[8u20] Request for approval, backport of 8026385, 8003900, 8042440, 8038027

[Seán Coffey]

I've no problem in committing these for David. Will work on getting them 
pushed to jdk8u-dev (8u40)

regards,
Sean.

On 18/07/14 10:12, dalibor topic wrote:
> Thanks, David -
>
> The fourth change was reviewed as well, and with that it is ready to 
> go, too: 
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2014-July/001475.html
>
> cheers,
> dalibor topic
>
> On 17.07.2014 21:36, David DeHaven wrote:
>>
>> I posted a review request for 8038027 before going on vacation, I 
>> haven't had time to address any of these since getting back. The 
>> other three are ready to push, but I either need jdk8u Committer role 
>> or a sponsor :)
>>
>> -DrD-
>>
>>> David,
>>>
>>> these slipped by as well. What's the current status ? Do they still 
>>> need to be pushed to jdk8u-dev ?
>>> Consider them approved. Please get a peer review just to make sure 
>>> the trivial conflict for 8038027is addressed correctly.
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> Sean.
>>>
>>> On 12/06/2014 12:04, Rob McKenna wrote:
>>>> Hi David, if there are changes we generally err on the side of 
>>>> caution. Can you please get the new fixes reviewed?
>>>>
>>>>     -Rob
>>>>
>>>> On 11/06/14 23:38, David DeHaven wrote:
>>>>> The following fixes have been incubating in 9 and the backports 
>>>>> are essentially unmodified.
>>>>>
>>>>> 8026385: [macosx] (awt) setjmp/longjmp changes the process signal 
>>>>> mask on OS X
>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/b5f284a0059b
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 8003900: X11 dependencies should be removed from Mac OS X build.
>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/56024e323104
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 8042440: awt_Plugin no longer needed
>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/75206fa5a43e
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 8038027: DTDBuilder should be run in headless mode
>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/0eab6c63201d
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 8042440 and 8038027 have trivial conflicts due to minor 
>>>>> surrounding differences but the actual changes are identical.
>>>>>
>>>>> I need a Committer to push for me, I have the closed source 
>>>>> changes for 8026385 ready as well. 8042440 has changes in deploy 
>>>>> but they were backported already.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> JPRT run resulted in 9 failures, all of which can be accounted for.
>>>>>
>>>>> Eight failures are due to:
>>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8040038
>>>>>
>>>>> The remaining failure is due to:
>>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8039212
>>>>>
>>>>> Neither fix has been backported to 8u yet.
>>>>>
>>>>> -DrD-
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>