[8u20] Request for approval for bulk integration of hs25.20-b02

David Holmes david.holmes at oracle.com
Fri Jan 31 11:49:43 UTC 2014


Hi Goetz,

On 31/01/2014 7:38 PM, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote:
> Hi Alejandro,
>
> we (SAP) would appreciate if you avoid bulk integrations as far as possible.

"bulk integration" - meaning a collective request for approval followed 
by a push of all pending changesets - is the normal modus operandi for 
hotspot integrations.

I'm unclear what you are looking for instead: N approval emails followed 
by N separate pushes ?? What practical difference does that make?

At this stage all pushes are to jdk8u-dev. The 8u20 moniker is only used 
as that is the proposed next release of 8u. jdk8u-dev and 8u20 are 
synonymous up to the point where 8u20 repos have to fork due to rampdown 
to the 8u20 release.

> For our internal VM (not the ppc port) we consume jdk8, then jdk8u20 and only
> much later jdk9.  Thus we have to sort out the changes that appear several times,
> but fix the differences between them.  Bulk integrations complicate this a lot.

I don't follow. From what you just wrote I don't expect you to even look 
at 8u until 8u20 is finalized. ??

Cheers,
David

> Thanks and best regards,
>    Goetz.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jdk8u-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net [mailto:jdk8u-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Alejandro E Murillo
> Sent: Freitag, 31. Januar 2014 01:30
> To: jdk8u-dev at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for bulk integration of hs25.20-b02
>
> Requesting approval to integrate hs25.20-b02 into jdk8u20-b01.
>
> A webrev is available at:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amurillo/8u20/hs25.20-b02-jdk8u20-b01.webrev/
>
> Pre-integration testing is in progress; the integration will proceed
> only after SQE has analyzed the results and approved.
>
> The fixes in the proposed integration are below.  All have undergone
> nightly testing and are already in a jdk9 repository.
>
> 8027364: PSScavenge accounts too large code section to StringTable unlink
> 8027454: Do not traverse string table during G1 remark when treating them as strong roots during initial mark
> 8027455: Improve symbol table scan times during gc pauses
> 8027476: Improve performance of Stringtable unlink
> 8027746: Remove do_gen_barrier template parameter in G1ParCopyClosure
> 8028553: The JVM should not throw VerifyError when 'overriding' a static final method in a superclass.
> 8030027: nsk/jvmti/scenarios/hotswap/HS101/hs101t006 Crashed the vm on Linux-amd64: SIGSEGV in JavaThread::last_java_vframe(RegisterMap*)+0xfa
> 8030955: assert(_prologue != NULL) failed: prologue pointer must be initialized
> 8031045: Access checks should precede additional per-instruction checks
> 8032014: new hotspot build - hs25.20-b02
>



More information about the jdk8u-dev mailing list