From dmitry.markov at oracle.com Mon Jun 2 12:55:12 2014 From: dmitry.markov at oracle.com (dmitry markov) Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 16:55:12 +0400 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval 8042465: Applet menus not rendering when browser is full screen on Mac Message-ID: <538C7430.3050406@oracle.com> Hello, Could you approve the straight back-port of the fix for 8042465 to jdk8u-dev, please? The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8042465 The webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dmarkov/8042465/jdk8u/webrev.00/ The review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2014-May/007745.html The jdk9 chageset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/25f07ac917f2 Thanks, Dmitry From Alan.Bateman at oracle.com Mon Jun 2 13:33:43 2014 From: Alan.Bateman at oracle.com (Alan Bateman) Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 14:33:43 +0100 Subject: RFR: JDK-8044343 - Check jdk/src/windows/native/java/lang/ProcessEnvironment_md.c for JNI pending exceptions In-Reply-To: <538A0448.70905@oracle.com> References: <538A0448.70905@oracle.com> Message-ID: <538C7D37.1040307@oracle.com> On 31/05/2014 17:33, Mark Sheppard wrote: > Hi, > please oblige and review the following change > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~msheppar/8044343/webrev/ > > which addresses issue > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044343 > > which is a backport of > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036603 > > the original changeset didn't apply cleanly and was applied manually > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/323b64a9dede This looks okay to me and should have the 8u version the same as 9 (except for the additional blank lines in the 9 version). -Alan From Alan.Bateman at oracle.com Mon Jun 2 13:37:09 2014 From: Alan.Bateman at oracle.com (Alan Bateman) Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 14:37:09 +0100 Subject: RFR: 8041602 - (prefs) Check jdk/src/windows/native/java/util/WindowsPreference.c for JNI pending exceptions In-Reply-To: <538A517F.6090808@oracle.com> References: <538A517F.6090808@oracle.com> Message-ID: <538C7E05.6010606@oracle.com> On 31/05/2014 23:02, Mark Sheppard wrote: > Hi, > please oblige and review the following change > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~msheppar/8041602/webrev/ > > which addresses the issue > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8041602 > > which is a backport of > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035340 > > the original changeset didn't apply cleanly and was applied manually > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/740ffd98e35a > This looks okay to me, I'm curious as whether it was just the new location in the jdk9/jdk tree that caused the issue or another change. A minor comment on L48 where it could be "if (result .." to be consistent. -Alan From mark.sheppard at oracle.com Mon Jun 2 15:15:45 2014 From: mark.sheppard at oracle.com (Mark Sheppard) Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 16:15:45 +0100 Subject: RFR: 8041602 - (prefs) Check jdk/src/windows/native/java/util/WindowsPreference.c for JNI pending exceptions In-Reply-To: <538C7E05.6010606@oracle.com> References: <538A517F.6090808@oracle.com> <538C7E05.6010606@oracle.com> Message-ID: <538C9521.7090307@oracle.com> Hi Alan, yes the differences in location was an issue and the jdk8 CoreLibraries.gmk had a clash regards Mark On 02/06/2014 14:37, Alan Bateman wrote: > On 31/05/2014 23:02, Mark Sheppard wrote: >> Hi, >> please oblige and review the following change >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~msheppar/8041602/webrev/ >> >> which addresses the issue >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8041602 >> >> which is a backport of >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035340 >> >> the original changeset didn't apply cleanly and was applied manually >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/740ffd98e35a >> > This looks okay to me, I'm curious as whether it was just the new > location in the jdk9/jdk tree that caused the issue or another change. > A minor comment on L48 where it could be "if (result .." to be > consistent. > > -Alan > > > From alejandro.murillo at oracle.com Mon Jun 2 16:47:38 2014 From: alejandro.murillo at oracle.com (Alejandro E Murillo) Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 10:47:38 -0600 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for bulk integration of hs25.20-b17 In-Reply-To: <5389673F.9080009@oracle.com> References: <5389673F.9080009@oracle.com> Message-ID: <538CAAAA.5050906@oracle.com> On 5/30/2014 11:23 PM, Alejandro E Murillo wrote: > Requesting approval to integrate hs25.20-b17 into jdk8u20-b17. > > A webrev is available at: > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amurillo/8u20/hs25.20-b17-jdk8u20-b17.webrev/ > > Pre-integration testing is in progress; the integration will proceed > only after SQE has analyzed the results and approved. > > The fixes in the proposed integration are below. All have undergone > nightly testing and are already in a jdk9 repository. > > 8027230: Overflow in > java.lang.instrument.Instrumentation.getObjectSize() method > 8031475: Missing oopmap in patching stubs > 8037112: gc/g1/TestHumongousAllocInitialMark.java caused SIGSEGV > 8039042: G1: Phantom zeros in cardtable > 8040245: G1: VM hangs during shutdown > 8040803: G1: Concurrent mark hangs when mark stack overflows > 8040804: G1: Concurrent mark stuck in loop calling os::elapsedVTime() > 8043086: Hotspot is expected to report OOM which is occurred > String.intern(), but crashes in JDK8u5 > 8043274: Test compiler/7184394/TestAESMain.java gets NPE on solaris > 8043906: new hotspot build - hs25.20-b17 > 8044090: C1: Old value instead of new one is passed to post-barrier in > UnsafeGetAndSetObject > This non hotspot change is also part of this snapshot: 8031766: jstatd nightly tests failing with Expected one jstatd process, got 2. Test will be canceled. Thanks -- Alejandro From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Mon Jun 2 17:49:09 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 18:49:09 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for bulk integration of hs25.20-b17 In-Reply-To: <538CAAAA.5050906@oracle.com> References: <5389673F.9080009@oracle.com> <538CAAAA.5050906@oracle.com> Message-ID: <538CB915.1000309@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 02/06/14 17:47, Alejandro E Murillo wrote: > > On 5/30/2014 11:23 PM, Alejandro E Murillo wrote: >> Requesting approval to integrate hs25.20-b17 into jdk8u20-b17. >> >> A webrev is available at: >> >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amurillo/8u20/hs25.20-b17-jdk8u20-b17.webrev/ >> >> >> Pre-integration testing is in progress; the integration will proceed >> only after SQE has analyzed the results and approved. >> >> The fixes in the proposed integration are below. All have undergone >> nightly testing and are already in a jdk9 repository. >> >> 8027230: Overflow in >> java.lang.instrument.Instrumentation.getObjectSize() method >> 8031475: Missing oopmap in patching stubs >> 8037112: gc/g1/TestHumongousAllocInitialMark.java caused SIGSEGV >> 8039042: G1: Phantom zeros in cardtable >> 8040245: G1: VM hangs during shutdown >> 8040803: G1: Concurrent mark hangs when mark stack overflows >> 8040804: G1: Concurrent mark stuck in loop calling os::elapsedVTime() >> 8043086: Hotspot is expected to report OOM which is occurred >> String.intern(), but crashes in JDK8u5 >> 8043274: Test compiler/7184394/TestAESMain.java gets NPE on solaris >> 8043906: new hotspot build - hs25.20-b17 >> 8044090: C1: Old value instead of new one is passed to post-barrier >> in UnsafeGetAndSetObject >> > This non hotspot change is also part of this snapshot: > 8031766: jstatd nightly tests failing with Expected one jstatd > process, got 2. Test will be canceled. > > Thanks > From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Mon Jun 2 17:51:13 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 18:51:13 +0100 Subject: RFR 8035870 - [was Re: RFR: 8041609 - Check jdk/src/windows/native/java/io/WinNTFileSystem_md.c for JNI pending exceptions] In-Reply-To: <53899B25.8070701@oracle.com> References: <53899B25.8070701@oracle.com> Message-ID: <538CB991.2000809@oracle.com> Approving 8035870 for backport to 8. Please use the main cr id in future requests. -Rob On 31/05/14 10:04, Mark Sheppard wrote: > Hi > please oblige review and approve the backport to jdk8u-dev, after > the review of the following change > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~msheppar/8041609/webrev/ > > for the issue > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8041609 > > which is a backport of > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035870 > > the hg import of changeset > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/56366827ebab > didn't apply cleanly so was manually > > the regression test run was fine > > regards > Mark From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Mon Jun 2 17:53:56 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 18:53:56 +0100 Subject: RFR 8035870 - [was Re: RFR: 8041609 - Check jdk/src/windows/native/java/io/WinNTFileSystem_md.c for JNI pending exceptions] In-Reply-To: <538CB991.2000809@oracle.com> References: <53899B25.8070701@oracle.com> <538CB991.2000809@oracle.com> Message-ID: <538CBA34.7030006@oracle.com> Apologies Mark, please ignore that mail. I misread as a request for approval to push to 8u. -Rob On 02/06/14 18:51, Rob McKenna wrote: > Approving 8035870 for backport to 8. Please use the main cr id in > future requests. > > -Rob > > On 31/05/14 10:04, Mark Sheppard wrote: >> Hi >> please oblige review and approve the backport to jdk8u-dev, after >> the review of the following change >> >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~msheppar/8041609/webrev/ >> >> for the issue >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8041609 >> >> which is a backport of >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035870 >> >> the hg import of changeset >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/56366827ebab >> didn't apply cleanly so was manually >> >> the regression test run was fine >> >> regards >> Mark > From lana.steuck at oracle.com Mon Jun 2 18:28:17 2014 From: lana.steuck at oracle.com (lana.steuck at oracle.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 11:28:17 -0700 (PDT) Subject: jdk8u-b17: jdk8u-dev Message-ID: <201406021828.s52ISHMx014109@jano-app.us.oracle.com> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/rev/3a49a08a2e39 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/nashorn/rev/046bf6509a1f http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/langtools/rev/b45fd486977d http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/rev/06a0d07d44b7 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jaxws/rev/3ff7f413379f http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jaxp/rev/3218a2d7eddb http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/rev/460b0b08247f http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/corba/rev/90a428aa799d --- All the fixes will be tested during promotion (no PIT testing at this point): List of all fixes: =================== JDK-8038999 client-libs In Java 8 java.awt.datatransfer.DataFlavor.equals is no longer symmetric JDK-8036110 client-libs In TextField can only select text visible or to the left of the cursor JDK-8043456 client-libs KSS: javax.swing.plaf.basic.BasicInternalFrameTitlePane#postClosingEvent JDK-8043151 client-libs KSS: javax.swing.plaf.nimbus.AbstractRegionPainter#getComponentColor JDK-8043152 client-libs KSS: javax.swing.plaf.synth.SynthContext JDK-8043153 client-libs KSS: javax.swing.plaf.synth.SynthParser#startColor JDK-8043627 client-libs NPE in SynthContext in plugin mode JDK-8041725 client-libs Nimbus JList selection colors persist across L&F changes JDK-8039083 client-libs REGRESSION: closed/java/awt/dnd/DragSourceListenerSerializationTest/DragSourceListenerSerializationTest.html fails with NPE since 8u20 b07 on Linux JDK-8040829 client-libs Uninitialised memory in jdk/src/closed/share/native/sun/java2d/cmm/ JDK-7175457 client-libs [TEST_BUG] closed/java/awt/Window/AlwaysOnTop/TestAlwaysOnTopBeforeShow.java still failed JDK-8014755 client-libs [TEST_BUG] frames didn't closed after execution some awt/dnd/ tests JDK-8031485 client-libs [macosx] Combo box consuming escape key events JDK-8024185 client-libs [macosx] Fullscreen button freezes application when started with -splash JDK-8040291 client-libs [macosx] Http-Images are not fully loaded when using ImageIcon JDK-8042855 client-libs [parfait] Potential null pointer dereference in IndicLayoutEngine.cpp JDK-8042850 client-libs [parfait]: Extra unused entries in ICU ScriptCodes enum JDK-7100952 client-libs closed/javax/swing/JComboBox/6246463/bug6246463.java deadlocks on MacOS JDK-8038000 client-libs java.awt.image.RasterFormatException: Incorrect scanline stride JDK-8040809 core-libs '}' left in the spec for j.u.Random.doubles(..) JDK-8043012 core-libs (tz) Support tzdata2014c JDK-8034220 core-libs AIX: Provide better time zone mappings (i.e. tzmappings file) JDK-8044000 core-libs Access to undefined property yields "null" instead of "undefined" JDK-8038994 core-libs AnnotatedType.getType() of a TypeVariable boundary without annotations return null JDK-8034170 core-libs Digest authentication interop issue JDK-8030202 core-libs Nashorn: Multiple RegExp#ignoreCase issues JDK-8041791 core-libs String.toLowerCase regression - violates Unicode standard JDK-8043443 core-libs Test framework changes to run script tests without security manager JDK-8043930 core-libs TypeError when attemping to create an instance of non-public class could be better JDK-8039751 core-libs UTF-8 decoder fails to handle some edge cases correctly JDK-8028615 core-libs jdk.nashorn.x3::some.serious.failure needs more memory to run JDK-8029346 core-svc LowMemoryTestConcMarkSweepGC.sh fails intermittently with timeout JDK-8043529 core-svc Serviceability tests using @library failing with java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError JDK-8035752 core-svc Some tmtools binaries reference JDK 7 on Mac JDK-8030628 core-svc Update java/lang/management/MemoryMXBean tests to ignore GC setting by jtreg JDK-8004183 core-svc test/sun/management/jmxremote/LocalRMIServerSocketFactoryTest.java doesn't clean-up JDK-8043237 docs Add a link to the com.sun.nio.sctp API in IO guide JDK-8042614 docs Need to add link to jdk.net apidoc in networking guide (for JDK 9 and 8u20) JDK-8031766 hotspot jstatd nightly tests failing with Expected one jstatd process, got 2. Test will be canceled. JDK-8028627 security-libs Unsynchronized code path from javax.crypto.Cipher to the WeakHashMap used by JceSecurity to store codebase mappings JDK-8044050 tools Move misplaced inference tests to test/tools/javac/generics/inference JDK-8042338 tools Refactor Types.upperBound to treat wildcards and variables separately JDK-8037398 tools integer overflow in jdk/src/share/bin/java.c JDK-8033437 tools javac, inconsistent generic types behaviour when compiling together vs. separate JDK-8041704 tools wrong error message when mixing lambda expression and inner class From jan.lahoda at oracle.com Mon Jun 2 19:28:30 2014 From: jan.lahoda at oracle.com (Jan Lahoda) Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 21:28:30 +0200 Subject: [8u20] request for approval to backport JDK-8031967: For some sources compiler compiles for ever Message-ID: <538CD05E.8020802@oracle.com> Hello, I'd like to ask for an approval to backport fix for: Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8031967 Backport bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038850 jdk9 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/ca2bc0c46552 The fix applies cleanly to: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/langtools Thanks, Jan From naoto.sato at oracle.com Mon Jun 2 19:57:36 2014 From: naoto.sato at oracle.com (Naoto Sato) Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 12:57:36 -0700 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval 8042465: Applet menus not rendering when browser is full screen on Mac In-Reply-To: <538C7430.3050406@oracle.com> References: <538C7430.3050406@oracle.com> Message-ID: <538CD730.7030803@oracle.com> Approved. Naoto On 6/2/14, 5:55 AM, dmitry markov wrote: > Hello, > > Could you approve the straight back-port of the fix for 8042465 to > jdk8u-dev, please? > > The bug: > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8042465 > The webrev: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dmarkov/8042465/jdk8u/webrev.00/ > The review thread: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2014-May/007745.html > The jdk9 chageset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/25f07ac917f2 > > Thanks, > Dmitry From naoto.sato at oracle.com Mon Jun 2 20:01:18 2014 From: naoto.sato at oracle.com (Naoto Sato) Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 13:01:18 -0700 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval 8042465: Applet menus not rendering when browser is full screen on Mac In-Reply-To: <538CD730.7030803@oracle.com> References: <538C7430.3050406@oracle.com> <538CD730.7030803@oracle.com> Message-ID: <538CD80E.8090203@oracle.com> Please specify the target update release you are going to push the fix (assuming 8u20). Naoto On 6/2/14, 12:57 PM, Naoto Sato wrote: > Approved. > > Naoto > > On 6/2/14, 5:55 AM, dmitry markov wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Could you approve the straight back-port of the fix for 8042465 to >> jdk8u-dev, please? >> >> The bug: >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8042465 >> The webrev: >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dmarkov/8042465/jdk8u/webrev.00/ >> The review thread: >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2014-May/007745.html >> The jdk9 chageset: >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/25f07ac917f2 >> >> Thanks, >> Dmitry From naoto.sato at oracle.com Mon Jun 2 20:01:32 2014 From: naoto.sato at oracle.com (Naoto Sato) Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 13:01:32 -0700 Subject: [8u20] request for approval to backport JDK-8031967: For some sources compiler compiles for ever In-Reply-To: <538CD05E.8020802@oracle.com> References: <538CD05E.8020802@oracle.com> Message-ID: <538CD81C.9080005@oracle.com> Approved. Naoto On 6/2/14, 12:28 PM, Jan Lahoda wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to ask for an approval to backport fix for: > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8031967 > Backport bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038850 > jdk9 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/ca2bc0c46552 > > The fix applies cleanly to: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/langtools > > Thanks, > Jan From jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com Mon Jun 2 20:15:48 2014 From: jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com (Jonathan Gibbons) Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 13:15:48 -0700 Subject: [8u20] request for review and approval to backport JDK-8043186, JDK-8029800 and JDK-8030726 In-Reply-To: <53886096.8050609@oracle.com> References: <538853DB.2030206@oracle.com> <53886096.8050609@oracle.com> Message-ID: <538CDB74.1010506@oracle.com> Almost approved: I leave the final call to Sean. The problem is in line 42 of the test in question: 42 "-overview", "SRC_DIR + FS + overview.html", "-use", "-top", "\u0130{@docroot}TOP TEXT", "-d", BUG_ID, "-sourcepath", Although the changes made by Jan are OK/approved, the line of code contains a different error which renders the test somewhat useless :-( Specifically, the string "SRC_DIR + FS + overview.html" should always have been the expression SRC_DIR + FS + "overview.html" -- Jon On 05/30/2014 03:42 AM, Se?n Coffey wrote: > Approved but subject to reviewer approval also. > > regards, > Sean. > > On 30/05/2014 10:48, Jan Lahoda wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'd like to ask for a review of a backport fix, and an approval to >> push it to jdk8u/jdk8u-dev, for the following bug: >> >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8043186 >> ('javac test langtools/tools/javac/util/StringUtilsTest.java fails') >> jdk9 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/4487f6f98252 >> jdk8u patch: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jlahoda/jdk8u/webrev-8043186-8/ >> >> The only difference between the JDK9 and JDK8u fixes is in this test: >> test/com/sun/javadoc/testTopOption/TestTopOption.java >> >> This fix requires also backport of these two other fixes: >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029800 >> jdk9 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/bc18278c195e >> jdk8u patch: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jlahoda/jdk8u/webrev-8029800-8/ >> (applies cleanly except one change in copyright years which is >> already part of jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/langtools) >> >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8030726 >> jdk9 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/c0ebdd10888c >> jdk8u patch: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jlahoda/jdk8u/webrev-8030726-8/ >> Applies cleanly to: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/langtools >> >> Thanks, >> Jan > From dalibor.topic at oracle.com Mon Jun 2 22:01:13 2014 From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (Dalibor Topic) Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 00:01:13 +0200 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8040058 IsoFields.WEEK_BASED_YEAR adjustInto incorrect In-Reply-To: <5388AAE5.2070507@oracle.com> References: <5388AAE5.2070507@oracle.com> Message-ID: <538CF429.1080609@oracle.com> On 5/30/14 5:59 PM, roger riggs wrote: > Please approve the backport of the fix from jdk9 to jdk8u-dev repository. > > It applies cleanly and passes the tests. > > Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8040058 > Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/ea141745e90d > > Thanks, Roger Thanks, Roger - approved. cheers, dalibor topic -- Oracle Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 Oracle Java Platform Group ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher Green Oracle Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment From dmitry.markov at oracle.com Tue Jun 3 07:11:26 2014 From: dmitry.markov at oracle.com (dmitry markov) Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 11:11:26 +0400 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval 8042465: Applet menus not rendering when browser is full screen on Mac In-Reply-To: <538CD80E.8090203@oracle.com> References: <538C7430.3050406@oracle.com> <538CD730.7030803@oracle.com> <538CD80E.8090203@oracle.com> Message-ID: <538D751E.9050004@oracle.com> Thank you Naoto! Yes, I am going to push the fix to 8u20. Dmitry On 03/06/2014 00:01, Naoto Sato wrote: > Please specify the target update release you are going to push the fix > (assuming 8u20). > > Naoto > > On 6/2/14, 12:57 PM, Naoto Sato wrote: >> Approved. >> >> Naoto >> >> On 6/2/14, 5:55 AM, dmitry markov wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> Could you approve the straight back-port of the fix for 8042465 to >>> jdk8u-dev, please? >>> >>> The bug: >>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8042465 >>> The webrev: >>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dmarkov/8042465/jdk8u/webrev.00/ >>> The review thread: >>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2014-May/007745.html >>> The jdk9 chageset: >>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/25f07ac917f2 >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Dmitry From weijun.wang at oracle.com Tue Jun 3 08:05:22 2014 From: weijun.wang at oracle.com (Wang Weijun) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 16:05:22 +0800 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval: 8036779: sun.security.krb5.KdcComm interprets kdc_timeout as msec instead of sec Message-ID: <0F9C40C4-AB01-4A6E-88BB-64ECFB8E3AEB@oracle.com> Hi All This is a request to backport a jdk9 fix into jdk8u-dev. 8036779: sun.security.krb5.KdcComm interprets kdc_timeout as msec instead of sec The fix is already included in jdk9 as: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/36a62e89532e The review thread was http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2014-May/010562.html The patch for jdk8u-dev is identical to the one in jdk9. The fix is low-risk. Backporting to 8u is already approved by CCC. Thanks Weijun From weijun.wang at oracle.com Tue Jun 3 08:09:17 2014 From: weijun.wang at oracle.com (Wang Weijun) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 16:09:17 +0800 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval: 8036709: Java 7 jarsigner displays warning about cert policy tree Message-ID: <18290741-A974-4965-9A3B-78A4418D9ED5@oracle.com> Hi All This is a request to backport a jdk9 fix into jdk8u-dev. 8036709: Java 7 jarsigner displays warning about cert policy tree The fix is already included in jdk9 as: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/d1978cf32bc1 The review thread was http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2014-May/010523.html The patch for jdk8u-dev is identical to the one in jdk9. Thanks Weijun From weijun.wang at oracle.com Tue Jun 3 08:20:40 2014 From: weijun.wang at oracle.com (Wang Weijun) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 16:20:40 +0800 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval: 8039132: cleanup @ignore JAAS/krb5 tests Message-ID: Hi All This is a request to backport a jdk9 fix into jdk8u-dev. 8039132: cleanup @ignore JAAS/krb5 tests This bug is about liberating some closed tests which used to depend on internal servers but can be rewritten to be independent now. The fix is already included in jdk9 as: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/37d001f0091a The patch for jdk8u-dev is identical to the one in jdk9. Thanks Weijun From sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com Tue Jun 3 08:47:59 2014 From: sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com (A. Sundararajan) Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 14:17:59 +0530 Subject: [8u20] approval request for 8044612: StringIndexOutOfBoundException in NativeRegExp.appendReplacement Message-ID: <538D8BBF.5080503@oracle.com> Please approve backport to 8u20: Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044520 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8044612/ jdk9 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-June/003029.html jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/e445404a69f5 Thanks -Sundar From sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com Tue Jun 3 08:50:11 2014 From: sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com (A. Sundararajan) Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 14:20:11 +0530 Subject: [8u20] approval request for 8044612: StringIndexOutOfBoundException in NativeRegExp.appendReplacement In-Reply-To: <538D8BBF.5080503@oracle.com> References: <538D8BBF.5080503@oracle.com> Message-ID: <538D8C43.7010908@oracle.com> Bug link was wrong. It is https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044612 -Sundar On Tuesday 03 June 2014 02:17 PM, A. Sundararajan wrote: > Please approve backport to 8u20: > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044520 > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8044612/ > jdk9 review thread: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-June/003029.html > jdk9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/e445404a69f5 > > Thanks > -Sundar From sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com Tue Jun 3 08:53:50 2014 From: sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com (A. Sundararajan) Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 14:23:50 +0530 Subject: [8u20] please approve backport of 8044520: Nashorn cannot execute node.js's express module Message-ID: <538D8D1E.1050009@oracle.com> Please approve. Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044520 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8044520/ jdk9 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-June/003027.html jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/f855686309df Thanks -Sundar From sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com Tue Jun 3 09:58:24 2014 From: sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com (A. Sundararajan) Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 15:28:24 +0530 Subject: [8u20] please approve backport of 8044520: Nashorn cannot execute node.js's express module In-Reply-To: <538D8D1E.1050009@oracle.com> References: <538D8D1E.1050009@oracle.com> Message-ID: <538D9C40.1030802@oracle.com> Please ignore this request. The patch requires adjustments specific for 8u-dev (trivial ones - but still patch does not apply "as is"). I'll ask fresh approval with new webrev specific for jdk8u-dev. Thanks -Sundar On Tuesday 03 June 2014 02:23 PM, A. Sundararajan wrote: > Please approve. > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044520 > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8044520/ > jdk9 review thread: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-June/003027.html > jdk9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/f855686309df > > Thanks > -Sundar From jan.lahoda at oracle.com Tue Jun 3 10:14:49 2014 From: jan.lahoda at oracle.com (Jan Lahoda) Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 12:14:49 +0200 Subject: [8u20] request for review and approval to backport JDK-8043186, JDK-8029800 and JDK-8030726 In-Reply-To: <538CDB74.1010506@oracle.com> References: <538853DB.2030206@oracle.com> <53886096.8050609@oracle.com> <538CDB74.1010506@oracle.com> Message-ID: <538DA019.2000906@oracle.com> Jon, Thanks for the comment/review. I updated the review with the overview.html fix: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jlahoda/jdk8u/webrev-8043186-8/ The webrev includes also a delta webrev. The original webrev/previous iteration is available here: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jlahoda/jdk8u/webrev-8043186-8.01 Thanks, Jan On 2.6.2014 22:15, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: > Almost approved: I leave the final call to Sean. > > The problem is in line 42 of the test in question: > > 42 "-overview", "SRC_DIR + FS + overview.html", "-use", > "-top", "\u0130{@docroot}TOP TEXT", "-d", BUG_ID, "-sourcepath", > > > Although the changes made by Jan are OK/approved, the line of code > contains a different error which renders the test somewhat useless :-( > Specifically, the string > > "SRC_DIR + FS + overview.html" > > should always have been the expression > > SRC_DIR + FS + "overview.html" > > > -- Jon > > On 05/30/2014 03:42 AM, Se?n Coffey wrote: >> Approved but subject to reviewer approval also. >> >> regards, >> Sean. >> >> On 30/05/2014 10:48, Jan Lahoda wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I'd like to ask for a review of a backport fix, and an approval to >>> push it to jdk8u/jdk8u-dev, for the following bug: >>> >>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8043186 >>> ('javac test langtools/tools/javac/util/StringUtilsTest.java fails') >>> jdk9 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/4487f6f98252 >>> jdk8u patch: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jlahoda/jdk8u/webrev-8043186-8/ >>> >>> The only difference between the JDK9 and JDK8u fixes is in this test: >>> test/com/sun/javadoc/testTopOption/TestTopOption.java >>> >>> This fix requires also backport of these two other fixes: >>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029800 >>> jdk9 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/bc18278c195e >>> jdk8u patch: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jlahoda/jdk8u/webrev-8029800-8/ >>> (applies cleanly except one change in copyright years which is >>> already part of jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/langtools) >>> >>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8030726 >>> jdk9 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/c0ebdd10888c >>> jdk8u patch: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jlahoda/jdk8u/webrev-8030726-8/ >>> Applies cleanly to: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/langtools >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Jan >> > From sean.coffey at oracle.com Tue Jun 3 10:40:01 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 11:40:01 +0100 Subject: [8u20] request for review and approval to backport JDK-8043186, JDK-8029800 and JDK-8030726 In-Reply-To: <538DA019.2000906@oracle.com> References: <538853DB.2030206@oracle.com> <53886096.8050609@oracle.com> <538CDB74.1010506@oracle.com> <538DA019.2000906@oracle.com> Message-ID: <538DA601.6060506@oracle.com> Looks fine to me. Still approved for JDK 8u20. regards, Sean. On 03/06/2014 11:14, Jan Lahoda wrote: > Jon, > > Thanks for the comment/review. I updated the review with the > overview.html fix: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jlahoda/jdk8u/webrev-8043186-8/ > The webrev includes also a delta webrev. The original webrev/previous > iteration is available here: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jlahoda/jdk8u/webrev-8043186-8.01 > > Thanks, > Jan > > On 2.6.2014 22:15, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: >> Almost approved: I leave the final call to Sean. >> >> The problem is in line 42 of the test in question: >> >> 42 "-overview", "SRC_DIR + FS + overview.html", "-use", >> "-top", "\u0130{@docroot}TOP TEXT", "-d", BUG_ID, "-sourcepath", >> >> >> Although the changes made by Jan are OK/approved, the line of code >> contains a different error which renders the test somewhat useless :-( >> Specifically, the string >> >> "SRC_DIR + FS + overview.html" >> >> should always have been the expression >> >> SRC_DIR + FS + "overview.html" >> >> >> -- Jon >> >> On 05/30/2014 03:42 AM, Se?n Coffey wrote: >>> Approved but subject to reviewer approval also. >>> >>> regards, >>> Sean. >>> >>> On 30/05/2014 10:48, Jan Lahoda wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I'd like to ask for a review of a backport fix, and an approval to >>>> push it to jdk8u/jdk8u-dev, for the following bug: >>>> >>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8043186 >>>> ('javac test langtools/tools/javac/util/StringUtilsTest.java fails') >>>> jdk9 fix: >>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/4487f6f98252 >>>> jdk8u patch: >>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jlahoda/jdk8u/webrev-8043186-8/ >>>> >>>> The only difference between the JDK9 and JDK8u fixes is in this test: >>>> test/com/sun/javadoc/testTopOption/TestTopOption.java >>>> >>>> This fix requires also backport of these two other fixes: >>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029800 >>>> jdk9 fix: >>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/bc18278c195e >>>> jdk8u patch: >>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jlahoda/jdk8u/webrev-8029800-8/ >>>> (applies cleanly except one change in copyright years which is >>>> already part of jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/langtools) >>>> >>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8030726 >>>> jdk9 fix: >>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/c0ebdd10888c >>>> jdk8u patch: >>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jlahoda/jdk8u/webrev-8030726-8/ >>>> Applies cleanly to: >>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/langtools >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Jan >>> >> From sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com Tue Jun 3 10:41:24 2014 From: sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com (A. Sundararajan) Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 16:11:24 +0530 Subject: [8u20] approval request for backport of 8044520: Nashorn cannot execute node.js's express module Message-ID: <538DA654.2040801@oracle.com> Please approve. backport applied with trivial changes - patch does not apply cleanly due to line number changes + minor code changes in jdk9. Including jdk9 reviewers for approval as well. Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044520 jdk8u webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8044520/8u20/webrev.00 jdk9 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8044520/webrev.00/ jdk9 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-June/003027.html jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/f855686309df Thanks -Sundar From marcus.lagergren at oracle.com Tue Jun 3 10:52:33 2014 From: marcus.lagergren at oracle.com (Marcus Lagergren) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 12:52:33 +0200 Subject: [8u20] approval request for backport of 8044520: Nashorn cannot execute node.js's express module In-Reply-To: <538DA654.2040801@oracle.com> References: <538DA654.2040801@oracle.com> Message-ID: Looks good, both branches. /M On 03 Jun 2014, at 12:41, A. Sundararajan wrote: > Please approve. > > backport applied with trivial changes - patch does not apply cleanly due to line number changes + minor code changes in jdk9. Including jdk9 reviewers for approval as well. > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044520 > jdk8u webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8044520/8u20/webrev.00 > > jdk9 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8044520/webrev.00/ > jdk9 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-June/003027.html > jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/f855686309df > > Thanks > -Sundar From sean.coffey at oracle.com Tue Jun 3 11:22:55 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 12:22:55 +0100 Subject: [8u20] approval request for backport of 8044520: Nashorn cannot execute node.js's express module In-Reply-To: References: <538DA654.2040801@oracle.com> Message-ID: <538DB00F.5050406@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 03/06/2014 11:52, Marcus Lagergren wrote: > Looks good, both branches. > > /M > > On 03 Jun 2014, at 12:41, A. Sundararajan wrote: > >> Please approve. >> >> backport applied with trivial changes - patch does not apply cleanly due to line number changes + minor code changes in jdk9. Including jdk9 reviewers for approval as well. >> >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044520 >> jdk8u webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8044520/8u20/webrev.00 >> >> jdk9 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8044520/webrev.00/ >> jdk9 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-June/003027.html >> jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/f855686309df >> >> Thanks >> -Sundar From vladimir.x.ivanov at oracle.com Tue Jun 3 11:24:41 2014 From: vladimir.x.ivanov at oracle.com (Vladimir Ivanov) Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 15:24:41 +0400 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8005873: JRuby test_respond_to.rb asserts with: MT-unsafe modification of inline cache Message-ID: <538DB079.3000109@oracle.com> Hello, Please, approve a backport of the fix from 9 to jdk8u-dev. The patch applies cleanly. https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8005873 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/13c3451f3587 http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2014-May/013902.html Thanks! Best regards, Vladimir Ivanov From sean.coffey at oracle.com Tue Jun 3 11:29:12 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 12:29:12 +0100 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval: 8036779: sun.security.krb5.KdcComm interprets kdc_timeout as msec instead of sec In-Reply-To: <0F9C40C4-AB01-4A6E-88BB-64ECFB8E3AEB@oracle.com> References: <0F9C40C4-AB01-4A6E-88BB-64ECFB8E3AEB@oracle.com> Message-ID: <538DB188.6080605@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 03/06/2014 09:05, Wang Weijun wrote: > Hi All > > This is a request to backport a jdk9 fix into jdk8u-dev. > > 8036779: sun.security.krb5.KdcComm interprets kdc_timeout as msec instead of sec > > The fix is already included in jdk9 as: > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/36a62e89532e > > The review thread was > > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2014-May/010562.html > > The patch for jdk8u-dev is identical to the one in jdk9. > > The fix is low-risk. Backporting to 8u is already approved by CCC. > > Thanks > Weijun From sean.coffey at oracle.com Tue Jun 3 11:29:50 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 12:29:50 +0100 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval: 8036709: Java 7 jarsigner displays warning about cert policy tree In-Reply-To: <18290741-A974-4965-9A3B-78A4418D9ED5@oracle.com> References: <18290741-A974-4965-9A3B-78A4418D9ED5@oracle.com> Message-ID: <538DB1AE.8090008@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 03/06/2014 09:09, Wang Weijun wrote: > Hi All > > This is a request to backport a jdk9 fix into jdk8u-dev. > > 8036709: Java 7 jarsigner displays warning about cert policy tree > > The fix is already included in jdk9 as: > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/d1978cf32bc1 > > The review thread was > > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2014-May/010523.html > > The patch for jdk8u-dev is identical to the one in jdk9. > > Thanks > Weijun From sean.coffey at oracle.com Tue Jun 3 11:30:25 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 12:30:25 +0100 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval: 8039132: cleanup @ignore JAAS/krb5 tests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <538DB1D1.7000306@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 03/06/2014 09:20, Wang Weijun wrote: > Hi All > > This is a request to backport a jdk9 fix into jdk8u-dev. > > 8039132: cleanup @ignore JAAS/krb5 tests > > This bug is about liberating some closed tests which used to depend on internal servers but can be rewritten to be independent now. > > The fix is already included in jdk9 as: > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/37d001f0091a > > The patch for jdk8u-dev is identical to the one in jdk9. > > Thanks > Weijun From sean.coffey at oracle.com Tue Jun 3 11:31:20 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 12:31:20 +0100 Subject: [8u20] approval request for 8044612: StringIndexOutOfBoundException in NativeRegExp.appendReplacement In-Reply-To: <538D8C43.7010908@oracle.com> References: <538D8BBF.5080503@oracle.com> <538D8C43.7010908@oracle.com> Message-ID: <538DB208.8000205@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 03/06/2014 09:50, A. Sundararajan wrote: > Bug link was wrong. It is > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044612 > > -Sundar > > On Tuesday 03 June 2014 02:17 PM, A. Sundararajan wrote: >> Please approve backport to 8u20: >> >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044520 >> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8044612/ >> jdk9 review thread: >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-June/003029.html >> jdk9 changeset: >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/e445404a69f5 >> >> Thanks >> -Sundar > From sean.coffey at oracle.com Tue Jun 3 11:33:20 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 12:33:20 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8005873: JRuby test_respond_to.rb asserts with: MT-unsafe modification of inline cache In-Reply-To: <538DB079.3000109@oracle.com> References: <538DB079.3000109@oracle.com> Message-ID: <538DB280.5000002@oracle.com> Approved. Please add a suitable noreg-* label to the bug report. http://openjdk.java.net/guide/changePlanning.html#noreg regards, Sean. On 03/06/2014 12:24, Vladimir Ivanov wrote: > Hello, > > Please, approve a backport of the fix from 9 to jdk8u-dev. > The patch applies cleanly. > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8005873 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/13c3451f3587 > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2014-May/013902.html > > Thanks! > > Best regards, > Vladimir Ivanov From vladimir.x.ivanov at oracle.com Tue Jun 3 12:35:49 2014 From: vladimir.x.ivanov at oracle.com (Vladimir Ivanov) Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 16:35:49 +0400 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8005873: JRuby test_respond_to.rb asserts with: MT-unsafe modification of inline cache In-Reply-To: <538DB280.5000002@oracle.com> References: <538DB079.3000109@oracle.com> <538DB280.5000002@oracle.com> Message-ID: <538DC125.8080002@oracle.com> Sean, thank you. Added noreg-sqe keywork. Best regards, Vladimir Ivanov On 6/3/14 3:33 PM, Se?n Coffey wrote: > Approved. Please add a suitable noreg-* label to the bug report. > > http://openjdk.java.net/guide/changePlanning.html#noreg > > regards, > Sean. > On 03/06/2014 12:24, Vladimir Ivanov wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Please, approve a backport of the fix from 9 to jdk8u-dev. >> The patch applies cleanly. >> >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8005873 >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/13c3451f3587 >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2014-May/013902.html >> >> Thanks! >> >> Best regards, >> Vladimir Ivanov > From vicente.romero at oracle.com Tue Jun 3 13:38:26 2014 From: vicente.romero at oracle.com (Vicente-Arturo Romero-Zaldivar) Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 14:38:26 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8044487: Fix for 8042785 causes regression tests to fail with java.lang.VerifyError Message-ID: <538DCFD2.9090208@oracle.com> Hi, Please approve the back-port of the following fix from 9 to 8u20: JDK9 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044487 JDK8u20 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044599 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/62e5d13e3383 Thanks, Vicente From kumar.x.srinivasan at oracle.com Tue Jun 3 14:16:55 2014 From: kumar.x.srinivasan at oracle.com (Kumar Srinivasan) Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 07:16:55 -0700 Subject: [8u20]: Request for Review/Approval: JDK-8044046: [asm] refresh internal ASM version to v5.0.3 In-Reply-To: <53890F1E.20808@oracle.com> References: <53890F1E.20808@oracle.com> Message-ID: <538DD8D7.5060002@oracle.com> Hi Sundar, Paul, Can one of you review this ? the difference between the 9 and 8u changeset is shown below, once you two review, Sean will approve this for 8u. Thanks Kumar On 5/30/2014 4:07 PM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote: > Hello Paul, Sean, Sundar, > > Please review and approve the fix for: > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044046 > > The JDK9 changesets (for ref) are here: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8044046/jdk9/webrev.00/ > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/e95072225d17 > > The JDK8u changeset is here: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8044046/jdk8u/webrev.00/ > > The diffs between jdk9 and jdk8u are the same except for 8u two > @SuppressWarnings are being added to keep the > code in sync with jdk9, this will make the merges from ASM and > ObjectWeb seamless. > > The two specific files are: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8044046/jdk8u/webrev.00/src/share/classes/jdk/internal/org/objectweb/asm/tree/MethodNode.java.udiff.html > > and > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8044046/jdk8u/webrev.00/src/share/classes/jdk/internal/org/objectweb/asm/tree/analysis/AnalyzerException.java.udiff.html > > > Thanks > Kumar > > From sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com Tue Jun 3 15:50:04 2014 From: sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com (A. Sundararajan) Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 21:20:04 +0530 Subject: [8u20]: Request for Review/Approval: JDK-8044046: [asm] refresh internal ASM version to v5.0.3 In-Reply-To: <538DD8D7.5060002@oracle.com> References: <53890F1E.20808@oracle.com> <538DD8D7.5060002@oracle.com> Message-ID: <538DEEAC.5030305@oracle.com> Hi Kumar, Looks good to me. -Sundar On Tuesday 03 June 2014 07:46 PM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote: > Hi Sundar, Paul, > > Can one of you review this ? the difference between the 9 and 8u > changeset is shown below, > once you two review, Sean will approve this for 8u. > > Thanks > > Kumar > > On 5/30/2014 4:07 PM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote: >> Hello Paul, Sean, Sundar, >> >> Please review and approve the fix for: >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044046 >> >> The JDK9 changesets (for ref) are here: >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8044046/jdk9/webrev.00/ >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/e95072225d17 >> >> The JDK8u changeset is here: >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8044046/jdk8u/webrev.00/ >> >> The diffs between jdk9 and jdk8u are the same except for 8u two >> @SuppressWarnings are being added to keep the >> code in sync with jdk9, this will make the merges from ASM and >> ObjectWeb seamless. >> >> The two specific files are: >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8044046/jdk8u/webrev.00/src/share/classes/jdk/internal/org/objectweb/asm/tree/MethodNode.java.udiff.html >> >> and >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8044046/jdk8u/webrev.00/src/share/classes/jdk/internal/org/objectweb/asm/tree/analysis/AnalyzerException.java.udiff.html >> >> >> Thanks >> Kumar >> >> > From alexander.zuev at oracle.com Tue Jun 3 17:48:53 2014 From: alexander.zuev at oracle.com (Alexander Zuev) Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 21:48:53 +0400 Subject: [8u20] RFA to backport 8044206: LambdaMetafactory.altMetafactory javadoc refers to wrong method Message-ID: <538E0A85.3090400@oracle.com> Please approve the backport of this issue to the 8u20. Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044206 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kizune/8044206/webrev.00 Review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-June/027090.html Fix applies to the http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev without any modification. /Alex From alejandro.murillo at oracle.com Tue Jun 3 17:53:53 2014 From: alejandro.murillo at oracle.com (Alejandro E Murillo) Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 11:53:53 -0600 Subject: jdk8u20-b17: HotSpot Message-ID: <538E0BB1.4010402@oracle.com> hs25.20-b17 has been integrated into jdk8u20-b17. http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/rev/3a49a08a2e39 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/corba/rev/90a428aa799d http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/rev/8ea4732884cc http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jaxp/rev/3218a2d7eddb http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jaxws/rev/3ff7f413379f http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/rev/31433e5da5bc http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/langtools/rev/b45fd486977d http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/nashorn/rev/046bf6509a1f Component : VM Status : 0 major failures, 0 minor failure Date : 06/02/2014 at 19:15 MSK Tested By : STT_VM Cost(total man-days): 1 Workspace : 2014-05-30-203214.amurillo.hs25-20-b17-jdk8u20-b17-control Bundles : 2014-05-30-203214.amurillo.hs25-20-b17-jdk8u20-b17-control Platforms : Others Tests :/net/sqenfs-1.sfbay/export1/comp/vm/testbase/ Log : link Browsers : NA Patches : NA Number of Tests Executed : 239143 passed tests, 2697 failed tests (no new failures) Bug verification status: ====================================== Tested, Pass: Tested, Pass (partial fixes): Tested, Fail: Untested bug fixes: Setup is not available: 8027230: Overflow in java.lang.instrument.Instrumentation.getObjectSize() method 8031475: Missing oopmap in patching stubs 8031766: jstatd nightly tests failing with Expected one jstatd process, got 2. Test will be canceled. 8037112: gc/g1/TestHumongousAllocInitialMark.java caused SIGSEGV 8039042: G1: Phantom zeros in cardtable 8040245: G1: VM hangs during shutdown 8040803: G1: Concurrent mark hangs when mark stack overflows 8040804: G1: Concurrent mark stuck in loop calling os::elapsedVTime() 8043086: Hotspot is expected to report OOM which is occurred String.intern(), but crashes in JDK8u5 8043274: Test compiler/7184394/TestAESMain.java gets NPE on solaris 8043906: new hotspot build - hs25.20-b17 8044090: C1: Old value instead of new one is passed to post-barrier in UnsafeGetAndSetObject New bugs filed: Bugs in PIT build: Bugs in earlier promoted build: Number of PIT requested: 1 Integration target J2SE build number: jdk8u20-b17 Issues and Notes: This is PIT for HS25.20-b17 for jdk8u20-b17. Go for integration. -- Alejandro From sean.coffey at oracle.com Tue Jun 3 18:49:23 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 19:49:23 +0100 Subject: [8u20]: Request for Review/Approval: JDK-8044046: [asm] refresh internal ASM version to v5.0.3 In-Reply-To: <538DEEAC.5030305@oracle.com> References: <53890F1E.20808@oracle.com> <538DD8D7.5060002@oracle.com> <538DEEAC.5030305@oracle.com> Message-ID: <538E18B3.4050108@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 03/06/2014 16:50, A. Sundararajan wrote: > Hi Kumar, > > Looks good to me. > > -Sundar > > On Tuesday 03 June 2014 07:46 PM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote: >> Hi Sundar, Paul, >> >> Can one of you review this ? the difference between the 9 and 8u >> changeset is shown below, >> once you two review, Sean will approve this for 8u. >> >> Thanks >> >> Kumar >> >> On 5/30/2014 4:07 PM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote: >>> Hello Paul, Sean, Sundar, >>> >>> Please review and approve the fix for: >>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044046 >>> >>> The JDK9 changesets (for ref) are here: >>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8044046/jdk9/webrev.00/ >>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/e95072225d17 >>> >>> The JDK8u changeset is here: >>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8044046/jdk8u/webrev.00/ >>> >>> The diffs between jdk9 and jdk8u are the same except for 8u two >>> @SuppressWarnings are being added to keep the >>> code in sync with jdk9, this will make the merges from ASM and >>> ObjectWeb seamless. >>> >>> The two specific files are: >>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8044046/jdk8u/webrev.00/src/share/classes/jdk/internal/org/objectweb/asm/tree/MethodNode.java.udiff.html >>> >>> and >>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8044046/jdk8u/webrev.00/src/share/classes/jdk/internal/org/objectweb/asm/tree/analysis/AnalyzerException.java.udiff.html >>> >>> >>> Thanks >>> Kumar >>> >>> >> > From sean.coffey at oracle.com Tue Jun 3 18:50:17 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 19:50:17 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8044487: Fix for 8042785 causes regression tests to fail with java.lang.VerifyError In-Reply-To: <538DCFD2.9090208@oracle.com> References: <538DCFD2.9090208@oracle.com> Message-ID: <538E18E9.6020102@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 03/06/2014 14:38, Vicente-Arturo Romero-Zaldivar wrote: > Hi, > > Please approve the back-port of the following fix from 9 to 8u20: > > JDK9 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044487 > JDK8u20 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044599 > fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/62e5d13e3383 > > Thanks, > Vicente From sean.coffey at oracle.com Tue Jun 3 18:55:24 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 19:55:24 +0100 Subject: [8u20] RFA to backport 8044206: LambdaMetafactory.altMetafactory javadoc refers to wrong method In-Reply-To: <538E0A85.3090400@oracle.com> References: <538E0A85.3090400@oracle.com> Message-ID: <538E1A1C.3060508@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 03/06/2014 18:48, Alexander Zuev wrote: > Please approve the backport of this issue to the 8u20. > > Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044206 > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kizune/8044206/webrev.00 > Review thread: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-June/027090.html > > Fix applies to the http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev without > any modification. > > /Alex From sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com Wed Jun 4 09:13:01 2014 From: sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com (A. Sundararajan) Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 14:43:01 +0530 Subject: [8u20] approval request for 8044750: megamorphic getter for scope objects does not call __noSuchProperty__ hook Message-ID: <538EE31D.9040802@oracle.com> Please approve backport. patch would not apply "as is" for one file (ScriptObject.java) - had to manually apply the diffs. Including jdk9 reviewers in this email. Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044750 jdk8u20 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8044750/8u20/webrev.00/ jdk9 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8044750/webrev.00/ jdk9 review thread: mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-June/003044.html jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/fd14a4b555f7 Thanks -Sundar From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Jun 4 09:21:25 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 10:21:25 +0100 Subject: [8u20] approval request for 8044750: megamorphic getter for scope objects does not call __noSuchProperty__ hook In-Reply-To: <538EE31D.9040802@oracle.com> References: <538EE31D.9040802@oracle.com> Message-ID: <538EE515.3030100@oracle.com> Approved but pending a reviewer approval of ScriptObject.java changes. regards, Sean. On 04/06/14 10:13, A. Sundararajan wrote: > Please approve backport. patch would not apply "as is" for one file > (ScriptObject.java) - had to manually apply the diffs. Including jdk9 > reviewers in this email. > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044750 > jdk8u20 webrev: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8044750/8u20/webrev.00/ > jdk9 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8044750/webrev.00/ > jdk9 review thread: > mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-June/003044.html > jdk9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/fd14a4b555f7 > > Thanks > -Sundar From attila.szegedi at oracle.com Wed Jun 4 11:06:12 2014 From: attila.szegedi at oracle.com (Attila Szegedi) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 13:06:12 +0200 Subject: [8u20] approval request for 8044750: megamorphic getter for scope objects does not call __noSuchProperty__ hook In-Reply-To: <538EE31D.9040802@oracle.com> References: <538EE31D.9040802@oracle.com> Message-ID: <74CEC402-FDF2-4C04-BEF8-A8D38F34CC18@oracle.com> Approved. On Jun 4, 2014, at 11:13 AM, A. Sundararajan wrote: > Please approve backport. patch would not apply "as is" for one file (ScriptObject.java) - had to manually apply the diffs. Including jdk9 reviewers in this email. > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044750 > jdk8u20 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8044750/8u20/webrev.00/ > jdk9 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8044750/webrev.00/ > jdk9 review thread: mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-June/003044.html > jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/fd14a4b555f7 > > Thanks > -Sundar From aleksej.efimov at oracle.com Wed Jun 4 14:36:46 2014 From: aleksej.efimov at oracle.com (Aleksej Efimov) Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 18:36:46 +0400 Subject: [8u20] RFA: 8032901: WaitForMultipleObjects() return value not handled appropriately Message-ID: <538F2EFE.5090005@oracle.com> Hello, Can I have an approval for a straight-forward backport of 8032901 fix [1] to JDK 8u20. Thank you, Aleksej [1] JDK9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/d23c0eb930f7 [2] Review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-May/026855.html [3] JBS bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8032901 From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Jun 4 14:49:45 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 15:49:45 +0100 Subject: [8u20] RFA: 8032901: WaitForMultipleObjects() return value not handled appropriately In-Reply-To: <538F2EFE.5090005@oracle.com> References: <538F2EFE.5090005@oracle.com> Message-ID: <538F3209.6020204@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 04/06/14 15:36, Aleksej Efimov wrote: > Hello, > > Can I have an approval for a straight-forward backport of 8032901 fix > [1] to JDK 8u20. > > Thank you, > Aleksej > > [1] JDK9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/d23c0eb930f7 > [2] Review thread: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-May/026855.html > [3] JBS bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8032901 From kumar.x.srinivasan at oracle.com Wed Jun 4 14:58:42 2014 From: kumar.x.srinivasan at oracle.com (Kumar Srinivasan) Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 07:58:42 -0700 Subject: [8u20]: Request for Review/Approval: JDK-8044046: [asm] refresh internal ASM version to v5.0.3 In-Reply-To: <538E18B3.4050108@oracle.com> References: <53890F1E.20808@oracle.com> <538DD8D7.5060002@oracle.com> <538DEEAC.5030305@oracle.com> <538E18B3.4050108@oracle.com> Message-ID: <538F3422.8000307@oracle.com> As an fyi, Since this changeset was thought to have created issues, but actually "not", just to play it safe I am delaying the push for 8u until jdk9-b17 is promoted which would contain the 9 version of this changeset. Kumar On 6/3/2014 11:49 AM, Se?n Coffey wrote: > Approved. > > regards, > Sean. > > On 03/06/2014 16:50, A. Sundararajan wrote: >> Hi Kumar, >> >> Looks good to me. >> >> -Sundar >> >> On Tuesday 03 June 2014 07:46 PM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote: >>> Hi Sundar, Paul, >>> >>> Can one of you review this ? the difference between the 9 and 8u >>> changeset is shown below, >>> once you two review, Sean will approve this for 8u. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Kumar >>> >>> On 5/30/2014 4:07 PM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote: >>>> Hello Paul, Sean, Sundar, >>>> >>>> Please review and approve the fix for: >>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044046 >>>> >>>> The JDK9 changesets (for ref) are here: >>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8044046/jdk9/webrev.00/ >>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/e95072225d17 >>>> >>>> The JDK8u changeset is here: >>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8044046/jdk8u/webrev.00/ >>>> >>>> The diffs between jdk9 and jdk8u are the same except for 8u two >>>> @SuppressWarnings are being added to keep the >>>> code in sync with jdk9, this will make the merges from ASM and >>>> ObjectWeb seamless. >>>> >>>> The two specific files are: >>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8044046/jdk8u/webrev.00/src/share/classes/jdk/internal/org/objectweb/asm/tree/MethodNode.java.udiff.html >>>> >>>> and >>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8044046/jdk8u/webrev.00/src/share/classes/jdk/internal/org/objectweb/asm/tree/analysis/AnalyzerException.java.udiff.html >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Kumar >>>> >>>> >>> >> > From xueming.shen at oracle.com Wed Jun 4 20:29:57 2014 From: xueming.shen at oracle.com (Xueming Shen) Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 13:29:57 -0700 Subject: [8u20] approval request for JDK-8044725: Bug in zlib 1.2.5 prevents inflation of some gzipped files Message-ID: <538F81C5.9020101@oracle.com> Hi, Please approve backport of the following fix from 9 to 8u20, the changeset (upgrade zlib version from 1.2.5 to 1.2.8) is the same. Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044725 JDK9 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/8044725/webrev JDK8u webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/8044725/8u20/webrev/ Thanks! -Sherman From naoto.sato at oracle.com Wed Jun 4 21:47:09 2014 From: naoto.sato at oracle.com (Naoto Sato) Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 14:47:09 -0700 Subject: [8u20] approval request for JDK-8044725: Bug in zlib 1.2.5 prevents inflation of some gzipped files In-Reply-To: <538F81C5.9020101@oracle.com> References: <538F81C5.9020101@oracle.com> Message-ID: <538F93DD.1050204@oracle.com> Approved. Naoto On 6/4/14, 1:29 PM, Xueming Shen wrote: > Hi, > > Please approve backport of the following fix from 9 to 8u20, the > changeset (upgrade > zlib version from 1.2.5 to 1.2.8) is the same. > > Issue: > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044725 > JDK9 webrev: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/8044725/webrev > JDK8u webrev: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/8044725/8u20/webrev/ > > Thanks! > -Sherman From xueming.shen at oracle.com Wed Jun 4 22:24:22 2014 From: xueming.shen at oracle.com (Xueming Shen) Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 15:24:22 -0700 Subject: [8u20] approval request for JDK-8044727: Problem reading the contents of some zip files Message-ID: <538F9C96.1030901@oracle.com> Hi, Please approve the backport of the following fix from 9 to 8u20, the changeset is identical. Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044727 JDK9 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/8044727/webrev/ JDK8u20 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/8044727/8u20/webrev/ Thanks! -Sherman From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Wed Jun 4 22:47:53 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 23:47:53 +0100 Subject: [8u20] approval request for JDK-8044727: Problem reading the contents of some zip files In-Reply-To: <538F9C96.1030901@oracle.com> References: <538F9C96.1030901@oracle.com> Message-ID: <538FA219.1000401@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 04/06/14 23:24, Xueming Shen wrote: > Hi, > > Please approve the backport of the following fix from 9 to 8u20, the > changeset is identical. > > Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044727 > JDK9 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/8044727/webrev/ > JDK8u20 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/8044727/8u20/webrev/ > > > Thanks! > -Sherman From sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com Thu Jun 5 04:07:29 2014 From: sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com (A. Sundararajan) Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 09:37:29 +0530 Subject: [8u20] 8044695: __stack__ becomes visible in Error properties Message-ID: <538FED01.30807@oracle.com> Please approve - copying jdk9 reviewers as I had to manually apply the diff on NativeError.java. Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044695 jdk9 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8044695/webrev.00/ jdk8u-dev webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8044695/8u-dev/webrev.00/ jdk9 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-June/003053.html jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/1987caf5e034 Thanks -Sundar From yekaterina.kantserova at oracle.com Thu Jun 5 09:31:13 2014 From: yekaterina.kantserova at oracle.com (Yekaterina Kantserova) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 02:31:13 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for CR 8043915: Tests get ClassNotFoundException: com.oracle.java.testlibrary.StreamPumper Message-ID: <1660f24c-fe42-4915-9acb-4b4666040264@default> Hi, Please approve the backport of following test fix: Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8043915 JDK9 change: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs-rt/hotspot/rev/a391f6c3cf22 Review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2014-May/014928.html Reviewers: sla, allwin The fix applies cleanly to http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/hs-dev/hotspot except test/serviceability/dcmd/DynLibDcmdTest.java which does not exist in jdk8u. Thanks, Katja From michael.x.mcmahon at oracle.com Thu Jun 5 11:25:12 2014 From: michael.x.mcmahon at oracle.com (Michael McMahon) Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 12:25:12 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for 8044766: New jdk.net classes have @since 1.9 tags in 8u20 Message-ID: <53905398.7090504@oracle.com> Hi, Could the following backport be approved please? The JDK 9 patch applies cleanly (trivial doc change) Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044766 JDK 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/9e8cddf3312e JDK 9 review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2014-June/008501.html Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/8044766/webrev.1/ Thanks, Michael. From sean.coffey at oracle.com Thu Jun 5 12:21:22 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 13:21:22 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for CR 8043915: Tests get ClassNotFoundException: com.oracle.java.testlibrary.StreamPumper In-Reply-To: <1660f24c-fe42-4915-9acb-4b4666040264@default> References: <1660f24c-fe42-4915-9acb-4b4666040264@default> Message-ID: <539060C2.3020502@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 05/06/2014 10:31, Yekaterina Kantserova wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > Please approve the backport of following test fix: > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8043915 > JDK9 change: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs-rt/hotspot/rev/a391f6c3cf22 > Review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2014-May/014928.html > Reviewers: sla, allwin > > The fix applies cleanly to http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/hs-dev/hotspot except test/serviceability/dcmd/DynLibDcmdTest.java which does not exist in jdk8u. > > Thanks, > Katja From marcus.lagergren at oracle.com Thu Jun 5 12:38:00 2014 From: marcus.lagergren at oracle.com (Marcus Lagergren) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 14:38:00 +0200 Subject: [8u20] 8044695: __stack__ becomes visible in Error properties In-Reply-To: <538FED01.30807@oracle.com> References: <538FED01.30807@oracle.com> Message-ID: Approved. On 05 Jun 2014, at 06:07, A. Sundararajan wrote: > Please approve - copying jdk9 reviewers as I had to manually apply the diff on NativeError.java. > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044695 > jdk9 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8044695/webrev.00/ > jdk8u-dev webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8044695/8u-dev/webrev.00/ > jdk9 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-June/003053.html > jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/1987caf5e034 > > Thanks > -Sundar > From sean.coffey at oracle.com Thu Jun 5 12:42:11 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 13:42:11 +0100 Subject: [8u20] 8044695: __stack__ becomes visible in Error properties In-Reply-To: References: <538FED01.30807@oracle.com> Message-ID: <539065A3.5050408@oracle.com> Approved for 8u20 push. regards, Sean. On 05/06/2014 13:38, Marcus Lagergren wrote: > Approved. > > On 05 Jun 2014, at 06:07, A. Sundararajan wrote: > >> Please approve - copying jdk9 reviewers as I had to manually apply the diff on NativeError.java. >> >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044695 >> jdk9 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8044695/webrev.00/ >> jdk8u-dev webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8044695/8u-dev/webrev.00/ >> jdk9 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-June/003053.html >> jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/1987caf5e034 >> >> Thanks >> -Sundar >> From attila.szegedi at oracle.com Thu Jun 5 12:43:21 2014 From: attila.szegedi at oracle.com (Attila Szegedi) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 14:43:21 +0200 Subject: [8u20] 8044695: __stack__ becomes visible in Error properties In-Reply-To: <538FED01.30807@oracle.com> References: <538FED01.30807@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5FC26F2E-ECD3-4E0E-B137-61A3A5E568E2@oracle.com> Approved. On Jun 5, 2014, at 6:07 AM, A. Sundararajan wrote: > Please approve - copying jdk9 reviewers as I had to manually apply the diff on NativeError.java. > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044695 > jdk9 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8044695/webrev.00/ > jdk8u-dev webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8044695/8u-dev/webrev.00/ > jdk9 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-June/003053.html > jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/1987caf5e034 > > Thanks > -Sundar > From vicente.romero at oracle.com Thu Jun 5 14:22:44 2014 From: vicente.romero at oracle.com (Vicente-Arturo Romero-Zaldivar) Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 15:22:44 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8041713: Type inference of non-existent method references crashes the compiler Message-ID: <53907D34.5080402@oracle.com> Hi, Please approve the back-port of the following fix from 9 to 8u20: JDK9 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8041713 JDK8u20 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8042977 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/b21c359c1fd1 Thanks, Vicente From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Thu Jun 5 14:29:36 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 15:29:36 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8041713: Type inference of non-existent method references crashes the compiler In-Reply-To: <53907D34.5080402@oracle.com> References: <53907D34.5080402@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53907ED0.9040609@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 05/06/14 15:22, Vicente-Arturo Romero-Zaldivar wrote: > Hi, > > Please approve the back-port of the following fix from 9 to 8u20: > > JDK9 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8041713 > JDK8u20 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8042977 > fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/b21c359c1fd1 > > Thanks, > Vicente From chris.hegarty at oracle.com Thu Jun 5 16:05:15 2014 From: chris.hegarty at oracle.com (Chris Hegarty) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 17:05:15 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for CR 8044590: Broken links in jre.api.net.socketoptions Message-ID: Hi 8u Maintainers, I would like to request approval for 8044590 for inclusion in 8u20 ( to be pushed to 8u-dev ). The 8u changes are identical to the JDK 9 changes. 8044590: Broken links in jre.api.net.socketoptions https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044590 JDK 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/da62865b6478 JDK 9 Review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2014-June/008500.html Thanks, -Chris. From sean.coffey at oracle.com Thu Jun 5 16:29:28 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 17:29:28 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for 8044766: New jdk.net classes have @since 1.9 tags in 8u20 In-Reply-To: <53905398.7090504@oracle.com> References: <53905398.7090504@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53909AE8.6020105@oracle.com> As per review thread update [1], let's just remove the @since tags for the 8u20 fix. Hopefully Chris is ok with that also. Approved. regards, Sean. [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2014-June/008506.html On 05/06/2014 12:25, Michael McMahon wrote: > Hi, > > Could the following backport be approved please? > The JDK 9 patch applies cleanly (trivial doc change) > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044766 > > JDK 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/9e8cddf3312e > > JDK 9 review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2014-June/008501.html > > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/8044766/webrev.1/ > > Thanks, > Michael. From chris.hegarty at oracle.com Thu Jun 5 16:43:31 2014 From: chris.hegarty at oracle.com (Chris Hegarty) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 17:43:31 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for 8044766: New jdk.net classes have @since 1.9 tags in 8u20 In-Reply-To: <53909AE8.6020105@oracle.com> References: <53905398.7090504@oracle.com> <53909AE8.6020105@oracle.com> Message-ID: <402D109C-36DD-412B-B986-C35599740202@oracle.com> > On 5 Jun 2014, at 17:29, Se?n Coffey wrote: > > As per review thread update [1], let's just remove the @since tags for the 8u20 fix. Hopefully Chris is ok with that also. Yes, this makes sense. -Chris. > > Approved. > > regards, > Sean. > > [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2014-June/008506.html > >> On 05/06/2014 12:25, Michael McMahon wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Could the following backport be approved please? >> The JDK 9 patch applies cleanly (trivial doc change) >> >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044766 >> >> JDK 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/9e8cddf3312e >> >> JDK 9 review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2014-June/008501.html >> >> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/8044766/webrev.1/ >> >> Thanks, >> Michael. > From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Thu Jun 5 16:49:30 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 17:49:30 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for CR 8044590: Broken links in jre.api.net.socketoptions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <53909F9A.3080603@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 05/06/14 17:05, Chris Hegarty wrote: > Hi 8u Maintainers, > > I would like to request approval for 8044590 for inclusion in 8u20 ( to be pushed to 8u-dev ). The 8u changes are identical to the JDK 9 changes. > > 8044590: Broken links in jre.api.net.socketoptions > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044590 > > JDK 9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/da62865b6478 > > JDK 9 Review thread: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2014-June/008500.html > > Thanks, > -Chris. From weijun.wang at oracle.com Fri Jun 6 14:43:04 2014 From: weijun.wang at oracle.com (Wang Weijun) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 22:43:04 +0800 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval: 8044747: [TESTBUG] Test sun/security/tools/policytool/i18n.sh fails after clicking 'Done' button in test frame Message-ID: Hi All This is a request to backport a simple jdk9 fix into jdk8u-dev. 8044747: [TESTBUG] Test sun/security/tools/policytool/i18n.sh fails after clicking 'Done' button in test frame The fix is already included in jdk9 as: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/a50ec15ca037 The patch for jdk8u-dev is identical to the one in jdk9. Thanks Weijun From sean.coffey at oracle.com Fri Jun 6 15:45:55 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 16:45:55 +0100 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval: 8044747: [TESTBUG] Test sun/security/tools/policytool/i18n.sh fails after clicking 'Done' button in test frame In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5391E233.9000404@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 06/06/14 15:43, Wang Weijun wrote: > Hi All > > This is a request to backport a simple jdk9 fix into jdk8u-dev. > > 8044747: [TESTBUG] Test sun/security/tools/policytool/i18n.sh fails after clicking 'Done' button in test frame > > The fix is already included in jdk9 as: > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/a50ec15ca037 > > The patch for jdk8u-dev is identical to the one in jdk9. > > Thanks > Weijun From sean.coffey at oracle.com Fri Jun 6 21:25:23 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 22:25:23 +0100 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for Approval : 8042789: org.omg.CORBA.ORBSingletonClass loading no longer uses context class Message-ID: <539231C3.6070309@oracle.com> Seeking approval to push this to jdk8u-dev. No plans to change behaviour in JDK 9. We'll maintain the new ORB classloading logic for that release. webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~coffeys/webrev.8042789/webrev/ bug : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8042789 Review thread : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-June/027163.html regards, Sean. From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Fri Jun 6 22:49:55 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 23:49:55 +0100 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for Approval : 8042789: org.omg.CORBA.ORBSingletonClass loading no longer uses context class In-Reply-To: <539231C3.6070309@oracle.com> References: <539231C3.6070309@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53924593.5080208@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 06/06/14 22:25, Se?n Coffey wrote: > Seeking approval to push this to jdk8u-dev. No plans to change > behaviour in JDK 9. We'll maintain the new ORB classloading logic for > that release. > > webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~coffeys/webrev.8042789/webrev/ > bug : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8042789 > Review thread : > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-June/027163.html > > regards, > Sean. From alejandro.murillo at oracle.com Fri Jun 6 23:40:19 2014 From: alejandro.murillo at oracle.com (Alejandro E Murillo) Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 17:40:19 -0600 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for bulk integration of hs25.20-b18 Message-ID: <53925163.1080501@oracle.com> Requesting approval to integrate hs25.20-b18 into jdk8u20-b18. A webrev is available at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amurillo/8u20/hs25.20-b18-jdk8u20-b18.webrev/ Pre-integration testing is in progress; the integration will proceed only after SQE has analyzed the results and approved. The fixes in the proposed integration are below. All have undergone nightly testing and are already in a jdk9 repository. 8011646: SEGV in compiled code with loop predication 8036823: Stack trace sometimes shows 'locked' instead of 'waiting to lock' 8038132: jprt bundles have libjsig.dylib in different place on OSX 8041979: sun/jvmstat/monitor/MonitoredVm/CR6672135.java failing on all platforms 8041980: (hotspot) sun/jvmstat/monitor/MonitoredVm/CR6672135.java failing on all platforms 8042310: TestStringDeduplicationMemoryUsage test failing 8043206: Fix signed vs. unsigned comparison warning in copy_sparc.hpp 8043354: OptimizePtrCompare too aggressive when allocations are present 8043413: REGRESSION: Hotspot causes segmentation fault in jdk8ux, but not in jdk7ux 8044437: new hotspot build - hs25.20-b18 -- Alejandro From sean.coffey at oracle.com Sat Jun 7 10:45:47 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2014 11:45:47 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for bulk integration of hs25.20-b18 In-Reply-To: <53925163.1080501@oracle.com> References: <53925163.1080501@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5392ED5B.6090102@oracle.com> Approved pending positive PIT results. regards, Sean. On 07/06/14 00:40, Alejandro E Murillo wrote: > Requesting approval to integrate hs25.20-b18 into jdk8u20-b18. > > A webrev is available at: > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amurillo/8u20/hs25.20-b18-jdk8u20-b18.webrev/ > > Pre-integration testing is in progress; the integration will proceed > only after SQE has analyzed the results and approved. > > The fixes in the proposed integration are below. All have undergone > nightly testing and are already in a jdk9 repository. > > 8011646: SEGV in compiled code with loop predication > 8036823: Stack trace sometimes shows 'locked' instead of 'waiting to > lock' > 8038132: jprt bundles have libjsig.dylib in different place on OSX > 8041979: sun/jvmstat/monitor/MonitoredVm/CR6672135.java failing on all > platforms > 8041980: (hotspot) sun/jvmstat/monitor/MonitoredVm/CR6672135.java > failing on all platforms > 8042310: TestStringDeduplicationMemoryUsage test failing > 8043206: Fix signed vs. unsigned comparison warning in copy_sparc.hpp > 8043354: OptimizePtrCompare too aggressive when allocations are present > 8043413: REGRESSION: Hotspot causes segmentation fault in jdk8ux, but > not in jdk7ux > 8044437: new hotspot build - hs25.20-b18 > From luchsh at linux.vnet.ibm.com Mon Jun 9 09:20:00 2014 From: luchsh at linux.vnet.ibm.com (Jonathan Lu) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 17:20:00 +0800 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval 8043954: Add async connect() support to NET_Connect() for AIX platform Message-ID: Hello, Could I have following JDK 9 change reviewed & ported to JDK 8u ? Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8043954 Change set in JDK 9 repository, which can be cleanly applied to 8u repository. http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/f0ae8bebfb14 Thanks Jonathan From sean.coffey at oracle.com Mon Jun 9 09:40:01 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 10:40:01 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval 8043954: Add async connect() support to NET_Connect() for AIX platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <539580F1.9050604@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 09/06/14 10:20, Jonathan Lu wrote: > Hello, > > Could I have following JDK 9 change reviewed & ported to JDK 8u ? > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8043954 > > > Change set in JDK 9 repository, which can be cleanly applied to 8u > repository. > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/f0ae8bebfb14 > > Thanks > Jonathan From vladimir.x.ivanov at oracle.com Mon Jun 9 11:46:03 2014 From: vladimir.x.ivanov at oracle.com (Vladimir Ivanov) Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 15:46:03 +0400 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8032400: JSR292: invokeSpecial: InternalError attempting to lookup a method Message-ID: <53959E7B.10601@oracle.com> Hello, Please, approve a backport of the fix from 9 to jdk8u-dev. https://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/JDK-8032400 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/56b7e029b7b6 http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-June/027132.html Thanks! Best regards, Vladimir Ivanov From sean.coffey at oracle.com Mon Jun 9 12:40:55 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 13:40:55 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8032400: JSR292: invokeSpecial: InternalError attempting to lookup a method In-Reply-To: <53959E7B.10601@oracle.com> References: <53959E7B.10601@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5395AB57.3070403@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 09/06/14 12:46, Vladimir Ivanov wrote: > Hello, > > Please, approve a backport of the fix from 9 to jdk8u-dev. > > https://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/JDK-8032400 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/56b7e029b7b6 > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-June/027132.html > > > Thanks! > > Best regards, > Vladimir Ivanov From vladimir.x.ivanov at oracle.com Mon Jun 9 13:20:07 2014 From: vladimir.x.ivanov at oracle.com (Vladimir Ivanov) Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 17:20:07 +0400 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8032400: JSR292: invokeSpecial: InternalError attempting to lookup a method In-Reply-To: <5395AB57.3070403@oracle.com> References: <53959E7B.10601@oracle.com> <5395AB57.3070403@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5395B487.3010307@oracle.com> Thank you, Sean. Best regards, Vladimir Ivanov On 6/9/14 4:40 PM, Se?n Coffey wrote: > Approved. > > regards, > Sean. > > On 09/06/14 12:46, Vladimir Ivanov wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Please, approve a backport of the fix from 9 to jdk8u-dev. >> >> https://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/JDK-8032400 >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/56b7e029b7b6 >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-June/027132.html >> >> >> Thanks! >> >> Best regards, >> Vladimir Ivanov > From maurizio.cimadamore at oracle.com Mon Jun 9 14:51:33 2014 From: maurizio.cimadamore at oracle.com (Maurizio Cimadamore) Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 15:51:33 +0100 Subject: [8u20] request for approval to backport JDK-8043725: javac fails with StackOverflowException Message-ID: <5395C9F5.8030506@oracle.com> Hello, I'd like to ask for an approval to backport fix for: Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8043725 Backport bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8046347 jdk9 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/a8ebc1d5cde9 The fix does *not* apply cleanly to: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/langtools because of some changes in JDK 9 that have not made into 8. However those changes are outside the context of the patch itself - and the code of the proposed backport is exactly the same as in 9. To be extra sure I checked that all reg tests still pass on the 'adapted' patch. Thanks Maurizio From sean.coffey at oracle.com Mon Jun 9 15:00:13 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 16:00:13 +0100 Subject: [8u20] request for approval to backport JDK-8043725: javac fails with StackOverflowException In-Reply-To: <5395C9F5.8030506@oracle.com> References: <5395C9F5.8030506@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5395CBFD.8090400@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 09/06/14 15:51, Maurizio Cimadamore wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to ask for an approval to backport fix for: > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8043725 > Backport bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8046347 > jdk9 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/a8ebc1d5cde9 > > The fix does *not* apply cleanly to: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/langtools because of some > changes in JDK 9 that have not made into 8. However those changes are > outside the context of the patch itself - and the code of the proposed > backport is exactly the same as in 9. To be extra sure I checked that > all reg tests still pass on the 'adapted' patch. > > Thanks > Maurizio From alejandro.murillo at oracle.com Tue Jun 10 18:44:40 2014 From: alejandro.murillo at oracle.com (Alejandro E Murillo) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:44:40 -0600 Subject: jdk8u20-b18: HotSpot Message-ID: <53975218.2000106@oracle.com> hs25.20-b18 has been integrated into jdk8u20-b18. http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/rev/1695032e51fa http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/corba/rev/2c5113522ce5 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/rev/11159d7ec804 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jaxp/rev/262363175ec8 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jaxws/rev/a3b85d6097c5 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/rev/266302e9c311 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/langtools/rev/a550336d045f http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/nashorn/rev/847387339a56 Component : VM Status : 0 major failures, 0 minor failures Date : 06/10/2014 at 13:00 MSK Tested By : STT_VM Cost(total man-days): 1 Workspace : 2014-06-06-175626.amurillo.hs25-20-b18-jdk8u20-b18-control Bundles : 2014-06-06-175626.amurillo.hs25-20-b18-jdk8u20-b18-control Platforms : Others Tests : link Log : link Browsers : NA Patches : NA Number of Tests Executed : 403188 passed tests, 5006 failed tests (no new failures) Bug verification status: ====================================== Tested, Pass: Tested, Pass (partial fixes): Tested, Fail: Untested bug fixes: 8011646: SEGV in compiled code with loop predication 8036823: Stack trace sometimes shows 'locked' instead of 'waiting to lock' 8038132: jprt bundles have libjsig.dylib in different place on OSX 8041979: sun/jvmstat/monitor/MonitoredVm/CR6672135.java failing on all platforms 8041980: (hotspot) sun/jvmstat/monitor/MonitoredVm/CR6672135.java failing on all platforms 8042310: TestStringDeduplicationMemoryUsage test failing 8043206: Fix signed vs. unsigned comparison warning in copy_sparc.hpp 8043354: OptimizePtrCompare too aggressive when allocations are present 8043413: REGRESSION: Hotspot causes segmentation fault in jdk8ux, but not in jdk7ux 8044437: new hotspot build - hs25.20-b18 New bugs filed: Bugs in PIT build: Bugs in earlier promoted build: Number of PIT requested: 1 Integration target J2SE build number: jdk8u20-b18 Issues and Notes: This is PIT for HS25.20-b18 for jdk8u20-b18. Go for integration. -- Alejandro From daniel.smith at oracle.com Tue Jun 10 18:45:24 2014 From: daniel.smith at oracle.com (Dan Smith) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:45:24 -0600 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for JDK-8037385: constant pool errors with -target 1.7 and static default methods Message-ID: Please approve this backport of langtools fix JDK-8037385 from 9 to 8u20. Bug report: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8037385 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/f7be68b3bd2e jdk9 reviewers: vromero, mcimadamore ?Dan From daniel.smith at oracle.com Tue Jun 10 21:28:58 2014 From: daniel.smith at oracle.com (Dan Smith) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 15:28:58 -0600 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for JDK-8015101: Covariance of return type implied by upper bounding on type parameter is ignored Message-ID: Please approve this backport of langtools fix JDK-8015101 from 9 to 8u20. Bug report: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8015101 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/71e241ea30f1 jdk9 reviewer: vromero ?Dan From sean.coffey at oracle.com Tue Jun 10 21:44:56 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?windows-1252?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 22:44:56 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for JDK-8037385: constant pool errors with -target 1.7 and static default methods In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <53977C58.6030201@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 10/06/2014 19:45, Dan Smith wrote: > Please approve this backport of langtools fix JDK-8037385 from 9 to 8u20. > > Bug report: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8037385 > Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/f7be68b3bd2e > jdk9 reviewers: vromero, mcimadamore > > ?Dan From sean.coffey at oracle.com Tue Jun 10 21:45:41 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?windows-1252?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 22:45:41 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for JDK-8015101: Covariance of return type implied by upper bounding on type parameter is ignored In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <53977C85.7090907@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 10/06/2014 22:28, Dan Smith wrote: > Please approve this backport of langtools fix JDK-8015101 from 9 to 8u20. > > Bug report: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8015101 > Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/71e241ea30f1 > jdk9 reviewer: vromero > > ?Dan From joel.franck at oracle.com Wed Jun 11 09:01:31 2014 From: joel.franck at oracle.com (Joel Borggren-Franck) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 11:01:31 +0200 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: JDK-8039916: AnnotatedType.getType() of a Executable parameters may return wrong type Message-ID: <20140611090131.GB31825@oracle.com> Hi Can I get approval to backport https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8039916 to 8u The 9 changeset, http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/a4138f3a3432 , applies cleanly Original review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-June/027096.html cheers /Joel From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Jun 11 09:36:22 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 10:36:22 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: JDK-8039916: AnnotatedType.getType() of a Executable parameters may return wrong type In-Reply-To: <20140611090131.GB31825@oracle.com> References: <20140611090131.GB31825@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53982316.4050206@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 11/06/14 10:01, Joel Borggren-Franck wrote: > Hi > > Can I get approval to backport https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8039916 to 8u > The 9 changeset, http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/a4138f3a3432 , > applies cleanly > Original review thread: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-June/027096.html > > cheers > /Joel From sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com Wed Jun 11 10:27:12 2014 From: sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com (A. Sundararajan) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 15:57:12 +0530 Subject: [8u20] approval request for 8044798: API for debugging Nashorn Message-ID: <53982F00.3040406@oracle.com> Please approve: Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044798 jdk9 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8044798/webrev.00/ jdk9 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-June/003069.html jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/71cfc5012321 jdk8u20 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8044798/8u20/webrev.00/ I had to adjust changes slightly for jdk8. I'm CC'ing jdk9 reviewers to okay the same. Changes are *) patch wouldn't apply "as is" on DebuggerSupport due to jdk9 specific code in jdk9 - but the current diff is applied manually. But actual change is same. *) JDK-8044798.js test adjusted to sort the output from valueInfosMethod so that the result is independent of order values of keys in the map returned by DebuggerSupport.valueInfos method. Thanks -Sundar From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Jun 11 10:35:19 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 11:35:19 +0100 Subject: [8u20] approval request for 8044798: API for debugging Nashorn In-Reply-To: <53982F00.3040406@oracle.com> References: <53982F00.3040406@oracle.com> Message-ID: <539830E7.9020801@oracle.com> Approved. Please be sure to get the changes reviewed also. regards, Sean. On 11/06/14 11:27, A. Sundararajan wrote: > Please approve: > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044798 > jdk9 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8044798/webrev.00/ > jdk9 review thread: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-June/003069.html > jdk9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/71cfc5012321 > > jdk8u20 webrev: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8044798/8u20/webrev.00/ > > I had to adjust changes slightly for jdk8. I'm CC'ing jdk9 reviewers > to okay the same. > > Changes are > *) patch wouldn't apply "as is" on DebuggerSupport due to jdk9 > specific code in jdk9 - but the current diff is applied manually. But > actual change is same. > > *) JDK-8044798.js test adjusted to sort the output from > valueInfosMethod so that the result is independent of order values of > keys in the map returned by DebuggerSupport.valueInfos method. > > Thanks > -Sundar From james.laskey at oracle.com Wed Jun 11 11:43:22 2014 From: james.laskey at oracle.com (Jim Laskey (Oracle)) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 08:43:22 -0300 Subject: [8u20] approval request for 8044798: API for debugging Nashorn In-Reply-To: <53982F00.3040406@oracle.com> References: <53982F00.3040406@oracle.com> Message-ID: <093AA2B7-0A30-4AA5-A501-E492B1448578@oracle.com> +1 On Jun 11, 2014, at 7:27 AM, A. Sundararajan wrote: > Please approve: > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044798 > jdk9 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8044798/webrev.00/ > jdk9 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-June/003069.html > jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/71cfc5012321 > > jdk8u20 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8044798/8u20/webrev.00/ > > I had to adjust changes slightly for jdk8. I'm CC'ing jdk9 reviewers to okay the same. > > Changes are > *) patch wouldn't apply "as is" on DebuggerSupport due to jdk9 specific code in jdk9 - but the current diff is applied manually. But actual change is same. > > *) JDK-8044798.js test adjusted to sort the output from valueInfosMethod so that the result is independent of order values of keys in the map returned by DebuggerSupport.valueInfos method. > > Thanks > -Sundar From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Jun 11 12:20:45 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 13:20:45 +0100 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval : 8033627: UTC+02:00 time zones are not detected correctly on Windows Message-ID: <5398499D.3020501@oracle.com> Looking to backport this tzmappings fix to 8u20. Patch applies cleanly. bug ID : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8033627 JDK 9 changeset : http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/d6585e6b53fe Review thread : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/i18n-dev/2014-May/001403.html Regards, Sean. From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Wed Jun 11 12:29:50 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 13:29:50 +0100 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval : 8033627: UTC+02:00 time zones are not detected correctly on Windows In-Reply-To: <5398499D.3020501@oracle.com> References: <5398499D.3020501@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53984BBE.9070904@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 11/06/14 13:20, Se?n Coffey wrote: > Looking to backport this tzmappings fix to 8u20. Patch applies cleanly. > > bug ID : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8033627 > JDK 9 changeset : > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/d6585e6b53fe > Review thread : > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/i18n-dev/2014-May/001403.html > > Regards, > Sean. > > From jan.lahoda at oracle.com Wed Jun 11 15:17:41 2014 From: jan.lahoda at oracle.com (Jan Lahoda) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 17:17:41 +0200 Subject: [8u20] request for approval to backport JDK-8031967: For some sources compiler compiles for ever Message-ID: <53987315.80801@oracle.com> Hello, I'd like to ask for an approval to backport fix for: Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8033287 Backport bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8046562 jdk9 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/1514b395e8e1 The fix does not apply cleanly to: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/langtools. However, the only difference between JDK 9 and JDK 8 patch is that one of the lines removed by the patch is using diamond operator in JDK 9 and is not using it in JDK 8. Thanks, Jan From jan.lahoda at oracle.com Wed Jun 11 16:31:40 2014 From: jan.lahoda at oracle.com (Jan Lahoda) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 18:31:40 +0200 Subject: [8u20] request for approval to backport JDK-8031967: For some sources compiler compiles for ever In-Reply-To: <53987315.80801@oracle.com> References: <53987315.80801@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5398846C.2080204@oracle.com> This e-mail has a wrong subject, sorry about that. Please ignore, I'll resend with a correct subject. Sorry, Jan On 11.6.2014 17:17, Jan Lahoda wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to ask for an approval to backport fix for: > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8033287 > Backport bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8046562 > jdk9 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/1514b395e8e1 > > The fix does not apply cleanly to: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/langtools. However, the only > difference between JDK 9 and JDK 8 patch is that one of the lines > removed by the patch is using diamond operator in JDK 9 and is not using > it in JDK 8. > > Thanks, > Jan From jan.lahoda at oracle.com Wed Jun 11 16:55:17 2014 From: jan.lahoda at oracle.com (Jan Lahoda) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 18:55:17 +0200 Subject: [8u20] request for approval to backport JDK-8033287: Reduce the size of the endPosTable Message-ID: <539889F5.7090502@oracle.com> Hello, I'd like to ask for an approval to backport fix for: Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8033287 Backport bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8046562 jdk9 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/1514b395e8e1 The fix does not apply cleanly to: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/langtools. However, the only difference between JDK 9 and JDK 8 patch is that one of the lines removed by the patch is using diamond operator in JDK 9 and is not using it in JDK 8. Thanks, Jan From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Jun 11 17:59:07 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 18:59:07 +0100 Subject: [8u20] request for approval to backport JDK-8033287: Reduce the size of the endPosTable In-Reply-To: <539889F5.7090502@oracle.com> References: <539889F5.7090502@oracle.com> Message-ID: <539898EB.7090604@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 11/06/14 17:55, Jan Lahoda wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to ask for an approval to backport fix for: > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8033287 > Backport bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8046562 > jdk9 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/1514b395e8e1 > > The fix does not apply cleanly to: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/langtools. However, the > only difference between JDK 9 and JDK 8 patch is that one of the lines > removed by the patch is using diamond operator in JDK 9 and is not > using it in JDK 8. > > Thanks, > Jan From david.dehaven at oracle.com Wed Jun 11 22:38:23 2014 From: david.dehaven at oracle.com (David DeHaven) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 15:38:23 -0700 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval, backport of 8026385, 8003900, 8042440, 8038027 Message-ID: <276BECEA-5ACA-483C-8280-6D1887D0AE95@oracle.com> The following fixes have been incubating in 9 and the backports are essentially unmodified. 8026385: [macosx] (awt) setjmp/longjmp changes the process signal mask on OS X http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/b5f284a0059b 8003900: X11 dependencies should be removed from Mac OS X build. http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/56024e323104 8042440: awt_Plugin no longer needed http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/75206fa5a43e 8038027: DTDBuilder should be run in headless mode http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/0eab6c63201d 8042440 and 8038027 have trivial conflicts due to minor surrounding differences but the actual changes are identical. I need a Committer to push for me, I have the closed source changes for 8026385 ready as well. 8042440 has changes in deploy but they were backported already. JPRT run resulted in 9 failures, all of which can be accounted for. Eight failures are due to: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8040038 The remaining failure is due to: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8039212 Neither fix has been backported to 8u yet. -DrD- From Sergey.Bylokhov at oracle.com Thu Jun 12 00:44:53 2014 From: Sergey.Bylokhov at oracle.com (Sergey Bylokhov) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 04:44:53 +0400 Subject: [8u] Request for approval for bulk integration of some client fixes Message-ID: <5398F805.9050306@oracle.com> Hello, These are a direct back-ports from jdk 9to jdk 8u. 8040113: File not initialized in src/share/native/sun/awt/giflib/dgif_lib.c Reviewed-by: Petr Pchelko, Phil Race jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/0b3012072c00 8041129: [OGL] surface->sw blit is extremely slow 8017626: [OGL] Translucent VolatileImages don't paint correctly 8046245: JDK 9 client build failure on Solaris Reviewed-by: Andrew Brygin, Jim Graham, Phil Race Review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2014-June/004618.html jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/294d463c7747 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/1d2849bfb7f8 8041644: [OGL] clip is ignored during surface->sw blit Reviewed-by: Andrew Brygin, Phil Race Review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2014-June/004640.html jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/4550c718ead3 8042103: Deserialization of empty java.awt.geom.Path2D will cause an exception Reviewed-by: Andrew Brygin, Jim Graham Review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2014-June/004639.html jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/57fd6448339f 8040271: Uninitialised memory in jdk/src/windows/native/sun/windows: awt_List.cpp, awt_InputMethod.cpp Reviewed-by: Petr Pchelko, Phil Race http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/d08ed3cf81da 8033786: White flashing when opening Dialogs and Menus using Nimbus with dark background Reviewed-by: Alexander Scherbatiy, Anthony Petrov Review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2014-June/008032.html jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/8bf432a31b39 -- Best regards, Sergey. From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Thu Jun 12 11:04:12 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 12:04:12 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval, backport of 8026385, 8003900, 8042440, 8038027 In-Reply-To: <276BECEA-5ACA-483C-8280-6D1887D0AE95@oracle.com> References: <276BECEA-5ACA-483C-8280-6D1887D0AE95@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5399892C.3030608@oracle.com> Hi David, if there are changes we generally err on the side of caution. Can you please get the new fixes reviewed? -Rob On 11/06/14 23:38, David DeHaven wrote: > The following fixes have been incubating in 9 and the backports are essentially unmodified. > > 8026385: [macosx] (awt) setjmp/longjmp changes the process signal mask on OS X > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/b5f284a0059b > > > 8003900: X11 dependencies should be removed from Mac OS X build. > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/56024e323104 > > > 8042440: awt_Plugin no longer needed > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/75206fa5a43e > > > 8038027: DTDBuilder should be run in headless mode > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/0eab6c63201d > > > 8042440 and 8038027 have trivial conflicts due to minor surrounding differences but the actual changes are identical. > > I need a Committer to push for me, I have the closed source changes for 8026385 ready as well. 8042440 has changes in deploy but they were backported already. > > > > JPRT run resulted in 9 failures, all of which can be accounted for. > > Eight failures are due to: > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8040038 > > The remaining failure is due to: > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8039212 > > Neither fix has been backported to 8u yet. > > -DrD- > From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Thu Jun 12 11:05:44 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 12:05:44 +0100 Subject: [8u] Request for approval for bulk integration of some client fixes In-Reply-To: <5398F805.9050306@oracle.com> References: <5398F805.9050306@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53998988.3070906@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 12/06/14 01:44, Sergey Bylokhov wrote: > Hello, > These are a direct back-ports from jdk 9to jdk 8u. > > 8040113: File not initialized in > src/share/native/sun/awt/giflib/dgif_lib.c > Reviewed-by: Petr Pchelko, Phil Race > jdk9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/0b3012072c00 > > 8041129: [OGL] surface->sw blit is extremely slow > 8017626: [OGL] Translucent VolatileImages don't paint correctly > 8046245: JDK 9 client build failure on Solaris > Reviewed-by: Andrew Brygin, Jim Graham, Phil Race > Review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2014-June/004618.html > jdk9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/294d463c7747 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/1d2849bfb7f8 > > 8041644: [OGL] clip is ignored during surface->sw blit > Reviewed-by: Andrew Brygin, Phil Race > Review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2014-June/004640.html > jdk9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/4550c718ead3 > > 8042103: Deserialization of empty java.awt.geom.Path2D will cause an > exception > Reviewed-by: Andrew Brygin, Jim Graham > Review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2014-June/004639.html > jdk9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/57fd6448339f > > 8040271: Uninitialised memory in jdk/src/windows/native/sun/windows: > awt_List.cpp, awt_InputMethod.cpp > Reviewed-by: Petr Pchelko, Phil Race > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/d08ed3cf81da > > 8033786: White flashing when opening Dialogs and Menus using Nimbus > with dark background > Reviewed-by: Alexander Scherbatiy, Anthony Petrov > Review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2014-June/008032.html > jdk9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/8bf432a31b39 > From sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com Thu Jun 12 13:24:23 2014 From: sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com (A. Sundararajan) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 18:54:23 +0530 Subject: [8u20] approval request for 8044517: Run & debug single Nashorn test Message-ID: <5399AA07.4060104@oracle.com> Please approve Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044517 jdk9 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8044517/webrev.00/ jdk9 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-June/003073.html jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/afba7593f395 jdk8u-dev webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8044517/8u20/webrev.00/ build.xml changes manually applied (as patch won't apply "as is"). CC'ing nashorn-dev. Thanks, -Sundar From sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com Thu Jun 12 14:05:25 2014 From: sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com (A. Sundararajan) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 19:35:25 +0530 Subject: [8u20] approval request for 8044517: Run & debug single Nashorn test In-Reply-To: <5399AA07.4060104@oracle.com> References: <5399AA07.4060104@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5399B3A5.8080103@oracle.com> Oops. Forgot CC to nashorn-dev. -Sundar On Thursday 12 June 2014 06:54 PM, A. Sundararajan wrote: > Please approve > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044517 > jdk9 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8044517/webrev.00/ > jdk9 review thread: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-June/003073.html > jdk9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/afba7593f395 > > jdk8u-dev webrev: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8044517/8u20/webrev.00/ > > build.xml changes manually applied (as patch won't apply "as is"). > CC'ing nashorn-dev. > > Thanks, > -Sundar From attila.szegedi at oracle.com Thu Jun 12 14:06:17 2014 From: attila.szegedi at oracle.com (Attila Szegedi) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 16:06:17 +0200 Subject: [8u20] approval request for 8044517: Run & debug single Nashorn test In-Reply-To: <5399AA07.4060104@oracle.com> References: <5399AA07.4060104@oracle.com> Message-ID: Approved. On Jun 12, 2014, at 3:24 PM, A. Sundararajan wrote: > Please approve > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044517 > jdk9 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8044517/webrev.00/ > jdk9 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-June/003073.html > jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/afba7593f395 > > jdk8u-dev webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8044517/8u20/webrev.00/ > > build.xml changes manually applied (as patch won't apply "as is"). CC'ing nashorn-dev. > > Thanks, > -Sundar From james.laskey at oracle.com Thu Jun 12 14:07:21 2014 From: james.laskey at oracle.com (Jim Laskey (Oracle)) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 11:07:21 -0300 Subject: [8u20] approval request for 8044517: Run & debug single Nashorn test In-Reply-To: <5399AA07.4060104@oracle.com> References: <5399AA07.4060104@oracle.com> Message-ID: Approve. On Jun 12, 2014, at 10:24 AM, A. Sundararajan wrote: > Please approve > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044517 > jdk9 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8044517/webrev.00/ > jdk9 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-June/003073.html > jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/afba7593f395 > > jdk8u-dev webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8044517/8u20/webrev.00/ > > build.xml changes manually applied (as patch won't apply "as is"). CC'ing nashorn-dev. > > Thanks, > -Sundar From david.dehaven at oracle.com Thu Jun 12 15:48:38 2014 From: david.dehaven at oracle.com (David DeHaven) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 08:48:38 -0700 Subject: [8u20] RFR: 8042440: awt_Plugin.h no longer needed Message-ID: <4FA85391-53F0-41B3-97D9-C6E32C933023@oracle.com> Please review the backport of JDK-8042440. The changes are identical to the JDK9 changes except for exactly one line: $ diff -Narup ~/Desktop/8042440-{8u,9} @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ diff --git a/src/solaris/native/sun/awt/ - - -#define REFLECT_VOID_FUNCTION(name, arglist, paramlist) \ --typedef name##_type arglist; \ +-typedef void name##_type arglist; \ -void name arglist \ -{ \ - static name##_type *name##_ptr = NULL; \ It seems someone added a void return type to the function being deleted, which resulted in the patch conflict, the end result is the same, all that code is deleted. JBS Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8042440 JDK 9 review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2014-May/007671.html Existing JDK9 patch: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/75206fa5a43e JDK 8u-dev webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ddehaven/8042440/8u-bp/ -DrD- From david.dehaven at oracle.com Thu Jun 12 15:55:56 2014 From: david.dehaven at oracle.com (David DeHaven) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 08:55:56 -0700 Subject: [8u20] RFR: 8038027: DTDBuilder should be run in headless mode Message-ID: Please review my trivial backport of JDK-8038027. The actual change is identical to 9, the difference is the surrounding $(JAVA) is $(JAVA_SMALL) in JDK 9. JBS Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038027 JDK 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/0eab6c63201d JDK 9 review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2014-March/012182.html 8u patch: --- cut here --- diff --git a/make/Tools.gmk b/make/Tools.gmk --- a/make/Tools.gmk +++ b/make/Tools.gmk @@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ build.tools.generatecharacter.CharacterName TOOL_DTDBUILDER = $(JAVA) -Ddtd_home=$(JDK_TOPDIR)/make/data/dtdbuilder \ + -Djava.awt.headless=true \ -cp $(JDK_OUTPUTDIR)/btclasses build.tools.dtdbuilder.DTDBuilder TOOL_GENERATEBREAKITERATORDATA = $(JAVA) \ --- cut here --- -DrD- From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Thu Jun 12 16:59:45 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 17:59:45 +0100 Subject: [8u20] approval request for 8044517: Run & debug single Nashorn test In-Reply-To: References: <5399AA07.4060104@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5399DC81.8020505@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 12/06/14 15:07, Jim Laskey (Oracle) wrote: > Approve. > > On Jun 12, 2014, at 10:24 AM, A. Sundararajan wrote: > >> Please approve >> >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044517 >> jdk9 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8044517/webrev.00/ >> jdk9 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-June/003073.html >> jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/afba7593f395 >> >> jdk8u-dev webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8044517/8u20/webrev.00/ >> >> build.xml changes manually applied (as patch won't apply "as is"). CC'ing nashorn-dev. >> >> Thanks, >> -Sundar From omajid at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 17:34:38 2014 From: omajid at redhat.com (Omair Majid) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 13:34:38 -0400 Subject: Hotspot changes for 8u20 In-Reply-To: <52D6DFD8.10408@oracle.com> References: <52D6C12B.8060103@oracle.com> <52D6C414.9010906@oracle.com> <52D6CE0A.7070903@oracle.com> <52D6DFD8.10408@oracle.com> Message-ID: <20140612173437.GF2069@redhat.com> * Alejandro E Murillo [2014-01-15 14:24]: > The process to get hotspot changes for 8u20 is the same > as the one to get changes for 7u releases. In a nutshell: > > (1) Request a review (not permission) on hotspot-dev at openjdk > (2) Push to jdk8u/hs-dev/hotspot (via jprt) > (3) NO NEED TO REQUEST approval for integration > > once the changes are in hs-dev, I will push then to the master after PIT > and I will request the approval for a bulk integration then Would it be possible to add this note to the project page? http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8u/ doesn't mention this special workflow for hotspot at all. Thanks, Omair -- PGP Key: 66484681 (http://pgp.mit.edu/) Fingerprint = F072 555B 0A17 3957 4E95 0056 F286 F14F 6648 4681 From alejandro.murillo at oracle.com Thu Jun 12 17:50:03 2014 From: alejandro.murillo at oracle.com (Alejandro E Murillo) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 11:50:03 -0600 Subject: Hotspot changes for 8u20 In-Reply-To: <20140612173437.GF2069@redhat.com> References: <52D6C12B.8060103@oracle.com> <52D6C414.9010906@oracle.com> <52D6CE0A.7070903@oracle.com> <52D6DFD8.10408@oracle.com> <20140612173437.GF2069@redhat.com> Message-ID: <5399E84B.8000103@oracle.com> On 6/12/2014 11:34 AM, Omair Majid wrote: > * Alejandro E Murillo [2014-01-15 14:24]: >> The process to get hotspot changes for 8u20 is the same >> as the one to get changes for 7u releases. In a nutshell: >> >> (1) Request a review (not permission) on hotspot-dev at openjdk >> (2) Push to jdk8u/hs-dev/hotspot (via jprt) >> (3) NO NEED TO REQUEST approval for integration >> >> once the changes are in hs-dev, I will push then to the master after PIT >> and I will request the approval for a bulk integration then > Would it be possible to add this note to the project page? > http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8u/ doesn't mention this special > workflow for hotspot at all. > > Thanks, > Omair > yes. I've been meaning to get a wiki with all that info, for all the active hotspot dev repo info but in the mean time I'll work with the owner of that page to add that info Thanks -- Alejandro From paul.govereau at oracle.com Thu Jun 12 19:40:21 2014 From: paul.govereau at oracle.com (Paul Govereau) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 15:40:21 -0400 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for JDK-8029042/8027886 - receiver parameters Message-ID: <539A0225.5050703@oracle.com> Please consider the following changeset for inclusion in 8udev/langtools http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/40d829674bb4 which fixes the following bugs: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029042 Receiver parameter not supported on local class constructor https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8027886 javac allows illegal receiver parameters Thanks, Paul From mike.duigou at oracle.com Thu Jun 12 20:30:53 2014 From: mike.duigou at oracle.com (Mike Duigou) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 13:30:53 -0700 Subject: Request for Approval: 804608 : inserting null key into HashMap treebin fails Message-ID: <4B3FD0F3-E402-4655-A5EA-927FDCCBB34B@oracle.com> Hello all; This is a small but very high-priority (P2) fix from JDK9. The proposed patch applies cleanly to JDK8 (modulo line number change). The change has been baking in JDK 9 for about a week. jbsbug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8046085 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mduigou/JDK-8046085/0/webrev/ changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/c9fe43f1cddb Mike From michael.x.mcmahon at oracle.com Fri Jun 13 14:22:39 2014 From: michael.x.mcmahon at oracle.com (Michael McMahon) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 15:22:39 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for 8046588 test for SO_FLOW_SLA availability does not check for EACCESS Message-ID: <539B092F.8050706@oracle.com> Could I get the following change approved for 8u20 please? The patch is identical to the JDK 9 version and applies cleanly. Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/8046588/webrev.1/ JDK 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/431cce1509b5 JDK 9 review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2014-June/008523.html Thanks, Michael From michael.fang at oracle.com Fri Jun 13 15:12:17 2014 From: michael.fang at oracle.com (Michael Fang) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 08:12:17 -0700 Subject: [8u20] request for approval to backport 8037343: Wrong dateformat for locale es_DO Message-ID: <539B14D1.2040803@oracle.com> Hello, Please approve this backport from JDK9 to 8u20. Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8037343 Bugport bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8046757 jdk9 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/baffcaf51b02 The fix does not apply cleanly to http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk . However, the only different between JDK9 and JDK8u is in the list of bugs section of a test case: test/sun/text/resources/LocaleDataTest.java. jdk9 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mfang/8037343/webrev.00/ jdk8u webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mfang/8037343/8u20/webrev.00/ jdk8u review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/i18n-dev/2014-June/001409.html thanks, -michael From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Fri Jun 13 15:14:25 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 16:14:25 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for JDK-8029042/8027886 - receiver parameters In-Reply-To: <539A0225.5050703@oracle.com> References: <539A0225.5050703@oracle.com> Message-ID: <539B1551.2000901@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 12/06/14 20:40, Paul Govereau wrote: > Please consider the following changeset for inclusion in 8udev/langtools > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/40d829674bb4 > > which fixes the following bugs: > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029042 > Receiver parameter not supported on local class constructor > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8027886 > javac allows illegal receiver parameters > > Thanks, > Paul From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Fri Jun 13 15:15:39 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 16:15:39 +0100 Subject: Request for Approval: 8046085 : inserting null key into HashMap treebin fails In-Reply-To: <4B3FD0F3-E402-4655-A5EA-927FDCCBB34B@oracle.com> References: <4B3FD0F3-E402-4655-A5EA-927FDCCBB34B@oracle.com> Message-ID: <539B159B.3070501@oracle.com> Approved, review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-June/027167.html -Rob On 12/06/14 21:30, Mike Duigou wrote: > Hello all; > > This is a small but very high-priority (P2) fix from JDK9. The proposed patch applies cleanly to JDK8 (modulo line number change). The change has been baking in JDK 9 for about a week. > > jbsbug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8046085 > webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mduigou/JDK-8046085/0/webrev/ > changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/c9fe43f1cddb > > Mike From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Fri Jun 13 15:16:03 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 16:16:03 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for 8046588 test for SO_FLOW_SLA availability does not check for EACCESS In-Reply-To: <539B092F.8050706@oracle.com> References: <539B092F.8050706@oracle.com> Message-ID: <539B15B3.1090709@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 13/06/14 15:22, Michael McMahon wrote: > Could I get the following change approved for 8u20 please? > The patch is identical to the JDK 9 version and applies cleanly. > > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/8046588/webrev.1/ > > JDK 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/431cce1509b5 > > JDK 9 review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2014-June/008523.html > > Thanks, > Michael From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Fri Jun 13 15:19:26 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 16:19:26 +0100 Subject: [8u20] request for approval to backport 8037343: Wrong dateformat for locale es_DO In-Reply-To: <539B14D1.2040803@oracle.com> References: <539B14D1.2040803@oracle.com> Message-ID: <539B167E.1070805@oracle.com> Approved. (given the trivial nature of the difference between versions) Please include the review thread in approval mails: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-May/026898.html -Rob On 13/06/14 16:12, Michael Fang wrote: > Hello, > > Please approve this backport from JDK9 to 8u20. > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8037343 > Bugport bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8046757 > jdk9 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/baffcaf51b02 > > The fix does not apply cleanly to > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk . However, the only > different between JDK9 and JDK8u is in the list of bugs section of a > test case: test/sun/text/resources/LocaleDataTest.java. > > jdk9 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mfang/8037343/webrev.00/ > jdk8u webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mfang/8037343/8u20/webrev.00/ > jdk8u review thread: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/i18n-dev/2014-June/001409.html > > thanks, > > -michael From michael.fang at oracle.com Fri Jun 13 16:10:19 2014 From: michael.fang at oracle.com (Michael Fang) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 09:10:19 -0700 Subject: [8u20] request for approval to backport 8037343: Wrong dateformat for locale es_DO In-Reply-To: <539B167E.1070805@oracle.com> References: <539B14D1.2040803@oracle.com> <539B167E.1070805@oracle.com> Message-ID: <539B226B.9050804@oracle.com> Thank you Rob. The review thread was included: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/i18n-dev/2014-June/001409.html :) thanks, -michae On 14?06?13? 08:19 ??, Rob McKenna wrote: > Approved. (given the trivial nature of the difference between versions) > > Please include the review thread in approval mails: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-May/026898.html > > -Rob > > On 13/06/14 16:12, Michael Fang wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Please approve this backport from JDK9 to 8u20. >> >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8037343 >> Bugport bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8046757 >> jdk9 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/baffcaf51b02 >> >> The fix does not apply cleanly to >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk . However, the only >> different between JDK9 and JDK8u is in the list of bugs section of a >> test case: test/sun/text/resources/LocaleDataTest.java. >> >> jdk9 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mfang/8037343/webrev.00/ >> jdk8u webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mfang/8037343/8u20/webrev.00/ >> jdk8u review thread: >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/i18n-dev/2014-June/001409.html >> >> thanks, >> >> -michael > From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Fri Jun 13 17:59:35 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 18:59:35 +0100 Subject: [8u20] request for approval to backport 8037343: Wrong dateformat for locale es_DO In-Reply-To: <539B226B.9050804@oracle.com> References: <539B14D1.2040803@oracle.com> <539B167E.1070805@oracle.com> <539B226B.9050804@oracle.com> Message-ID: <539B3C07.9030607@oracle.com> Ah! Apologies, thanks Michael. -Rob On 13/06/14 17:10, Michael Fang wrote: > Thank you Rob. > > The review thread was included: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/i18n-dev/2014-June/001409.html :) > > thanks, > > -michae > > On 14?06?13? 08:19 ??, Rob McKenna wrote: >> Approved. (given the trivial nature of the difference between versions) >> >> Please include the review thread in approval mails: >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-May/026898.html >> >> -Rob >> >> On 13/06/14 16:12, Michael Fang wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> Please approve this backport from JDK9 to 8u20. >>> >>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8037343 >>> Bugport bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8046757 >>> jdk9 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/baffcaf51b02 >>> >>> The fix does not apply cleanly to >>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk . However, the only >>> different between JDK9 and JDK8u is in the list of bugs section of a >>> test case: test/sun/text/resources/LocaleDataTest.java. >>> >>> jdk9 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mfang/8037343/webrev.00/ >>> jdk8u webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mfang/8037343/8u20/webrev.00/ >>> jdk8u review thread: >>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/i18n-dev/2014-June/001409.html >>> >>> thanks, >>> >>> -michael >> From michael.fang at oracle.com Fri Jun 13 18:05:59 2014 From: michael.fang at oracle.com (Michael Fang) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 11:05:59 -0700 Subject: [8u20] request for approval to backport 8037343: Wrong dateformat for locale es_DO In-Reply-To: <539B3C07.9030607@oracle.com> References: <539B14D1.2040803@oracle.com> <539B167E.1070805@oracle.com> <539B226B.9050804@oracle.com> <539B3C07.9030607@oracle.com> Message-ID: <539B3D87.30807@oracle.com> No problem :) -michael On 14?06?13? 10:59 ??, Rob McKenna wrote: > Ah! Apologies, thanks Michael. > > -Rob > > On 13/06/14 17:10, Michael Fang wrote: >> Thank you Rob. >> >> The review thread was included: >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/i18n-dev/2014-June/001409.html :) >> >> thanks, >> >> -michae >> >> On 14?06?13? 08:19 ??, Rob McKenna wrote: >>> Approved. (given the trivial nature of the difference between versions) >>> >>> Please include the review thread in approval mails: >>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-May/026898.html >>> >>> -Rob >>> >>> On 13/06/14 16:12, Michael Fang wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> Please approve this backport from JDK9 to 8u20. >>>> >>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8037343 >>>> Bugport bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8046757 >>>> jdk9 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/baffcaf51b02 >>>> >>>> The fix does not apply cleanly to >>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk . However, the only >>>> different between JDK9 and JDK8u is in the list of bugs section of >>>> a test case: test/sun/text/resources/LocaleDataTest.java. >>>> >>>> jdk9 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mfang/8037343/webrev.00/ >>>> jdk8u webrev: >>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mfang/8037343/8u20/webrev.00/ >>>> jdk8u review thread: >>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/i18n-dev/2014-June/001409.html >>>> >>>> thanks, >>>> >>>> -michael >>> > From daniel.smith at oracle.com Fri Jun 13 18:34:32 2014 From: daniel.smith at oracle.com (Dan Smith) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 12:34:32 -0600 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for JDK-8046762: Revert some inference fixes in JDK-8033718 Message-ID: <4FA902CC-03DF-4B66-A7D8-81274DD94E52@oracle.com> This is an 8u-only patch to stabilize the javac type inference behavior in 8u while we pursue additional bug fixes in 9 only. Bug report:https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8046762 Review (patch is inline): http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/compiler-dev/2014-June/008852.html ?Dan From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Fri Jun 13 18:58:09 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 19:58:09 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for JDK-8046762: Revert some inference fixes in JDK-8033718 In-Reply-To: <4FA902CC-03DF-4B66-A7D8-81274DD94E52@oracle.com> References: <4FA902CC-03DF-4B66-A7D8-81274DD94E52@oracle.com> Message-ID: <539B49C1.6070707@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 13/06/14 19:34, Dan Smith wrote: > This is an 8u-only patch to stabilize the javac type inference behavior in 8u while we pursue additional bug fixes in 9 only. > > Bug report:https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8046762 > Review (patch is inline): http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/compiler-dev/2014-June/008852.html > > ?Dan From david.dehaven at oracle.com Fri Jun 13 21:43:10 2014 From: david.dehaven at oracle.com (David DeHaven) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 14:43:10 -0700 Subject: [8u20] RFR: 8042440: awt_Plugin.h no longer needed In-Reply-To: <4FA85391-53F0-41B3-97D9-C6E32C933023@oracle.com> References: <4FA85391-53F0-41B3-97D9-C6E32C933023@oracle.com> Message-ID: <9BAC6F0F-E54D-41E0-89DE-2D73C65CD35E@oracle.com> In my haste I forgot to post to awt-dev... Can someone please review this backport to 8u? The differences are trivial from the 9 changes. -DrD- > > Please review the backport of JDK-8042440. The changes are identical to the JDK9 changes except for exactly one line: > > $ diff -Narup ~/Desktop/8042440-{8u,9} > @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ diff --git a/src/solaris/native/sun/awt/ > - > - > -#define REFLECT_VOID_FUNCTION(name, arglist, paramlist) \ > --typedef name##_type arglist; \ > +-typedef void name##_type arglist; \ > -void name arglist \ > -{ \ > - static name##_type *name##_ptr = NULL; \ > > It seems someone added a void return type to the function being deleted, which resulted in the patch conflict, the end result is the same, all that code is deleted. > > > JBS Issue: > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8042440 > > JDK 9 review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2014-May/007671.html > > Existing JDK9 patch: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/75206fa5a43e > > JDK 8u-dev webrev: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ddehaven/8042440/8u-bp/ > > -DrD- > From david.dehaven at oracle.com Fri Jun 13 21:44:27 2014 From: david.dehaven at oracle.com (David DeHaven) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 14:44:27 -0700 Subject: [8u20] RFR: 8038027: DTDBuilder should be run in headless mode In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <7B80EEDA-26C8-4A73-9EBF-77D37D280FF0@oracle.com> And now actually including build-dev... Please review this slightly different backport of JDK-8038027 to 8u. -DrD- > > Please review my trivial backport of JDK-8038027. The actual change is identical to 9, the difference is the surrounding $(JAVA) is $(JAVA_SMALL) in JDK 9. > > JBS Issue: > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038027 > > JDK 9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/0eab6c63201d > > JDK 9 review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2014-March/012182.html > > 8u patch: > --- cut here --- > diff --git a/make/Tools.gmk b/make/Tools.gmk > --- a/make/Tools.gmk > +++ b/make/Tools.gmk > @@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ > build.tools.generatecharacter.CharacterName > > TOOL_DTDBUILDER = $(JAVA) -Ddtd_home=$(JDK_TOPDIR)/make/data/dtdbuilder \ > + -Djava.awt.headless=true \ > -cp $(JDK_OUTPUTDIR)/btclasses build.tools.dtdbuilder.DTDBuilder > > TOOL_GENERATEBREAKITERATORDATA = $(JAVA) \ > --- cut here --- > > -DrD- > From alejandro.murillo at oracle.com Fri Jun 13 22:56:03 2014 From: alejandro.murillo at oracle.com (Alejandro E Murillo) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 16:56:03 -0600 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for bulk integration of hs25.20-b19 Message-ID: <539B8183.3050704@oracle.com> Requesting approval to integrate hs25.20-b19 into jdk8u20-b19. A webrev is available at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amurillo/8u20/hs25.20-b19-jdk8u20-b19.webrev/ Pre-integration testing is in progress; the integration will proceed only after SQE has analyzed the results and approved. The fixes in the proposed integration are below. All have undergone nightly testing and are already in a jdk9 repository. 8029381: assert(is_method_type()) failed: bad cast 8032410: compiler/uncommontrap/TestStackBangRbp.java times out on Solaris-Sparc V9 8034188: OSR methods may not be recompiled at proper compilation level 8040244: compiler/whitebox/IsMethodCompilableTest.java fails 8042933: assert(capacity_until_gc >= committed_bytes) failed 8043239: G1: Missing post barrier in processing of j.l.ref.Reference objects 8043915: Tests get ClassNotFoundException: com.oracle.java.testlibrary.StreamPumper 8046232: new hotspot build - hs25.20-b19 8046275: Fastdebug build failing on jdk9/hs/ control jobs after pulling some hs-comp changes 8046287: [TESTBUG] runtime/Thread/TestThreadDumpMonitorContention.java failed error_cnt=12 8046516: Segmentation fault in JVM (easily reproducible) -- Alejandro From anthony.petrov at oracle.com Mon Jun 16 18:43:06 2014 From: anthony.petrov at oracle.com (Anthony Petrov) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 22:43:06 +0400 Subject: [8u20] RFR: 8042440: awt_Plugin.h no longer needed In-Reply-To: <9BAC6F0F-E54D-41E0-89DE-2D73C65CD35E@oracle.com> References: <4FA85391-53F0-41B3-97D9-C6E32C933023@oracle.com> <9BAC6F0F-E54D-41E0-89DE-2D73C65CD35E@oracle.com> Message-ID: <539F3ABA.9010703@oracle.com> Looks fine to me. Approved. -- best regards, Anthony On 6/14/2014 1:43 AM, David DeHaven wrote: > > In my haste I forgot to post to awt-dev... > > Can someone please review this backport to 8u? The differences are trivial from the 9 changes. > > -DrD- > >> >> Please review the backport of JDK-8042440. The changes are identical to the JDK9 changes except for exactly one line: >> >> $ diff -Narup ~/Desktop/8042440-{8u,9} >> @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ diff --git a/src/solaris/native/sun/awt/ >> - >> - >> -#define REFLECT_VOID_FUNCTION(name, arglist, paramlist) \ >> --typedef name##_type arglist; \ >> +-typedef void name##_type arglist; \ >> -void name arglist \ >> -{ \ >> - static name##_type *name##_ptr = NULL; \ >> >> It seems someone added a void return type to the function being deleted, which resulted in the patch conflict, the end result is the same, all that code is deleted. >> >> >> JBS Issue: >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8042440 >> >> JDK 9 review: >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2014-May/007671.html >> >> Existing JDK9 patch: >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/75206fa5a43e >> >> JDK 8u-dev webrev: >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ddehaven/8042440/8u-bp/ >> >> -DrD- >> > From anthony.petrov at oracle.com Mon Jun 16 20:55:30 2014 From: anthony.petrov at oracle.com (Anthony Petrov) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 00:55:30 +0400 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for 8033233 and 8029455 Message-ID: <539F59C2.6010407@oracle.com> Hello, JavaFX team requests an approval to back-port the following two fixes from JDK 9 to JDK 8u20: 8033233: [JLightweightFrame] support default JViewport BLIT_SCROLL_MODE https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8033233 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/903396918a8b http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ant/JDK-8033233/webrev.1 http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2014-January/003231.html 8029455: [JLightweightFrame] support scaled painting https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029455 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/c5bcb5902a70 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8029455/webrev.02 http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2014-May/007734.html Both patches apply cleanly to 8u-dev apart from conflicts in copyright-header years changes in 3 files which I've updated manually (trivial changes). -- best regards, Anthony From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Mon Jun 16 23:20:35 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 00:20:35 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for 8033233 and 8029455 In-Reply-To: <539F59C2.6010407@oracle.com> References: <539F59C2.6010407@oracle.com> Message-ID: <539F7BC3.6050307@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 16/06/14 21:55, Anthony Petrov wrote: > Hello, > > JavaFX team requests an approval to back-port the following two fixes > from JDK 9 to JDK 8u20: > > > 8033233: [JLightweightFrame] support default JViewport BLIT_SCROLL_MODE > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8033233 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/903396918a8b > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ant/JDK-8033233/webrev.1 > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2014-January/003231.html > > > 8029455: [JLightweightFrame] support scaled painting > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029455 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/c5bcb5902a70 > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8029455/webrev.02 > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2014-May/007734.html > > > Both patches apply cleanly to 8u-dev apart from conflicts in > copyright-header years changes in 3 files which I've updated manually > (trivial changes). > > -- > best regards, > Anthony From joel.franck at oracle.com Tue Jun 17 04:47:45 2014 From: joel.franck at oracle.com (=?windows-1252?Q?Joel_Borggr=E9n-Franck?=) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 06:47:45 +0200 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: JDK-8029674: (reflect) getMethods returns default methods that are not members of the class Message-ID: <7DF7AC24-BF4E-4E7C-806E-B2C14F5F69AF@oracle.com> Hi, Can I get approval to back port: http://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029674 to 8u20 9 change didn?t apply cleanly, there was one trivial diff of a for that had been changed to a for-each in 9 and not back ported, so I did a separate review for 8u20: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-June/027218.html Original review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-June/027173.html cheers /Joel From anton.tarasov at oracle.com Tue Jun 17 07:42:17 2014 From: anton.tarasov at oracle.com (Anton V. Tarasov) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:42:17 +0400 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for 8033233 and 8029455 In-Reply-To: <539F59C2.6010407@oracle.com> References: <539F59C2.6010407@oracle.com> Message-ID: <539FF159.70702@oracle.com> Hi Anthony, I'm fine with it. Thanks, Anton. On 6/17/14 12:55 AM, Anthony Petrov wrote: > Hello, > > JavaFX team requests an approval to back-port the following two fixes > from JDK 9 to JDK 8u20: > > > 8033233: [JLightweightFrame] support default JViewport BLIT_SCROLL_MODE > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8033233 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/903396918a8b > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ant/JDK-8033233/webrev.1 > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2014-January/003231.html > > > 8029455: [JLightweightFrame] support scaled painting > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029455 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/c5bcb5902a70 > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8029455/webrev.02 > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2014-May/007734.html > > > Both patches apply cleanly to 8u-dev apart from conflicts in > copyright-header years changes in 3 files which I've updated manually > (trivial changes). > > -- > best regards, > Anthony From vladimir.x.ivanov at oracle.com Tue Jun 17 09:29:36 2014 From: vladimir.x.ivanov at oracle.com (Vladimir Ivanov) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:29:36 +0400 Subject: [8u] Request for approval: 8046903: VM anonymous class members can't be statically invocable Message-ID: <53A00A80.5040009@oracle.com> Hello, Please, approve a backport of the fix from 9 to 8u-dev. https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8046903 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/9ffe170f236f http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-June/027214.html Thanks! Best regards, Vladimir Ivanov From sean.coffey at oracle.com Tue Jun 17 10:34:37 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:34:37 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for bulk integration of hs25.20-b19 In-Reply-To: <539B8183.3050704@oracle.com> References: <539B8183.3050704@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53A019BD.6070206@oracle.com> Approved pending positive PIT results. regards, Sean. On 13/06/2014 23:56, Alejandro E Murillo wrote: > Requesting approval to integrate hs25.20-b19 into jdk8u20-b19. > > A webrev is available at: > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amurillo/8u20/hs25.20-b19-jdk8u20-b19.webrev/ > > Pre-integration testing is in progress; the integration will proceed > only after SQE has analyzed the results and approved. > > The fixes in the proposed integration are below. All have undergone > nightly testing and are already in a jdk9 repository. > > 8029381: assert(is_method_type()) failed: bad cast > 8032410: compiler/uncommontrap/TestStackBangRbp.java times out on > Solaris-Sparc V9 > 8034188: OSR methods may not be recompiled at proper compilation level > 8040244: compiler/whitebox/IsMethodCompilableTest.java fails > 8042933: assert(capacity_until_gc >= committed_bytes) failed > 8043239: G1: Missing post barrier in processing of j.l.ref.Reference > objects > 8043915: Tests get ClassNotFoundException: > com.oracle.java.testlibrary.StreamPumper > 8046232: new hotspot build - hs25.20-b19 > 8046275: Fastdebug build failing on jdk9/hs/ control jobs after > pulling some hs-comp changes > 8046287: [TESTBUG] runtime/Thread/TestThreadDumpMonitorContention.java > failed error_cnt=12 > 8046516: Segmentation fault in JVM (easily reproducible) > From sean.coffey at oracle.com Tue Jun 17 10:47:20 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?windows-1252?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:47:20 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: JDK-8029674: (reflect) getMethods returns default methods that are not members of the class In-Reply-To: <7DF7AC24-BF4E-4E7C-806E-B2C14F5F69AF@oracle.com> References: <7DF7AC24-BF4E-4E7C-806E-B2C14F5F69AF@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53A01CB8.9010207@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 17/06/2014 05:47, Joel Borggr?n-Franck wrote: > Hi, > > Can I get approval to back port: http://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029674 to 8u20 > > 9 change didn?t apply cleanly, there was one trivial diff of a for that had been changed to a for-each in 9 and not back ported, so I did a separate review for 8u20: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-June/027218.html > > Original review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-June/027173.html > > cheers > /Joel From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Tue Jun 17 11:57:03 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 12:57:03 +0100 Subject: [8u] Request for approval: 8046903: VM anonymous class members can't be statically invocable In-Reply-To: <53A00A80.5040009@oracle.com> References: <53A00A80.5040009@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53A02D0F.7080702@oracle.com> Approved, assuming its a clean backport. -Rob On 17/06/14 10:29, Vladimir Ivanov wrote: > Hello, > > Please, approve a backport of the fix from 9 to 8u-dev. > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8046903 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/9ffe170f236f > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-June/027214.html > > > Thanks! > > Best regards, > Vladimir Ivanov From vladimir.x.ivanov at oracle.com Tue Jun 17 12:21:14 2014 From: vladimir.x.ivanov at oracle.com (Vladimir Ivanov) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 16:21:14 +0400 Subject: [8u] Request for approval: 8046903: VM anonymous class members can't be statically invocable In-Reply-To: <53A02D0F.7080702@oracle.com> References: <53A00A80.5040009@oracle.com> <53A02D0F.7080702@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53A032BA.80001@oracle.com> Thank you, Rob. Yes, the fix applies cleanly. Best regards, Vladimir Ivanov On 6/17/14 3:57 PM, Rob McKenna wrote: > Approved, assuming its a clean backport. > > -Rob > > On 17/06/14 10:29, Vladimir Ivanov wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Please, approve a backport of the fix from 9 to 8u-dev. >> >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8046903 >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/9ffe170f236f >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-June/027214.html >> >> >> Thanks! >> >> Best regards, >> Vladimir Ivanov > From alejandro.murillo at oracle.com Tue Jun 17 18:28:14 2014 From: alejandro.murillo at oracle.com (Alejandro E Murillo) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 12:28:14 -0600 Subject: jdk8u20-b19: HotSpot Message-ID: <53A088BE.7070307@oracle.com> hs25.20-b19 has been integrated into jdk8u20-b19. http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/rev/2f40422f564b http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/corba/rev/b078cb18ef95 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/rev/b15553cde967 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jaxp/rev/beb64f6b1989 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jaxws/rev/615fdd17d4e2 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/rev/38548d32c91c http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/langtools/rev/c04d99e00268 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/nashorn/rev/b047df215de4 Component : VM Status : 0 major failures, 0 minor failure Date : 06/17/2014 at 17:00 MSK Tested By : STT_VM Cost(total man-days): 1 Workspace : 2014-06-13-211851.amurillo.hs25-20-b19-snapshot Bundles : 2014-06-13-211851.amurillo.hs25-20-b19-snapshot Platforms : Others Tests : link Log : link Browsers : NA Patches : NA Number of Tests Executed : 301394 passed tests, 4737 failed tests (no new failures) Bug verification status: ====================================== Tested, Pass: Tested, Pass (partial fixes): Tested, Fail: Untested bug fixes: Setup is not available: 8029381: assert(is_method_type()) failed: bad cast 8032410: compiler/uncommontrap/TestStackBangRbp.java times out on Solaris-Sparc V9 8034188: OSR methods may not be recompiled at proper compilation level 8040244: compiler/whitebox/IsMethodCompilableTest.java fails 8042933: assert(capacity_until_gc >= committed_bytes) failed 8043239: G1: Missing post barrier in processing of j.l.ref.Reference objects 8043915: Tests get ClassNotFoundException: com.oracle.java.testlibrary.StreamPumper 8046232: new hotspot build - hs25.20-b19 8046275: Fastdebug build failing on jdk9/hs/ control jobs after pulling some hs-comp changes 8046287: [TESTBUG] runtime/Thread/TestThreadDumpMonitorContention.java failed error_cnt=12 8046516: Segmentation fault in JVM (easily reproducible) New bugs filed: Bugs in PIT build: Bugs in earlier promoted build: Number of PIT requested: 1 Integration target J2SE build number: jdk8u20-b19 Issues and Notes: This is PIT for HS25.20-b19 for jdk8u20-b19. Go for integration. -- Alejandro From daniel.smith at oracle.com Tue Jun 17 20:11:40 2014 From: daniel.smith at oracle.com (Dan Smith) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 14:11:40 -0600 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for JDK-8042805: Types.wildLowerBound and cvarLowerBound should call unannotatedType() Message-ID: <5E3DA550-9C24-418B-B55E-614AA88DF850@oracle.com> Please approve this patch for langtools in 8u20. Bug report: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8042805 Review (patch is inline): http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/compiler-dev/2014-June/008857.html ?Dan From sean.coffey at oracle.com Tue Jun 17 21:50:38 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 22:50:38 +0100 Subject: [8u-communication] Update to the Phase2 Process Description Project page. Message-ID: <53A0B82E.8010706@oracle.com> The Phase2 Process Description page on the JDK 8 Updates Project page [1] contained some old process steps. To reflect the rampdown 2 changes made during the 7u60 Project, I've updated the doc to indicate that all fixes which are approved for inclusion in a stabilization forest must be pushed to the always open mainline (jdk8u-dev). A maintainer will look after the steps around importing the fix into the stabilization forest. regards, Sean. [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8u/phase2/phase2-process.html From sean.coffey at oracle.com Tue Jun 17 21:55:45 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?windows-1252?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 22:55:45 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for JDK-8042805: Types.wildLowerBound and cvarLowerBound should call unannotatedType() (8042803) In-Reply-To: <5E3DA550-9C24-418B-B55E-614AA88DF850@oracle.com> References: <5E3DA550-9C24-418B-B55E-614AA88DF850@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53A0B961.9060302@oracle.com> Approved. You've listed the backport ID here. Just a reminder to push changeset with master bug ID : 8042803 regards, Sean. On 17/06/2014 21:11, Dan Smith wrote: > Please approve this patch for langtools in 8u20. > > Bug report: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8042805 > Review (patch is inline): http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/compiler-dev/2014-June/008857.html > > ?Dan From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Jun 18 09:51:03 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 10:51:03 +0100 Subject: [8u-communication] Upcoming JDK 8u20 milestone : Rampdown 2 Message-ID: <53A16107.1020103@oracle.com> As per earlier communication [1], the 8u20 Rampdown 2 milestone is approaching. Only important bug fixes will be considered for 8u20 once we enter this milestone. The current plan is to create an 8u20 stabilization master forest once build 20 promotes next week. If you need to request a bug fix for inclusion in 8u20 post build 20, you need to follow the phase 2 guidelines found on the Project page [2]. The 8u20 timeline is available at : http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8u/releases/8u20.html regards, Sean. [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2014-February/000201.html [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8u/phase2/phase2-process.html From vincent.x.ryan at oracle.com Wed Jun 18 13:15:02 2014 From: vincent.x.ryan at oracle.com (Vincent Ryan) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 14:15:02 +0100 Subject: [8u20] request for approval for JDK-8044038: Security tests fail on 32 bit linux platform Message-ID: Please approve the following changeset to correct PKCS11 test failures on Linux 32-bit. The changeset is identical to the fix for JDK 9. Thanks. Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044038 JDK 9 Webrev: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/79a6703ab839 JDK 9 code review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2014-May/010564.html From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Jun 18 13:25:15 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 14:25:15 +0100 Subject: [8u20] request for approval for JDK-8044038: Security tests fail on 32 bit linux platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <53A1933B.800@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 18/06/14 14:15, Vincent Ryan wrote: > Please approve the following changeset to correct PKCS11 test failures on Linux 32-bit. > The changeset is identical to the fix for JDK 9. > > Thanks. > > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044038 > JDK 9 Webrev: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/79a6703ab839 > JDK 9 code review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2014-May/010564.html > From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Wed Jun 18 13:26:10 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 14:26:10 +0100 Subject: [8u20] request for approval for JDK-8044038: Security tests fail on 32 bit linux platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <53A19372.2030606@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 18/06/14 14:15, Vincent Ryan wrote: > Please approve the following changeset to correct PKCS11 test failures on Linux 32-bit. > The changeset is identical to the fix for JDK 9. > > Thanks. > > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044038 > JDK 9 Webrev: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/79a6703ab839 > JDK 9 code review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2014-May/010564.html > From paul.govereau at oracle.com Wed Jun 18 14:54:12 2014 From: paul.govereau at oracle.com (Paul Govereau) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 10:54:12 -0400 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for JDK-8038975 - Access control in enhanced for Message-ID: <53A1A814.1020601@oracle.com> Please consider the following changeset for inclusion in 8udev/langtools http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/33cb06e65de2 For J JDK-8038975 - Access control in enhanced for https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038975 Thanks, Paul From petr.pchelko at oracle.com Wed Jun 18 15:27:50 2014 From: petr.pchelko at oracle.com (Petr Pchelko) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 19:27:50 +0400 Subject: Request for approval: 8047061 [macosx] Crash when setting display mode Message-ID: <63385A48-7A79-40DF-9728-6370B7AA49A8@oracle.com> Hello, This is a request for approval to backport the fix to the jdk8u-dev repository. The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8047061 The fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/82159b0fd359 The review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2014-June/008056.html Thank you. With best regards. Petr. From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Jun 18 15:33:39 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 16:33:39 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for JDK-8038975 - Access control in enhanced for In-Reply-To: <53A1A814.1020601@oracle.com> References: <53A1A814.1020601@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53A1B153.1020400@oracle.com> Approved. Note that PIT snapshots are already being taken for integration to 8u master next week (b20 promotion) - I'm not sure if late fixes will be accepted into 8u20 (without going through the critical approval process) but I'll work with gatekeeper on that. regards, Sean. On 18/06/14 15:54, Paul Govereau wrote: > Please consider the following changeset for inclusion in 8udev/langtools > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/33cb06e65de2 > > For J JDK-8038975 - Access control in enhanced for > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038975 > > Thanks, > Paul From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Jun 18 15:35:11 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 16:35:11 +0100 Subject: Request for approval: 8047061 [macosx] Crash when setting display mode In-Reply-To: <63385A48-7A79-40DF-9728-6370B7AA49A8@oracle.com> References: <63385A48-7A79-40DF-9728-6370B7AA49A8@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53A1B1AF.2010108@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 18/06/14 16:27, Petr Pchelko wrote: > Hello, > > This is a request for approval to backport the fix to the jdk8u-dev repository. > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8047061 > The fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/82159b0fd359 > The review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2014-June/008056.html > > Thank you. > With best regards. Petr. From vincent.x.ryan at oracle.com Wed Jun 18 16:02:17 2014 From: vincent.x.ryan at oracle.com (Vincent Ryan) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 17:02:17 +0100 Subject: [8u20] request for approval for JDK-8047085: PKCS11/NSS tests failing intermittently on Windows Message-ID: Please approve the following changeset to refresh the version of NSS that we include with the PKCS11 testsuite. This will fix the intermittent problem of PKCS11 tests failing on Windows when there is a mismatch of the Visual C runtime. Thanks. Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8047085 JDK 9 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vinnie/8047085/webrev.00/ JDK 9 code review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2014-June/010642.html From anthony.scarpino at oracle.com Wed Jun 18 16:13:51 2014 From: anthony.scarpino at oracle.com (Anthony Scarpino) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 09:13:51 -0700 Subject: [8u20] request for approval JDK-8039212: SecretKeyBasic.sh needs to avoid NSS libnss3 and libsoftokn3 version mismatches Message-ID: <53A1BABF.3070303@oracle.com> Please approve the below change into 8u20. The backport is identical to what is in jdk9. The change addresses a test issue where mismatched NSS libraries cause failures. bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8039212 JDK 9 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ascarpino/8039212/ JDK 9 code review: mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2014-June/010608.html Thanks Tony From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Wed Jun 18 16:18:07 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 17:18:07 +0100 Subject: [8u20] request for approval for JDK-8047085: PKCS11/NSS tests failing intermittently on Windows In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <53A1BBBF.3000206@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 18/06/14 17:02, Vincent Ryan wrote: > Please approve the following changeset to refresh the version of NSS that we include with the PKCS11 testsuite. > This will fix the intermittent problem of PKCS11 tests failing on Windows when there is a mismatch of the Visual C runtime. > > Thanks. > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8047085 > JDK 9 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vinnie/8047085/webrev.00/ > JDK 9 code review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2014-June/010642.html From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Wed Jun 18 16:19:20 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 17:19:20 +0100 Subject: [8u20] request for approval JDK-8039212: SecretKeyBasic.sh needs to avoid NSS libnss3 and libsoftokn3 version mismatches In-Reply-To: <53A1BABF.3070303@oracle.com> References: <53A1BABF.3070303@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53A1BC08.3000309@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 18/06/14 17:13, Anthony Scarpino wrote: > Please approve the below change into 8u20. The backport is identical > to what is in jdk9. The change addresses a test issue where > mismatched NSS libraries cause failures. > > bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8039212 > JDK 9 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ascarpino/8039212/ > JDK 9 code review: > mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2014-June/010608.html > > Thanks > > Tony From roger.riggs at oracle.com Wed Jun 18 20:57:53 2014 From: roger.riggs at oracle.com (roger riggs) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 16:57:53 -0400 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: java.time fixes 8046416 and 8046707 Message-ID: <53A1FD51.4040509@oracle.com> Please approve these two backports of java.time issues from JDK 9 to jdk 8u20. Both changesets applied without changes and passed the tests (old and new). 8046416: Unable to parse an Instant from fields Changeset from JDK 9: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/fc467102b0b2 8046707: Performance of java.time could be better Changeset from JDK 9: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/99d16469a830 Thanks, Roger From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Jun 18 22:46:53 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 23:46:53 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: java.time fixes 8046416 and 8046707 In-Reply-To: <53A1FD51.4040509@oracle.com> References: <53A1FD51.4040509@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53A216DD.5020100@oracle.com> Roger, I see a TCK test being modified for the 8046416 change. Let's approve these changes but only if the current jdk8u TCK tests pass for this area. Please add a suitable noreg- label to the 8046707 bug report. Regards, Sean. On 18/06/14 21:57, roger riggs wrote: > Please approve these two backports of java.time issues from JDK 9 to > jdk 8u20. > Both changesets applied without changes and passed the tests (old and > new). > > 8046416: Unable to parse an Instant from fields > Changeset from JDK 9: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/fc467102b0b2 > > 8046707: Performance of java.time could be better > Changeset from JDK 9: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/99d16469a830 > > Thanks, Roger > > > From michael.x.mcmahon at oracle.com Thu Jun 19 10:05:25 2014 From: michael.x.mcmahon at oracle.com (Michael McMahon) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 11:05:25 +0100 Subject: [8u20] request for approval: 8047187: Test jdk/net/Sockets/Test.java fails to compile after fix JDK-8046588 Message-ID: <53A2B5E5.8070404@oracle.com> Could I get the following change approved for 8u20 please? It fixes a test case problem in a recent integration. Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/8047187/webrev.1/ JDK 9 changeset: Not applicable to JDK 9 JDK 8 review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2014-June/008534.html Thanks, Michael From maurizio.cimadamore at oracle.com Thu Jun 19 10:32:48 2014 From: maurizio.cimadamore at oracle.com (Maurizio Cimadamore) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 11:32:48 +0100 Subject: [8u20] request for approval to backport JDK-8043253: Slow javac compile times in JDK 8 Message-ID: <53A2BC50.7040700@oracle.com> Hello, I'd like to ask for an approval to backport fix for: Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8043253 Backport bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8047348 jdk9 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/f4ea5dca6498 Thanks Maurizio From staffan.larsen at oracle.com Thu Jun 19 11:03:42 2014 From: staffan.larsen at oracle.com (Staffan Larsen) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 13:03:42 +0200 Subject: [8u20] request for approval of backport of JDK-8046024: JDI shared memory transport failed with "Observed abandoned IP mutex" Message-ID: <18A97A13-7C23-4F58-BFF8-17048DF50411@oracle.com> I?d like to backport this backout of a previous change. See the jdk 9 review request for details. bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8046024 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2014-June/015077.html jdk9 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/d9ed5f9c4bb9 Thanks, /Staffan From sean.coffey at oracle.com Thu Jun 19 11:06:39 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 12:06:39 +0100 Subject: [8u20] request for approval: 8047187: Test jdk/net/Sockets/Test.java fails to compile after fix JDK-8046588 In-Reply-To: <53A2B5E5.8070404@oracle.com> References: <53A2B5E5.8070404@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53A2C43F.6070700@oracle.com> Approved. Please add noreg-self to bug report. regards, Sean. On 19/06/2014 11:05, Michael McMahon wrote: > Could I get the following change approved for 8u20 please? > It fixes a test case problem in a recent integration. > > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/8047187/webrev.1/ > > JDK 9 changeset: Not applicable to JDK 9 > > JDK 8 review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2014-June/008534.html > > Thanks, > Michael From sean.coffey at oracle.com Thu Jun 19 11:07:07 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 12:07:07 +0100 Subject: [8u20] request for approval to backport JDK-8043253: Slow javac compile times in JDK 8 In-Reply-To: <53A2BC50.7040700@oracle.com> References: <53A2BC50.7040700@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53A2C45B.30503@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 19/06/2014 11:32, Maurizio Cimadamore wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to ask for an approval to backport fix for: > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8043253 > Backport bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8047348 > jdk9 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/f4ea5dca6498 > > Thanks > Maurizio From sean.coffey at oracle.com Thu Jun 19 11:08:31 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?windows-1252?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 12:08:31 +0100 Subject: [8u20] request for approval of backport of JDK-8046024: JDI shared memory transport failed with "Observed abandoned IP mutex" In-Reply-To: <18A97A13-7C23-4F58-BFF8-17048DF50411@oracle.com> References: <18A97A13-7C23-4F58-BFF8-17048DF50411@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53A2C4AF.1030608@oracle.com> Approved. Thanks for handling this. Please add a suitable noreg- label. regards, Sean. On 19/06/2014 12:03, Staffan Larsen wrote: > I?d like to backport this backout of a previous change. See the jdk 9 review request for details. > > bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8046024 > review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2014-June/015077.html > jdk9 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/d9ed5f9c4bb9 > > Thanks, > /Staffan From sean.coffey at oracle.com Thu Jun 19 12:52:07 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 13:52:07 +0100 Subject: RFR: JDK-8044343 - Check jdk/src/windows/native/java/lang/ProcessEnvironment_md.c for JNI pending exceptions In-Reply-To: <538A0448.70905@oracle.com> References: <538A0448.70905@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53A2DCF7.5060107@oracle.com> Approved. Missed due to incorrect approval template format. regards, Sean. On 31/05/2014 17:33, Mark Sheppard wrote: > Hi, > please oblige and review the following change > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~msheppar/8044343/webrev/ > > which addresses issue > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044343 > > which is a backport of > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036603 > > the original changeset didn't apply cleanly and was applied manually > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/323b64a9dede > > regression tests ran ok > > and finally please approve backport to jdk8u-dev > > regards > Mark From sean.coffey at oracle.com Thu Jun 19 12:53:36 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 13:53:36 +0100 Subject: RFR: 8041602 - (prefs) Check jdk/src/windows/native/java/util/WindowsPreference.c for JNI pending exceptions In-Reply-To: <538A517F.6090808@oracle.com> References: <538A517F.6090808@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53A2DD50.6080607@oracle.com> Approved. Missed due to incorrect approval template format. regards, Sean. On 31/05/2014 23:02, Mark Sheppard wrote: > Hi, > please oblige and review the following change > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~msheppar/8041602/webrev/ > > which addresses the issue > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8041602 > > which is a backport of > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035340 > > the original changeset didn't apply cleanly and was applied manually > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/740ffd98e35a > > regression tests ran ok > > and finally please approve backport to jdk8u-dev > > regards > Mark > > > > > > From sean.coffey at oracle.com Thu Jun 19 12:57:42 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 13:57:42 +0100 Subject: RFR 8035870 - [was Re: RFR: 8041609 - Check jdk/src/windows/native/java/io/WinNTFileSystem_md.c for JNI pending exceptions] In-Reply-To: <538CBA34.7030006@oracle.com> References: <53899B25.8070701@oracle.com> <538CB991.2000809@oracle.com> <538CBA34.7030006@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53A2DE46.5020309@oracle.com> There does seem to be a push approval request here. Consider it approved in any case. regards, Sean. On 02/06/2014 18:53, Rob McKenna wrote: > Apologies Mark, please ignore that mail. I misread as a request for > approval to push to 8u. > > -Rob > > On 02/06/14 18:51, Rob McKenna wrote: >> Approving 8035870 for backport to 8. Please use the main cr id in >> future requests. >> >> -Rob >> >> On 31/05/14 10:04, Mark Sheppard wrote: >>> Hi >>> please oblige review and approve the backport to jdk8u-dev, >>> after the review of the following change >>> >>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~msheppar/8041609/webrev/ >>> >>> for the issue >>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8041609 >>> >>> which is a backport of >>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035870 >>> >>> the hg import of changeset >>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/56366827ebab >>> didn't apply cleanly so was manually >>> >>> the regression test run was fine >>> >>> regards >>> Mark >> > From roger.riggs at oracle.com Thu Jun 19 13:38:47 2014 From: roger.riggs at oracle.com (roger riggs) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 09:38:47 -0400 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: java.time fixes 8046416 and 8046707 In-Reply-To: <53A216DD.5020100@oracle.com> References: <53A1FD51.4040509@oracle.com> <53A216DD.5020100@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53A2E7E7.4020209@oracle.com> Hi Sean, The updated implementation passes JCK tests for java.time. The 'tck' tests are new to extend test coverage to this area of the implementation addressed by the issue. They are used as unit tests in OpenJDK and will be separately considered for inclusion in the appropriate JCK version. Roger On 6/18/2014 6:46 PM, Se?n Coffey wrote: > Roger, > > I see a TCK test being modified for the 8046416 change. Let's approve > these changes but only if the current jdk8u TCK tests pass for this area. > > Please add a suitable noreg- label to the 8046707 bug report. > > Regards, > Sean. > > On 18/06/14 21:57, roger riggs wrote: >> Please approve these two backports of java.time issues from JDK 9 to >> jdk 8u20. >> Both changesets applied without changes and passed the tests (old and >> new). >> >> 8046416: Unable to parse an Instant from fields >> Changeset from JDK 9: >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/fc467102b0b2 >> >> 8046707: Performance of java.time could be better >> Changeset from JDK 9: >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/99d16469a830 >> >> Thanks, Roger >> >> >> > From lana.steuck at oracle.com Fri Jun 20 02:14:10 2014 From: lana.steuck at oracle.com (lana.steuck at oracle.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 19:14:10 -0700 (PDT) Subject: jdk8u-b20: jdk8u-dev Message-ID: <201406200214.s5K2EAlx004378@jano-app.us.oracle.com> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/rev/5b76ecd0cdcf http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/nashorn/rev/ed3439dca4a7 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/langtools/rev/cff4be16ffdd http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/rev/4737afe5a03e http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jaxws/rev/4681b10c0c31 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jaxp/rev/255d961955e4 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/rev/cb081789d265 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/corba/rev/aca1d25d1081 --- All the fixes will be tested during promotion (no PIT testing at this point): List of all fixes: =================== JDK-8012224 client-libs AWT_TopLevels/TopLevelEvents/Automated/WindowIconifyDeiconifyEventsTest02 fails on Ubuntu 12.04 Unity shell JDK-8042465 client-libs Applet menus not rendering when browser is full screen on Mac JDK-8033991 client-libs Applet:SwingSet2 is not working as expected JDK-8043705 client-libs Can't exit color chooser dialog when running as an applet JDK-8042103 client-libs Deserialization of empty java.awt.geom.Path2D will cause an exception JDK-8028617 client-libs Dvorak keyboard mapping not honored when ctrl key pressed JDK-8040113 client-libs File not initialized in src/share/native/sun/awt/giflib/dgif_lib.c JDK-8032788 client-libs ImageIcon constructor throws an NPE and hangs when passed a null String parameter JDK-8046245 client-libs JDK 9 client build failure on Solaris JDK-8009883 client-libs REGRESSION: test/closed/javax/swing/AbstractButton/4246045/bug4246045.java fails JDK-8041896 client-libs Test closed/java/awt/Choice/RemoveAllShrinkTest/RemoveAllShrinkTest fails with java.awt.IllegalComponentStateException JDK-8031471 client-libs Test closed/java/awt/dnd/FileDialogDropTargetTest/FileDialogDropTargetTest.java fails on Solaris zones virtual hosts JDK-8040271 client-libs Uninitialised memory in jdk/src/windows/native/sun/windows: awt_List.cpp, awt_InputMethod.cpp JDK-8019180 client-libs Use JComboBox as it's own ActionListener leads to unexpected behaviour JDK-8007563 client-libs When checking the default behaviour for a scroll tab layout and checking the 'opaque' checkbox, the area behind tabs is not red. JDK-8033786 client-libs White flashing when opening Dialogs and Menus using Nimbus with dark background JDK-8033233 client-libs [JLightweightFrame] support default JViewport BLIT_SCROLL_MODE JDK-8029455 client-libs [JLightweightFrame] support scaled painting JDK-8017626 client-libs [OGL] Translucent VolatileImages don't paint correctly JDK-8041644 client-libs [OGL] clip is ignored during surface->sw blit JDK-8041129 client-libs [OGL] surface->sw blit is extremely slow JDK-6963359 client-libs [TEST_BUG] The FileDialog window is different from the case KeyboardInteractionTest.html description. JDK-8036055 client-libs [TEST_BUG] waitForIdle() does not work in closed/java/awt/Container/ZOrder/Test.java JDK-8017472 client-libs [macosx] Transparency demo is not correctly dragged on the second monitor JDK-8030100 client-libs java.awt.Desktop: Enable check for supported URI schemes on Linux JDK-6788138 client-libs leak in Java_sun_awt_X11_XlibWrapper_getStringBytes? JDK-8043495 core-libs (fc) Provide native implementation of FileChannel.transferTo for AIX JDK-8029674 core-libs (reflect) getMethods returns default methods that are not members of the class JDK-8042857 core-libs 14 stuck threads waiting for notification on LDAPRequest JDK-8044798 core-libs API for debugging Nashorn JDK-8039916 core-libs AnnotatedType.getType() of a Executable parameters may return wrong type JDK-8043954 core-libs Behavior difference when connect() is interrupted by signal on AIX JDK-8044590 core-libs Broken links in jre.api.net.socketoptions JDK-8044725 core-libs Bug in zlib 1.2.5 prevents inflation of some gzipped files JDK-8035930 core-libs Check jdk/src/windows/native/java/io/io_util_md.c for JNI pending exceptions JDK-8036134 core-libs Check src/windows/native/sun/nio/fs/WindowsNativeDispatcher.c for JNI pending exceptions JDK-8046085 core-libs HashMap.put with null key may throw NullPointerException JDK-8040058 core-libs IsoFields.WEEK_BASED_YEAR adjustInto incorrect JDK-8025293 core-libs JNI exception pending checks in java.net JDK-8036607 core-libs JNI exception pending in jdk/src/windows/native/java/net/DualStackPlainDatagramSocketImpl.c JDK-8036601 core-libs JNI exception pending in jdk/src/windows/native/sun/net/dns/ResolverConfigurationImpl.c JDK-8032400 core-libs JSR292: invokeSpecial: InternalError attempting to lookup a method JDK-8044206 core-libs LambdaMetafactory.altMetafactory javadoc refers to wrong method JDK-8044520 core-libs Nashorn cannot execute node.js's express module JDK-8044766 core-libs New jdk.net classes have @since 1.9 tags in 8u20 JDK-8044727 core-libs Problem reading the contents of some zip files JDK-8044517 core-libs Run & debug single Nashorn test JDK-8044612 core-libs StringIndexOutOfBoundException in NativeRegExp.appendReplacement JDK-8033627 core-libs UTC+02:00 time zones are not detected correctly on Windows JDK-8046903 core-libs VM anonymous class members can't be statically invocable JDK-8035160 core-libs [TESTBUG] closed/java/util/TimeZone/LinuxTZVM.sh requires Olson tzdata of a certain version. JDK-8044695 core-libs __stack__ becomes visible in Error properties JDK-8044415 core-libs ant makefile should have a target to generate javadoc only for jdk.nashorn.api and sub-packages JDK-8041451 core-libs com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection:ReadTimeout should abandon ldap request JDK-8044750 core-libs megamorphic getter for scope objects does not call __noSuchProperty__ hook JDK-8046588 core-libs test for SO_FLOW_SLA availability does not check for EACCESS JDK-8032901 core-svc WaitForMultipleObjects() return value not handled appropriately JDK-8042009 docs Generate nroff for Java tools documentation for 8u20 release JDK-8037343 globalization Wrong dateformat for locale es_DO JDK-8005873 hotspot JRuby test_respond_to.rb asserts with: MT-unsafe modification of inline cache JDK-8041891 hotspot closed/com/oracle/jfr/gc/ObjectCountEventTest/TestObjectCountEvent.java fails because unexpected size JDK-8043917 infrastructure ALT_BUNDLE_DATE does not work in jdk8u and 9 build JDK-8044046 other-libs [asm] refresh internal ASM version to v5.0.3 JDK-8042789 other-libs org.omg.CORBA.ORBSingletonClass loading no longer uses context class loader JDK-7047033 security-libs (smartcardio) Card.disconnect(boolean reset) does not reset when reset is true JDK-8039319 security-libs (smartcardio) Card.transmitControlCommand() does not work on Mac OS X JDK-8043720 security-libs (smartcardio) Native memory should be handled more accurately JDK-8043507 security-libs (smartcardio) javax.smartcardio.CardTerminals.list() fails on MacOSX JDK-8044038 security-libs Security tests fail on 32 bit linux platform JDK-8039118 security-libs Windows build failure (j2pcsc.dll : fatal error unresolved external symbol throwByName) JDK-8044747 security-libs [TESTBUG] Test sun/security/tools/policytool/i18n.sh fails after clicking 'Done' button in test frame JDK-8033571 security-libs [parfait] warning from b128 for security/smartcardio/pcsc_md.c: JNI exception pending JDK-8030114 security-libs [parfait] warnings from b119 for jdk.src.share.native.sun.security.smartcardio: JNI exception pending JDK-8039132 security-libs cleanup @ignore JAAS/krb5 tests JDK-7195480 security-libs javax.smartcardio does not detect cards on Mac OS X JDK-8036779 security-libs sun.security.krb5.KdcComm interprets kdc_timeout as msec instead of sec JDK-8015101 tools Covariance of return type implied by upper bounding on type parameter is ignored JDK-8044487 tools Fix for 8042785 causes regression tests to fail with java.lang.VerifyError JDK-8029800 tools Flags.java uses String.toLowerCase without specifying Locale JDK-8031967 tools For some sources compiler compiles for ever JDK-8036709 tools Java 7 jarsigner displays warning about cert policy tree JDK-8042741 tools Java 8 compiler throws NullPointerException depending location in source file JDK-8037934 tools Javac generates invalid signatures for local types JDK-8033287 tools Reduce the size of the endPosTable JDK-8046762 tools Revert some inference fixes in JDK-8033718 JDK-8041713 tools Type inference of non-existent method references crashes the compiler JDK-8042803 tools Types.wildLowerBound and cvarLowerBound should call unannotatedType() JDK-8037385 tools constant pool errors with -target 1.7 and static default methods JDK-8043725 tools javac fails with StackOverflowException JDK-8043186 tools javac test langtools/tools/javac/util/StringUtilsTest.java fails JDK-8042785 tools javac, bridge methods are not getting the flags from the original method JDK-8037937 tools javac: AssertionError during LVT generation, wrong variable ranges JDK-8030726 tools tools/javac/NoStringToLower.java fails due to enforcement no use of String.toLowerCase on non-langtools classes JDK-8043129 xml JAF initialisation in SAAJ clashing with the one in javax.mail From jan.lahoda at oracle.com Fri Jun 20 10:21:43 2014 From: jan.lahoda at oracle.com (Jan Lahoda) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 12:21:43 +0200 Subject: [8u20] request for approval to backport JDK-8046916: Type parameter annotations don't work with multiple type parameters Message-ID: <53A40B37.4000601@oracle.com> Hello, I'd like to ask for an approval to backport fix for: Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8046916 Backport bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8047176 jdk9 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/d8d49a41294a The fix applies cleanly to: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/langtools. Thanks, Jan From sean.coffey at oracle.com Fri Jun 20 12:45:09 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 13:45:09 +0100 Subject: [8u20] request for approval to backport JDK-8046916: Type parameter annotations don't work with multiple type parameters In-Reply-To: <53A40B37.4000601@oracle.com> References: <53A40B37.4000601@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53A42CD5.7070805@oracle.com> Approved. Note that the 8u20b20 PIT snapshot is complete and changesets from that snapshot are already the 8u master codeline awaiting promotion in b20 next Wednesday. Anything else is late for b20. As a one off, I'll perform PIT on late/incoming fixes and put to master if PIT results are good. From here in, if your fix does need to be considered for 8u20, please follow the Rampdown 2 (RDP2) process [1]. regards, Sean. [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8u/phase2/phase2-process.html On 20/06/14 11:21, Jan Lahoda wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to ask for an approval to backport fix for: > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8046916 > Backport bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8047176 > jdk9 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/d8d49a41294a > > The fix applies cleanly to: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/langtools. > > Thanks, > Jan From vicente.romero at oracle.com Fri Jun 20 14:24:35 2014 From: vicente.romero at oracle.com (Vicente-Arturo Romero-Zaldivar) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 15:24:35 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: JDK-8042759 and JDK-8047372 Message-ID: <53A44423.5070109@oracle.com> Hi, Please approve the back-port of the following fixes from 9 to 8u20: 8042759: Lambda returning implicitly-typed lambdas considered pertinent to applicability JDK9 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8042759 JDK8u20 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8047408 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/340148a26acf 8047372: javac crash with FunctionDescriptorLookupError for invalid functional interface JDK9 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038182 JDK8u20 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8047372 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/f25395823aab Thanks, Vicente From sean.coffey at oracle.com Fri Jun 20 14:37:13 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 15:37:13 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: JDK-8042759 and JDK-8047372 In-Reply-To: <53A44423.5070109@oracle.com> References: <53A44423.5070109@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53A44719.7040607@oracle.com> Approved. Please push asap and we can squeeze them in for b20. regards, Sean. On 20/06/14 15:24, Vicente-Arturo Romero-Zaldivar wrote: > Hi, > > Please approve the back-port of the following fixes from 9 to 8u20: > > 8042759: Lambda returning implicitly-typed lambdas considered > pertinent to applicability > JDK9 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8042759 > JDK8u20 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8047408 > fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/340148a26acf > > > 8047372: javac crash with FunctionDescriptorLookupError for invalid > functional interface > JDK9 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038182 > JDK8u20 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8047372 > fix: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/f25395823aab > > Thanks, > Vicente From vicente.romero at oracle.com Fri Jun 20 15:19:46 2014 From: vicente.romero at oracle.com (Vicente-Arturo Romero-Zaldivar) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 16:19:46 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: JDK-8042759 and JDK-8047372 In-Reply-To: <53A44719.7040607@oracle.com> References: <53A44423.5070109@oracle.com> <53A44719.7040607@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53A45112.5030805@oracle.com> On 20/06/14 15:37, Se?n Coffey wrote: > Approved. Please push asap and we can squeeze them in for b20. Pushed, Thanks, Vicente > > regards, > Sean. > > On 20/06/14 15:24, Vicente-Arturo Romero-Zaldivar wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Please approve the back-port of the following fixes from 9 to 8u20: >> >> 8042759: Lambda returning implicitly-typed lambdas considered >> pertinent to applicability >> JDK9 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8042759 >> JDK8u20 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8047408 >> fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/340148a26acf >> >> >> 8047372: javac crash with FunctionDescriptorLookupError for invalid >> functional interface >> JDK9 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038182 >> JDK8u20 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8047372 >> fix: >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/f25395823aab >> >> Thanks, >> Vicente > From daniel.smith at oracle.com Fri Jun 20 17:22:11 2014 From: daniel.smith at oracle.com (Dan Smith) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 11:22:11 -0600 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for JDK-8034147: javac crashes with a NullPointerException during bounds checking Message-ID: <0C8D6E5D-9D85-466C-AE65-C08F3450ADE5@oracle.com> Please approve this backport of a big fix from jdk9. Bug report: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8034147 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/9b187f24c709 jdk9 reviewers: vromero, mcimadamore ?Dan From mark.sheppard at oracle.com Fri Jun 20 17:24:26 2014 From: mark.sheppard at oracle.com (Mark Sheppard) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 18:24:26 +0100 Subject: [8u-dev] Request fro approval JDK-8036600, JDK-8036609 Message-ID: <53A46E4A.5020203@oracle.com> Hi please oblige and approve the backports below from jdk9 to jdk8u-dev JDK-8036600: JNI exception pending in src/jdk/src/windows/native/sun/net/www/protocol/http/ntlm/NTLMAuthSequence.c jdk9 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036600 jdk8 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044384 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/700bd3ba3a41 JDK-8036609: Check jdk/src/windows/native/java/lang/ProcessImpl_md.c for JNI pending exceptions jdk9 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036609 jdk8 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044341 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/4b4adb994191 regards Mark From daniel.smith at oracle.com Fri Jun 20 17:30:33 2014 From: daniel.smith at oracle.com (Dan Smith) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 11:30:33 -0600 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for JDK-8034147: javac crashes with a NullPointerException during bounds checking In-Reply-To: <0C8D6E5D-9D85-466C-AE65-C08F3450ADE5@oracle.com> References: <0C8D6E5D-9D85-466C-AE65-C08F3450ADE5@oracle.com> Message-ID: <0A67A582-C9AD-4BFC-9EED-5EB025E566F0@oracle.com> s/big/bug/. It's a *small* fix, actually. :-) ?Dan On Jun 20, 2014, at 11:22 AM, Dan Smith wrote: > Please approve this backport of a big fix from jdk9. > > Bug report: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8034147 > Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/9b187f24c709 > jdk9 reviewers: vromero, mcimadamore > > ?Dan From daniel.smith at oracle.com Fri Jun 20 17:54:57 2014 From: daniel.smith at oracle.com (Dan Smith) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 11:54:57 -0600 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for JDK-8047407: Add test for JDK-8037385 Message-ID: <53AC5B2E-B124-4334-A1C8-E3F49C6AB4CB@oracle.com> Please approve the backport of this langtools regression test from 9 to 8u. Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8047407 Patch: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/11ed38d8765b jdk9 reviewer: mcimadamore ?Dan From robert.field at oracle.com Fri Jun 20 18:24:34 2014 From: robert.field at oracle.com (Robert Field) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 11:24:34 -0700 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for JDK-8046060: Different results of floating point multiplication for lambda code block Message-ID: <53A47C62.4070004@oracle.com> Please approve this backport of a bug fix from jdk9. Bug report:https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8046060 Changeset:http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/173f27d6e81f jdk9 reviewers: vromero, jlahoda -Robert From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Fri Jun 20 18:51:25 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 19:51:25 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for JDK-8034147: javac crashes with a NullPointerException during bounds checking In-Reply-To: <0A67A582-C9AD-4BFC-9EED-5EB025E566F0@oracle.com> References: <0C8D6E5D-9D85-466C-AE65-C08F3450ADE5@oracle.com> <0A67A582-C9AD-4BFC-9EED-5EB025E566F0@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53A482AD.5000106@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 20/06/14 18:30, Dan Smith wrote: > s/big/bug/. It's a *small* fix, actually. :-) > > ?Dan > > On Jun 20, 2014, at 11:22 AM, Dan Smith wrote: > >> Please approve this backport of a big fix from jdk9. >> >> Bug report: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8034147 >> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/9b187f24c709 >> jdk9 reviewers: vromero, mcimadamore >> >> ?Dan From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Fri Jun 20 18:54:07 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 19:54:07 +0100 Subject: [8u-dev] Request fro approval JDK-8036600, JDK-8036609 In-Reply-To: <53A46E4A.5020203@oracle.com> References: <53A46E4A.5020203@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53A4834F.3060905@oracle.com> Review threads: 8036600: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2014-March/008328.html 8036609: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-March/025609.html Approved. -Rob On 20/06/14 18:24, Mark Sheppard wrote: > > Hi > please oblige and approve the backports below from jdk9 to jdk8u-dev > > JDK-8036600: JNI exception pending in > src/jdk/src/windows/native/sun/net/www/protocol/http/ntlm/NTLMAuthSequence.c > jdk9 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036600 > jdk8 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044384 > fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/700bd3ba3a41 > > > JDK-8036609: Check jdk/src/windows/native/java/lang/ProcessImpl_md.c > for JNI pending exceptions > jdk9 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036609 > jdk8 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044341 > fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/4b4adb994191 > > regards > Mark From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Fri Jun 20 18:54:26 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 19:54:26 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for JDK-8047407: Add test for JDK-8037385 In-Reply-To: <53AC5B2E-B124-4334-A1C8-E3F49C6AB4CB@oracle.com> References: <53AC5B2E-B124-4334-A1C8-E3F49C6AB4CB@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53A48362.3060209@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 20/06/14 18:54, Dan Smith wrote: > Please approve the backport of this langtools regression test from 9 to 8u. > > Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8047407 > Patch: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/11ed38d8765b > jdk9 reviewer: mcimadamore > > ?Dan From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Fri Jun 20 18:54:51 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 19:54:51 +0100 Subject: [8u-dev] Request fro approval JDK-8036600, JDK-8036609 In-Reply-To: <53A4834F.3060905@oracle.com> References: <53A46E4A.5020203@oracle.com> <53A4834F.3060905@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53A4837B.4050907@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 20/06/14 19:54, Rob McKenna wrote: > Review threads: > > 8036600: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2014-March/008328.html > 8036609: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-March/025609.html > > Approved. > > -Rob > > On 20/06/14 18:24, Mark Sheppard wrote: >> >> Hi >> please oblige and approve the backports below from jdk9 to jdk8u-dev >> >> JDK-8036600: JNI exception pending in >> src/jdk/src/windows/native/sun/net/www/protocol/http/ntlm/NTLMAuthSequence.c >> jdk9 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036600 >> jdk8 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044384 >> fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/700bd3ba3a41 >> >> >> JDK-8036609: Check jdk/src/windows/native/java/lang/ProcessImpl_md.c >> for JNI pending exceptions >> jdk9 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036609 >> jdk8 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044341 >> fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/4b4adb994191 >> >> regards >> Mark > From kumar.x.srinivasan at oracle.com Fri Jun 20 21:41:12 2014 From: kumar.x.srinivasan at oracle.com (Kumar Srinivasan) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 14:41:12 -0700 Subject: [8u-dev] Request approval for: 8044866: Fix raw and unchecked lint warnings in asm Message-ID: <53A4AA78.8010505@oracle.com> Hello, Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044866 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/08319e8e76ce Trivial fixes, this goes in cleanly into 8u-dev, I would like to get this into 8u-dev, so as to keep the ASM sources in sync between 8u-dev and 9. Thanks Kumar From alejandro.murillo at oracle.com Fri Jun 20 21:45:52 2014 From: alejandro.murillo at oracle.com (Alejandro E Murillo) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 15:45:52 -0600 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for bulk integration of hs25.20-b20 Message-ID: <53A4AB90.9060605@oracle.com> Requesting approval to integrate hs25.20-b20 into jdk8u20-b20. A webrev is available at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amurillo/8u20/hs25.20-b20-jdk8u20-b20.webrev/ Pre-integration testing is in progress; the integration will proceed only after SQE has analyzed the results and approved. The fixes in the proposed integration are below. All have undergone nightly testing and are already in a jdk9 repository. 8033626: assert(ex_map->jvms()->same_calls_as(_exceptions->jvms())) failed: all collected exceptions must come from the same place 8044796: G1: Enable G1CollectedHeap::stop() 8046408: Build failure from multiple ptrace.h 8046798: new hotspot build - hs25.20-b20 -- Alejandro From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Fri Jun 20 22:01:23 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 23:01:23 +0100 Subject: [8u-dev] Request approval for: 8044866: Fix raw and unchecked lint warnings in asm In-Reply-To: <53A4AA78.8010505@oracle.com> References: <53A4AA78.8010505@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53A4AF33.9090502@oracle.com> Review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-June/027287.html Approved. -Rob On 20/06/14 22:41, Kumar Srinivasan wrote: > Hello, > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044866 > Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/08319e8e76ce > > Trivial fixes, this goes in cleanly into 8u-dev, I would like to get > this into 8u-dev, so as to keep > the ASM sources in sync between 8u-dev and 9. > > Thanks > Kumar > > > From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Fri Jun 20 22:02:21 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 23:02:21 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for bulk integration of hs25.20-b20 In-Reply-To: <53A4AB90.9060605@oracle.com> References: <53A4AB90.9060605@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53A4AF6D.1020606@oracle.com> Approved pending SQE approval. -Rob On 20/06/14 22:45, Alejandro E Murillo wrote: > Requesting approval to integrate hs25.20-b20 into jdk8u20-b20. > > A webrev is available at: > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amurillo/8u20/hs25.20-b20-jdk8u20-b20.webrev/ > > Pre-integration testing is in progress; the integration will proceed > only after SQE has analyzed the results and approved. > > The fixes in the proposed integration are below. All have undergone > nightly testing and are already in a jdk9 repository. > > 8033626: assert(ex_map->jvms()->same_calls_as(_exceptions->jvms())) > failed: all collected exceptions must come from the same place > 8044796: G1: Enable G1CollectedHeap::stop() > 8046408: Build failure from multiple ptrace.h > 8046798: new hotspot build - hs25.20-b20 > From sean.coffey at oracle.com Sun Jun 22 18:46:45 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2014 19:46:45 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for JDK-8046060: Different results of floating point multiplication for lambda code block In-Reply-To: <53A47C62.4070004@oracle.com> References: <53A47C62.4070004@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53A72495.3040203@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 20/06/14 19:24, Robert Field wrote: > Please approve this backport of a bug fix from jdk9. > > Bug report:https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8046060 > Changeset:http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/173f27d6e81f > jdk9 reviewers: vromero, jlahoda > > -Robert > From sean.coffey at oracle.com Sun Jun 22 22:10:07 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2014 23:10:07 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval : 8047777: (process) ProcessEnvironment_md.c not compiling on 8uX Message-ID: <53A7543F.80806@oracle.com> Request to fix up a build failure introduced on Friday. bug report : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8047777 review thread : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-June/027315.html regards, Sean. From dalibor.topic at oracle.com Sun Jun 22 22:12:17 2014 From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (dalibor.topic at oracle.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 00:12:17 +0200 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval : 8047777: (process) ProcessEnvironment_md.c not compiling on 8uX In-Reply-To: <53A7543F.80806@oracle.com> References: <53A7543F.80806@oracle.com> Message-ID: <4633593E-558C-4D23-BBBB-615EEFF7A274@oracle.com> Approved. -- Oracle Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile:+491737185961 Oracle Java Platform Group ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher Green Oracle Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment > On 23.06.2014, at 00:10, Se?n Coffey wrote: > > Request to fix up a build failure introduced on Friday. > > bug report : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8047777 > review thread : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-June/027315.html > > regards, > Sean. From sean.coffey at oracle.com Mon Jun 23 09:51:57 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 10:51:57 +0100 Subject: jdk8u-b20: jdk8u-dev In-Reply-To: <201406200214.s5K2EAlx004378@jano-app.us.oracle.com> References: <201406200214.s5K2EAlx004378@jano-app.us.oracle.com> Message-ID: <53A7F8BD.2060406@oracle.com> Some late incoming fixes [1] from jdk8u-dev just pushed to jdk8u master also. Any fixes in jdk8u-dev since yesterday have made b20. Any other fixes for 8u20 will need to follow the phase 2 approval approach [2] regards, Sean. 8027886: javac allows illegal receiver parameters 8034147: javac crashes with a NullPointerException during bounds checking 8035340: (prefs) Check jdk/src/windows/native/java/util/WindowsPreference.c for JNI pending exceptions 8035870: Check jdk/src/windows/native/java/io/WinNTFileSystem_md.c for JNI pending exceptions 8036600: JNI exception pending in src/jdk/src/windows/native/sun/net/www/protocol/http/ntlm/NTLMAuthSequence.c 8036603: Check jdk/src/windows/native/java/lang/ProcessEnvironment_md.c for JNI pending exceptions 8036609: Check jdk/src/windows/native/java/lang/ProcessImpl_md.c for JNI pending exceptions 8038182: javac crash with FunctionDescriptorLookupError for invalid functional interface 8038975: Access control in enhanced for 8039212: SecretKeyBasic.sh needs to avoid NSS libnss3 and libsoftokn3 version mismatches 8042759: Lambda returning implicitly-typed lambdas considered pertinent to applicability 8043253: Slow javac compile times in JDK 8 8046024: JDI shared memory transport failed with "Observed abandoned IP mutex" 8046416: Unable to parse an Instant from fields 8046707: Performance of java.time could be better 8046916: Type parameter annotations don't work with multiple type parameters 8047061: [macosx] Crash when setting display mode 8047085: PKCS11/NSS tests failing intermittently on Windows 8047187: Test jdk/net/Sockets/Test.java fails to compile after fix JDK-8046588 8047407: Add test for JDK-8037385 8047777: (process) ProcessEnvironment_md.c not compiling on 8uX [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8u/phase2/phase2-process.html On 20/06/14 03:14, lana.steuck at oracle.com wrote: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/rev/5b76ecd0cdcf > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/nashorn/rev/ed3439dca4a7 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/langtools/rev/cff4be16ffdd > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/rev/4737afe5a03e > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jaxws/rev/4681b10c0c31 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jaxp/rev/255d961955e4 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/rev/cb081789d265 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/corba/rev/aca1d25d1081 > > --- > > All the fixes will be tested during promotion (no PIT testing at this point): > > List of all fixes: > =================== > JDK-8012224 client-libs AWT_TopLevels/TopLevelEvents/Automated/WindowIconifyDeiconifyEventsTest02 fails on Ubuntu 12.04 Unity shell > JDK-8042465 client-libs Applet menus not rendering when browser is full screen on Mac > JDK-8033991 client-libs Applet:SwingSet2 is not working as expected > JDK-8043705 client-libs Can't exit color chooser dialog when running as an applet > JDK-8042103 client-libs Deserialization of empty java.awt.geom.Path2D will cause an exception > JDK-8028617 client-libs Dvorak keyboard mapping not honored when ctrl key pressed > JDK-8040113 client-libs File not initialized in src/share/native/sun/awt/giflib/dgif_lib.c > JDK-8032788 client-libs ImageIcon constructor throws an NPE and hangs when passed a null String parameter > JDK-8046245 client-libs JDK 9 client build failure on Solaris > JDK-8009883 client-libs REGRESSION: test/closed/javax/swing/AbstractButton/4246045/bug4246045.java fails > JDK-8041896 client-libs Test closed/java/awt/Choice/RemoveAllShrinkTest/RemoveAllShrinkTest fails with java.awt.IllegalComponentStateException > JDK-8031471 client-libs Test closed/java/awt/dnd/FileDialogDropTargetTest/FileDialogDropTargetTest.java fails on Solaris zones virtual hosts > JDK-8040271 client-libs Uninitialised memory in jdk/src/windows/native/sun/windows: awt_List.cpp, awt_InputMethod.cpp > JDK-8019180 client-libs Use JComboBox as it's own ActionListener leads to unexpected behaviour > JDK-8007563 client-libs When checking the default behaviour for a scroll tab layout and checking the 'opaque' checkbox, the area behind tabs is not red. > JDK-8033786 client-libs White flashing when opening Dialogs and Menus using Nimbus with dark background > JDK-8033233 client-libs [JLightweightFrame] support default JViewport BLIT_SCROLL_MODE > JDK-8029455 client-libs [JLightweightFrame] support scaled painting > JDK-8017626 client-libs [OGL] Translucent VolatileImages don't paint correctly > JDK-8041644 client-libs [OGL] clip is ignored during surface->sw blit > JDK-8041129 client-libs [OGL] surface->sw blit is extremely slow > JDK-6963359 client-libs [TEST_BUG] The FileDialog window is different from the case KeyboardInteractionTest.html description. > JDK-8036055 client-libs [TEST_BUG] waitForIdle() does not work in closed/java/awt/Container/ZOrder/Test.java > JDK-8017472 client-libs [macosx] Transparency demo is not correctly dragged on the second monitor > JDK-8030100 client-libs java.awt.Desktop: Enable check for supported URI schemes on Linux > JDK-6788138 client-libs leak in Java_sun_awt_X11_XlibWrapper_getStringBytes? > JDK-8043495 core-libs (fc) Provide native implementation of FileChannel.transferTo for AIX > JDK-8029674 core-libs (reflect) getMethods returns default methods that are not members of the class > JDK-8042857 core-libs 14 stuck threads waiting for notification on LDAPRequest > JDK-8044798 core-libs API for debugging Nashorn > JDK-8039916 core-libs AnnotatedType.getType() of a Executable parameters may return wrong type > JDK-8043954 core-libs Behavior difference when connect() is interrupted by signal on AIX > JDK-8044590 core-libs Broken links in jre.api.net.socketoptions > JDK-8044725 core-libs Bug in zlib 1.2.5 prevents inflation of some gzipped files > JDK-8035930 core-libs Check jdk/src/windows/native/java/io/io_util_md.c for JNI pending exceptions > JDK-8036134 core-libs Check src/windows/native/sun/nio/fs/WindowsNativeDispatcher.c for JNI pending exceptions > JDK-8046085 core-libs HashMap.put with null key may throw NullPointerException > JDK-8040058 core-libs IsoFields.WEEK_BASED_YEAR adjustInto incorrect > JDK-8025293 core-libs JNI exception pending checks in java.net > JDK-8036607 core-libs JNI exception pending in jdk/src/windows/native/java/net/DualStackPlainDatagramSocketImpl.c > JDK-8036601 core-libs JNI exception pending in jdk/src/windows/native/sun/net/dns/ResolverConfigurationImpl.c > JDK-8032400 core-libs JSR292: invokeSpecial: InternalError attempting to lookup a method > JDK-8044206 core-libs LambdaMetafactory.altMetafactory javadoc refers to wrong method > JDK-8044520 core-libs Nashorn cannot execute node.js's express module > JDK-8044766 core-libs New jdk.net classes have @since 1.9 tags in 8u20 > JDK-8044727 core-libs Problem reading the contents of some zip files > JDK-8044517 core-libs Run & debug single Nashorn test > JDK-8044612 core-libs StringIndexOutOfBoundException in NativeRegExp.appendReplacement > JDK-8033627 core-libs UTC+02:00 time zones are not detected correctly on Windows > JDK-8046903 core-libs VM anonymous class members can't be statically invocable > JDK-8035160 core-libs [TESTBUG] closed/java/util/TimeZone/LinuxTZVM.sh requires Olson tzdata of a certain version. > JDK-8044695 core-libs __stack__ becomes visible in Error properties > JDK-8044415 core-libs ant makefile should have a target to generate javadoc only for jdk.nashorn.api and sub-packages > JDK-8041451 core-libs com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection:ReadTimeout should abandon ldap request > JDK-8044750 core-libs megamorphic getter for scope objects does not call __noSuchProperty__ hook > JDK-8046588 core-libs test for SO_FLOW_SLA availability does not check for EACCESS > JDK-8032901 core-svc WaitForMultipleObjects() return value not handled appropriately > JDK-8042009 docs Generate nroff for Java tools documentation for 8u20 release > JDK-8037343 globalization Wrong dateformat for locale es_DO > JDK-8005873 hotspot JRuby test_respond_to.rb asserts with: MT-unsafe modification of inline cache > JDK-8041891 hotspot closed/com/oracle/jfr/gc/ObjectCountEventTest/TestObjectCountEvent.java fails because unexpected size > JDK-8043917 infrastructure ALT_BUNDLE_DATE does not work in jdk8u and 9 build > JDK-8044046 other-libs [asm] refresh internal ASM version to v5.0.3 > JDK-8042789 other-libs org.omg.CORBA.ORBSingletonClass loading no longer uses context class loader > JDK-7047033 security-libs (smartcardio) Card.disconnect(boolean reset) does not reset when reset is true > JDK-8039319 security-libs (smartcardio) Card.transmitControlCommand() does not work on Mac OS X > JDK-8043720 security-libs (smartcardio) Native memory should be handled more accurately > JDK-8043507 security-libs (smartcardio) javax.smartcardio.CardTerminals.list() fails on MacOSX > JDK-8044038 security-libs Security tests fail on 32 bit linux platform > JDK-8039118 security-libs Windows build failure (j2pcsc.dll : fatal error unresolved external symbol throwByName) > JDK-8044747 security-libs [TESTBUG] Test sun/security/tools/policytool/i18n.sh fails after clicking 'Done' button in test frame > JDK-8033571 security-libs [parfait] warning from b128 for security/smartcardio/pcsc_md.c: JNI exception pending > JDK-8030114 security-libs [parfait] warnings from b119 for jdk.src.share.native.sun.security.smartcardio: JNI exception pending > JDK-8039132 security-libs cleanup @ignore JAAS/krb5 tests > JDK-7195480 security-libs javax.smartcardio does not detect cards on Mac OS X > JDK-8036779 security-libs sun.security.krb5.KdcComm interprets kdc_timeout as msec instead of sec > JDK-8015101 tools Covariance of return type implied by upper bounding on type parameter is ignored > JDK-8044487 tools Fix for 8042785 causes regression tests to fail with java.lang.VerifyError > JDK-8029800 tools Flags.java uses String.toLowerCase without specifying Locale > JDK-8031967 tools For some sources compiler compiles for ever > JDK-8036709 tools Java 7 jarsigner displays warning about cert policy tree > JDK-8042741 tools Java 8 compiler throws NullPointerException depending location in source file > JDK-8037934 tools Javac generates invalid signatures for local types > JDK-8033287 tools Reduce the size of the endPosTable > JDK-8046762 tools Revert some inference fixes in JDK-8033718 > JDK-8041713 tools Type inference of non-existent method references crashes the compiler > JDK-8042803 tools Types.wildLowerBound and cvarLowerBound should call unannotatedType() > JDK-8037385 tools constant pool errors with -target 1.7 and static default methods > JDK-8043725 tools javac fails with StackOverflowException > JDK-8043186 tools javac test langtools/tools/javac/util/StringUtilsTest.java fails > JDK-8042785 tools javac, bridge methods are not getting the flags from the original method > JDK-8037937 tools javac: AssertionError during LVT generation, wrong variable ranges > JDK-8030726 tools tools/javac/NoStringToLower.java fails due to enforcement no use of String.toLowerCase on non-langtools classes > JDK-8043129 xml JAF initialisation in SAAJ clashing with the one in javax.mail From michael.x.mcmahon at oracle.com Mon Jun 23 11:52:14 2014 From: michael.x.mcmahon at oracle.com (Michael McMahon) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 12:52:14 +0100 Subject: [8u20] request for approval: 8047186: jdk.net.Sockets throws InvocationTargetException instead of original runtime exceptions Message-ID: <53A814EE.2030502@oracle.com> Could I get the following change approved for 8u20 please? Fix contributed by Artem Smotrakov Webrev: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8047186 JDK 9 changeset: Not applicable to JDK 9 JDK 8 review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2014-June/008533.html Thanks, Michael From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Mon Jun 23 13:59:32 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 14:59:32 +0100 Subject: [8u20] request for approval: 8047186: jdk.net.Sockets throws InvocationTargetException instead of original runtime exceptions In-Reply-To: <53A814EE.2030502@oracle.com> References: <53A814EE.2030502@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53A832C4.3020605@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 23/06/14 12:52, Michael McMahon wrote: > Could I get the following change approved for 8u20 please? > Fix contributed by Artem Smotrakov > > Webrev: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8047186 > > JDK 9 changeset: Not applicable to JDK 9 > > JDK 8 review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2014-June/008533.html > > Thanks, > Michael From daniel.smith at oracle.com Mon Jun 23 18:26:50 2014 From: daniel.smith at oracle.com (Dan Smith) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 12:26:50 -0600 Subject: HG updater failure? Message-ID: On Friday, I committed backports for JDK-8034147 and JDK-8047407: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/langtools/rev/37c7dbe8efee http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/langtools/rev/f4381f9541e6 But the accompanying backport bugs have not been resolved: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035433 https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8047730 Anyone understand what's going on? Is there, say, something wrong with the metadata? Is HG updater not running for some reason? ?Dan From abhi.saha at oracle.com Mon Jun 23 18:28:59 2014 From: abhi.saha at oracle.com (Abhijit Saha) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 11:28:59 -0700 Subject: HG updater failure? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <53A871EB.8060401@oracle.com> Hi Dan, We're having some outage with hgupdater. Stay tuned for more update. Thanks Abhijit On 6/23/2014 11:26 AM, Dan Smith wrote: > On Friday, I committed backports for JDK-8034147 and JDK-8047407: > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/langtools/rev/37c7dbe8efee > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/langtools/rev/f4381f9541e6 > > But the accompanying backport bugs have not been resolved: > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035433 > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8047730 > > Anyone understand what's going on? Is there, say, something wrong with the metadata? Is HG updater not running for some reason? > > ?Dan -- Lead, Java SE Updates Java Platform Group Oracle Corporation. (408)276-7564 From daniel.smith at oracle.com Mon Jun 23 21:31:00 2014 From: daniel.smith at oracle.com (Dan Smith) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 15:31:00 -0600 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for JDK-8036007: javac crashes when encountering an unresolvable interface Message-ID: <4A4F9D0A-D4C4-4BA1-9DBE-5B29D4053A7A@oracle.com> Please approve backporting this langtools fix from 9 to 8u. It is necessary to support backporting JDK-8034147 -- I've already completed the 8034147 backport, but didn't notice that its test fails in 8u without the 8036007 fix. Bug report: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036007 Patch in jdk9: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/3dd1606e93fb ?Dan From michael.fang at oracle.com Mon Jun 23 23:01:12 2014 From: michael.fang at oracle.com (Michael Fang) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 16:01:12 -0700 Subject: Review request for 8047145 8u20 l10n resource file translation update 2 Message-ID: <53A8B1B8.30307@oracle.com> Hi all, Please help to code review the changes for the following CR: 8047145 8u20 l10n resource file translation update 2 https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8047145 The webrev is located at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mfang/8047145/ Since we perform resource file translation updates separately for jdk9, jdk8 and jdk7u, these changes are specific to jdk8u and not ported back from jdk9. thanks, -michael From naoto.sato at oracle.com Mon Jun 23 23:38:28 2014 From: naoto.sato at oracle.com (Naoto Sato) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 16:38:28 -0700 Subject: Review request for 8047145 8u20 l10n resource file translation update 2 In-Reply-To: <53A8B1B8.30307@oracle.com> References: <53A8B1B8.30307@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53A8BA74.6010806@oracle.com> Looks good to me. Naoto On 6/23/14, 4:01 PM, Michael Fang wrote: > Hi all, > > Please help to code review the changes for the following CR: > 8047145 8u20 l10n resource file translation update 2 > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8047145 > > The webrev is located at: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mfang/8047145/ > > Since we perform resource file translation updates separately for jdk9, > jdk8 > and jdk7u, these changes are specific to jdk8u and not ported back from > jdk9. > > thanks, > > -michael From michael.fang at oracle.com Tue Jun 24 03:53:59 2014 From: michael.fang at oracle.com (Michael Fang) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 20:53:59 -0700 Subject: Review request for 8047145 8u20 l10n resource file translation update 2 In-Reply-To: <53A8BA74.6010806@oracle.com> References: <53A8B1B8.30307@oracle.com> <53A8BA74.6010806@oracle.com> Message-ID: <8F34380A-EAE6-476E-8DF7-2E9EC8CBF6F4@oracle.com> Thank you Naoto for the review. Regards, Michael Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 23, 2014, at 4:38 PM, Naoto Sato wrote: > > Looks good to me. > > Naoto > >> On 6/23/14, 4:01 PM, Michael Fang wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Please help to code review the changes for the following CR: >> 8047145 8u20 l10n resource file translation update 2 >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8047145 >> >> The webrev is located at: >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mfang/8047145/ >> >> Since we perform resource file translation updates separately for jdk9, >> jdk8 >> and jdk7u, these changes are specific to jdk8u and not ported back from >> jdk9. >> >> thanks, >> >> -michael From sean.coffey at oracle.com Tue Jun 24 08:44:31 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?windows-1252?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 09:44:31 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for JDK-8036007: javac crashes when encountering an unresolvable interface In-Reply-To: <4A4F9D0A-D4C4-4BA1-9DBE-5B29D4053A7A@oracle.com> References: <4A4F9D0A-D4C4-4BA1-9DBE-5B29D4053A7A@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53A93A6F.1040904@oracle.com> Dan, 8u20b20 snapshot is complete. This fix is approved for 8u40 (jdk8u-dev). If it's required in 8u20, please log a phase 2 approval request. (critical request process) http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2014-June/001284.html Regards, Sean. On 23/06/2014 22:31, Dan Smith wrote: > Please approve backporting this langtools fix from 9 to 8u. It is necessary to support backporting JDK-8034147 -- I've already completed the 8034147 backport, but didn't notice that its test fails in 8u without the 8036007 fix. > > Bug report: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036007 > Patch in jdk9: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/3dd1606e93fb > > ?Dan From sean.coffey at oracle.com Tue Jun 24 08:49:51 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 09:49:51 +0100 Subject: [8u20] request for approval: 8047186: jdk.net.Sockets throws InvocationTargetException instead of original runtime exceptions In-Reply-To: <53A832C4.3020605@oracle.com> References: <53A814EE.2030502@oracle.com> <53A832C4.3020605@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53A93BAF.2030602@oracle.com> jdk8u-dev is now collecting fixes for 8u40. I'll update the Project page to reflect this once the 8u20 stabilization forest is available. That'll be created once 8u20b20 is promoted tomorrow. If this fix is required in 8u20, the phase2 / critical-request approach will be necessary. regards, Sean. On 23/06/2014 14:59, Rob McKenna wrote: > Approved. > > -Rob > > On 23/06/14 12:52, Michael McMahon wrote: >> Could I get the following change approved for 8u20 please? >> Fix contributed by Artem Smotrakov >> >> Webrev: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8047186 >> >> JDK 9 changeset: Not applicable to JDK 9 >> >> JDK 8 review: >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2014-June/008533.html >> >> Thanks, >> Michael > From michael.x.mcmahon at oracle.com Tue Jun 24 10:51:11 2014 From: michael.x.mcmahon at oracle.com (Michael McMahon) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 11:51:11 +0100 Subject: [8u20] request for approval: 8047186: jdk.net.Sockets throws InvocationTargetException instead of original runtime exceptions In-Reply-To: <53A93BAF.2030602@oracle.com> References: <53A814EE.2030502@oracle.com> <53A832C4.3020605@oracle.com> <53A93BAF.2030602@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53A9581F.3050407@oracle.com> 8u40 is fine for this fix. Thanks, Michael On 24/06/14 09:49, Se?n Coffey wrote: > jdk8u-dev is now collecting fixes for 8u40. I'll update the Project > page to reflect this once the 8u20 stabilization forest is available. > That'll be created once 8u20b20 is promoted tomorrow. > > If this fix is required in 8u20, the phase2 / critical-request > approach will be necessary. > > regards, > Sean. > > On 23/06/2014 14:59, Rob McKenna wrote: >> Approved. >> >> -Rob >> >> On 23/06/14 12:52, Michael McMahon wrote: >>> Could I get the following change approved for 8u20 please? >>> Fix contributed by Artem Smotrakov >>> >>> Webrev: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8047186 >>> >>> JDK 9 changeset: Not applicable to JDK 9 >>> >>> JDK 8 review: >>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2014-June/008533.html >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Michael >> > From coleen.phillimore at oracle.com Tue Jun 24 17:40:31 2014 From: coleen.phillimore at oracle.com (Coleen Phillimore) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 13:40:31 -0400 Subject: [8u20] Request for phase 2 approval for CR 8039150 host_klass invariant fails when verifying newly loaded JSR-292 anonymous classes Message-ID: <53A9B80F.9030307@oracle.com> Bug https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8039150 I already integrated it into the 8u-dev repository as a backport because I thought it had made the deadline before RDP2. This request to have this change integrated into 8u20. The fix should be approved because it is very small and low risk. The symptoms of the bug can be a crash during VerifyBeforeGC and VerifyAfterGC which we may need in evaluating any 8u20 bugs that come in. Changeset comments are: 8039150: host_klass invariant fails when verifying newly loaded JSR-292 anonymous classe s Summary: Initialize host_klass while parsing the class with the other initializations. Reviewed-by: sspitsyn, stefank The process didn't say anything about keywords on the bug. Thanks, Coleen From alejandro.murillo at oracle.com Tue Jun 24 18:40:20 2014 From: alejandro.murillo at oracle.com (Alejandro E Murillo) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 12:40:20 -0600 Subject: jdk8u20-b20: HotSpot Message-ID: <53A9C614.7020506@oracle.com> hs25.20-b20 has been integrated into jdk8u20-b20. http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/rev/5b76ecd0cdcf http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/corba/rev/aca1d25d1081 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/rev/9e4d27da4ac0 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jaxp/rev/255d961955e4 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jaxws/rev/4681b10c0c31 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/rev/5c0406ee9e82 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/langtools/rev/e92effa22ece http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/nashorn/rev/ed3439dca4a7 Component : VM Status : 0 major failures, 0 minor failure Date : 06/24/2014 at 20:10 MSK Tested By : STT_VM Cost(total man-days): 1 Workspace : 2014-06-20-193707.amurillo.hs25-20-b20-snapshot Bundles : 2014-06-20-193707.amurillo.hs25-20-b20-snapshot Platforms : Others Tests :/net/sqenfs-1.sfbay/export1/comp/vm/testbase/ Log : link Browsers : NA Patches : NA Number of Tests Executed : 255403 passed tests, 3815 failed tests (no new failures) Bug verification status: ====================================== Tested, Pass: Tested, Pass (partial fixes): Tested, Fail: Untested bug fixes: Setup is not available: 8033626: assert(ex_map->jvms()->same_calls_as(_exceptions->jvms())) failed: all collected exceptions must come from the same place 8044796: G1: Enable G1CollectedHeap::stop() 8046408: Build failure from multiple ptrace.h 8046798: new hotspot build - hs25.20-b20 New bugs filed: Bugs in PIT build: Bugs in earlier promoted build: JDK-8048008 Jstack tests that verify stacktrace obtained with '-m' option should expect that system calls may not be shown Number of PIT requested: 1 Integration target J2SE build number: jdk8u20-b20 Issues and Notes: This is PIT for HS25.20-b20 for jdk8u20-b20. Go for integration. -- Alejandro From daniel.smith at oracle.com Tue Jun 24 18:40:43 2014 From: daniel.smith at oracle.com (Dan Smith) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 12:40:43 -0600 Subject: [8u20] Request for Phase 2 approval for JDK-8036007: javac crashes when encountering an unresolvable interface Message-ID: Bug report: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036007 8u patch: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/langtools/rev/a138f9c9ba33 jdk9 reviewers: vromero, jlahoda 8u20 already includes a fix for JDK-8034147 (http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/langtools/rev/37c7dbe8efee). However, this fix depends on JDK-8036007. Without it, the test included with JDK-8034147 fails, and the patch simply replaces one crash with another. Benefits of backport: eliminates an (uncommon) crash, fixes a failing test Risks of backport: none -- it's a one-line change that _only_ affects invocations that would otherwise crash with an AssertionError ?Dan From sean.coffey at oracle.com Tue Jun 24 19:21:49 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 20:21:49 +0100 Subject: [8u-communication] Creation of 8u20 stabilization forests Message-ID: <53A9CFCD.6090207@oracle.com> I'd like to propose that the following 8u20 stabilization forests be created tomorrow once 8u20b20 is promoted and tagged : hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u20 based on hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/ tag jdk8u20-b20 (master forest) hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u20-dev based on hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/ tag jdk8u20-b20 (team forest) regards, Sean. From michael.fang at oracle.com Wed Jun 25 15:24:55 2014 From: michael.fang at oracle.com (Michael Fang) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 08:24:55 -0700 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for 8047145: 8u20 l10n resource file translation update 2 In-Reply-To: <53A8BA74.6010806@oracle.com> References: <53A8B1B8.30307@oracle.com> <53A8BA74.6010806@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53AAE9C7.8010504@oracle.com> Hi, Please approve bug fix 8047145 for 8u20 (not a back port from 9): Bug report: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8047145 Review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2014-June/001291.html Reviewer: naoto thanks, -michael From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Jun 25 16:01:23 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 17:01:23 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for 8047145: 8u20 l10n resource file translation update 2 In-Reply-To: <53AAE9C7.8010504@oracle.com> References: <53A8B1B8.30307@oracle.com> <53A8BA74.6010806@oracle.com> <53AAE9C7.8010504@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53AAF253.4050700@oracle.com> Approved for 8u20. Please push to jdk8u-dev forest and Project maintainers will look after getting this into 8u20-dev forest. regards, Sean. On 25/06/14 16:24, Michael Fang wrote: > Hi, > > Please approve bug fix 8047145 for 8u20 (not a back port from 9): > > Bug report: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8047145 > Review thread: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2014-June/001291.html > Reviewer: naoto > > thanks, > > -michael > From iris.clark at oracle.com Wed Jun 25 22:31:22 2014 From: iris.clark at oracle.com (Iris Clark) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 15:31:22 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [8u-communication] Creation of 8u20 stabilization forests In-Reply-To: <53A9CFCD.6090207@oracle.com> References: <53A9CFCD.6090207@oracle.com> Message-ID: Hi, Sean. Done: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u20 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8j/jdk8u20-dev hgupdater set to 8u20. Thanks, iris -----Original Message----- From: Se?n Coffey Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 12:22 PM To: ops at openjdk.java.net; jdk8u-dev at openjdk.java.net Subject: [8u-communication] Creation of 8u20 stabilization forests I'd like to propose that the following 8u20 stabilization forests be created tomorrow once 8u20b20 is promoted and tagged : hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u20 based on hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/ tag jdk8u20-b20 (master forest) hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u20-dev based on hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/ tag jdk8u20-b20 (team forest) regards, Sean. From alejandro.murillo at oracle.com Thu Jun 26 00:17:04 2014 From: alejandro.murillo at oracle.com (Alejandro E Murillo) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 18:17:04 -0600 Subject: Repo for hotspot changes destined for 8u20 & 8u40 Message-ID: <53AB6680.8050309@oracle.com> (1) 8u20: Going forward, Hotspot changes destined/approved for 8u20 should be pushed to [1], unless the change should NOT be pushed to 8u40 for any reason, in which case please contact me before pushing it (I expect all fixes going to 8u20 being also required in 8u40). Changes pushed to [1] and approved for 8u20, will be taken to the 8u20 stabilization forest [2] after PIT (or via PIT waiver). (2) 8u40: jdk8u/hs-dev/hotspot ([1]) has been associated with 8u40, so it is now ready to receive Hotspot changes destined for 8u40. As usual for update releases, you do not need to request approval to push, just request for reviews in the hotspot alias. I will request the approval to push when taking the changes to the respective master repos after PIT let me know if something is not clear Thanks [1] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/hs-dev/hotspot [2] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u20/hotspot -- Alejandro From iris.clark at oracle.com Thu Jun 26 00:53:20 2014 From: iris.clark at oracle.com (Iris Clark) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 17:53:20 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [8u-communication] Creation of 8u20 stabilization forests In-Reply-To: References: <53A9CFCD.6090207@oracle.com> Message-ID: <3738f688-edb1-4997-87f5-fd016684395d@default> Oops. Wrong URLs. They should be: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u20 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u20-dev Thanks, iris -----Original Message----- From: Iris Clark Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 3:31 PM To: Se?n Coffey; ops at openjdk.java.net; jdk8u-dev at openjdk.java.net Subject: RE: [8u-communication] Creation of 8u20 stabilization forests Hi, Sean. Done: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u20 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8j/jdk8u20-dev hgupdater set to 8u20. Thanks, iris -----Original Message----- From: Se?n Coffey Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 12:22 PM To: ops at openjdk.java.net; jdk8u-dev at openjdk.java.net Subject: [8u-communication] Creation of 8u20 stabilization forests I'd like to propose that the following 8u20 stabilization forests be created tomorrow once 8u20b20 is promoted and tagged : hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u20 based on hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/ tag jdk8u20-b20 (master forest) hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u20-dev based on hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/ tag jdk8u20-b20 (team forest) regards, Sean. From vicente.romero at oracle.com Thu Jun 26 20:13:07 2014 From: vicente.romero at oracle.com (Vicente-Arturo Romero-Zaldivar) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 21:13:07 +0100 Subject: [8udev] Request for approval: 8036953: Fix timing of varargs access check, per JDK-8016205 Message-ID: <53AC7ED3.5010204@oracle.com> Hi, Please approve this backport from 9 repo for 8udev: Bug report: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036953 Backport : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044835 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/langtools/rev/b4d1f317b2cc Thanks, Vicente From naoto.sato at oracle.com Thu Jun 26 21:12:40 2014 From: naoto.sato at oracle.com (Naoto Sato) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 14:12:40 -0700 Subject: [8udev] Request for approval: 8036953: Fix timing of varargs access check, per JDK-8016205 In-Reply-To: <53AC7ED3.5010204@oracle.com> References: <53AC7ED3.5010204@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53AC8CC8.9050306@oracle.com> Approved. Naoto On 6/26/14, 1:13 PM, Vicente-Arturo Romero-Zaldivar wrote: > Hi, > > Please approve this backport from 9 repo for 8udev: > > Bug report: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036953 > Backport : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044835 > Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/langtools/rev/b4d1f317b2cc > > Thanks, > > Vicente From ivan.gerasimov at oracle.com Fri Jun 27 04:10:05 2014 From: ivan.gerasimov at oracle.com (Ivan Gerasimov) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 08:10:05 +0400 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval: 8048080: (smartcardio) javax.smartcardio.Card.openLogicalChannel() dosn't work on MacOSX Message-ID: <53ACEE9D.6060108@oracle.com> Hi! Would you please approve this unaltered backport to 8u-dev? Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8048080 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/45592d253efe Review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2014-June/010695.html Sincerely yours, Ivan From sean.coffey at oracle.com Fri Jun 27 09:16:37 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 10:16:37 +0100 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval: 8048080: (smartcardio) javax.smartcardio.Card.openLogicalChannel() dosn't work on MacOSX In-Reply-To: <53ACEE9D.6060108@oracle.com> References: <53ACEE9D.6060108@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53AD3675.6030402@oracle.com> Approved for 8u40. regards, Sean. On 27/06/14 05:10, Ivan Gerasimov wrote: > Hi! > > Would you please approve this unaltered backport to 8u-dev? > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8048080 > Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/45592d253efe > Review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2014-June/010695.html > > Sincerely yours, > Ivan From brent.christian at oracle.com Fri Jun 27 17:36:14 2014 From: brent.christian at oracle.com (Brent Christian) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 10:36:14 -0700 Subject: [8u40] Request approval: 8044473: Allow for extended set of platform MXBeans Message-ID: <53ADAB8E.8000202@oracle.com> Please approve this fix for 8u-dev. Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044473 Review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2014-June/014984.html Note this is new work for 8u40 - it is expected that the changes needed for JDK 9 will be different. There are no new public APIs or MXBeans. Thanks, -Brent From mike.duigou at oracle.com Fri Jun 27 17:46:52 2014 From: mike.duigou at oracle.com (Mike Duigou) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 10:46:52 -0700 Subject: Request for approval : 8048207: Collections.checkedQueue.offer() calls add on wrapped queue Message-ID: <66BD2FFA-003D-4A85-BC51-44ADC497B4C8@oracle.com> This request is for a backport of an issue fixed in JDK 9. The same changeset will be used. This issue follows 8047795 JBSBug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8048207 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mduigou/JDK-8048207/0/webrev/ Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/c5481aa40b6f Review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-June/027419.html Thanks, Mike From mike.duigou at oracle.com Fri Jun 27 17:48:38 2014 From: mike.duigou at oracle.com (Mike Duigou) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 10:48:38 -0700 Subject: Request for Approval: 8047795 : Collections.checkedList checking bypassed by List.replaceAll Message-ID: <77595D58-C50D-4847-BF66-9606348FEA93@oracle.com> This request is for a backport of an issue fixed in JDK 9. The same changeset will be used. JBSBug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8047795 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mduigou/JDK-8047795/1/webrev/ Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/f1187a0de1e9 Review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-June/027338.html Thanks, Mike From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Fri Jun 27 18:23:56 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 19:23:56 +0100 Subject: [8u40] Request approval: 8044473: Allow for extended set of platform MXBeans In-Reply-To: <53ADAB8E.8000202@oracle.com> References: <53ADAB8E.8000202@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53ADB6BC.4050709@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 27/06/14 18:36, Brent Christian wrote: > Please approve this fix for 8u-dev. > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044473 > > Review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2014-June/014984.html > > Note this is new work for 8u40 - it is expected that the changes > needed for JDK 9 will be different. There are no new public APIs or > MXBeans. > > Thanks, > -Brent > From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Fri Jun 27 18:24:30 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 19:24:30 +0100 Subject: Request for approval : 8048207: Collections.checkedQueue.offer() calls add on wrapped queue In-Reply-To: <66BD2FFA-003D-4A85-BC51-44ADC497B4C8@oracle.com> References: <66BD2FFA-003D-4A85-BC51-44ADC497B4C8@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53ADB6DE.9040003@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 27/06/14 18:46, Mike Duigou wrote: > This request is for a backport of an issue fixed in JDK 9. The same changeset will be used. This issue follows 8047795 > > JBSBug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8048207 > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mduigou/JDK-8048207/0/webrev/ > Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/c5481aa40b6f > Review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-June/027419.html > > Thanks, > > Mike From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Fri Jun 27 20:59:15 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 21:59:15 +0100 Subject: Request for Approval: 8047795 : Collections.checkedList checking bypassed by List.replaceAll In-Reply-To: <77595D58-C50D-4847-BF66-9606348FEA93@oracle.com> References: <77595D58-C50D-4847-BF66-9606348FEA93@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53ADDB23.3060008@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 27/06/14 18:48, Mike Duigou wrote: > This request is for a backport of an issue fixed in JDK 9. The same changeset will be used. > > JBSBug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8047795 > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mduigou/JDK-8047795/1/webrev/ > Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/f1187a0de1e9 > Review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-June/027338.html > > Thanks, > > Mike From weijun.wang at oracle.com Sat Jun 28 01:01:50 2014 From: weijun.wang at oracle.com (Wang Weijun) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 09:01:50 +0800 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval: 8048073: Cannot read ccache entry with a realm-less service name Message-ID: <26C00948-396A-4D86-9F66-7A7BDAD2A557@oracle.com> Hi All This is a request to backport a jdk9 fix into jdk8u-dev. 8048073: Cannot read ccache entry with a realm-less service name https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8048073 The fix is already included in jdk9 as: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/2e1a51eb4152 The review thread was http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2014-June/010692.html The patch for jdk8u-dev is identical to the one in jdk9 except for a one line comment in the TimeInCCache.java test. The fix is low-risk, and isolated. new regression test added. Existing tests also run fine. Thanks Weijun From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Sun Jun 29 17:39:52 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 18:39:52 +0100 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval: 8048073: Cannot read ccache entry with a realm-less service name In-Reply-To: <26C00948-396A-4D86-9F66-7A7BDAD2A557@oracle.com> References: <26C00948-396A-4D86-9F66-7A7BDAD2A557@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53B04F68.6040407@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 28/06/14 02:01, Wang Weijun wrote: > Hi All > > This is a request to backport a jdk9 fix into jdk8u-dev. > > 8048073: Cannot read ccache entry with a realm-less service name > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8048073 > > The fix is already included in jdk9 as: > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/2e1a51eb4152 > > The review thread was > > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2014-June/010692.html > > The patch for jdk8u-dev is identical to the one in jdk9 except for a one line comment in the TimeInCCache.java test. > > The fix is low-risk, and isolated. new regression test added. Existing tests also run fine. > > Thanks > Weijun From weijun.wang at oracle.com Mon Jun 30 00:55:12 2014 From: weijun.wang at oracle.com (Wang Weijun) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 08:55:12 +0800 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval: 8028780: JDK KRB5 module throws OutOfMemoryError when CCache is corrupt Message-ID: <98884322-41CF-4843-80F6-37B248AF9D3F@oracle.com> Hi All This is a request to backport a jdk9 fix into jdk8u-dev. 8028780: JDK KRB5 module throws OutOfMemoryError when CCache is corrupt https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8028780 The bug is about that a randomized corrupted ccache file could trigger OOME. The fix checks for invalid bits and fails gracefully. The fix is already included in jdk9 as: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/076738bb967d The review thread was http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2013-December/009992.html The patch for jdk8u-dev is identical to the one in jdk9. The fix is low-risk, and isolated. new regression test added. Existing tests also run fine. Thanks Weijun From sean.coffey at oracle.com Mon Jun 30 08:24:03 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 09:24:03 +0100 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval: 8028780: JDK KRB5 module throws OutOfMemoryError when CCache is corrupt In-Reply-To: <98884322-41CF-4843-80F6-37B248AF9D3F@oracle.com> References: <98884322-41CF-4843-80F6-37B248AF9D3F@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53B11EA3.9020800@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 30/06/14 01:55, Wang Weijun wrote: > Hi All > > This is a request to backport a jdk9 fix into jdk8u-dev. > > 8028780: JDK KRB5 module throws OutOfMemoryError when CCache is corrupt > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8028780 > > The bug is about that a randomized corrupted ccache file could trigger OOME. The fix checks for invalid bits and fails gracefully. > > The fix is already included in jdk9 as: > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/076738bb967d > > The review thread was > > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2013-December/009992.html > > The patch for jdk8u-dev is identical to the one in jdk9. > > The fix is low-risk, and isolated. new regression test added. Existing tests also run fine. > > Thanks > Weijun From vicente.romero at oracle.com Mon Jun 30 18:49:20 2014 From: vicente.romero at oracle.com (Vicente-Arturo Romero-Zaldivar) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 19:49:20 +0100 Subject: [8udev] Request for approval: 8047719: Incorrect LVT in switch statement Message-ID: <53B1B130.6030001@oracle.com> Hi, Please approve this backport from 9 to 8udev repo: Bug report: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8047719 Backport : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8048587 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/855f8c7337eb Thanks, Vicente From huizhe.wang at oracle.com Mon Jun 30 21:18:12 2014 From: huizhe.wang at oracle.com (huizhe wang) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:18:12 -0700 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval: 8037948: Improve documentation for org.w3c.dom package Message-ID: <53B1D414.6080308@oracle.com> This is a request to backport a jdk9 fix into jdk8u-dev. 8037948: Improve documentation for org.w3c.dom package https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8037948 It fixed a broken link in org.w3c.dom package.html and improved the description for the package. The fix is already included in jdk9 as: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jaxp/rev/a155b1d3f973 The review thread was http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-June/027459.html The patch for jdk8u-dev is identical to the one in jdk9. The fix only involves documentation. Thanks Joe From naoto.sato at oracle.com Mon Jun 30 21:33:52 2014 From: naoto.sato at oracle.com (Naoto Sato) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:33:52 -0700 Subject: [8udev] Request for approval: 8047719: Incorrect LVT in switch statement In-Reply-To: <53B1B130.6030001@oracle.com> References: <53B1B130.6030001@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53B1D7C0.6000900@oracle.com> Approved. Naoto On 6/30/14, 11:49 AM, Vicente-Arturo Romero-Zaldivar wrote: > Hi, > > Please approve this backport from 9 to 8udev repo: > > Bug report: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8047719 > Backport : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8048587 > Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/855f8c7337eb > > Thanks, > > Vicente From naoto.sato at oracle.com Mon Jun 30 21:34:36 2014 From: naoto.sato at oracle.com (Naoto Sato) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:34:36 -0700 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval: 8037948: Improve documentation for org.w3c.dom package In-Reply-To: <53B1D414.6080308@oracle.com> References: <53B1D414.6080308@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53B1D7EC.1090102@oracle.com> Approved. Naoto On 6/30/14, 2:18 PM, huizhe wang wrote: > This is a request to backport a jdk9 fix into jdk8u-dev. > > 8037948: Improve documentation for org.w3c.dom package > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8037948 > > > It fixed a broken link in org.w3c.dom package.html and improved the > description for the package. > > The fix is already included in jdk9 as: > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jaxp/rev/a155b1d3f973 > > The review thread was > > > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-June/027459.html > > The patch for jdk8u-dev is identical to the one in jdk9. > > The fix only involves documentation. > > Thanks > Joe >