[8u20] request for approval to backport 8037343: Wrong dateformat for locale es_DO

[Rob McKenna]

Ah! Apologies, thanks Michael.

     -Rob

On 13/06/14 17:10, Michael Fang wrote:
> Thank you Rob.
>
> The review thread was included: 
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/i18n-dev/2014-June/001409.html :)
>
> thanks,
>
> -michae
>
> On 14年06月13日 08:19 上午, Rob McKenna wrote:
>> Approved. (given the trivial nature of the difference between versions)
>>
>> Please include the review thread in approval mails: 
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-May/026898.html
>>
>> -Rob
>>
>> On 13/06/14 16:12, Michael Fang wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Please approve this backport from JDK9 to 8u20.
>>>
>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8037343
>>> Bugport bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8046757
>>> jdk9 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/baffcaf51b02
>>>
>>> The fix does not apply cleanly to 
>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk . However, the only 
>>> different between JDK9 and JDK8u is in the list of bugs section of a 
>>> test case: test/sun/text/resources/LocaleDataTest.java.
>>>
>>> jdk9 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mfang/8037343/webrev.00/
>>> jdk8u webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mfang/8037343/8u20/webrev.00/
>>> jdk8u review thread: 
>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/i18n-dev/2014-June/001409.html
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> -michael
>>