatedWith receives wrong elements
Jan Lahoda
jan.lahoda at oracle.com
Wed Jan 29 18:09:20 UTC 2014
Hello,
On 01/29/2014 06:29 PM, Joe Darcy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've seen the revised patch and I approve it going back.
Thanks for the approval Joe.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Joe
>
> On 01/29/2014 09:21 AM, dalibor topic wrote:
>> Since it's not the same changeset as in 9, it may be worth getting
>> Jon's or Joe's signoff on the trivial tweaks.
>>
>> Jan - can you put the changeset up on cr.openjdk.java.net, since it
>> got stripped from your post?
Sorry, I did not know the attachments are being removed, a webrev is
here for reference:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jlahoda/8030049-backport/webrev.00/
Thanks,
Jan
>>
>> cheers,
>> dalibor topic
>>
>> On 29.01.2014 16:00, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'd like to ask for an approval to backport fix for:
>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8030049
>>> Backport bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8033136
>>> jdk9 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/7163a6b6d8ea
>>>
>>> The patch requires a few trivial tweaks to apply to jdk8u-dev/langtools:
>>> -two changes in copyright headers
>>> -the context in one of the hunks has a diamond operator in
>>> jdk9/langtools, but does not have the diamond operator in
>>> jdk8-dev/langtools. Fixed in the patch by undoing the diamond operator
>>> in the context.
>>>
>>> Attaching the updated patch that applies to:
>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/langtools
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jan
>>
>
More information about the jdk8u-dev
mailing list