From sean.coffey at oracle.com Sat Mar 1 10:02:21 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 10:02:21 +0000 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for bulk integration of hs25.20-b05 In-Reply-To: <53110201.4090005@oracle.com> References: <53110201.4090005@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5311B02D.5030409@oracle.com> Approved pending positive PIT results. regards, Sean. On 28/02/14 21:39, Alejandro E Murillo wrote: > Requesting approval to integrate hs25.20-b05 into jdk8u20-b04. > > A webrev is available at: > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amurillo/8u20/hs25.20-b05-jdk8u20-b04.webrev/ > > Pre-integration testing is in progress; the integration will proceed > only after SQE has analyzed the results and approved. > > The fixes in the proposed integration are below. All have undergone > nightly testing and are already in a jdk8 repository. > > 8027559: Decrease code size and templatizing in > G1ParCopyClosure::do_oop_work > 8028073: race condition in ObjectMonitor implementation causing deadlocks > 8028623: SA: hash codes in SymbolTable mismatching > java_lang_String::hash_code for extended characters. > 8030184: Remove unneeded "content_type" declarations from tracetypes.xml > 8031290: Adjust call to getisax() for additional words returned > 8031968: Mac OS X: VM starts the agent by calling both Agent_OnAttach > and Agent_OnAttach_L functions if its agent library is dynamically > linked. > 8032250: Add trace event for VM flag changes > 8032466: serviceability/sa/jmap-hashcode/Test8028623.java fails with > compilation errors > 8033126: Can't call default methods from JNI > 8034171: Remove use of template template parameters from > binaryTreeDictionary. > 8034948: Back out JDK-6976350 since it does not fix any issue > 8035150: ShouldNotReachHere() in ConstantPool::copy_entry_to > 8035283: Second phase of branch shortening doesn't account for loop > alignment > 8035326: Assume non-NULL references in G1CollectedHeap::in_cset_fast_test > 8035329: Move G1ParCopyClosure::copy_to_survivor_space into > G1ParScanThreadState > 8035436: new hotspot build - hs25.20-b05 > 8035585: Restore UseOldInlining in jdk8u > 8035822: Unable to test minimalVM > From petr.pchelko at oracle.com Mon Mar 3 08:35:48 2014 From: petr.pchelko at oracle.com (Petr Pchelko) Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 12:35:48 +0400 Subject: Request for approval: JDK-8035640 JNU_CHECK_EXCEPTION should support c++ JNI syntax Message-ID: <6A677CC3-BDAD-49EA-93CE-1B24C5B789C0@oracle.com> Hello, This is a request for approval to backport the fix to JDK8u20. The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035640 The fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/6dcb850ba4c6 The review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2014-February/007089.html This fix is a critical dependency for backporting parfait fixes to 8u20. Thank you. With best regards. Petr. From alexandr.scherbatiy at oracle.com Mon Mar 3 13:38:38 2014 From: alexandr.scherbatiy at oracle.com (Alexander Scherbatiy) Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 17:38:38 +0400 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: JDK-8031573 [macosx] Checkmarks of JCheckBoxMenuItems aren't rendered in high resolution on Retina Message-ID: <531485DE.9090800@oracle.com> Hello, Could you approve the backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8031573 The webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alexsch/8031573/webrev.00 The review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/macosx-port-dev/2014-February/006445.html The jdk 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/ae53ebce5fa3 Thanks, Alexandr. From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Mon Mar 3 16:52:33 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 16:52:33 +0000 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: JDK-8031573 [macosx] Checkmarks of JCheckBoxMenuItems aren't rendered in high resolution on Retina In-Reply-To: <531485DE.9090800@oracle.com> References: <531485DE.9090800@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5314B351.5020707@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 03/03/14 13:38, Alexander Scherbatiy wrote: > > Hello, > > Could you approve the backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8031573 > The webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alexsch/8031573/webrev.00 > The review thread: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/macosx-port-dev/2014-February/006445.html > > The jdk 9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/ae53ebce5fa3 > > Thanks, > Alexandr. > From dalibor.topic at oracle.com Mon Mar 3 17:00:25 2014 From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (Dalibor Topic) Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 18:00:25 +0100 Subject: Request for approval: JDK-8035640 JNU_CHECK_EXCEPTION should support c++ JNI syntax In-Reply-To: <6A677CC3-BDAD-49EA-93CE-1B24C5B789C0@oracle.com> References: <6A677CC3-BDAD-49EA-93CE-1B24C5B789C0@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5314B529.4090501@oracle.com> On 3/3/14 9:35 AM, Petr Pchelko wrote: > Hello, > > This is a request for approval to backport the fix to JDK8u20. > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035640 > The fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/6dcb850ba4c6 > The review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2014-February/007089.html > > This fix is a critical dependency for backporting parfait fixes to 8u20. > > Thank you. > With best regards. Petr. > Thanks, Petr - approved. -- Oracle Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 Oracle Java Platform Group ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher Green Oracle Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment From alejandro.murillo at oracle.com Tue Mar 4 21:57:56 2014 From: alejandro.murillo at oracle.com (Alejandro E Murillo) Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 14:57:56 -0700 Subject: jdk8u20-b04: HotSpot Message-ID: <53164C64.7090801@oracle.com> hs25.20-b05 has been integrated into jdk8u20-b04. http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/rev/7e1b01df280f http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/corba/rev/abe5b0157c36 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/rev/d4e18f0633c6 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jaxp/rev/f6742d0cf712 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jaxws/rev/579caba2483e http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/rev/c347889445c1 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/langtools/rev/613c1d9930c9 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/nashorn/rev/e70dd55986e0 Component : VM Status : 0 major failures, 0 minor failures Date : 03/04/2014 at 21:00 MSK Tested By : STT_VM Cost(total man-days): 1 Workspace : 2014-02-28-180420.amurillo.hs25-20-b05-jdk8u20-b04-control Bundles : 2014-02-28-180420.amurillo.hs25-20-b05-jdk8u20-b04-control Platforms : Others Tests :/net/sqenfs-1.sfbay/export1/comp/vm/testbase/ Log : link Browsers : NA Patches : NA Number of Tests Executed : 288807 passed tests, 2976 failed tests (0 new failures) Bug verification status: ====================================== Tested, Pass: Tested, Pass (partial fixes): Tested, Fail: Untested bug fixes: Setup is not available: 8027559: Decrease code size and templatizing in G1ParCopyClosure::do_oop_work 8028073: race condition in ObjectMonitor implementation causing deadlocks 8028623: SA: hash codes in SymbolTable mismatching java_lang_String::hash_code for extended characters. 8030184: Remove unneeded "content_type" declarations from tracetypes.xml 8031290: Adjust call to getisax() for additional words returned 8031387: Add test for bci in stacktraces 8031968: Mac OS X: VM starts the agent by calling both Agent_OnAttach and Agent_OnAttach_L functions if its agent library is dynamically linked. 8032250: Add trace event for VM flag changes 8032466: serviceability/sa/jmap-hashcode/Test8028623.java fails with compilation errors 8032557: (jdk) Add trace event for VM flag changes 8033126: Can't call default methods from JNI 8034171: Remove use of template template parameters from binaryTreeDictionary. 8034948: Back out JDK-6976350 since it does not fix any issue 8035150: ShouldNotReachHere() in ConstantPool::copy_entry_to 8035283: Second phase of branch shortening doesn't account for loop alignment 8035326: Assume non-NULL references in G1CollectedHeap::in_cset_fast_test 8035329: Move G1ParCopyClosure::copy_to_survivor_space into G1ParScanThreadState 8035436: new hotspot build - hs25.20-b05 8035585: Restore UseOldInlining in jdk8u 8035822: Unable to test minimalVM New bugs filed: Bugs in PIT build: Bugs in earlier promoted build: Number of PIT requested: 1 Integration target J2SE build number: jdk8u20-b04 Issues and Notes: This is PIT for HS25.20-b05 for jdk8u20-b04. Go for integration. -- Alejandro From chris.hegarty at oracle.com Wed Mar 5 10:18:46 2014 From: chris.hegarty at oracle.com (Chris Hegarty) Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:18:46 +0000 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for CR 8035897 - Better memory allocation for file descriptors greater than 1024 on macosx Message-ID: <730C58C4-D1E4-4BBB-B97E-00B5E0945E43@oracle.com> Hi 8u Maintainers, I would like to request approval for 8035897, and follow up bug 8036584, for inclusion in 8u20 ( to be pushed to 8u-dev ). The 8u changes are mostly the same as for 9, but some context around the edited lines has changed, so I have included, below, a link to the 8u webrev. Alan and Michael (original reviewers), Can you please give the 8u webrev a once over. The changes are the same as for 9. 8u_webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8035897/8u_webrev/webrev/ 8035897: Better memory allocation for file descriptors greater than 1024 on macosx https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035897 9 Review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2014-March/008303.html 8036584: Review comments from 8035897 https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036584 9 Review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2014-March/008305.html Thanks, -Chris. From Alan.Bateman at oracle.com Wed Mar 5 11:34:17 2014 From: Alan.Bateman at oracle.com (Alan Bateman) Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 11:34:17 +0000 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for CR 8035897 - Better memory allocation for file descriptors greater than 1024 on macosx In-Reply-To: <730C58C4-D1E4-4BBB-B97E-00B5E0945E43@oracle.com> References: <730C58C4-D1E4-4BBB-B97E-00B5E0945E43@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53170BB9.10709@oracle.com> On 05/03/2014 10:18, Chris Hegarty wrote: > Hi 8u Maintainers, > > I would like to request approval for 8035897, and follow up bug 8036584, for inclusion in 8u20 ( to be pushed to 8u-dev ). The 8u changes are mostly the same as for 9, but some context around the edited lines has changed, so I have included, below, a link to the 8u webrev. > > Alan and Michael (original reviewers), > Can you please give the 8u webrev a once over. The changes are the same as for 9. > > 8u_webrev: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8035897/8u_webrev/webrev/ > > 8035897: Better memory allocation for file descriptors greater than 1024 on macosx > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035897 > 9 Review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2014-March/008303.html > > 8036584: Review comments from 8035897 > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036584 > 9 Review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2014-March/008305.html > This looks okay to me and the webrev looks the same as what is in 9 (it is initially confusing as 8036584 un-does much of 8035897). -Alan. From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Mar 5 16:53:14 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 08:53:14 -0800 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for CR 8035897 - Better memory allocation for file descriptors greater than 1024 on macosx In-Reply-To: <53170BB9.10709@oracle.com> References: <730C58C4-D1E4-4BBB-B97E-00B5E0945E43@oracle.com> <53170BB9.10709@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5317567A.2070804@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 05/03/14 03:34, Alan Bateman wrote: > On 05/03/2014 10:18, Chris Hegarty wrote: >> Hi 8u Maintainers, >> >> I would like to request approval for 8035897, and follow up bug >> 8036584, for inclusion in 8u20 ( to be pushed to 8u-dev ). The 8u >> changes are mostly the same as for 9, but some context around the >> edited lines has changed, so I have included, below, a link to the 8u >> webrev. >> >> Alan and Michael (original reviewers), >> Can you please give the 8u webrev a once over. The changes are the >> same as for 9. >> >> 8u_webrev: >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8035897/8u_webrev/webrev/ >> >> 8035897: Better memory allocation for file descriptors greater than >> 1024 on macosx >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035897 >> 9 Review thread: >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2014-March/008303.html >> >> 8036584: Review comments from 8035897 >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036584 >> 9 Review thread: >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2014-March/008305.html >> > This looks okay to me and the webrev looks the same as what is in 9 > (it is initially confusing as 8036584 un-does much of 8035897). > > -Alan. From alexandr.scherbatiy at oracle.com Thu Mar 6 09:39:14 2014 From: alexandr.scherbatiy at oracle.com (Alexander Scherbatiy) Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 13:39:14 +0400 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8035629 [parfait] JNI exc pending in jdk/src/windows/native/sun/windows/ShellFolder2.cpp Message-ID: <53184242.9070809@oracle.com> Hello, Could you approve the backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035629 The JDK 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/44db5d223658 Thanks, Alexandr. From neugens at redhat.com Thu Mar 6 10:59:34 2014 From: neugens at redhat.com (Mario Torre) Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 11:59:34 +0100 Subject: Request backport JDK-8036619 Message-ID: <1394103574.3834.121.camel@galactica.localdomain> Hello! I'm not sure if this is the correct mailing list, if not, please direct me to the correct one. I would like to ask the backport of the changes made for the following bug report into JDK 8: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036619 The changes apply cleanly without modification: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~neugens/zero-2014-02-24/webrev.01/ Somehow the webrev was a bit broken, here is the actual patch: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~neugens/zero-2014-02-24/webrev.01/shark-patches.patch The related changes for JDK 9 are here: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~neugens/zero-2014-02-24/webrev.02/ The discussion here: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2014-March/012814.html and here: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2014-February/012679.html I can't push myself, so if OK, someone would need to do for me. Thanks! Cheers, Mario From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Thu Mar 6 16:23:07 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 16:23:07 +0000 Subject: Request backport JDK-8036619 In-Reply-To: <1394103574.3834.121.camel@galactica.localdomain> References: <1394103574.3834.121.camel@galactica.localdomain> Message-ID: <5318A0EB.3060301@oracle.com> Hi Mario, Hopefully Alejandro can work with you on this issue. -Rob On 06/03/14 10:59, Mario Torre wrote: > Hello! > > I'm not sure if this is the correct mailing list, if not, please direct > me to the correct one. > > I would like to ask the backport of the changes made for the following > bug report into JDK 8: > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036619 > > The changes apply cleanly without modification: > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~neugens/zero-2014-02-24/webrev.01/ > > Somehow the webrev was a bit broken, here is the actual patch: > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~neugens/zero-2014-02-24/webrev.01/shark-patches.patch > > The related changes for JDK 9 are here: > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~neugens/zero-2014-02-24/webrev.02/ > > The discussion here: > > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2014-March/012814.html > > and here: > > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2014-February/012679.html > > I can't push myself, so if OK, someone would need to do for me. > > Thanks! > > Cheers, > Mario > > From alejandro.murillo at oracle.com Thu Mar 6 17:43:38 2014 From: alejandro.murillo at oracle.com (Alejandro E Murillo) Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 10:43:38 -0700 Subject: Request backport JDK-8036619 In-Reply-To: <5318A0EB.3060301@oracle.com> References: <1394103574.3834.121.camel@galactica.localdomain> <5318A0EB.3060301@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5318B3CA.7090303@oracle.com> Hi Mario, looks like you want to backport it to 8u20, please check and follow the steps in the attached email and let me know if you have any question Thanks Alejandro On 3/6/2014 9:23 AM, Rob McKenna wrote: > Hi Mario, > > Hopefully Alejandro can work with you on this issue. > > -Rob > > On 06/03/14 10:59, Mario Torre wrote: >> Hello! >> >> I'm not sure if this is the correct mailing list, if not, please direct >> me to the correct one. >> >> I would like to ask the backport of the changes made for the following >> bug report into JDK 8: >> >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036619 >> >> The changes apply cleanly without modification: >> >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~neugens/zero-2014-02-24/webrev.01/ >> >> Somehow the webrev was a bit broken, here is the actual patch: >> >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~neugens/zero-2014-02-24/webrev.01/shark-patches.patch >> >> >> The related changes for JDK 9 are here: >> >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~neugens/zero-2014-02-24/webrev.02/ >> >> The discussion here: >> >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2014-March/012814.html >> >> >> and here: >> >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2014-February/012679.html >> >> >> I can't push myself, so if OK, someone would need to do for me. >> >> Thanks! >> >> Cheers, >> Mario >> >> > -- Alejandro -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Alejandro E Murillo Subject: Active Hotspot development repos & process summary Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 11:30:01 -0700 Size: 3053 URL: From sean.coffey at oracle.com Fri Mar 7 00:16:37 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 16:16:37 -0800 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8035629 [parfait] JNI exc pending in jdk/src/windows/native/sun/windows/ShellFolder2.cpp In-Reply-To: <53184242.9070809@oracle.com> References: <53184242.9070809@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53190FE5.6040304@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 06/03/14 01:39, Alexander Scherbatiy wrote: > > Hello, > > Could you approve the backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035629 > The JDK 9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/44db5d223658 > > Thanks, > Alexandr. > From dmitry.markov at oracle.com Fri Mar 7 07:08:28 2014 From: dmitry.markov at oracle.com (dmitry markov) Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 11:08:28 +0400 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval 8032872: [macosx] Cannot select from JComboBox in a JWindow Message-ID: <5319706C.5020007@oracle.com> Hello, Could you approve the straight back-port of the fix for 8032872 to jdk8u-dev, please? The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8032872 The webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dmarkov/8032872/jdk8u/webrev.00/ The review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2014-March/007109.html The jdk9 chageset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/0a574bcd66a7 Thanks, Dmitry From dalibor.topic at oracle.com Fri Mar 7 11:54:54 2014 From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (dalibor topic) Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 12:54:54 +0100 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval 8032872: [macosx] Cannot select from JComboBox in a JWindow In-Reply-To: <5319706C.5020007@oracle.com> References: <5319706C.5020007@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5319B38E.7090000@oracle.com> Thanks, Dmitry - approved for 8u-dev. On 07.03.2014 08:08, dmitry markov wrote: > Hello, > > Could you approve the straight back-port of the fix for 8032872 to > jdk8u-dev, please? > > The bug: > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8032872 > The webrev: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dmarkov/8032872/jdk8u/webrev.00/ > The review thread: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2014-March/007109.html > The jdk9 chageset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/0a574bcd66a7 > > Thanks, > Dmitry -- Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment From lana.steuck at oracle.com Tue Mar 11 05:44:55 2014 From: lana.steuck at oracle.com (lana.steuck at oracle.com) Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 22:44:55 -0700 (PDT) Subject: jdk8u-b05: jdk8u-dev Message-ID: <201403110544.s2B5itnt012541@jano-app.us.oracle.com> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/rev/69e0af208dad http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/nashorn/rev/4ceb9789a6a5 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/langtools/rev/27c08b9195d1 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/rev/c9117a5defe9 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jaxws/rev/918ceef47cb4 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jaxp/rev/fc6ca92688ef http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/rev/57eb3e69397e http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/corba/rev/17d296953274 --- All the fixes will be tested during promotion (no PIT testing at this point): List of all fixes: =================== JDK-7133499 core-libs (fc) FileChannel.read not preempted by asynchronous close on OS X JDK-7142035 core-svc assert in j.l.instrument agents during shutdown when daemon thread is running JDK-8027212 core-libs TEST_BUG: java/nio/channels/Selector/SelectAfterRead.java fails intermittently JDK-8030875 core-libs Macros for checking and returning on exceptions JDK-8031492 client-libs [Parfait] warnings from b122 for jdk/src/solaris/native/sun/awt: JNI exception pending JDK-8031573 client-libs [macosx] Checkmarks of JCheckBoxMenuItems aren't rendered in high resolution on Retina JDK-8032078 client-libs [macosx] CPlatformWindow.setWindowState throws RuntimeException, if windowState=ICONIFIED|MAXIMIZED_BOTH JDK-8032206 deploy Applet with jnlp.Packenabled=True And jnlp.versionEnabled=True Fails JDK-8032869 tools remove support for legacy options in javap JDK-8033787 core-svc [TESTBUG] Few jdk regression management tests should be improved with -XX:+UsePerfData usage JDK-8033911 core-libs Simplify instrumentation of FileInputStream and RandomAccessFile JDK-8033917 core-libs Keep track of file paths in file streams and channels for instrumentation purposes JDK-8034035 client-libs [parfait] JNI exception pending in jdk/src/macosx/native/sun/awt/LWCToolkit.m JDK-8034038 client-libs [parfait] JNI exception pending in macosx/native/sun/awt/CDataTransferer.m JDK-8034176 hotspot Update mapfile for libjfr JDK-8034189 hotspot Add dynamic instrumentation for I/O events JDK-8034840 tools Regression test tools/javap/MethodParameters.java fails in 8u20 nightly build JDK-8035363 docs Typo "aand" in security overview page JDK-8035364 tools An extra space in the comments of constant pool entries JDK-8035443 deploy Two api/javax_swing/text/JTextComponent TCK tests fail under plugin only JDK-8035618 other-libs Four api/org_omg/CORBA TCK tests fail under plugin only JDK-8035640 core-libs JNU_CHECK_EXCEPTION should support c++ JNI syntax JDK-8035897 core-libs Better memory allocation for file descriptors greater than 1024 on macosx JDK-8036004 xml Incorrect license header for a test class JDK-8036135 hotspot Missing null check in call to jfr_log from classFileLoadHook causes SIGSEGV JDK-8036584 core-libs Review comments from 8035897 From alexandr.scherbatiy at oracle.com Tue Mar 11 15:33:59 2014 From: alexandr.scherbatiy at oracle.com (Alexander Scherbatiy) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 19:33:59 +0400 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8036787 [parfait] JNI exc. pending in jdk/src/windows/native/sun/windows/awt_Object.cpp Message-ID: <531F2CE7.20800@oracle.com> Hello, Could you approve the backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036787 The JDK 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/9366f16bbaea Thanks, Alexandr. From alexandr.scherbatiy at oracle.com Tue Mar 11 15:34:25 2014 From: alexandr.scherbatiy at oracle.com (Alexander Scherbatiy) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 19:34:25 +0400 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8036781 [parfait] JNI exception pending in jdk/src/windows/native/sun/windows/awt_PrintDialog.cpp Message-ID: <531F2D01.4060908@oracle.com> Hello, Could you approve the backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036781 The JDK 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/40d3e4cc68d4 Thanks, Alexandr. From igor.veresov at oracle.com Tue Mar 11 18:54:16 2014 From: igor.veresov at oracle.com (Igor Veresov) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 11:54:16 -0700 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8025644: java/util/stream/test/org/openjdk/tests/java/util/stream/ToArrayOpTest.java fails with TestData$OfRef): failure java.lang.AssertionError: expected [true] but found [false] Message-ID: <32FC335E-CBAF-402B-85AC-63F999D89400@oracle.com> The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8025644 The JDK9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs-comp/hotspot/rev/5e2306b00977 Review discussion: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-compiler-dev/2014-January/013247.html Thanks! igor From vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com Tue Mar 11 19:02:51 2014 From: vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com (Vladimir Kozlov) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 12:02:51 -0700 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8025644: java/util/stream/test/org/openjdk/tests/java/util/stream/ToArrayOpTest.java fails with TestData$OfRef): failure java.lang.AssertionError: expected [true] but found [false] In-Reply-To: <32FC335E-CBAF-402B-85AC-63F999D89400@oracle.com> References: <32FC335E-CBAF-402B-85AC-63F999D89400@oracle.com> Message-ID: <531F5DDB.5090607@oracle.com> Igor, You don't need formal approval for Hotspot changes. Alejandro does it for all hotspot changes. You only need to send normal RFR to hotspot-dev and push it into hotspot staging repo from where Alejandor push it into 8u20: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/hs-dev/hotspot Changes are good. Thanks, Vladimri On 3/11/14 11:54 AM, Igor Veresov wrote: > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8025644 > The JDK9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs-comp/hotspot/rev/5e2306b00977 > Review discussion: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-compiler-dev/2014-January/013247.html > > Thanks! > igor > From igor.veresov at oracle.com Tue Mar 11 19:12:47 2014 From: igor.veresov at oracle.com (Igor Veresov) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 12:12:47 -0700 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8025644: java/util/stream/test/org/openjdk/tests/java/util/stream/ToArrayOpTest.java fails with TestData$OfRef): failure java.lang.AssertionError: expected [true] but found [false] In-Reply-To: <531F5DDB.5090607@oracle.com> References: <32FC335E-CBAF-402B-85AC-63F999D89400@oracle.com> <531F5DDB.5090607@oracle.com> Message-ID: <81A871B9-8766-4FE2-9E70-71937FB32EC9@oracle.com> Ugh, alright, thanks! igor On Mar 11, 2014, at 12:02 PM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote: > Igor, > > You don't need formal approval for Hotspot changes. Alejandro does it for all hotspot changes. > You only need to send normal RFR to hotspot-dev and push it into hotspot staging repo from where Alejandor push it into 8u20: > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/hs-dev/hotspot > > Changes are good. > > Thanks, > Vladimri > > On 3/11/14 11:54 AM, Igor Veresov wrote: >> The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8025644 >> The JDK9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs-comp/hotspot/rev/5e2306b00977 >> Review discussion: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-compiler-dev/2014-January/013247.html >> >> Thanks! >> igor >> From sean.coffey at oracle.com Tue Mar 11 19:39:36 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 19:39:36 +0000 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8036787 [parfait] JNI exc. pending in jdk/src/windows/native/sun/windows/awt_Object.cpp In-Reply-To: <531F2CE7.20800@oracle.com> References: <531F2CE7.20800@oracle.com> Message-ID: <531F6678.60604@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 11/03/2014 15:33, Alexander Scherbatiy wrote: > > Hello, > > Could you approve the backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036787 > The JDK 9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/9366f16bbaea > > Thanks, > Alexandr. > From sean.coffey at oracle.com Tue Mar 11 19:40:02 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 19:40:02 +0000 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8036781 [parfait] JNI exception pending in jdk/src/windows/native/sun/windows/awt_PrintDialog.cpp In-Reply-To: <531F2D01.4060908@oracle.com> References: <531F2D01.4060908@oracle.com> Message-ID: <531F6692.2070202@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 11/03/2014 15:34, Alexander Scherbatiy wrote: > > Hello, > > Could you approve the backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036781 > The JDK 9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/40d3e4cc68d4 > > Thanks, > Alexandr. > > From petr.pchelko at oracle.com Wed Mar 12 11:47:28 2014 From: petr.pchelko at oracle.com (Petr Pchelko) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 15:47:28 +0400 Subject: Request for approval: JDK-8023148 [macosx] java.util.NoSuchElementException at java.util.LinkedList.getFirst Message-ID: <46AED210-614A-42A5-B079-DD4A8DE6FA1D@oracle.com> Hello, This is a request for approval to backport the fix from JDK-9 to JDK8u20. The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8023148 The 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/b9f416d23fd1 The webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pchelko/9/8023148/webrev/ The review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2013-December/006648.html Thank you. With best regards. Petr. From petr.pchelko at oracle.com Wed Mar 12 11:49:22 2014 From: petr.pchelko at oracle.com (Petr Pchelko) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 15:49:22 +0400 Subject: Request for approval: JDK-8026869 [macosx] Support apple.awt.use-file-dialog-packages property Message-ID: <968818D8-597D-4E5F-880A-5EF769FB7A50@oracle.com> Hello, This is a request for approval to backport the fix from JDK-9 to JDK8u20. The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8026869 The 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/95cf1f5d7c7f The webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pchelko/9/8026869/webrev.00/ The review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2013-December/006647.html Thank you. With best regards. Petr. From petr.pchelko at oracle.com Wed Mar 12 11:52:37 2014 From: petr.pchelko at oracle.com (Petr Pchelko) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 15:52:37 +0400 Subject: Request for approval: JDK-7159566 The choice positioned in the top of applet when clicking the choice. Message-ID: <65174986-9F06-4616-A0B2-4852770FA02E@oracle.com> Hello, This is a request for approval to backport the fix from JDK-9 to JDK8u20. The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7159566 The 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/e6ac19befa88 The webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pchelko/9/7159566/webrev.01/ The review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2013-December/006694.html Thank you. With best regards. Petr. From petr.pchelko at oracle.com Wed Mar 12 11:54:35 2014 From: petr.pchelko at oracle.com (Petr Pchelko) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 15:54:35 +0400 Subject: Request for approval: JDK-8007220 [macosx] Setting popupmenu on TrayIcon do not work if done *after* adding TrayIcon Message-ID: <2BCA8659-45C9-4CB8-A974-E24E24DEFFA2@oracle.com> Hello, This is a request for approval to backport the fix from JDK-9 to JDK8u20. The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8007220 The 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/d81ecc68a87a The webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pchelko/9/8007220/webrev.02/ The review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2013-December/006666.html Thank you. With best regards. Petr. From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Mar 12 11:50:31 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 11:50:31 +0000 Subject: Request for approval: JDK-8023148 [macosx] java.util.NoSuchElementException at java.util.LinkedList.getFirst In-Reply-To: <46AED210-614A-42A5-B079-DD4A8DE6FA1D@oracle.com> References: <46AED210-614A-42A5-B079-DD4A8DE6FA1D@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53204A07.4010806@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 12/03/14 11:47, Petr Pchelko wrote: > Hello, > > This is a request for approval to backport the fix from JDK-9 to JDK8u20. > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8023148 > The 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/b9f416d23fd1 > The webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pchelko/9/8023148/webrev/ > The review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2013-December/006648.html > > Thank you. > With best regards. Petr. From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Mar 12 11:50:44 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 11:50:44 +0000 Subject: Request for approval: JDK-8026869 [macosx] Support apple.awt.use-file-dialog-packages property In-Reply-To: <968818D8-597D-4E5F-880A-5EF769FB7A50@oracle.com> References: <968818D8-597D-4E5F-880A-5EF769FB7A50@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53204A14.2030409@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 12/03/14 11:49, Petr Pchelko wrote: > Hello, > > This is a request for approval to backport the fix from JDK-9 to JDK8u20. > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8026869 > The 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/95cf1f5d7c7f > The webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pchelko/9/8026869/webrev.00/ > The review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2013-December/006647.html > > Thank you. > With best regards. Petr. From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Mar 12 11:50:57 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 11:50:57 +0000 Subject: Request for approval: JDK-7159566 The choice positioned in the top of applet when clicking the choice. In-Reply-To: <65174986-9F06-4616-A0B2-4852770FA02E@oracle.com> References: <65174986-9F06-4616-A0B2-4852770FA02E@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53204A21.6050601@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 12/03/14 11:52, Petr Pchelko wrote: > Hello, > > This is a request for approval to backport the fix from JDK-9 to JDK8u20. > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7159566 > The 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/e6ac19befa88 > The webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pchelko/9/7159566/webrev.01/ > The review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2013-December/006694.html > > Thank you. > With best regards. Petr. From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Mar 12 11:51:32 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 11:51:32 +0000 Subject: Request for approval: JDK-8007220 [macosx] Setting popupmenu on TrayIcon do not work if done *after* adding TrayIcon In-Reply-To: <2BCA8659-45C9-4CB8-A974-E24E24DEFFA2@oracle.com> References: <2BCA8659-45C9-4CB8-A974-E24E24DEFFA2@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53204A44.1010302@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 12/03/14 11:54, Petr Pchelko wrote: > Hello, > > This is a request for approval to backport the fix from JDK-9 to JDK8u20. > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8007220 > The 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/d81ecc68a87a > The webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pchelko/9/8007220/webrev.02/ > The review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2013-December/006666.html > > Thank you. > With best regards. Petr. From petr.pchelko at oracle.com Wed Mar 12 11:57:17 2014 From: petr.pchelko at oracle.com (Petr Pchelko) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 15:57:17 +0400 Subject: Request for approval: JDK-7154841 [macosx] Popups appear behind taskbar Message-ID: Hello, This is a request for approval to backport the fix from JDK-9 to JDK8u20. The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7154841 The 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/586871d43b48 The webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pchelko/9/7154841/webrev.02/ The review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2013-December/006739.html Thank you. With best regards. Petr. From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Mar 12 11:54:34 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 11:54:34 +0000 Subject: Request for approval: JDK-7154841 [macosx] Popups appear behind taskbar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <53204AFA.5090107@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 12/03/14 11:57, Petr Pchelko wrote: > Hello, > > This is a request for approval to backport the fix from JDK-9 to JDK8u20. > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7154841 > The 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/586871d43b48 > The webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pchelko/9/7154841/webrev.02/ > The review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2013-December/006739.html > > Thank you. > With best regards. Petr. From petr.pchelko at oracle.com Wed Mar 12 12:00:50 2014 From: petr.pchelko at oracle.com (Petr Pchelko) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 16:00:50 +0400 Subject: Request for approval: JDK-8037202 Remove reflection from DataTransferer.getInstance Message-ID: Hello, This is a request for approval to backport the fix from JDK-9 to JDK8u20. The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029893 The 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/97658806cb35 Thank you. With best regards. Petr. From petr.pchelko at oracle.com Wed Mar 12 12:03:18 2014 From: petr.pchelko at oracle.com (Petr Pchelko) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 16:03:18 +0400 Subject: Request for approval: JDK-8032058 [TEST_BUG] [macosx] java/awt/dnd/Button2DragTest sometimes fail Message-ID: <04681619-78F1-45D7-B8FA-C9BE1A3DEEA8@oracle.com> Hello, This is a request for approval to backport the fix from JDK-9 to JDK8u20. The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8032058 The 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/832706782635 The webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pchelko/9/8032058/webrev/ The review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2014-January/006806.html Thank you. With best regards. Petr. From petr.pchelko at oracle.com Wed Mar 12 12:04:45 2014 From: petr.pchelko at oracle.com (Petr Pchelko) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 16:04:45 +0400 Subject: Request for approval: JDK-8030050 Validate fields on DnD class deserialization Message-ID: Hello, This is a request for approval to backport the fix from JDK-9 to JDK8u20. The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8030050 The 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/0efdaaad9678 Thank you. With best regards. Petr. From petr.pchelko at oracle.com Wed Mar 12 12:06:42 2014 From: petr.pchelko at oracle.com (Petr Pchelko) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 16:06:42 +0400 Subject: Request for approval: JDK-8029868 Fix KSS issues in sun.lwawt.macosx Message-ID: Hello, This is a request for approval to backport the fix from JDK-9 to JDK8u20. The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029868 The 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/04737ebcbe7f Thank you. With best regards. Petr. From petr.pchelko at oracle.com Wed Mar 12 12:10:06 2014 From: petr.pchelko at oracle.com (Petr Pchelko) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 16:10:06 +0400 Subject: Request for approval: JDK-8031964 [macosx] Dragging images from the browser does not work Message-ID: Hello, This is a request for approval to backport the fix from JDK-9 to JDK8u20. The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8031964 The 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/74516c1d71c4 The webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pchelko/9/8031964/webrev.03/ The review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2014-January/006889.html Thank you. With best regards. Petr. From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Mar 12 12:11:54 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 12:11:54 +0000 Subject: Request for approval: JDK-8037202 Remove reflection from DataTransferer.getInstance In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <53204F0A.20605@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 12/03/14 12:00, Petr Pchelko wrote: > Hello, > > This is a request for approval to backport the fix from JDK-9 to JDK8u20. > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029893 > The 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/97658806cb35 > > Thank you. > With best regards. Petr. From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Mar 12 12:13:01 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 12:13:01 +0000 Subject: Request for approval: JDK-8032058 [TEST_BUG] [macosx] java/awt/dnd/Button2DragTest sometimes fail In-Reply-To: <04681619-78F1-45D7-B8FA-C9BE1A3DEEA8@oracle.com> References: <04681619-78F1-45D7-B8FA-C9BE1A3DEEA8@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53204F4D.9070505@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 12/03/14 12:03, Petr Pchelko wrote: > Hello, > > This is a request for approval to backport the fix from JDK-9 to JDK8u20. > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8032058 > The 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/832706782635 > The webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pchelko/9/8032058/webrev/ > The review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2014-January/006806.html > > Thank you. > With best regards. Petr. From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Mar 12 12:13:34 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 12:13:34 +0000 Subject: Request for approval: JDK-8030050 Validate fields on DnD class deserialization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <53204F6E.3010805@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 12/03/14 12:04, Petr Pchelko wrote: > Hello, > > This is a request for approval to backport the fix from JDK-9 to JDK8u20. > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8030050 > The 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/0efdaaad9678 > > Thank you. > With best regards. Petr. From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Mar 12 12:14:03 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 12:14:03 +0000 Subject: Request for approval: JDK-8029868 Fix KSS issues in sun.lwawt.macosx In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <53204F8B.3020403@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 12/03/14 12:06, Petr Pchelko wrote: > Hello, > > This is a request for approval to backport the fix from JDK-9 to JDK8u20. > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029868 > The 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/04737ebcbe7f > > Thank you. > With best regards. Petr. From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Mar 12 12:15:20 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 12:15:20 +0000 Subject: Request for approval: JDK-8031964 [macosx] Dragging images from the browser does not work In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <53204FD8.1020908@oracle.com> Approved. Thanks for taking these backports on! regards, Sean. On 12/03/14 12:10, Petr Pchelko wrote: > Hello, > > This is a request for approval to backport the fix from JDK-9 to JDK8u20. > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8031964 > The 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/74516c1d71c4 > The webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pchelko/9/8031964/webrev.03/ > The review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2014-January/006889.html > > Thank you. > With best regards. Petr. From petr.pchelko at oracle.com Wed Mar 12 13:56:34 2014 From: petr.pchelko at oracle.com (Petr Pchelko) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 17:56:34 +0400 Subject: Request for approval: JDK-8027561 [macosx] Cleanup "may not respond to selector" warnings in native code Message-ID: Hello, This is a request to backport the fix from JDK9 to JDK 8u20. The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8027561 JDK9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/d3c831d1d2e2 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pchelko/9/8027561/webrev/ The review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2013-December/006755.html Thank you. With best regards. Petr. From dalibor.topic at oracle.com Thu Mar 13 08:53:46 2014 From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (dalibor topic) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 09:53:46 +0100 Subject: Request for approval: JDK-8027561 [macosx] Cleanup "may not respond to selector" warnings in native code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5321721A.9020609@oracle.com> Thanks, Petr - approved for 8u-dev. On 12.03.2014 14:56, Petr Pchelko wrote: > Hello, > > This is a request to backport the fix from JDK9 to JDK 8u20. > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8027561 > JDK9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/d3c831d1d2e2 > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pchelko/9/8027561/webrev/ > The review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2013-December/006755.html > > Thank you. > With best regards. Petr. > -- Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment From aleksej.efimov at oracle.com Thu Mar 13 09:46:22 2014 From: aleksej.efimov at oracle.com (Aleksej Efimov) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 13:46:22 +0400 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8027359: XML parser returns incorrect parsing results Message-ID: <53217E6E.3080300@oracle.com> Hello, This is a request for approval to backport the JDK-8027359 fix from JDK9 to JDK8u20. This is a straight-forward backport. The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8027359 JDK 9 changesets: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jaxp/rev/6cfe9502343e http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/1a4ed2bd4556 JDK 9 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-January/024184.html Thank you. Aleksej From dalibor.topic at oracle.com Thu Mar 13 10:58:45 2014 From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (dalibor topic) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 11:58:45 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8027359: XML parser returns incorrect parsing results In-Reply-To: <53217E6E.3080300@oracle.com> References: <53217E6E.3080300@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53218F65.2030008@oracle.com> Thanks, Aleksej - approved for 8u-dev. cheers, dalibor topic On 13.03.2014 10:46, Aleksej Efimov wrote: > Hello, > > This is a request for approval to backport the JDK-8027359 fix from JDK9 > to JDK8u20. > This is a straight-forward backport. > > The bug: > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8027359 > > JDK 9 changesets: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jaxp/rev/6cfe9502343e > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/1a4ed2bd4556 > > JDK 9 review thread: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-January/024184.html > > > Thank you. > Aleksej -- Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment From sean.coffey at oracle.com Thu Mar 13 11:38:14 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 11:38:14 +0000 Subject: sync of jdk8 master -> jdk8u-dev complete for this week. Message-ID: <532198A6.9030207@oracle.com> jdk8u-dev forest now synced up to jdk8-b132 tag from JDK 8 master forest. regards, Sean. From alejandro.murillo at oracle.com Thu Mar 13 20:07:27 2014 From: alejandro.murillo at oracle.com (Alejandro E Murillo) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 14:07:27 -0600 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for bulk integration of hs25.20-b06 Message-ID: <53220FFF.6090901@oracle.com> Requesting approval to integrate hs25.20-b06 into jdk8u20-b06. A webrev is available at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amurillo/8u20/hs25.20-b06-jdk8u20-b06.webrev/ Pre-integration testing is in progress; the integration will proceed only after SQE has analyzed the results and approved. The fixes in the proposed integration are below. All have undergone nightly testing and are already in a jdk9 repository. 6498581: ThreadInterruptTest3 produces wrong output on Windows 8025644: java/util/stream/test/org/openjdk/tests/java/util/stream/ToArrayOpTest.java fails with TestData$OfRef): failure java.lang.AssertionError: expected [true] but found [false] 8027124: [TESTBUG] NonTieredLevelsTest: java.lang.RuntimeException: private TestCase$Helper(java.lang.Object) must be osr_compiled 8027257: [TESTBUG] compiler/ciReplay/TestVM.sh : Error: Could not find or load main class negative_test 8028280: ParkEvent leak when running modified runThese which only loads classes 8028482: [TESTBUG] tests that use JMX should be in need_compact3 test group 8028785: [parfait] warnings from b116 for hotspot.src.share.vm.prims: JNI exception pending 8029775: Solaris code cleanup 8033792: AltHashing used jint for imprecise bit shifting 8033805: Move Fast_Lock/Fast_Unlock code from .ad files to macroassembler 8034860: Fatal error due to incorrect thread state during nightly testing 8035983: Fix "Native frames:" in crash report (hs_err file) 8036032: new hotspot build - hs25.20-b06 -- Alejandro From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Thu Mar 13 22:22:09 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 22:22:09 +0000 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for bulk integration of hs25.20-b06 In-Reply-To: <53220FFF.6090901@oracle.com> References: <53220FFF.6090901@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53222F91.4040009@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 13/03/14 20:07, Alejandro E Murillo wrote: > Requesting approval to integrate hs25.20-b06 into jdk8u20-b06. > > A webrev is available at: > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amurillo/8u20/hs25.20-b06-jdk8u20-b06.webrev/ > > Pre-integration testing is in progress; the integration will proceed > only after SQE has analyzed the results and approved. > > The fixes in the proposed integration are below. All have undergone > nightly testing and are already in a jdk9 repository. > > 6498581: ThreadInterruptTest3 produces wrong output on Windows > 8025644: > java/util/stream/test/org/openjdk/tests/java/util/stream/ToArrayOpTest.java > fails with TestData$OfRef): failure java.lang.AssertionError: expected > [true] but found [false] > 8027124: [TESTBUG] NonTieredLevelsTest: java.lang.RuntimeException: > private TestCase$Helper(java.lang.Object) must be osr_compiled > 8027257: [TESTBUG] compiler/ciReplay/TestVM.sh : Error: Could not find > or load main class negative_test > 8028280: ParkEvent leak when running modified runThese which only > loads classes > 8028482: [TESTBUG] tests that use JMX should be in need_compact3 test > group > 8028785: [parfait] warnings from b116 for hotspot.src.share.vm.prims: > JNI exception pending > 8029775: Solaris code cleanup > 8033792: AltHashing used jint for imprecise bit shifting > 8033805: Move Fast_Lock/Fast_Unlock code from .ad files to macroassembler > 8034860: Fatal error due to incorrect thread state during nightly testing > 8035983: Fix "Native frames:" in crash report (hs_err file) > 8036032: new hotspot build - hs25.20-b06 > From neugens at redhat.com Fri Mar 14 08:04:15 2014 From: neugens at redhat.com (Mario Torre) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 09:04:15 +0100 Subject: Request backport JDK-8036619 In-Reply-To: <5318B3CA.7090303@oracle.com> References: <1394103574.3834.121.camel@galactica.localdomain> <5318A0EB.3060301@oracle.com> <5318B3CA.7090303@oracle.com> Message-ID: <1394784255.4008.18.camel@galactica.localdomain> On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 10:43 -0700, Alejandro E Murillo wrote: Hi Alejandro, Thanks for the reply. > (1) Mark the bugs appropriately according to the development phase of > the targeted JDK > - For instance, 7u60 is in RDP2 now, so bugs should be marked > appropriately and approved > before changes can be pushed to the hotspot repo. > I'm not sure what's the "appropriate" marking for this bug. Also, should I create a new bug report? As for the rest, I just sent a mail to the hotspot-dev mailing list. I don't have access to JPRT so I can't push it myself. Cheers, Mario From magnus.ihse.bursie at oracle.com Fri Mar 14 09:46:12 2014 From: magnus.ihse.bursie at oracle.com (Magnus Ihse Bursie) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:46:12 +0100 Subject: Request for approval to backport JDK-8033921: Build fails if --with-alsa option is used due to incorrect ALSA link parameter in autoconf script. Message-ID: <5322CFE4.3090507@oracle.com> Hi, Please approve the backport to jdk8u-dev of JDK-8033921. While the real contents of the patch applies without conflict, since it involves configure code, generated-configure.sh must be regenerated. Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8033921 Review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2014-February/011760.html JDK9 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/rev/260f2ef12254 /Magnus From sean.coffey at oracle.com Fri Mar 14 11:02:39 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:02:39 +0000 Subject: Request for approval to backport JDK-8033921: Build fails if --with-alsa option is used due to incorrect ALSA link parameter in autoconf script. In-Reply-To: <5322CFE4.3090507@oracle.com> References: <5322CFE4.3090507@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5322E1CF.4010502@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 14/03/14 09:46, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: > Hi, > > Please approve the backport to jdk8u-dev of JDK-8033921. While the > real contents of the patch applies without conflict, since it involves > configure code, generated-configure.sh must be regenerated. > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8033921 > Review thread: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2014-February/011760.html > JDK9 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/rev/260f2ef12254 > > /Magnus From aleksej.efimov at oracle.com Fri Mar 14 12:09:44 2014 From: aleksej.efimov at oracle.com (Aleksej Efimov) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 16:09:44 +0400 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8037012: (tz) Support tzdata2014a Message-ID: <5322F188.3010009@oracle.com> Hello, This is a request for approval to backport the latest tzdata (2014a) fix from JDK9 to JDK8u20. This is a straight-forward backport. The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8037012 JDK 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/bfc1616f6533 JDK 9 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-March/025694.html Thank you. Aleksej From aleksej.efimov at oracle.com Fri Mar 14 12:09:51 2014 From: aleksej.efimov at oracle.com (Aleksej Efimov) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 16:09:51 +0400 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8037180: [TEST_BUG] test/sun/util/calendar/zi/Zoneinfo.java incorrectly calculates raw GMT offset change time Message-ID: <5322F18F.8030705@oracle.com> Hello, This is a request for approval to backport the test failure fix from JDK9 to JDK8u20. This is a straight-forward backport. The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8037180 JDK 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/229b1fe14362 JDK 9 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-March/025695.html Thank you. Aleksej From alejandro.murillo at oracle.com Fri Mar 14 20:45:55 2014 From: alejandro.murillo at oracle.com (Alejandro E Murillo) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 14:45:55 -0600 Subject: Request backport JDK-8036619 In-Reply-To: <1394784255.4008.18.camel@galactica.localdomain> References: <1394103574.3834.121.camel@galactica.localdomain> <5318A0EB.3060301@oracle.com> <5318B3CA.7090303@oracle.com> <1394784255.4008.18.camel@galactica.localdomain> Message-ID: <53236A83.5020208@oracle.com> On 3/14/2014 2:04 AM, Mario Torre wrote: > On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 10:43 -0700, Alejandro E Murillo wrote: > > Hi Alejandro, > > Thanks for the reply. > >> (1) Mark the bugs appropriately according to the development phase of >> the targeted JDK >> - For instance, 7u60 is in RDP2 now, so bugs should be marked >> appropriately and approved >> before changes can be pushed to the hotspot repo. >> > I'm not sure what's the "appropriate" marking for this bug. Also, should > I create a new bug report? > > As for the rest, I just sent a mail to the hotspot-dev mailing list. I > don't have access to JPRT so I can't push it myself. > > Cheers, > Mario > > Hi Mario, Looks like you are requesting a backport to 8u (8 will be released very soon), for that release no special permission is required to push the change, so no need to enter any info to the bug or create one. The backport will be created when the change is pushed The hotspot development repo for 8u20 is: jdk8u/hs-dev/hotspot please provide the webrev against that. You only need to get your webrev reviewed, once that's done then ping me again, and I can get the committed patch, with the appropriate reviewers, and push it for you via JPRT. Also, with so many active releases is better to use a more standard subject for that email request, in this case something like this: [8u20] RFR (size): 8036619: Shark: add LLVM 3.4 support RFR = Request for Review size = size of the review, can be: XS, S, M, L since the change applied cleanly, perhaps getting the ok from the reviewers of the changeset on jdk9 should be enough. Please resend the request with the appropriate subject and webrev, and let me know if something is not clear thanks -- Alejandro From dalibor.topic at oracle.com Mon Mar 17 15:51:34 2014 From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (dalibor topic) Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 16:51:34 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8037012: (tz) Support tzdata2014a In-Reply-To: <5322F188.3010009@oracle.com> References: <5322F188.3010009@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53271A06.3020601@oracle.com> Thanks Aleksej - approved for 8u-dev. On 14.03.2014 13:09, Aleksej Efimov wrote: > Hello, > > This is a request for approval to backport the latest tzdata (2014a) fix > from JDK9 to JDK8u20. > This is a straight-forward backport. > > The bug: > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8037012 > > JDK 9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/bfc1616f6533 > > JDK 9 review thread: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-March/025694.html > > Thank you. > Aleksej -- Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment From dalibor.topic at oracle.com Mon Mar 17 15:52:37 2014 From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (dalibor topic) Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 16:52:37 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8037180: [TEST_BUG] test/sun/util/calendar/zi/Zoneinfo.java incorrectly calculates raw GMT offset change time In-Reply-To: <5322F18F.8030705@oracle.com> References: <5322F18F.8030705@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53271A45.2040407@oracle.com> Thanks, Aleksej - approved for 8u-dev. cheers, dalibor topic On 14.03.2014 13:09, Aleksej Efimov wrote: > Hello, > > This is a request for approval to backport the test failure fix from > JDK9 to JDK8u20. > This is a straight-forward backport. > > The bug: > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8037180 > > JDK 9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/229b1fe14362 > > JDK 9 review thread: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-March/025695.html > > Thank you. > Aleksej -- Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment From erik.joelsson at oracle.com Tue Mar 18 12:26:06 2014 From: erik.joelsson at oracle.com (Erik Joelsson) Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 13:26:06 +0100 Subject: Request for approval: 8037483: issue with the crypto / sec zip unzipping in the jdk8 build Message-ID: <53283B5E.7090907@oracle.com> Hello, I would like to backport JDK-8037483 to jdk8u-dev. Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8037483 Review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2014-March/012135.html Jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/51be733cf7b5 /Erik From sean.coffey at oracle.com Tue Mar 18 12:30:56 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 12:30:56 +0000 Subject: Request for approval: 8037483: issue with the crypto / sec zip unzipping in the jdk8 build In-Reply-To: <53283B5E.7090907@oracle.com> References: <53283B5E.7090907@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53283C80.7090406@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 18/03/2014 12:26, Erik Joelsson wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to backport JDK-8037483 to jdk8u-dev. > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8037483 > Review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2014-March/012135.html > Jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/51be733cf7b5 > > /Erik From alejandro.murillo at oracle.com Tue Mar 18 18:37:29 2014 From: alejandro.murillo at oracle.com (Alejandro E Murillo) Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 12:37:29 -0600 Subject: jdk8u20-b06: HotSpot Message-ID: <53289269.9060302@oracle.com> hs25.20-b06 has been integrated into jdk8u20-b06. http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/rev/ae6a3aec6aa2 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/corba/rev/bcdc679d86aa http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/rev/c3d92e048737 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jaxp/rev/7b1a6da8ad82 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jaxws/rev/515ddaddbb64 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/rev/1ecfc0fac3e7 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/langtools/rev/c6d0108aca9f http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/nashorn/rev/4268cd11c241 Component : VM Status : 0 major failures, 0 minor failures Date : 03/18/2014 at 13:15 MSK Tested By : STT_VM Cost(total man-days): 1 Workspace : 2014-03-13-172148.amurillo.hs25-20-b06-jdk8u20-b06-control Bundles : 2014-03-13-172148.amurillo.hs25-20-b06-jdk8u20-b06-control Platforms : Others Tests :/net/sqenfs-1.sfbay/export1/comp/vm/testbase/ Log : link Browsers : NA Patches : NA Number of Tests Executed: 289397 passed tests, 2920 failed tests (0 new failures) Bug verification status: ====================================== Tested, Pass: Tested, Pass (partial fixes): Tested, Fail: Untested bug fixes: Setup is not available: 6498581: ThreadInterruptTest3 produces wrong output on Windows 8025644: java/util/stream/test/org/openjdk/tests/java/util/stream/ToArrayOpTest.java fails with TestData$OfRef): failure java.lang.AssertionError: expected [true] but found [false] 8027124: [TESTBUG] NonTieredLevelsTest: java.lang.RuntimeException: private TestCase$Helper(java.lang.Object) must be osr_compiled 8027257: [TESTBUG] compiler/ciReplay/TestVM.sh : Error: Could not find or load main class negative_test 8028280: ParkEvent leak when running modified runThese which only loads classes 8028482: [TESTBUG] tests that use JMX should be in need_compact3 test group 8028785: [parfait] warnings from b116 for hotspot.src.share.vm.prims: JNI exception pending 8029775: Solaris code cleanup 8032518: fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment(access violation) 8033792: AltHashing used jint for imprecise bit shifting 8033805: Move Fast_Lock/Fast_Unlock code from .ad files to macroassembler 8034860: Fatal error due to incorrect thread state during nightly testing 8035983: Fix "Native frames:" in crash report (hs_err file) 8036032: new hotspot build - hs25.20-b06 New bugs filed: Bugs in PIT build: Bugs in earlier promoted build: Number of PIT requested: 1 Integration target J2SE build number: jdk8u20-b06 Issues and Notes: No new issue found. Go for integration. -- Alejandro From weijun.wang at oracle.com Wed Mar 19 09:01:47 2014 From: weijun.wang at oracle.com (Wang Weijun) Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 17:01:47 +0800 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval: 8036971: krb5.conf does not accept directive lines before the first section Message-ID: <6AF35574-E875-46C0-AC79-AC53DA90F0E3@oracle.com> Hi All This is a request to backport a jdk9 fix into jdk8u-dev. 8036971: krb5.conf does not accept directive lines before the first section https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036971 The fix ignores unsupported directive lines (Ex, include) before any section in a krb5.conf file. It is already included in jdk9 as: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/74ee60cf6174 The review thread was http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2014-March/010282.html The patch for jdk8u-dev is identical to the one in jdk9. The fix is low-risk, and isolated. new regression test added. Existing tests also run fine. Thanks Weijun From weijun.wang at oracle.com Wed Mar 19 09:10:15 2014 From: weijun.wang at oracle.com (Wang Weijun) Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 17:10:15 +0800 Subject: [8u-dev & 7u-dev] Request for approval: 8035963: The failed Kerberos tests due to timeouts Message-ID: <751D4068-01F9-4D3C-905F-14E7C1ECDC34@oracle.com> Hi All This is a request to backport a jdk9 fix into jdk8u-dev *and* jdk7u-dev. 8035963: The failed Kerberos tests due to timeouts https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035963 The fix modifies the timeout values for several tests to make them more stable. It is already included in jdk9 as: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/f193fc8bbaf5 The review thread was http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2014-March/010275.html The patch for jdk8u-dev and jdk7u-dev is identical to the one in jdk9. The fix is test only. Thanks Weijun From jan.lahoda at oracle.com Wed Mar 19 10:20:56 2014 From: jan.lahoda at oracle.com (Jan Lahoda) Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 11:20:56 +0100 Subject: [8u20] request for approval to backport JDK-8034854: outer_class_info_index of synthetic class is not zero Message-ID: <53296F88.7010205@oracle.com> Hello, I'd like to ask for an approval to backport fix for: JDK-8034854: outer_class_info_index of synthetic class is not zero Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8034854 jdk9 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/7690787d1a81 Review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/compiler-dev/2014-February/008523.html Patch applies cleanly to: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/langtools Thank you, Jan From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Mar 19 10:30:26 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 10:30:26 +0000 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval: 8036971: krb5.conf does not accept directive lines before the first section In-Reply-To: <6AF35574-E875-46C0-AC79-AC53DA90F0E3@oracle.com> References: <6AF35574-E875-46C0-AC79-AC53DA90F0E3@oracle.com> Message-ID: <532971C2.5030204@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 19/03/14 09:01, Wang Weijun wrote: > Hi All > > This is a request to backport a jdk9 fix into jdk8u-dev. > > 8036971: krb5.conf does not accept directive lines before the first section > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036971 > > The fix ignores unsupported directive lines (Ex, include) before any section in a krb5.conf file. > > It is already included in jdk9 as: > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/74ee60cf6174 > > The review thread was > > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2014-March/010282.html > > The patch for jdk8u-dev is identical to the one in jdk9. > > The fix is low-risk, and isolated. new regression test added. Existing tests also run fine. > > Thanks > Weijun From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Mar 19 10:31:27 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 10:31:27 +0000 Subject: [8u-dev & 7u-dev] Request for approval: 8035963: The failed Kerberos tests due to timeouts In-Reply-To: <751D4068-01F9-4D3C-905F-14E7C1ECDC34@oracle.com> References: <751D4068-01F9-4D3C-905F-14E7C1ECDC34@oracle.com> Message-ID: <532971FF.3030704@oracle.com> Approved for jdk8u-dev and jdk7u-dev. regards, Sean. On 19/03/14 09:10, Wang Weijun wrote: > Hi All > > This is a request to backport a jdk9 fix into jdk8u-dev *and* jdk7u-dev. > > 8035963: The failed Kerberos tests due to timeouts > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035963 > > The fix modifies the timeout values for several tests to make them more stable. It is already included in jdk9 as: > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/f193fc8bbaf5 > > The review thread was > > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2014-March/010275.html > > The patch for jdk8u-dev and jdk7u-dev is identical to the one in jdk9. > > The fix is test only. > > Thanks > Weijun From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Mar 19 10:32:17 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 10:32:17 +0000 Subject: [8u20] request for approval to backport JDK-8034854: outer_class_info_index of synthetic class is not zero In-Reply-To: <53296F88.7010205@oracle.com> References: <53296F88.7010205@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53297231.1040005@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 19/03/14 10:20, Jan Lahoda wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to ask for an approval to backport fix for: > > JDK-8034854: outer_class_info_index of synthetic class is not zero > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8034854 > jdk9 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/7690787d1a81 > Review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/compiler-dev/2014-February/008523.html > Patch applies cleanly to: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/langtools > > Thank you, > Jan From oleg.pekhovskiy at oracle.com Wed Mar 19 15:07:24 2014 From: oleg.pekhovskiy at oracle.com (Oleg Pekhovskiy) Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 19:07:24 +0400 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8036788 [parfait] JNI exception pending in jdk/src/windows/native/sun/windows/awt_Event.cpp Message-ID: <5329B2AC.9070509@oracle.com> Hello, please approve the backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036788 The JDK 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/33a020a3811c Thanks, Oleg. From oleg.pekhovskiy at oracle.com Wed Mar 19 15:11:12 2014 From: oleg.pekhovskiy at oracle.com (Oleg Pekhovskiy) Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 19:11:12 +0400 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8036782 [parfait] JNI exc. pending in jdk/src/windows/native/sun/windows/awt_MouseEvent.cpp Message-ID: <5329B390.7060901@oracle.com> Hello, please approve the backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036782 The JDK 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/6301592b5351 Thanks, Oleg From oleg.pekhovskiy at oracle.com Wed Mar 19 15:13:39 2014 From: oleg.pekhovskiy at oracle.com (Oleg Pekhovskiy) Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 19:13:39 +0400 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8035622 [parfait] JNI exception pending in jdk/src/windows/native/sun/windows/awt_DesktopProperties.cpp Message-ID: <5329B423.2090708@oracle.com> Hello, please approve the backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035622 The JDK 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/e34c139e8c9f Thanks, Oleg From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Mar 19 16:01:27 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 16:01:27 +0000 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8036788 [parfait] JNI exception pending in jdk/src/windows/native/sun/windows/awt_Event.cpp In-Reply-To: <5329B2AC.9070509@oracle.com> References: <5329B2AC.9070509@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5329BF57.8020409@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 19/03/14 15:07, Oleg Pekhovskiy wrote: > Hello, > > please approve the backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036788 > The JDK 9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/33a020a3811c > > Thanks, > Oleg. From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Mar 19 16:01:54 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 16:01:54 +0000 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8036782 [parfait] JNI exc. pending in jdk/src/windows/native/sun/windows/awt_MouseEvent.cpp In-Reply-To: <5329B390.7060901@oracle.com> References: <5329B390.7060901@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5329BF72.2030709@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 19/03/14 15:11, Oleg Pekhovskiy wrote: > Hello, > > please approve the backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036782 > The JDK 9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/6301592b5351 > > Thanks, > Oleg From vicente.romero at oracle.com Wed Mar 19 17:13:13 2014 From: vicente.romero at oracle.com (Vicente-Arturo Romero-Zaldivar) Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 17:13:13 +0000 Subject: [8u20] request for approval to backport JDK-8034924: Incorrect inheritance of inaccessible static method Message-ID: <5329D029.7010807@oracle.com> Hi, Please approve a backport fix for: JDK-8034924: Incorrect inheritance of inaccessible static method Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8034924 jdk9 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/bd152504a538 Patch applies cleanly to: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/langtools Thanks, Vicente From vicente.romero at oracle.com Wed Mar 19 17:22:46 2014 From: vicente.romero at oracle.com (Vicente-Arturo Romero-Zaldivar) Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 17:22:46 +0000 Subject: [8u20] request for approval to backport JDK-8034127: javac provide debug oriented toString() methods to InferenceContext and UndetVar Message-ID: <5329D266.1080403@oracle.com> Hi, Please approve a backport fix for: JDK-8034127: javac provide debug oriented toString() methods to InferenceContext and UndetVar Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8034127 jdk9 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/06c9978d2891 Patch applies cleanly to: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/langtools Thanks, Vicente From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Mar 19 17:28:05 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 17:28:05 +0000 Subject: [8u20] request for approval to backport JDK-8034924: Incorrect inheritance of inaccessible static method In-Reply-To: <5329D029.7010807@oracle.com> References: <5329D029.7010807@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5329D3A5.2070505@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 19/03/14 17:13, Vicente-Arturo Romero-Zaldivar wrote: > Hi, > > Please approve a backport fix for: > > JDK-8034924: Incorrect inheritance of inaccessible static method > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8034924 > jdk9 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/bd152504a538 > Patch applies cleanly to: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/langtools > > Thanks, > > Vicente From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Mar 19 17:31:55 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 17:31:55 +0000 Subject: [8u20] request for approval to backport JDK-8034127: javac provide debug oriented toString() methods to InferenceContext and UndetVar In-Reply-To: <5329D266.1080403@oracle.com> References: <5329D266.1080403@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5329D48B.40701@oracle.com> Approved. Useful helper code to have. Thanks. regards, Sean. On 19/03/14 17:22, Vicente-Arturo Romero-Zaldivar wrote: > Hi, > > Please approve a backport fix for: > > JDK-8034127: javac provide debug oriented toString() methods to > InferenceContext and UndetVar > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8034127 > jdk9 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/06c9978d2891 > Patch applies cleanly to: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/langtools > > Thanks, > > Vicente From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Mar 19 18:16:42 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 18:16:42 +0000 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8035622 [parfait] JNI exception pending in jdk/src/windows/native/sun/windows/awt_DesktopProperties.cpp In-Reply-To: <5329B423.2090708@oracle.com> References: <5329B423.2090708@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5329DF0A.6010908@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 19/03/14 15:13, Oleg Pekhovskiy wrote: > Hello, > > please approve the backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035622 > The JDK 9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/e34c139e8c9f > > Thanks, > Oleg From dmitry.degrave at oracle.com Wed Mar 19 18:51:46 2014 From: dmitry.degrave at oracle.com (dmeetry degrave) Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 22:51:46 +0400 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8037843: test needs to be removed from jaxp repo Message-ID: <5329E742.2030108@oracle.com> Hi, I'm looking for an approval to remove a test from jaxp repo, which was pushed there mistakenly. bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8037843 patch: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dmeetry/8037843/8037843.patch reviewed by: Aleksej Efimov, Se?n Coffey thanks, dmeetry From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Mar 19 18:54:56 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 18:54:56 +0000 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8037843: test needs to be removed from jaxp repo In-Reply-To: <5329E742.2030108@oracle.com> References: <5329E742.2030108@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5329E800.5080805@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 19/03/14 18:51, dmeetry degrave wrote: > Hi, > > I'm looking for an approval to remove a test from jaxp repo, which was > pushed there mistakenly. > > bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8037843 > patch: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dmeetry/8037843/8037843.patch > reviewed by: Aleksej Efimov, Se?n Coffey > > thanks, > dmeetry From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Mar 19 23:38:30 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 23:38:30 +0000 Subject: [8u communication] Upcoming JDK 8 Updates milestone : Feature Complete Message-ID: <532A2A76.4090200@oracle.com> As per earlier communication [1], the 8u20 Feature Complete milestone is approaching. Please aim to have all planned features in the jdk8u master forest by the end of this month. JDK 8u20 b08 is due for promotion on 2nd April and should contain all features. We'll be entering the Rampdown 1 phase in mid April where only P1, P2, P3 issues should be considered. The 8u20 timeline is available at : http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8u/releases/8u20.html regards, Sean. [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2014-February/000201.html From jason.uh at oracle.com Wed Mar 19 23:56:46 2014 From: jason.uh at oracle.com (Jason Uh) Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 16:56:46 -0700 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8021804: Certpath validation fails if validity period of root cert does not include validity period of intermediate cert Message-ID: <532A2EBE.5070009@oracle.com> Requesting approval to backport a JDK 9 fix identically to 8u-dev Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8021804 JDK 9 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/d729feb685c3 Review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2014-March/010286.html Thanks, Jason From kumar.x.srinivasan at oracle.com Thu Mar 20 01:14:46 2014 From: kumar.x.srinivasan at oracle.com (Kumar Srinivasan) Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 18:14:46 -0700 Subject: RFR: [8u20]: 8037221: [asm] refresh internal ASM version Message-ID: <532A4106.9020809@oracle.com> Hello, Please review and approve the back-port of the above fix, the fix is simply a refresh of the sources from ObjectWeb's ASM5_GA. The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8037221 Webrev in for jdk9: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8037221/webrev.0/ Changeset for jdk9: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/a791773d6e91 The backport: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8037478 Webrev for jdk8u20: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8037221/webrev.1/ There is a subtle difference between the two, for 8u20 the following two files were removed, since those changes don't exist in 8 and 8u20. src/share/classes/jdk/internal/org/objectweb/asm/tree/MethodNode.java src/share/classes/jdk/internal/org/objectweb/asm/tree/analysis/AnalyzerException.java Thanks in advance. Kumar From sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com Thu Mar 20 04:04:22 2014 From: sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com (A. Sundararajan) Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 09:34:22 +0530 Subject: [8u20] request for approval to backport of nashorn changesets from jdk9/dev to jdk8u20 Message-ID: <532A68C6.8010303@oracle.com> Hi, Please approve backport of the following 25 nashorn (javascript engine) changesets from jdk9/dev/nashorn to jdk8u20/nashorn. Webrev against jdk8u-dev is here: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/jdk9dev_to_8u20/ http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/jdk9dev_to_8u20/webrev.00/ List of bug fixes backported: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/jdk9dev_to_8u20/jdk8u20_changesets.txt Links to the individual bugs and the corresponding jdk9/dev changesets below: Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029031 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/fce0ef0c9858 Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029364 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/dcca148a8219 Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8030182 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/cade47c36c6c Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8030809 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/8c0524412634 Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8031106 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/78cdf566535d Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029003 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/d6e66fef38eb Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029667 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/18eccb9656e0 Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8031317 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/3bbf629a2db9 Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8031359 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/d1d4d669373c Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029332 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/64ab63d26500 Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8031715 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/c041d151d7e6 Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8031983 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/b2ca350d8415 Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8032004 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/341f81ebefe0 Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8032060 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/76f606690a45 Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8032068 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/071eb6953a4a Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8033763 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/22420177ec9d Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8011964 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/0afcc0851aab Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8033924 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/79c69831674f Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8030197 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/feceb45debac Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035948 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/4d54c3d19e88 Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8033951 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/nashorn/rev/17c5f77518b1 Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8034055 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/ec0d76397a7d Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8021350 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/b457a6ab0738 Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8015958 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/91ef0e039d91 Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8037400 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/3febf16a3039 Thanks -Sundar From sean.coffey at oracle.com Thu Mar 20 09:26:25 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 09:26:25 +0000 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8021804: Certpath validation fails if validity period of root cert does not include validity period of intermediate cert In-Reply-To: <532A2EBE.5070009@oracle.com> References: <532A2EBE.5070009@oracle.com> Message-ID: <532AB441.6020007@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 19/03/2014 23:56, Jason Uh wrote: > Requesting approval to backport a JDK 9 fix identically to 8u-dev > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8021804 > JDK 9 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/d729feb685c3 > Review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2014-March/010286.html > > Thanks, > Jason From sean.coffey at oracle.com Thu Mar 20 09:48:38 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 09:48:38 +0000 Subject: [8u20] request for approval to backport of nashorn changesets from jdk9/dev to jdk8u20 In-Reply-To: <532A68C6.8010303@oracle.com> References: <532A68C6.8010303@oracle.com> Message-ID: <532AB976.9000200@oracle.com> Thanks for looking after the bulk backport effort here Sundar. Can you confirm that the changesets applied without any significant updates being required for jdk8u-dev ? I've pasted in some code review links from jdk9 Project for reference also. regards, Sean. On 20/03/2014 04:04, A. Sundararajan wrote: > Hi, > > Please approve backport of the following 25 nashorn (javascript > engine) changesets from jdk9/dev/nashorn to jdk8u20/nashorn. > > Webrev against jdk8u-dev is here: > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/jdk9dev_to_8u20/ > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/jdk9dev_to_8u20/webrev.00/ > > List of bug fixes backported: > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/jdk9dev_to_8u20/jdk8u20_changesets.txt > > Links to the individual bugs and the corresponding jdk9/dev changesets > below: > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029031 > Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/fce0ef0c9858 > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029364 > Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/dcca148a8219 > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8030182 > Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/cade47c36c6c > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8030809 > Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/8c0524412634 review : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2013-December/002612.html > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8031106 > Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/78cdf566535d review : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-January/002628.html > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029003 > Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/d6e66fef38eb > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029667 > Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/18eccb9656e0 > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8031317 > Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/3bbf629a2db9 review : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-January/002640.html > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8031359 > Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/d1d4d669373c review : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-January/002645.html > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029332 > Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/64ab63d26500 review : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-January/002664.html > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8031715 > Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/c041d151d7e6 review : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-January/002677.html > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8031983 > Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/b2ca350d8415 review : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-January/002678.html > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8032004 > Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/341f81ebefe0 review : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-January/002680.html > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8032060 > Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/76f606690a45 review : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-January/002682.html > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8032068 > Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/071eb6953a4a review : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-January/002686.html > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8033763 > Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/22420177ec9d review : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-February/002733.html > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8011964 > Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/0afcc0851aab review : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-February/002752.html > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8033924 > Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/79c69831674f review : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-February/002740.html > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8030197 > Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/feceb45debac review : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-February/002767.html > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035948 > Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/4d54c3d19e88 review : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-February/002770.html > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8033951 > Changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/nashorn/rev/17c5f77518b1 review : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-February/002742.html > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8034055 > Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/ec0d76397a7d > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8021350 > Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/b457a6ab0738 > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8015958 > Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/91ef0e039d91 review : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-March/002815.html > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8037400 > Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/3febf16a3039 review : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-March/002823.html > > Thanks > -Sundar From sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com Thu Mar 20 10:51:26 2014 From: sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com (A. Sundararajan) Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 16:21:26 +0530 Subject: [8u20] request for approval to backport of nashorn changesets from jdk9/dev to jdk8u20 In-Reply-To: <532AB976.9000200@oracle.com> References: <532A68C6.8010303@oracle.com> <532AB976.9000200@oracle.com> Message-ID: <532AC82E.7070803@oracle.com> No significant changes. Only one minor in a single changeset. All other changesets appled "as is" (with no manual changes). Regards, -Sundar On Thursday 20 March 2014 03:18 PM, Se?n Coffey wrote: > Thanks for looking after the bulk backport effort here Sundar. Can > you confirm that the changesets applied without any significant > updates being required for jdk8u-dev ? > > I've pasted in some code review links from jdk9 Project for reference > also. > > regards, > Sean. > > On 20/03/2014 04:04, A. Sundararajan wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Please approve backport of the following 25 nashorn (javascript >> engine) changesets from jdk9/dev/nashorn to jdk8u20/nashorn. >> >> Webrev against jdk8u-dev is here: >> >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/jdk9dev_to_8u20/ >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/jdk9dev_to_8u20/webrev.00/ >> >> List of bug fixes backported: >> >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/jdk9dev_to_8u20/jdk8u20_changesets.txt >> >> >> Links to the individual bugs and the corresponding jdk9/dev >> changesets below: >> >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029031 >> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/fce0ef0c9858 >> >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029364 >> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/dcca148a8219 >> >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8030182 >> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/cade47c36c6c >> >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8030809 >> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/8c0524412634 > review : > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2013-December/002612.html >> >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8031106 >> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/78cdf566535d > review : > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-January/002628.html >> >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029003 >> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/d6e66fef38eb >> >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029667 >> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/18eccb9656e0 >> >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8031317 >> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/3bbf629a2db9 > review : > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-January/002640.html >> >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8031359 >> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/d1d4d669373c > review : > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-January/002645.html >> >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029332 >> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/64ab63d26500 > review : > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-January/002664.html >> >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8031715 >> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/c041d151d7e6 > review : > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-January/002677.html >> >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8031983 >> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/b2ca350d8415 > review : > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-January/002678.html >> >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8032004 >> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/341f81ebefe0 > review : > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-January/002680.html >> >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8032060 >> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/76f606690a45 > review : > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-January/002682.html >> >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8032068 >> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/071eb6953a4a > review : > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-January/002686.html >> >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8033763 >> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/22420177ec9d > review : > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-February/002733.html >> >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8011964 >> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/0afcc0851aab > review : > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-February/002752.html >> >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8033924 >> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/79c69831674f > review : > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-February/002740.html >> >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8030197 >> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/feceb45debac > review : > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-February/002767.html >> >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035948 >> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/4d54c3d19e88 > review : > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-February/002770.html >> >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8033951 >> Changeset: >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/nashorn/rev/17c5f77518b1 > review : > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-February/002742.html >> >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8034055 >> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/ec0d76397a7d >> >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8021350 >> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/b457a6ab0738 >> >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8015958 >> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/91ef0e039d91 > review : > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-March/002815.html >> >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8037400 >> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/3febf16a3039 > review : > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-March/002823.html >> >> Thanks >> -Sundar > From sean.coffey at oracle.com Thu Mar 20 15:14:03 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 15:14:03 +0000 Subject: [8u20] request for approval to backport of nashorn changesets from jdk9/dev to jdk8u20 In-Reply-To: <532AC82E.7070803@oracle.com> References: <532A68C6.8010303@oracle.com> <532AB976.9000200@oracle.com> <532AC82E.7070803@oracle.com> Message-ID: <532B05BB.1020701@oracle.com> Thanks for confirming Sundar! Approved. regards, Sean. On 20/03/2014 10:51, A. Sundararajan wrote: > No significant changes. Only one minor in a single changeset. All > other changesets appled "as is" (with no manual changes). > > Regards, > -Sundar > > On Thursday 20 March 2014 03:18 PM, Se?n Coffey wrote: >> Thanks for looking after the bulk backport effort here Sundar. Can >> you confirm that the changesets applied without any significant >> updates being required for jdk8u-dev ? >> >> I've pasted in some code review links from jdk9 Project for reference >> also. >> >> regards, >> Sean. >> >> On 20/03/2014 04:04, A. Sundararajan wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Please approve backport of the following 25 nashorn (javascript >>> engine) changesets from jdk9/dev/nashorn to jdk8u20/nashorn. >>> >>> Webrev against jdk8u-dev is here: >>> >>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/jdk9dev_to_8u20/ >>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/jdk9dev_to_8u20/webrev.00/ >>> >>> List of bug fixes backported: >>> >>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/jdk9dev_to_8u20/jdk8u20_changesets.txt >>> >>> >>> Links to the individual bugs and the corresponding jdk9/dev >>> changesets below: >>> >>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029031 >>> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/fce0ef0c9858 >>> >>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029364 >>> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/dcca148a8219 >>> >>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8030182 >>> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/cade47c36c6c >>> >>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8030809 >>> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/8c0524412634 >> review : >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2013-December/002612.html >>> >>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8031106 >>> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/78cdf566535d >> review : >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-January/002628.html >>> >>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029003 >>> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/d6e66fef38eb >>> >>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029667 >>> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/18eccb9656e0 >>> >>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8031317 >>> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/3bbf629a2db9 >> review : >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-January/002640.html >>> >>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8031359 >>> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/d1d4d669373c >> review : >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-January/002645.html >>> >>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029332 >>> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/64ab63d26500 >> review : >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-January/002664.html >>> >>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8031715 >>> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/c041d151d7e6 >> review : >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-January/002677.html >>> >>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8031983 >>> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/b2ca350d8415 >> review : >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-January/002678.html >>> >>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8032004 >>> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/341f81ebefe0 >> review : >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-January/002680.html >>> >>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8032060 >>> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/76f606690a45 >> review : >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-January/002682.html >>> >>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8032068 >>> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/071eb6953a4a >> review : >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-January/002686.html >>> >>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8033763 >>> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/22420177ec9d >> review : >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-February/002733.html >>> >>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8011964 >>> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/0afcc0851aab >> review : >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-February/002752.html >>> >>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8033924 >>> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/79c69831674f >> review : >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-February/002740.html >>> >>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8030197 >>> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/feceb45debac >> review : >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-February/002767.html >>> >>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035948 >>> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/4d54c3d19e88 >> review : >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-February/002770.html >>> >>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8033951 >>> Changeset: >>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/nashorn/rev/17c5f77518b1 >> review : >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-February/002742.html >>> >>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8034055 >>> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/ec0d76397a7d >>> >>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8021350 >>> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/b457a6ab0738 >>> >>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8015958 >>> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/91ef0e039d91 >> review : >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-March/002815.html >>> >>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8037400 >>> Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/3febf16a3039 >> review : >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-March/002823.html >>> >>> Thanks >>> -Sundar >> > From kumar.x.srinivasan at oracle.com Thu Mar 20 15:22:58 2014 From: kumar.x.srinivasan at oracle.com (Kumar Srinivasan) Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 08:22:58 -0700 Subject: RFR: [8u20]: 8037221: [asm] refresh internal ASM version In-Reply-To: <532A4106.9020809@oracle.com> References: <532A4106.9020809@oracle.com> Message-ID: <532B07D2.1010400@oracle.com> On 3/19/2014 6:14 PM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote: > Hello, > > Please review and approve the back-port of the above fix, the fix is > simply a refresh of the > sources from ObjectWeb's ASM5_GA. > > The bug: > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8037221 > Webrev in for jdk9: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8037221/webrev.0/ > Changeset for jdk9: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/a791773d6e91 > > The backport: > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8037478 > > Webrev for jdk8u20: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8037221/webrev.1/ > > There is a subtle difference between the two, for 8u20 the following > two files were removed, since those changes don't exist in 8 and 8u20. After rereading my email, I should clarify that, these files were not *removed*, however the diffs associated with these files were removed from the 8u20 webrev. Kumar > > src/share/classes/jdk/internal/org/objectweb/asm/tree/MethodNode.java > src/share/classes/jdk/internal/org/objectweb/asm/tree/analysis/AnalyzerException.java > > > > Thanks in advance. > Kumar > > > From alejandro.murillo at oracle.com Thu Mar 20 23:28:22 2014 From: alejandro.murillo at oracle.com (Alejandro E Murillo) Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:28:22 -0600 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for bulk integration of hs25.20-b07 Message-ID: <532B7996.40809@oracle.com> Requesting approval to integrate hs25.20-b07 into jdk8u20-b07. A webrev is available at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amurillo/8u20/hs25.20-b07-jdk8u20-b07.webrev/ Pre-integration testing is in progress; the integration will proceed only after SQE has analyzed the results and approved. The fixes in the proposed integration are below. All have undergone nightly testing and are already in a jdk9 repository. 8027754: Enable loop optimizations for loops with MathExact inside 8030177: G1: Enable TLAB resizing 8031321: Support Intel bit manipulation instructions 8031752: Failed speculative optimizations should be reattempted when root of compilation is different 8031754: Type speculation should favor profile data from outermost inlined method 8032633: Enable type speculation by default 8034079: G1: Refactor the HeapRegionSet hierarchy 8035841: assert(dp_src->tag() == dp_dst->tag()) failed: should be same tags 1 != 0 at ciMethodData.cpp:90 8036092: [TESTBUG] compiler/uncommontrap/TestSpecTrapClassUnloading.java fails with: Unrecognized VM option 'UseTypeSpeculation' 8037226: compiler/7196199/Test7196199.java fails on 32-bit linux with MaxVectorSize > 16 8037305: new hotspot build - hs25.20-b07 8037340: Linux semaphores to use CLOCK_REALTIME 8037407: G1: Remove heapRegionSets.cpp -- Alejandro From konstantin.shefov at oracle.com Fri Mar 21 12:45:17 2014 From: konstantin.shefov at oracle.com (Konstantin Shefov) Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 16:45:17 +0400 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8030640 [TEST_BUG] java/awt/Toolkit/Headless/WrappedToolkitTest/WrappedToolkitTest.sh fails with exit code 2 Message-ID: <532C345D.9000603@oracle.com> Hello, please approve the backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8030640 The JDK 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/88816854cdc1 Thanks, Konstantin From konstantin.shefov at oracle.com Fri Mar 21 12:46:24 2014 From: konstantin.shefov at oracle.com (Konstantin Shefov) Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 16:46:24 +0400 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8022531 [TEST_BUG] After double-click on the folder names , there is no 'OK' button in the dialog. Message-ID: <532C34A0.7060001@oracle.com> Hello, please approve the backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8022531 The JDK 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/3d9d937de317 Thanks, Konstantin From andrew.brygin at oracle.com Fri Mar 21 13:00:33 2014 From: andrew.brygin at oracle.com (Andrew Brygin) Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 17:00:33 +0400 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8036022: D3D: rendering with XOR composite causes InternalError. Message-ID: <532C37F1.1050500@oracle.com> Hello, please approve the backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036022 The JDK 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/908547704655 Thanks, Andrew From kumar.x.srinivasan at oracle.com Fri Mar 21 13:58:05 2014 From: kumar.x.srinivasan at oracle.com (Kumar Srinivasan) Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 06:58:05 -0700 Subject: RFR: [8u20]: 8037221: [asm] refresh internal ASM version In-Reply-To: <532B07D2.1010400@oracle.com> References: <532A4106.9020809@oracle.com> <532B07D2.1010400@oracle.com> Message-ID: <532C456D.1060900@oracle.com> "Hello? Hello? Hello? Is there anybody in there? Just nod if you can hear me. Is there anyone at home? ....." --- Pink Floyd Kumar On 3/20/2014 8:22 AM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote: > > On 3/19/2014 6:14 PM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Please review and approve the back-port of the above fix, the fix is >> simply a refresh of the >> sources from ObjectWeb's ASM5_GA. >> >> The bug: >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8037221 >> Webrev in for jdk9: >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8037221/webrev.0/ >> Changeset for jdk9: >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/a791773d6e91 >> >> The backport: >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8037478 >> >> Webrev for jdk8u20: >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8037221/webrev.1/ >> >> There is a subtle difference between the two, for 8u20 the following >> two files were removed, since those changes don't exist in 8 and 8u20. > > After rereading my email, I should clarify that, these files were > not *removed*, > however the diffs associated with these files were removed from the > 8u20 webrev. > > Kumar > >> >> src/share/classes/jdk/internal/org/objectweb/asm/tree/MethodNode.java >> src/share/classes/jdk/internal/org/objectweb/asm/tree/analysis/AnalyzerException.java >> >> >> >> Thanks in advance. >> Kumar >> >> >> > From sean.coffey at oracle.com Fri Mar 21 14:12:24 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 14:12:24 +0000 Subject: RFR: [8u20]: 8037221: [asm] refresh internal ASM version In-Reply-To: <532C456D.1060900@oracle.com> References: <532A4106.9020809@oracle.com> <532B07D2.1010400@oracle.com> <532C456D.1060900@oracle.com> Message-ID: <532C48C8.804@oracle.com> "Hello, is it me you're looking for?" - actually, let's not go down the Lionel route ;) I was hoping someone from the tools group could review but the minor change (or non-changes) needed to import this into jdk8u-dev seem fine to me Kumar. Consider this approved for for 8u20 also. regards, Sean. On 21/03/14 13:58, Kumar Srinivasan wrote: > "Hello? Hello? Hello? > Is there anybody in there? > Just nod if you can hear me. > Is there anyone at home? > ....." --- Pink Floyd > > Kumar > > On 3/20/2014 8:22 AM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote: >> >> On 3/19/2014 6:14 PM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> Please review and approve the back-port of the above fix, the fix is >>> simply a refresh of the >>> sources from ObjectWeb's ASM5_GA. >>> >>> The bug: >>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8037221 >>> Webrev in for jdk9: >>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8037221/webrev.0/ >>> Changeset for jdk9: >>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/a791773d6e91 >>> >>> The backport: >>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8037478 >>> >>> Webrev for jdk8u20: >>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8037221/webrev.1/ >>> >>> There is a subtle difference between the two, for 8u20 the following >>> two files were removed, since those changes don't exist in 8 and 8u20. >> >> After rereading my email, I should clarify that, these files were >> not *removed*, >> however the diffs associated with these files were removed from the >> 8u20 webrev. >> >> Kumar >> >>> >>> src/share/classes/jdk/internal/org/objectweb/asm/tree/MethodNode.java >>> src/share/classes/jdk/internal/org/objectweb/asm/tree/analysis/AnalyzerException.java >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks in advance. >>> Kumar >>> >>> >>> >> > From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Fri Mar 21 14:23:00 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 14:23:00 +0000 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8030640 [TEST_BUG] java/awt/Toolkit/Headless/WrappedToolkitTest/WrappedToolkitTest.sh fails with exit code 2 In-Reply-To: <532C345D.9000603@oracle.com> References: <532C345D.9000603@oracle.com> Message-ID: <532C4B44.60909@oracle.com> Approved. Please include a link to the review thread in future: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2014-March/007308.html -Rob On 21/03/14 12:45, Konstantin Shefov wrote: > Hello, > > please approve the backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8030640 > The JDK 9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/88816854cdc1 > > Thanks, > Konstantin From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Fri Mar 21 14:23:33 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 14:23:33 +0000 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8022531 [TEST_BUG] After double-click on the folder names , there is no 'OK' button in the dialog. In-Reply-To: <532C34A0.7060001@oracle.com> References: <532C34A0.7060001@oracle.com> Message-ID: <532C4B65.6010905@oracle.com> Approved. Review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2014-March/007293.html -Rob On 21/03/14 12:46, Konstantin Shefov wrote: > Hello, > > please approve the backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8022531 > The JDK 9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/3d9d937de317 > > Thanks, > Konstantin From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Fri Mar 21 14:25:48 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 14:25:48 +0000 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8036022: D3D: rendering with XOR composite causes InternalError. In-Reply-To: <532C37F1.1050500@oracle.com> References: <532C37F1.1050500@oracle.com> Message-ID: <532C4BEC.5080305@oracle.com> Approved. Please include a link to the review thread in future requests: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2014-March/004301.html -Rob On 21/03/14 13:00, Andrew Brygin wrote: > Hello, > > please approve the backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036022 > > The JDK 9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/908547704655 > > Thanks, > Andrew From konstantin.shefov at oracle.com Fri Mar 21 14:38:00 2014 From: konstantin.shefov at oracle.com (Konstantin Shefov) Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 18:38:00 +0400 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 7161320 TEST_BUG: java/awt/event/KeyEvent/SwallowKeyEvents/SwallowKeyEvents.java fails (Invalid key code) Message-ID: <532C4EC8.4070206@oracle.com> Hello, please approve the backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7161320 The JDK 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/8ff3f0084bc0 Thanks, Konstantin From kumar.x.srinivasan at oracle.com Fri Mar 21 14:40:09 2014 From: kumar.x.srinivasan at oracle.com (Kumar Srinivasan) Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 07:40:09 -0700 Subject: RFR: [8u20]: 8037221: [asm] refresh internal ASM version In-Reply-To: <532C48C8.804@oracle.com> References: <532A4106.9020809@oracle.com> <532B07D2.1010400@oracle.com> <532C456D.1060900@oracle.com> <532C48C8.804@oracle.com> Message-ID: <532C4F49.1050905@oracle.com> Ah I see, I have cc'ed Paul Sandoz, he usually reviews these for me. On 3/21/2014 7:12 AM, Se?n Coffey wrote: > "Hello, is it me you're looking for?" - actually, let's not go down > the Lionel route ;) Nicely done. Kumar > > I was hoping someone from the tools group could review but the minor > change (or non-changes) needed to import this into jdk8u-dev seem fine > to me Kumar. Consider this approved for for 8u20 also. > > regards, > Sean. > > On 21/03/14 13:58, Kumar Srinivasan wrote: >> "Hello? Hello? Hello? >> Is there anybody in there? >> Just nod if you can hear me. >> Is there anyone at home? >> ....." --- Pink Floyd >> >> Kumar >> >> On 3/20/2014 8:22 AM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote: >>> >>> On 3/19/2014 6:14 PM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> Please review and approve the back-port of the above fix, the fix >>>> is simply a refresh of the >>>> sources from ObjectWeb's ASM5_GA. >>>> >>>> The bug: >>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8037221 >>>> Webrev in for jdk9: >>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8037221/webrev.0/ >>>> Changeset for jdk9: >>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/a791773d6e91 >>>> >>>> The backport: >>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8037478 >>>> >>>> Webrev for jdk8u20: >>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8037221/webrev.1/ >>>> >>>> There is a subtle difference between the two, for 8u20 the following >>>> two files were removed, since those changes don't exist in 8 and >>>> 8u20. >>> >>> After rereading my email, I should clarify that, these files were >>> not *removed*, >>> however the diffs associated with these files were removed from the >>> 8u20 webrev. >>> >>> Kumar >>> >>>> >>>> src/share/classes/jdk/internal/org/objectweb/asm/tree/MethodNode.java >>>> src/share/classes/jdk/internal/org/objectweb/asm/tree/analysis/AnalyzerException.java >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks in advance. >>>> Kumar >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Fri Mar 21 15:01:00 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 15:01:00 +0000 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 7161320 TEST_BUG: java/awt/event/KeyEvent/SwallowKeyEvents/SwallowKeyEvents.java fails (Invalid key code) In-Reply-To: <532C4EC8.4070206@oracle.com> References: <532C4EC8.4070206@oracle.com> Message-ID: <532C542C.2000404@oracle.com> Approved. http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2014-March/007322.html -Rob On 21/03/14 14:38, Konstantin Shefov wrote: > Hello, > > please approve the backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7161320 > The JDK 9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/8ff3f0084bc0 > > Thanks, > Konstantin From paul.sandoz at oracle.com Fri Mar 21 15:29:53 2014 From: paul.sandoz at oracle.com (Paul Sandoz) Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 16:29:53 +0100 Subject: RFR: [8u20]: 8037221: [asm] refresh internal ASM version In-Reply-To: <532C48C8.804@oracle.com> References: <532A4106.9020809@oracle.com> <532B07D2.1010400@oracle.com> <532C456D.1060900@oracle.com> <532C48C8.804@oracle.com> Message-ID: <00D1DE7C-5DEC-4BAF-A924-39D0B04A0C1B@oracle.com> On Mar 21, 2014, at 3:12 PM, Se?n Coffey wrote: > "Hello, is it me you're looking for?" - actually, let's not go down the Lionel route ;) > That is terrible! > I was hoping someone from the tools group could review but the minor change (or non-changes) needed to import this into jdk8u-dev seem fine to me Kumar. Consider this approved for for 8u20 also. > > regards, > Sean. > > On 21/03/14 13:58, Kumar Srinivasan wrote: >> "Hello? Hello? Hello? >> Is there anybody in there? >> Just nod if you can hear me. >> Is there anyone at home? >> ....." --- Pink Floyd >> This be the same code changes as that for 9 (plus not removing the supporting serial warnings) ? If so a quick +1. Paul. From vladimir.x.ivanov at oracle.com Fri Mar 21 16:14:58 2014 From: vladimir.x.ivanov at oracle.com (Vladimir Ivanov) Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 20:14:58 +0400 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8027827: Improve performance of catchException combinator Message-ID: <532C6582.3050403@oracle.com> Hello, Please, approve a backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8027827 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/403765ccd4ac Thanks! Best regards, Vladimir Ivanov From vladimir.x.ivanov at oracle.com Fri Mar 21 16:16:22 2014 From: vladimir.x.ivanov at oracle.com (Vladimir Ivanov) Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 20:16:22 +0400 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8036117: MethodHandles.catchException doesn't handle VarargsCollector right (8034120 failed) Message-ID: <532C65D6.5050507@oracle.com> Hello, Please, approve a backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036117 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/8aed3a063263 Thanks! Best regards, Vladimir Ivanov From sean.coffey at oracle.com Fri Mar 21 17:39:01 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 17:39:01 +0000 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8027827: Improve performance of catchException combinator In-Reply-To: <532C6582.3050403@oracle.com> References: <532C6582.3050403@oracle.com> Message-ID: <532C7935.9060804@oracle.com> Please include the code review links where possible. code review : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-February/025203.html Will you be backporting the raw lint warning fix also or is it applicable ? : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036732 Consider both approved. regards, Sean. On 21/03/14 16:14, Vladimir Ivanov wrote: > Hello, > > Please, approve a backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8027827 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/403765ccd4ac > > Thanks! > > Best regards, > Vladimir Ivanov From sean.coffey at oracle.com Fri Mar 21 17:40:17 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 17:40:17 +0000 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8036117: MethodHandles.catchException doesn't handle VarargsCollector right (8034120 failed) In-Reply-To: <532C65D6.5050507@oracle.com> References: <532C65D6.5050507@oracle.com> Message-ID: <532C7981.6000500@oracle.com> code review link : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-March/025530.html Approved. regards, Sean. On 21/03/14 16:16, Vladimir Ivanov wrote: > Hello, > > Please, approve a backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036117 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/8aed3a063263 > > Thanks! > > Best regards, > Vladimir Ivanov From sean.coffey at oracle.com Fri Mar 21 17:41:56 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 17:41:56 +0000 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for bulk integration of hs25.20-b07 In-Reply-To: <532B7996.40809@oracle.com> References: <532B7996.40809@oracle.com> Message-ID: <532C79E4.4050209@oracle.com> Approved pending positive PIT results. regards, Sean. On 20/03/14 23:28, Alejandro E Murillo wrote: > Requesting approval to integrate hs25.20-b07 into jdk8u20-b07. > > A webrev is available at: > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amurillo/8u20/hs25.20-b07-jdk8u20-b07.webrev/ > > Pre-integration testing is in progress; the integration will proceed > only after SQE has analyzed the results and approved. > > The fixes in the proposed integration are below. All have undergone > nightly testing and are already in a jdk9 repository. > > 8027754: Enable loop optimizations for loops with MathExact inside > 8030177: G1: Enable TLAB resizing > 8031321: Support Intel bit manipulation instructions > 8031752: Failed speculative optimizations should be reattempted when > root of compilation is different > 8031754: Type speculation should favor profile data from outermost > inlined method > 8032633: Enable type speculation by default > 8034079: G1: Refactor the HeapRegionSet hierarchy > 8035841: assert(dp_src->tag() == dp_dst->tag()) failed: should be same > tags 1 != 0 at ciMethodData.cpp:90 > 8036092: [TESTBUG] > compiler/uncommontrap/TestSpecTrapClassUnloading.java fails with: > Unrecognized VM option 'UseTypeSpeculation' > 8037226: compiler/7196199/Test7196199.java fails on 32-bit linux with > MaxVectorSize > 16 > 8037305: new hotspot build - hs25.20-b07 > 8037340: Linux semaphores to use CLOCK_REALTIME > 8037407: G1: Remove heapRegionSets.cpp > From vladimir.x.ivanov at oracle.com Fri Mar 21 18:07:29 2014 From: vladimir.x.ivanov at oracle.com (Vladimir Ivanov) Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 22:07:29 +0400 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8027827: Improve performance of catchException combinator In-Reply-To: <532C7935.9060804@oracle.com> References: <532C6582.3050403@oracle.com> <532C7935.9060804@oracle.com> Message-ID: <532C7FE1.5080908@oracle.com> Sean, Yes, I'll incorporate lint warning fix as well. Thanks for catching this and for approval. Best regards, Vladimir Ivanov On 3/21/14 9:39 PM, Se?n Coffey wrote: > Please include the code review links where possible. > > code review : > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-February/025203.html > > Will you be backporting the raw lint warning fix also or is it > applicable ? : > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036732 > > Consider both approved. > > regards, > Sean. > > On 21/03/14 16:14, Vladimir Ivanov wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Please, approve a backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. >> >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8027827 >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/403765ccd4ac >> >> Thanks! >> >> Best regards, >> Vladimir Ivanov > From alexey.ivanov at oracle.com Mon Mar 24 07:40:54 2014 From: alexey.ivanov at oracle.com (Alexey Ivanov) Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 11:40:54 +0400 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for 8032878: Editable combos in table do not behave as expected Message-ID: <532FE186.1030607@oracle.com> Hello, Please approve the backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8032878 JDK 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/2153a7725a4a Code review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2014-March/003317.html Thanks, Alexey. From sean.coffey at oracle.com Mon Mar 24 10:53:24 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 10:53:24 +0000 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for 8032878: Editable combos in table do not behave as expected In-Reply-To: <532FE186.1030607@oracle.com> References: <532FE186.1030607@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53300EA4.3050400@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 24/03/14 07:40, Alexey Ivanov wrote: > Hello, > > Please approve the backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8032878 > JDK 9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/2153a7725a4a > > Code review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2014-March/003317.html > > Thanks, > Alexey. From jan.lahoda at oracle.com Mon Mar 24 11:05:17 2014 From: jan.lahoda at oracle.com (Jan Lahoda) Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 12:05:17 +0100 Subject: [8u20] request for approval to backport Message-ID: <5330116D.3080306@oracle.com> Hello, I'd like to ask for an approval to backport fix for: Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8028576 Backport bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8031783 jdk9 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/c71cb4fbb329 Patch applies cleanly to: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/langtools Thanks, Jan From sean.coffey at oracle.com Mon Mar 24 11:47:57 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 11:47:57 +0000 Subject: [8u20] request for approval to backport In-Reply-To: <5330116D.3080306@oracle.com> References: <5330116D.3080306@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53301B6D.2030105@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 24/03/14 11:05, Jan Lahoda wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to ask for an approval to backport fix for: > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8028576 > Backport bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8031783 > jdk9 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/c71cb4fbb329 > Patch applies cleanly to: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/langtools > > Thanks, > Jan From petr.pchelko at oracle.com Mon Mar 24 13:14:34 2014 From: petr.pchelko at oracle.com (Petr Pchelko) Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 17:14:34 +0400 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8038106 PIT: access problem to a PrinterJob on OS X Message-ID: Hello, This is a request for approval to backport the fix from JDK-9 to JDK-8u-dev. The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038106 The fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/272be4836387 The review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2014-March/007331.html The webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pchelko/9/8038106/webrev/ Thank you. With best regards. Petr. From sean.coffey at oracle.com Mon Mar 24 13:56:25 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 13:56:25 +0000 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8038106 PIT: access problem to a PrinterJob on OS X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <53303989.7010807@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 24/03/14 13:14, Petr Pchelko wrote: > Hello, > > This is a request for approval to backport the fix from JDK-9 to JDK-8u-dev. > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038106 > The fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/272be4836387 > The review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2014-March/007331.html > The webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pchelko/9/8038106/webrev/ > > Thank you. > With best regards. Petr. > > From Paul.Sandoz at oracle.com Mon Mar 24 16:03:52 2014 From: Paul.Sandoz at oracle.com (Paul Sandoz) Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 17:03:52 +0100 Subject: Backport Fwd: RFR 8037857: Methods j.u.Arrays.spliterator/stream(X[], int, int) throw IAE instead of specified AIOOBE when endIndex < startIndex References: Message-ID: <8B6CCF52-7BE0-4A4B-835A-F7F883194715@oracle.com> Hi, I would like to backport the following that has been approved for 9 to 8u20. Patch for 9 currently applies cleanly to 8u20. Thanks, Paul. Begin forwarded message: > From: Paul Sandoz > Subject: RFR 8037857: Methods j.u.Arrays.spliterator/stream(X[], int, int) throw IAE instead of specified AIOOBE when endIndex < startIndex > Date: March 24, 2014 12:44:45 PM GMT+01:00 > To: core-libs-dev Libs > > Hi, > > Simple patch to align code with spec for stream/spliterator factory methods on Arrays and spliterator methods on Spliterators, and make the next release of the JCK happy: > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~psandoz/jdk9/JDK-8037857-spliterator-aioob/webrev/ > > After 9 it should go back to 8u20. > > Paul. From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Mon Mar 24 16:17:02 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 16:17:02 +0000 Subject: Backport Fwd: RFR 8037857: Methods j.u.Arrays.spliterator/stream(X[], int, int) throw IAE instead of specified AIOOBE when endIndex < startIndex In-Reply-To: <8B6CCF52-7BE0-4A4B-835A-F7F883194715@oracle.com> References: <8B6CCF52-7BE0-4A4B-835A-F7F883194715@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53305A7E.4050301@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 24/03/14 16:03, Paul Sandoz wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to backport the following that has been approved for 9 to 8u20. Patch for 9 currently applies cleanly to 8u20. > > Thanks, > Paul. > > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: Paul Sandoz >> Subject: RFR 8037857: Methods j.u.Arrays.spliterator/stream(X[], int, int) throw IAE instead of specified AIOOBE when endIndex < startIndex >> Date: March 24, 2014 12:44:45 PM GMT+01:00 >> To: core-libs-dev Libs >> >> Hi, >> >> Simple patch to align code with spec for stream/spliterator factory methods on Arrays and spliterator methods on Spliterators, and make the next release of the JCK happy: >> >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~psandoz/jdk9/JDK-8037857-spliterator-aioob/webrev/ >> >> After 9 it should go back to 8u20. >> >> Paul. From paul.sandoz at oracle.com Mon Mar 24 17:47:50 2014 From: paul.sandoz at oracle.com (Paul Sandoz) Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 18:47:50 +0100 Subject: Request to backport 8037106: Optimize Arrays.asList(...).forEach Message-ID: <36BFC9A1-0127-45FC-B3D9-F598BE508ACF@oracle.com> Hi, The patch on 9 applies cleanly to 8u: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/06469421d261 https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8037106 Thanks, Paul. From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Mon Mar 24 18:16:58 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 18:16:58 +0000 Subject: Request to backport 8037106: Optimize Arrays.asList(...).forEach In-Reply-To: <36BFC9A1-0127-45FC-B3D9-F598BE508ACF@oracle.com> References: <36BFC9A1-0127-45FC-B3D9-F598BE508ACF@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5330769A.2040708@oracle.com> Review Thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-March/025768.html Approved. -Rob On 24/03/14 17:47, Paul Sandoz wrote: > Hi, > > The patch on 9 applies cleanly to 8u: > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/06469421d261 > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8037106 > > Thanks, > Paul. From lana.steuck at oracle.com Mon Mar 24 20:39:10 2014 From: lana.steuck at oracle.com (lana.steuck at oracle.com) Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 13:39:10 -0700 (PDT) Subject: jdk8u-b07: jdk8u-dev Message-ID: <201403242039.s2OKdA3Y008182@jano-app.us.oracle.com> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/rev/6403ef94cb0d http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/nashorn/rev/7e89db817ed0 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/langtools/rev/1a57c569cb81 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/rev/db30cb9eb18d http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jaxws/rev/a61ba2e3e6c8 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jaxp/rev/30b8baceb72b http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/rev/7ce7247df891 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/corba/rev/32b9c4f0ab3c --- All the fixes will be tested during promotion (no PIT testing at this point): List of all fixes: =================== JDK-7154841 client-libs [macosx] Popups appear behind taskbar JDK-7159566 client-libs The choice positioned in the top of applet when clicking the choice. JDK-8007220 client-libs [macosx] Setting popupmenu on TrayIcon do not work if done *after* adding TrayIcon JDK-8022299 hotspot closed/com/oracle/jfr/os/TestInitialEnvironmentVariable.sh failing intermittently JDK-8023148 client-libs [macosx] java.util.NoSuchElementException at java.util.LinkedList.getFirst JDK-8026869 client-libs [macosx] Support apple.awt.use-file-dialog-packages property JDK-8027359 xml XML parser returns incorrect parsing results JDK-8027561 client-libs [macosx] Cleanup "may not respond to selector" warnings in native code JDK-8028253 embedded Remove version 8.0 hardcode for the JDK arm and JavaFX arm cobundles JDK-8029592 hotspot closed/com/oracle/jfr/api/JavaAPITest/TestRequestable.java fails with java.lang.Exception: Expected at least one matching requestable event. JDK-8029868 client-libs Fix KSS issues in sun.lwawt.macosx JDK-8029893 client-libs Remove reflection from DataTransferer.getInstance JDK-8030050 client-libs Validate fields on DnD class deserialization JDK-8031964 client-libs [macosx] Dragging images from the browser does not work JDK-8032058 client-libs [TEST_BUG] [macosx] java/awt/dnd/Button2DragTest sometimes fail JDK-8032872 client-libs [macosx] Cannot select from JComboBox in a JWindow JDK-8032909 xml XSLT string-length returns incorrect length when string includes complementary chars JDK-8032984 hotspot new hotspot build - hs25-b70 JDK-8033921 infrastructure alsa library name is asound, not alsa JDK-8034064 security-libs sun-ds.sfbay.sun.com needs to be removed from tests JDK-8035629 client-libs [parfait] JNI exc pending in jdk/src/windows/native/sun/windows/ShellFolder2.cpp JDK-8035777 core-libs Consistent Lambda construction JDK-8035816 hotspot TestDynamicRequestable fails intermittently JDK-8035818 hotspot Test TestStringConstantPoolDiskRecordingNoEmptyOnRotation times out sometimes JDK-8036100 hotspot Default method returns true for a while, and then returns false JDK-8036781 client-libs [parfait] JNI exception pending in jdk/src/windows/native/sun/windows/awt_PrintDialog.cpp JDK-8036787 client-libs [parfait] JNI exc. pending in jdk/src/windows/native/sun/windows/awt_Object.cpp JDK-8037012 core-libs (tz) Support tzdata2014a JDK-8037180 core-libs [TEST_BUG] test/sun/util/calendar/zi/Zoneinfo.java incorrectly calculates raw GMT offset change time JDK-8037483 infrastructure issue with the crypto / sec zip unzipping in the jdk8 build From lana.steuck at oracle.com Mon Mar 24 22:01:52 2014 From: lana.steuck at oracle.com (Lana Steuck) Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 15:01:52 -0700 Subject: 8u-dev (8u20): finished sync-up with Master Message-ID: <5330AB50.4040802@oracle.com> From ivan.gerasimov at oracle.com Tue Mar 25 12:12:42 2014 From: ivan.gerasimov at oracle.com (Ivan Gerasimov) Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 16:12:42 +0400 Subject: [8u-dev] Request to backport: 8027348, 8034262 Message-ID: <533172BA.2040309@oracle.com> Hi! This is a request to backport two linked changes: 8027348: (process) Enhancement of handling async close of ProcessInputStream Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8027348 Jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/62704cc3aaaf Review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-January/024557.html 8034262: Test java/lang/ProcessBuilder/CloseRace.java fails Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8034262 Jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/9642561f4df9 Review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-March/025651.html Both changes apply cleanly. Sincerely yours, Ivan From sean.coffey at oracle.com Tue Mar 25 13:08:52 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 13:08:52 +0000 Subject: [8u-dev] Request to backport: 8027348, 8034262 In-Reply-To: <533172BA.2040309@oracle.com> References: <533172BA.2040309@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53317FE4.4000403@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 25/03/2014 12:12, Ivan Gerasimov wrote: > Hi! > > This is a request to backport two linked changes: > > 8027348: (process) Enhancement of handling async close of > ProcessInputStream > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8027348 > Jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/62704cc3aaaf > Review thread: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-January/024557.html > > 8034262: Test java/lang/ProcessBuilder/CloseRace.java fails > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8034262 > Jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/9642561f4df9 > Review thread: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-March/025651.html > > Both changes apply cleanly. > > Sincerely yours, > Ivan From konstantin.shefov at oracle.com Tue Mar 25 14:29:51 2014 From: konstantin.shefov at oracle.com (Konstantin Shefov) Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 18:29:51 +0400 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for CR 8031422 - [TEST_BUG] java/awt/Paint/bug8024864.java fails on Windows 7 Message-ID: <533192DF.3070006@oracle.com> Hello, please approve the backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8031422 The JDK 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/3844d4e9fda5 Thanks, Konstantin -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Alexander Zvegintsev Subject: Re: [9] Review request : 8031422 [TEST_BUG] java/awt/Paint/bug8024864.java fails on Windows 7 Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 17:45:02 +0400 Size: 1623 URL: From vladimir.x.ivanov at oracle.com Tue Mar 25 16:40:38 2014 From: vladimir.x.ivanov at oracle.com (Vladimir Ivanov) Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 20:40:38 +0400 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8033666: Make sure @ForceInline is everywhere it needs to be in sun.misc and java.lang.invoke Message-ID: <5331B186.8040109@oracle.com> Hello, Please, approve a backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8033666 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/486987be7561 http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-February/025337.html Thanks! Best regards, Vladimir Ivanov From sean.coffey at oracle.com Tue Mar 25 17:18:37 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 17:18:37 +0000 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for CR 8031422 - [TEST_BUG] java/awt/Paint/bug8024864.java fails on Windows 7 In-Reply-To: <533192DF.3070006@oracle.com> References: <533192DF.3070006@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5331BA6D.6070509@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 25/03/2014 14:29, Konstantin Shefov wrote: > Hello, > > please approve the backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8031422 > The JDK 9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/3844d4e9fda5 > > Thanks, > Konstantin From sean.coffey at oracle.com Tue Mar 25 17:18:53 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 17:18:53 +0000 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8033666: Make sure @ForceInline is everywhere it needs to be in sun.misc and java.lang.invoke In-Reply-To: <5331B186.8040109@oracle.com> References: <5331B186.8040109@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5331BA7D.8000205@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 25/03/2014 16:40, Vladimir Ivanov wrote: > Hello, > > Please, approve a backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8033666 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/486987be7561 > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-February/025337.html > > > Thanks! > > Best regards, > Vladimir Ivanov From vladimir.x.ivanov at oracle.com Tue Mar 25 17:25:08 2014 From: vladimir.x.ivanov at oracle.com (Vladimir Ivanov) Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 21:25:08 +0400 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8033666: Make sure @ForceInline is everywhere it needs to be in sun.misc and java.lang.invoke In-Reply-To: <5331BA7D.8000205@oracle.com> References: <5331B186.8040109@oracle.com> <5331BA7D.8000205@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5331BBF4.9020704@oracle.com> Thanks, Sean. Best regards, Vladimir Ivanov On 3/25/14 9:18 PM, Se?n Coffey wrote: > Approved. > > regards, > Sean. > > On 25/03/2014 16:40, Vladimir Ivanov wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Please, approve a backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. >> >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8033666 >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/486987be7561 >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-February/025337.html >> >> >> Thanks! >> >> Best regards, >> Vladimir Ivanov > From martinrb at google.com Tue Mar 25 17:58:50 2014 From: martinrb at google.com (Martin Buchholz) Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 10:58:50 -0700 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8033666: Make sure @ForceInline is everywhere it needs to be in sun.misc and java.lang.invoke In-Reply-To: <5331B186.8040109@oracle.com> References: <5331B186.8040109@oracle.com> Message-ID: On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Vladimir Ivanov < vladimir.x.ivanov at oracle.com> wrote: > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8033666 Trying to follow that link gives me Permission Violation, as if this jira issue doesn't exist. From vladimir.x.ivanov at oracle.com Tue Mar 25 18:04:33 2014 From: vladimir.x.ivanov at oracle.com (Vladimir Ivanov) Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 22:04:33 +0400 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8033666: Make sure @ForceInline is everywhere it needs to be in sun.misc and java.lang.invoke In-Reply-To: References: <5331B186.8040109@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5331C531.6010404@oracle.com> Martin, Unfortunately, this bug is confidential, because parent/umbrella CR is marked as confidential. And I can't fix it - security level is inherited from the umbrella CR. Best regards, Vladimir Ivanov On 3/25/14 9:58 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Vladimir Ivanov > > wrote: > > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/__browse/JDK-8033666 > > > > Trying to follow that link gives me Permission Violation, as if this > jira issue doesn't exist. From alejandro.murillo at oracle.com Tue Mar 25 18:08:39 2014 From: alejandro.murillo at oracle.com (Alejandro E Murillo) Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 12:08:39 -0600 Subject: jdk8u20-b07: HotSpot Message-ID: <5331C627.8030906@oracle.com> hs25.20-b07 has been integrated into jdk8u20-b07. http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/rev/6403ef94cb0d http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/corba/rev/32b9c4f0ab3c http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/rev/f0ea4d3df129 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jaxp/rev/30b8baceb72b http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jaxws/rev/a61ba2e3e6c8 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/rev/db30cb9eb18d http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/langtools/rev/1a57c569cb81 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/nashorn/rev/7e89db817ed0 Component : VM Status : 0 major failures, 0 minor failures Date : 03/25/2014 at 17:00 MSK Tested By : STT_VM Cost(total man-days): 1 Workspace : 2014-03-20-203227.amurillo.hs25-20-b07-jdk8u20-b07-control Bundles : 2014-03-20-203227.amurillo.hs25-20-b07-jdk8u20-b07-control Platforms : Others Tests :/net/sqenfs-1.sfbay/export1/comp/vm/testbase/ Log : link Browsers : NA Patches : NA Number of Tests Executed: 191011 passed tests, 1934 failed tests (0 new failures) Bug verification status: ====================================== Tested, Pass: Tested, Pass (partial fixes): Tested, Fail: Untested bug fixes: Setup is not available: 8027754: Enable loop optimizations for loops with MathExact inside 8030177: G1: Enable TLAB resizing 8031321: Support Intel bit manipulation instructions 8031752: Failed speculative optimizations should be reattempted when root of compilation is different 8031754: Type speculation should favor profile data from outermost inlined method 8032633: Enable type speculation by default 8034079: G1: Refactor the HeapRegionSet hierarchy 8035841: assert(dp_src->tag() == dp_dst->tag()) failed: should be same tags 1 != 0 at ciMethodData.cpp:90 8036092: [TESTBUG] compiler/uncommontrap/TestSpecTrapClassUnloading.java fails with: Unrecognized VM option 'UseTypeSpeculation' 8037226: compiler/7196199/Test7196199.java fails on 32-bit linux with MaxVectorSize > 16 8037305: new hotspot build - hs25.20-b07 8037340: Linux semaphores to use CLOCK_REALTIME 8037407: G1: Remove heapRegionSets.cpp New bugs filed: Bugs in PIT build: Bugs in earlier promoted build: Number of PIT requested: 1 Integration target J2SE build number: jdk8u20-b07 Issues and Notes: No new issue found. Go for integration. -- Alejandro From martinrb at google.com Tue Mar 25 19:00:46 2014 From: martinrb at google.com (Martin Buchholz) Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 12:00:46 -0700 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8033666: Make sure @ForceInline is everywhere it needs to be in sun.misc and java.lang.invoke In-Reply-To: <5331C531.6010404@oracle.com> References: <5331B186.8040109@oracle.com> <5331C531.6010404@oracle.com> Message-ID: The user experience is a regression from the old bug system; at least that one told you "this bug is not available". It would be nice if the public info on the bug (that is, the summary line) was universally available in jbs as well. It would also be nice if trusted users outside Oracle had access. On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Vladimir Ivanov < vladimir.x.ivanov at oracle.com> wrote: > Martin, > > Unfortunately, this bug is confidential, because parent/umbrella CR is > marked as confidential. And I can't fix it - security level is inherited > from the umbrella CR. > > Best regards, > Vladimir Ivanov > > > On 3/25/14 9:58 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Vladimir Ivanov >> > >> wrote: >> >> >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/__browse/JDK-8033666 >> >> >> >> >> Trying to follow that link gives me Permission Violation, as if this >> jira issue doesn't exist. >> > From joel.franck at oracle.com Wed Mar 26 12:06:52 2014 From: joel.franck at oracle.com (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Joel_Borggr=E9n-Franck?=) Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 13:06:52 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8038080: annotation processors don't visit declaration parameter annotations Message-ID: <2BACAFAD-4C51-4DD6-9188-81F7F6353945@oracle.com> Hi, Can I get approval to backport the fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/545b66f5c82a for bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038080 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/compiler-dev/2014-March/008657.html Applies cleanly to 8u. cheers /Joel From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Wed Mar 26 12:57:05 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 12:57:05 +0000 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8038080: annotation processors don't visit declaration parameter annotations In-Reply-To: <2BACAFAD-4C51-4DD6-9188-81F7F6353945@oracle.com> References: <2BACAFAD-4C51-4DD6-9188-81F7F6353945@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5332CEA1.9010005@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 26/03/14 12:06, Joel Borggr?n-Franck wrote: > Hi, > > Can I get approval to backport the fix: > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/545b66f5c82a > > for bug: > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038080 > > review thread: > > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/compiler-dev/2014-March/008657.html > > Applies cleanly to 8u. > > cheers > /Joel From chris.hegarty at oracle.com Wed Mar 26 14:43:34 2014 From: chris.hegarty at oracle.com (Chris Hegarty) Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 14:43:34 +0000 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for CR 8034181: SIGBUS in SctpChannelImpl receive Message-ID: <5332E796.50609@oracle.com> Hi 8u Maintainers, I would like to request approval for 8034181 for inclusion in 8u20 ( to be pushed to 8u-dev ). The 8u changes identical to the JDK 9 changes. 8034181: SIGBUS in SctpChannelImpl receive https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8034181 JDK 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/3603451813f0 JDK 9 Review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2014-March/008353.html Thanks, -Chris. From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Wed Mar 26 14:59:30 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 14:59:30 +0000 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for CR 8034181: SIGBUS in SctpChannelImpl receive In-Reply-To: <5332E796.50609@oracle.com> References: <5332E796.50609@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5332EB52.8010300@oracle.com> Approved. Thanks Chris. -Rob On 26/03/14 14:43, Chris Hegarty wrote: > Hi 8u Maintainers, > > I would like to request approval for 8034181 for inclusion in 8u20 ( > to be pushed to 8u-dev ). The 8u changes identical to the JDK 9 changes. > > 8034181: SIGBUS in SctpChannelImpl receive > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8034181 > > JDK 9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/3603451813f0 > > JDK 9 Review thread: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2014-March/008353.html > > Thanks, > -Chris. From rajan.halade at oracle.com Wed Mar 26 17:54:22 2014 From: rajan.halade at oracle.com (Rajan Halade) Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 10:54:22 -0700 Subject: Request for approval: 8038425: AIOB while parsing CRL for revoked certificate Message-ID: <5333144E.90301@oracle.com> Can I get approval to backport the fix for 8037258 to 8u? The 8u fix will be identical to JDK 9 changes. http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/6904c171ffc5 for bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038425 jdk 9 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2014-March/010325.html Thanks, Rajan From anthony.scarpino at oracle.com Wed Mar 26 18:37:46 2014 From: anthony.scarpino at oracle.com (Anthony Scarpino) Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 11:37:46 -0700 Subject: [8u20] request for approval to backport 8036543: [parfait] JNI pending exceptions for j2secmod.c, j2secmod_md.c, and p11_md.c Message-ID: <53331E7A.5080709@oracle.com> Hi, I'm requesting backport approval for this changes pushed into jdk9: 8036543: [parfait] JNI pending exceptions for j2secmod.c, j2secmod_md.c, and p11_md.c The fix in 8u is the same as 9. bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036543 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/f22fa82ff7f0 JDK 9 review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2014-March/010249.html thanks Tony From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Mar 26 18:42:47 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 18:42:47 +0000 Subject: (8037258) Request for approval: 8038425: AIOB while parsing CRL for revoked certificate In-Reply-To: <5333144E.90301@oracle.com> References: <5333144E.90301@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53331FA7.8010205@oracle.com> For record, 8037258 is the master bug ID. Approved. I can help with pushing this for you Rajan. regards, Sean. On 26/03/14 17:54, Rajan Halade wrote: > Can I get approval to backport the fix for 8037258 to 8u? The 8u fix > will be identical to JDK 9 changes. > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/6904c171ffc5 > > for bug: > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038425 > > jdk 9 review thread: > > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2014-March/010325.html > > > Thanks, > Rajan From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Mar 26 18:45:32 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 18:45:32 +0000 Subject: [8u20] request for approval to backport 8036543: [parfait] JNI pending exceptions for j2secmod.c, j2secmod_md.c, and p11_md.c In-Reply-To: <53331E7A.5080709@oracle.com> References: <53331E7A.5080709@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5333204C.7080309@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 26/03/14 18:37, Anthony Scarpino wrote: > Hi, > > I'm requesting backport approval for this changes pushed into jdk9: > > 8036543: [parfait] JNI pending exceptions for j2secmod.c, > j2secmod_md.c, and p11_md.c > > The fix in 8u is the same as 9. > > bug: > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036543 > > changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/f22fa82ff7f0 > > JDK 9 review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2014-March/010249.html > > > thanks > > Tony From alexander.zuev at oracle.com Thu Mar 27 01:49:49 2014 From: alexander.zuev at oracle.com (Alexander Zuev) Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 18:49:49 -0700 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8035104 - reorder class file attributes in javap listing Message-ID: <533383BD.80909@oracle.com> Please approve the backport of the following change from the jdk9. Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035104 Fix pushed as: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/9c6a23d6f96c Fix applies without an issue to http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/langtools Webrev is available at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kizune/8035104/webrev.00 /Alex From sean.coffey at oracle.com Thu Mar 27 09:09:43 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 09:09:43 +0000 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8035104 - reorder class file attributes in javap listing In-Reply-To: <533383BD.80909@oracle.com> References: <533383BD.80909@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5333EAD7.6050907@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 27/03/2014 01:49, Alexander Zuev wrote: > Please approve the backport of the following change from the jdk9. > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035104 > Fix pushed as: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/9c6a23d6f96c > Fix applies without an issue to > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/langtools > Webrev is available at: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kizune/8035104/webrev.00 > > /Alex From sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com Fri Mar 28 08:19:20 2014 From: sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com (A. Sundararajan) Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 13:49:20 +0530 Subject: [8u20] Please approve 8038456 : improve nasgen type checks and use specific return type for @Function, @SpecializedFunctio methods Message-ID: <53353088.5090706@oracle.com> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038456 jdk9-dev webrev request: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-March/002866.html jdk9-dev changeset:http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/1a9a2d8bd800 Thanks -Sundar From sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com Fri Mar 28 09:11:55 2014 From: sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com (A. Sundararajan) Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 14:41:55 +0530 Subject: [8u20] Please approve 8038456 : improve nasgen type checks and use specific return type for @Function, @SpecializedFunctio methods In-Reply-To: <53353088.5090706@oracle.com> References: <53353088.5090706@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53353CDB.9070606@oracle.com> Sorry jdk9 changeset link in my last email is wrong. Right one is this: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/b0bb00872963 -Sundar On Friday 28 March 2014 01:49 PM, A. Sundararajan wrote: > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038456 > > jdk9-dev webrev request: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-March/002866.html > > jdk9-dev > changeset:http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/1a9a2d8bd800 > > > Thanks > -Sundar From anton.litvinov at oracle.com Fri Mar 28 12:55:48 2014 From: anton.litvinov at oracle.com (Anton Litvinov) Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 16:55:48 +0400 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for CR 8032832: Applet/browser deadlocks, when IIS integrated authentication is used Message-ID: <53357154.8090301@oracle.com> Hello, I would like to request for approval to push a backport of the fix from JDK 9 to JDK 8. The backport fix is identical to the original fix. Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8032832 JDK 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/8379313ae50e JDK 9 review thread: Approval 1 - http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2014-March/008355.html Approval 2 - http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2014-March/008359.html Reviewers: chegar, weijun Thank you, Anton From sean.coffey at oracle.com Fri Mar 28 13:43:07 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 13:43:07 +0000 Subject: [8u20] Please approve 8038456 : improve nasgen type checks and use specific return type for @Function, @SpecializedFunctio methods In-Reply-To: <53353088.5090706@oracle.com> References: <53353088.5090706@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53357C6B.9000405@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 28/03/14 08:19, A. Sundararajan wrote: > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038456 > > jdk9-dev webrev request: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-March/002866.html > > jdk9-dev > changeset:http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/1a9a2d8bd800 > > > Thanks > -Sundar From sean.coffey at oracle.com Fri Mar 28 13:44:09 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 13:44:09 +0000 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for CR 8032832: Applet/browser deadlocks, when IIS integrated authentication is used In-Reply-To: <53357154.8090301@oracle.com> References: <53357154.8090301@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53357CA9.1040602@oracle.com> Approved for jdk8u-dev. regards, Sean. On 28/03/14 12:55, Anton Litvinov wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to request for approval to push a backport of the fix > from JDK 9 to JDK 8. The backport fix is identical to the original fix. > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8032832 > JDK 9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/8379313ae50e > JDK 9 review thread: > Approval 1 - > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2014-March/008355.html > Approval 2 - > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2014-March/008359.html > Reviewers: chegar, weijun > > Thank you, > Anton From alexandr.scherbatiy at oracle.com Fri Mar 28 14:32:50 2014 From: alexandr.scherbatiy at oracle.com (Alexander Scherbatiy) Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 18:32:50 +0400 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8035069 [macosx] Loading resolution variants by demand Message-ID: <53358812.60200@oracle.com> Hello, Could you approve the backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035069 The webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alexsch/8035069/webrev.01 The review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2014-March/007218.html The jdk 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/3e456289a684 Thanks, Alexandr. From alexandr.scherbatiy at oracle.com Fri Mar 28 14:36:25 2014 From: alexandr.scherbatiy at oracle.com (Alexander Scherbatiy) Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 18:36:25 +0400 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8036882 [macosx] Native memory leak in Java_sun_lwawt_macosx_CImage_nativeGetNSImageRepresentationSizes Message-ID: <533588E9.7040600@oracle.com> Hello, Could you approve the backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036882 The webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alexsch/8036882/webrev.00 The review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2014-March/007388.html The jdk 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/07dc208840ca Thanks, Alexandr. From alexandr.scherbatiy at oracle.com Fri Mar 28 14:41:44 2014 From: alexandr.scherbatiy at oracle.com (Alexander Scherbatiy) Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 18:41:44 +0400 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8034955 JLabel/JToolTip throw ClassCastException for "a" Message-ID: <53358A28.90005@oracle.com> Hello, Could you approve the backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8034955 The webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alexsch/8034955/webrev.00 The review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2014-March/003301.html The jdk 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/1f4842051d8a Thanks, Alexandr. From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Fri Mar 28 15:27:47 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 15:27:47 +0000 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8035069 [macosx] Loading resolution variants by demand In-Reply-To: <53358812.60200@oracle.com> References: <53358812.60200@oracle.com> Message-ID: <533594F3.1060609@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 28/03/14 14:32, Alexander Scherbatiy wrote: > > Hello, > > Could you approve the backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035069 > The webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alexsch/8035069/webrev.01 > The review thread: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2014-March/007218.html > The jdk 9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/3e456289a684 > > Thanks, > Alexandr. > From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Fri Mar 28 15:27:53 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 15:27:53 +0000 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8036882 [macosx] Native memory leak in Java_sun_lwawt_macosx_CImage_nativeGetNSImageRepresentationSizes In-Reply-To: <533588E9.7040600@oracle.com> References: <533588E9.7040600@oracle.com> Message-ID: <533594F9.6080604@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 28/03/14 14:36, Alexander Scherbatiy wrote: > > Hello, > > Could you approve the backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036882 > The webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alexsch/8036882/webrev.00 > The review thread: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2014-March/007388.html > The jdk 9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/07dc208840ca > > Thanks, > Alexandr. > From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Fri Mar 28 15:27:57 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 15:27:57 +0000 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8034955 JLabel/JToolTip throw ClassCastException for "<html>a<title>" In-Reply-To: <53358A28.90005@oracle.com> References: <53358A28.90005@oracle.com> Message-ID: <533594FD.2040108@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 28/03/14 14:41, Alexander Scherbatiy wrote: > > Hello, > > Could you approve the backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8034955 > The webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alexsch/8034955/webrev.00 > The review thread: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2014-March/003301.html > The jdk 9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/1f4842051d8a > > Thanks, > Alexandr. > From sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com Fri Mar 28 15:40:12 2014 From: sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com (A. Sundararajan) Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 21:10:12 +0530 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8038615 test262 repo is now a git repo in github Message-ID: <533597DC.1090003@oracle.com> Please approve backport of the following fix from jdk9 to jdk8u20. Fix backported 'as is' with no jdk8u20 specific change. Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038615 jdk9 webrev thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-March/002870.html jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/1a9a2d8bd800 Thanks, -Sundar From alejandro.murillo at oracle.com Sat Mar 29 02:00:26 2014 From: alejandro.murillo at oracle.com (Alejandro E Murillo) Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 20:00:26 -0600 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for bulk integration of hs25.20-b08 Message-ID: <5336293A.5050302@oracle.com> Requesting approval to integrate hs25.20-b08 into jdk8u20-b08. A webrev is available at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amurillo/8u20/hs25.20-b08-jdk8u20-b08.webrev/ Pre-integration testing is in progress; the integration will proceed only after SQE has analyzed the results and approved. The fixes in the proposed integration are below. All have undergone nightly testing and are already in a jdk8 repository. 6653795: C2 intrinsic for Unsafe.getAddress performs pointer sign extension on 32-bit systems 8003854: PPC64 (part 115): Introduce PostallocExpand that expands nodes after register allocation 8009462: Young GC's (ParNewGC and SerialGC) have unexpected variances. 8016476: PPC64 (part 1): reenable CORE build 8016491: PPC64 (part 2): Clean up PPC defines. 8016586: PPC64 (part 3): basic changes for PPC64 8016696: PPC64 (part 4): add relocation for trampoline stubs 8017313: PPC64 (part 6): stack handling improvements 8017317: PPC64 (part 7): cppInterpreter: implement support for biased locking 8019517: PPC64 (part 102): cppInterpreter: implement G1 support 8019518: PPC64 (part 103): cppInterpreter: implement support for compressed Oops 8019519: PPC64 (part 105): C interpreter: implement support for jvmti early return. 8019922: PPC64 (part 8): Implement Linux/PPC64 support in HotSpot makefiles 8019926: PPC64 (part 106): Make hsdis build and work on Linux/PPC64 8019929: PPC64 (part 107): Extend ELF-decoder to support PPC64 function descriptor tables 8019972: PPC64 (part 9): platform files for interpreter only VM. 8019973: PPC64 (part 11): Fix IA64 preprocessor conditionals on AIX. 8020121: PPC64: fix build in cppInterpreter after 8019519 8020277: Young GC could be extremely slow due to assertion in ObjectStartArray::object_starts_in_range 8020775: PPC64 (part 12): posix signal printing 8023033: PPC64 (part 13): basic changes for AIX 8023034: PPC64 (part 14): Implement AIX/PPC64 support in HotSpot makefiles 8023038: PPC64 (part 15): Platform files for AIX/PPC64 support 8024342: PPC64 (part 111): Support for C calling conventions that require 64-bit ints. 8024344: PPC64 (part 112): C argument in register AND stack slot. 8024379: Adapt PPC64 port to 8003424 8024468: PPC64 (part 201): cppInterpreter: implement bytecode profiling 8024469: PPC64 (part 202): cppInterpreter: support for OSR. 8024921: PPC64 (part 113): Extend Load and Store nodes to know about memory ordering 8024922: PPC64 (part 116): Extend adlc to generate fields into nodes. 8026487: PPC64: Implement 'os::fork_and_exec' on AIX 8027295: Free CSet takes ~50% of young pause time 8027964: Adapt PPC to 6843347: Boundary values in some public GC options cause crashes 8027965: Adapt PPC to 8015107: NPG: Use consistent naming for metaspace concepts 8027966: Adapt PPC to 8023657: New type profiling points: arguments to call 8027968: Adapt PPC to 8024927: Nashorn performance regression with CompressedOops 8027969: Adapt PPC to 8026328: Setting a breakpoint on invokedynamic crashes the JVM 8028401: PPC (part 117): Improve usability of adlc and format() functionality. 8028470: PPC64 (part 214): linux: extend signal handler to catch SIGTRAP on ppc64. 8028471: PPC64 (part 215): opto: Extend ImplicitNullCheck optimization. 8028514: PPC64: Fix C++ Interpreter after '7195622: CheckUnhandledOops has limited usefulness now' 8028515: PPPC64 (part 113.2): opto: Introduce LoadFence/StoreFence. 8028580: PPC64 (part 114/120): Support for Call nodes with constants. 8028767: PPC64: (part 121): smaller shared changes needed to build C2 8029015: PPC64 (part 216): opto: trap based null and range checks 8029025: PPC64 (part 203): opto: Move static _in_dump_cnt to Compile object. 8029075: String deduplication in G1 8029101: PPC64 (part 211): ordering of Independent Reads of Independent Writes 8029162: G1: Shared SATB queue never enabled 8029255: G1: Reference processing should not enqueue references on the shared SATB queue 8029396: PPC64 (part 212): Several memory ordering fixes in C-code. 8029888: PPC64: (part 219): adl replacement variable CondRegister 8029940: PPC64 (part 122): C2 compiler port 8029941: rollback changes in make/jprt.properties for embedded testing 8029957: PPC64 (part 213): cppInterpreter: memory ordering for object initialization 8030863: PPC64: (part 220): ConstantTableBase for calls between args and jvms 8031188: Fix for 8029015: PPC64 (part 216): opto: trap based null and range checks 8031319: PPC64: Some fixes in ppc and aix coding. 8031320: Use Intel RTM instructions for locks 8031703: Missing post-barrier in ReferenceProcessor 8032634: Add #ifdef PPC64 around OrderAccess operations on _thread_state. 8033117: PPC64: Adapt to 8002074: Support for AES on SPARC 8033168: PPC64: gcc 4.8 warning in output_c.cpp 8033464: Linux code cleanup 8033566: [parfait] warning from b128 for hotspot/src/share/vm/runtime/frame.cpp: JNI primitive type mismatch 8033931: Several nightly tests failing with assert(imin < imax) failed: Unexpected page size 8034034: [parfait] JNI exc. pending in hotspot/agent/src/os/bsd/MacosxDebuggerLocal.m 8034797: AIX: Fix os::naked_short_sleep() in os_aix.cpp after 8028280 8034868: Extract G1 From Card Cache into separate class 8035330: Remove G1ParScanPartialArrayClosure and G1ParScanHeapEvacClosure 8035392: cppInterpreter: fix message of NPE 8035394: PPC64: Make usage of intrinsic dsqrt depend on processor recognition. 8035396: Introduce accessor for tmp_oop in frame. 8035398: Add card redirty time in "Other" time in G1 8035406: Improve data structure for Code Cache remembered sets 8035423: AIX: Fix os::get_default_process_handle() in os_aix.cpp after 8031968 8035647: PPC64: Support for elf v2 abi. 8035654: Add times for evacuation failure handling in "Other" time 8035815: Cache-align and pad the from card cache 8035828: Turn on @Stable support in VM 8035857: Add tests to verify correctness of operations with BMI1 and LZCNT instructions 8035887: VM crashes trying to force inlining the recursive call 8035970: PPC64: fix ad file after 8027754: Enable loop optimizations for loops with MathExact 8036025: Sort the freelist in order to shrink the heap 8036667: "assert(adr->is_AddP() && adr->in(AddPNode::Offset)->is_Con()) failed: offset is a constant" with FoldStableValues on 8036672: G1: alloc_purpose in copy_to_survivor_space() used incorrectly 8036673: G1: Abort weak reference processing if mark stack overflows 8036696: Add metaspace gc threshold to metaspace summary trace event 8036698: Add trace event for updates to metaspace gc threshold 8036699: Add trace event when a metaspace allocation fails 8036701: Add trace event when a metaspace throws out of memory error 8036703: Add trace event with statistics for the metaspace chunk free lists 8036860: Pad and cache-align the BiasedMappedArray 8036976: PPC64: implement the template interpreter 8037510: CMM Testing: Min/MaxHeapFreeRatio flags should be manageable through the API 8037821: Account for trampoline stubs when estimating code buffer sizes 8037915: PPC64/AIX: Several smaller fixes 8037962: metaspaceTracer.cpp misses a symbol 8038028: new hotspot build - hs25.20-b08 8038181: Can't build product VM without precompiled header 8038193: Add command line option tests for BMI options 8038222: Assembler::bsrl fails on assert when -UseCountLeadingZerosInstruction is used on CPU with LZCNT support 8038240: new WB API to get nmethod 8038262: Workaround for ccache in vm.make is missing for aix 8038274: update 8u fix for 8028073 now that 8028280 is backported to 8u 8038286: nm->set_rtm_state() should be called after (nm != NULL) check -- Alejandro From igor.ignatyev at oracle.com Sat Mar 29 08:40:48 2014 From: igor.ignatyev at oracle.com (Igor Ignatyev) Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 12:40:48 +0400 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for JDK-8038186 : [TESTBUG] improvements of test j.l.i.MethodHandles Message-ID: <53368710.4030009@oracle.com> Hi all, Please, approve a backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. Patch is applied almost clean: only position of 'Asserts.assertSame' has been changed. webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev/8038186/8u20/webrev.00/ jbs: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038186 review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-March/026001.html jdk9 CS: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/11f9d4697256 -- Igor From dalibor.topic at oracle.com Sat Mar 29 11:59:43 2014 From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (dalibor.topic at oracle.com) Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 12:59:43 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for JDK-8038186 : [TESTBUG] improvements of test j.l.i.MethodHandles In-Reply-To: <53368710.4030009@oracle.com> References: <53368710.4030009@oracle.com> Message-ID: <32B39AEE-7BB8-40C7-BB5F-83CB53D51F12@oracle.com> Thanks, Igor - approved for 8u-dev. -- Oracle <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214<tel:+494089091214> | Mobile:+491737185961<tel:+491737185961> Oracle Java Platform Group ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher Green Oracle <http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment > On 29.03.2014, at 09:40, Igor Ignatyev <igor.ignatyev at oracle.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Please, approve a backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. Patch is applied almost clean: only position of 'Asserts.assertSame' has been changed. > > webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev/8038186/8u20/webrev.00/ > jbs: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038186 > review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-March/026001.html > jdk9 CS: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/11f9d4697256 > -- > Igor From sean.coffey at oracle.com Sat Mar 29 13:02:28 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 13:02:28 +0000 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8038615 test262 repo is now a git repo in github In-Reply-To: <533597DC.1090003@oracle.com> References: <533597DC.1090003@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5336C464.6060502@oracle.com> Please include review thread links where possible : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-March/002871.html Approved. regards, Sean. On 28/03/14 15:40, A. Sundararajan wrote: > Please approve backport of the following fix from jdk9 to jdk8u20. Fix > backported 'as is' with no jdk8u20 specific change. > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038615 > jdk9 webrev thread: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-March/002870.html > jdk9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/1a9a2d8bd800 > > Thanks, > -Sundar > From sean.coffey at oracle.com Sat Mar 29 13:05:56 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 13:05:56 +0000 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for bulk integration of hs25.20-b08 In-Reply-To: <5336293A.5050302@oracle.com> References: <5336293A.5050302@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5336C534.6000008@oracle.com> Good to see PPC64 making an entry into jdk8u! approved pending positive PIT results. regards, Sean. On 29/03/14 02:00, Alejandro E Murillo wrote: > Requesting approval to integrate hs25.20-b08 into jdk8u20-b08. > > A webrev is available at: > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amurillo/8u20/hs25.20-b08-jdk8u20-b08.webrev/ > > Pre-integration testing is in progress; the integration will proceed > only after SQE has analyzed the results and approved. > > The fixes in the proposed integration are below. All have undergone > nightly testing and are already in a jdk8 repository. > > 6653795: C2 intrinsic for Unsafe.getAddress performs pointer sign > extension on 32-bit systems > 8003854: PPC64 (part 115): Introduce PostallocExpand that expands > nodes after register allocation > 8009462: Young GC's (ParNewGC and SerialGC) have unexpected variances. > 8016476: PPC64 (part 1): reenable CORE build > 8016491: PPC64 (part 2): Clean up PPC defines. > 8016586: PPC64 (part 3): basic changes for PPC64 > 8016696: PPC64 (part 4): add relocation for trampoline stubs > 8017313: PPC64 (part 6): stack handling improvements > 8017317: PPC64 (part 7): cppInterpreter: implement support for biased > locking > 8019517: PPC64 (part 102): cppInterpreter: implement G1 support > 8019518: PPC64 (part 103): cppInterpreter: implement support for > compressed Oops > 8019519: PPC64 (part 105): C interpreter: implement support for jvmti > early return. > 8019922: PPC64 (part 8): Implement Linux/PPC64 support in HotSpot > makefiles > 8019926: PPC64 (part 106): Make hsdis build and work on Linux/PPC64 > 8019929: PPC64 (part 107): Extend ELF-decoder to support PPC64 > function descriptor tables > 8019972: PPC64 (part 9): platform files for interpreter only VM. > 8019973: PPC64 (part 11): Fix IA64 preprocessor conditionals on AIX. > 8020121: PPC64: fix build in cppInterpreter after 8019519 > 8020277: Young GC could be extremely slow due to assertion in > ObjectStartArray::object_starts_in_range > 8020775: PPC64 (part 12): posix signal printing > 8023033: PPC64 (part 13): basic changes for AIX > 8023034: PPC64 (part 14): Implement AIX/PPC64 support in HotSpot > makefiles > 8023038: PPC64 (part 15): Platform files for AIX/PPC64 support > 8024342: PPC64 (part 111): Support for C calling conventions that > require 64-bit ints. > 8024344: PPC64 (part 112): C argument in register AND stack slot. > 8024379: Adapt PPC64 port to 8003424 > 8024468: PPC64 (part 201): cppInterpreter: implement bytecode profiling > 8024469: PPC64 (part 202): cppInterpreter: support for OSR. > 8024921: PPC64 (part 113): Extend Load and Store nodes to know about > memory ordering > 8024922: PPC64 (part 116): Extend adlc to generate fields into nodes. > 8026487: PPC64: Implement 'os::fork_and_exec' on AIX > 8027295: Free CSet takes ~50% of young pause time > 8027964: Adapt PPC to 6843347: Boundary values in some public GC > options cause crashes > 8027965: Adapt PPC to 8015107: NPG: Use consistent naming for > metaspace concepts > 8027966: Adapt PPC to 8023657: New type profiling points: arguments to > call > 8027968: Adapt PPC to 8024927: Nashorn performance regression with > CompressedOops > 8027969: Adapt PPC to 8026328: Setting a breakpoint on invokedynamic > crashes the JVM > 8028401: PPC (part 117): Improve usability of adlc and format() > functionality. > 8028470: PPC64 (part 214): linux: extend signal handler to catch > SIGTRAP on ppc64. > 8028471: PPC64 (part 215): opto: Extend ImplicitNullCheck optimization. > 8028514: PPC64: Fix C++ Interpreter after '7195622: CheckUnhandledOops > has limited usefulness now' > 8028515: PPPC64 (part 113.2): opto: Introduce LoadFence/StoreFence. > 8028580: PPC64 (part 114/120): Support for Call nodes with constants. > 8028767: PPC64: (part 121): smaller shared changes needed to build C2 > 8029015: PPC64 (part 216): opto: trap based null and range checks > 8029025: PPC64 (part 203): opto: Move static _in_dump_cnt to Compile > object. > 8029075: String deduplication in G1 > 8029101: PPC64 (part 211): ordering of Independent Reads of > Independent Writes > 8029162: G1: Shared SATB queue never enabled > 8029255: G1: Reference processing should not enqueue references on the > shared SATB queue > 8029396: PPC64 (part 212): Several memory ordering fixes in C-code. > 8029888: PPC64: (part 219): adl replacement variable CondRegister > 8029940: PPC64 (part 122): C2 compiler port > 8029941: rollback changes in make/jprt.properties for embedded testing > 8029957: PPC64 (part 213): cppInterpreter: memory ordering for object > initialization > 8030863: PPC64: (part 220): ConstantTableBase for calls between args > and jvms > 8031188: Fix for 8029015: PPC64 (part 216): opto: trap based null and > range checks > 8031319: PPC64: Some fixes in ppc and aix coding. > 8031320: Use Intel RTM instructions for locks > 8031703: Missing post-barrier in ReferenceProcessor > 8032634: Add #ifdef PPC64 around OrderAccess operations on _thread_state. > 8033117: PPC64: Adapt to 8002074: Support for AES on SPARC > 8033168: PPC64: gcc 4.8 warning in output_c.cpp > 8033464: Linux code cleanup > 8033566: [parfait] warning from b128 for > hotspot/src/share/vm/runtime/frame.cpp: JNI primitive type mismatch > 8033931: Several nightly tests failing with assert(imin < imax) > failed: Unexpected page size > 8034034: [parfait] JNI exc. pending in > hotspot/agent/src/os/bsd/MacosxDebuggerLocal.m > 8034797: AIX: Fix os::naked_short_sleep() in os_aix.cpp after 8028280 > 8034868: Extract G1 From Card Cache into separate class > 8035330: Remove G1ParScanPartialArrayClosure and G1ParScanHeapEvacClosure > 8035392: cppInterpreter: fix message of NPE > 8035394: PPC64: Make usage of intrinsic dsqrt depend on processor > recognition. > 8035396: Introduce accessor for tmp_oop in frame. > 8035398: Add card redirty time in "Other" time in G1 > 8035406: Improve data structure for Code Cache remembered sets > 8035423: AIX: Fix os::get_default_process_handle() in os_aix.cpp after > 8031968 > 8035647: PPC64: Support for elf v2 abi. > 8035654: Add times for evacuation failure handling in "Other" time > 8035815: Cache-align and pad the from card cache > 8035828: Turn on @Stable support in VM > 8035857: Add tests to verify correctness of operations with BMI1 and > LZCNT instructions > 8035887: VM crashes trying to force inlining the recursive call > 8035970: PPC64: fix ad file after 8027754: Enable loop optimizations > for loops with MathExact > 8036025: Sort the freelist in order to shrink the heap > 8036667: "assert(adr->is_AddP() && > adr->in(AddPNode::Offset)->is_Con()) failed: offset is a constant" > with FoldStableValues on > 8036672: G1: alloc_purpose in copy_to_survivor_space() used incorrectly > 8036673: G1: Abort weak reference processing if mark stack overflows > 8036696: Add metaspace gc threshold to metaspace summary trace event > 8036698: Add trace event for updates to metaspace gc threshold > 8036699: Add trace event when a metaspace allocation fails > 8036701: Add trace event when a metaspace throws out of memory error > 8036703: Add trace event with statistics for the metaspace chunk free > lists > 8036860: Pad and cache-align the BiasedMappedArray > 8036976: PPC64: implement the template interpreter > 8037510: CMM Testing: Min/MaxHeapFreeRatio flags should be manageable > through the API > 8037821: Account for trampoline stubs when estimating code buffer sizes > 8037915: PPC64/AIX: Several smaller fixes > 8037962: metaspaceTracer.cpp misses a symbol > 8038028: new hotspot build - hs25.20-b08 > 8038181: Can't build product VM without precompiled header > 8038193: Add command line option tests for BMI options > 8038222: Assembler::bsrl fails on assert when > -UseCountLeadingZerosInstruction is used on CPU with LZCNT support > 8038240: new WB API to get nmethod > 8038262: Workaround for ccache in vm.make is missing for aix > 8038274: update 8u fix for 8028073 now that 8028280 is backported to 8u > 8038286: nm->set_rtm_state() should be called after (nm != NULL) check > From sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com Mon Mar 31 03:22:29 2014 From: sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com (A. Sundararajan) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 08:52:29 +0530 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval: 8038615 test262 repo is now a git repo in github In-Reply-To: <5336C464.6060502@oracle.com> References: <533597DC.1090003@oracle.com> <5336C464.6060502@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5338DF75.4080905@oracle.com> Thanks. I included the start (request part) of webrev. | jdk9 webrev thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-March/002870.html Looks like you'd like 'review done' link. Thanks, -Sundar On Saturday 29 March 2014 06:32 PM, Se?n Coffey wrote: > Please include review thread links where possible : > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-March/002871.html > > Approved. > > regards, > Sean. > > On 28/03/14 15:40, A. Sundararajan wrote: >> Please approve backport of the following fix from jdk9 to jdk8u20. >> Fix backported 'as is' with no jdk8u20 specific change. >> >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038615 >> jdk9 webrev thread: >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-March/002870.html >> jdk9 changeset: >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/nashorn/rev/1a9a2d8bd800 >> >> Thanks, >> -Sundar >> > From petr.pchelko at oracle.com Mon Mar 31 09:59:21 2014 From: petr.pchelko at oracle.com (Petr Pchelko) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 13:59:21 +0400 Subject: Request for approval for bulk integration of the parfait fixes Message-ID: <1CC85ACF-080A-443E-8031-E2C8581F66D1@oracle.com> Hello, This is a request for approval to backport the fixes from JDK9 to JDK8u-dev. I'm writing a bulk request for parfait warning fixes, because there are lots of them and tracking single requests would be difficult. All of the fixes are in JDK9 for a while and apply cleanly to jdk8u-dev repository. The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035855 The fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/3291c136312d The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035844 The fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/0e6454c9d033 The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035860 The fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/a2c00e74ba33 The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035327 The fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/5c2865f7f4e1 The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035332 The fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/2ea8c65eb3bc The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035842 The fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/80cffdf437eb The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035335 The fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/634fa31532fb The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036761 The fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/2e464ef54988 The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036793 The fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/aa46c4040075 The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036759 The fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/53be390e937e The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035847 The fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/5393784b8a6f The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035337 The fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/702e0ea97607 The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035325 The fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/ce324a17daec The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035626 The fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/2e0b3b6c46d3 The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035320 The fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/838072fb8344 Thank you. With best regards. Petr. From sean.coffey at oracle.com Mon Mar 31 10:13:15 2014 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 11:13:15 +0100 Subject: Request for approval for bulk integration of the parfait fixes In-Reply-To: <1CC85ACF-080A-443E-8031-E2C8581F66D1@oracle.com> References: <1CC85ACF-080A-443E-8031-E2C8581F66D1@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53393FBB.1080300@oracle.com> Approved. Thanks for your efforts in backporting. regards, Sean. On 31/03/14 10:59, Petr Pchelko wrote: > Hello, > > This is a request for approval to backport the fixes from JDK9 to JDK8u-dev. > I'm writing a bulk request for parfait warning fixes, because there are lots of them and tracking single requests would be difficult. > All of the fixes are in JDK9 for a while and apply cleanly to jdk8u-dev repository. > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035855 > The fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/3291c136312d > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035844 > The fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/0e6454c9d033 > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035860 > The fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/a2c00e74ba33 > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035327 > The fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/5c2865f7f4e1 > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035332 > The fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/2ea8c65eb3bc > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035842 > The fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/80cffdf437eb > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035335 > The fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/634fa31532fb > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036761 > The fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/2e464ef54988 > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036793 > The fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/aa46c4040075 > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036759 > The fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/53be390e937e > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035847 > The fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/5393784b8a6f > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035337 > The fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/702e0ea97607 > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035325 > The fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/ce324a17daec > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035626 > The fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/2e0b3b6c46d3 > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035320 > The fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/838072fb8344 > > Thank you. > With best regards. Petr. From konstantin.shefov at oracle.com Mon Mar 31 14:08:12 2014 From: konstantin.shefov at oracle.com (Konstantin Shefov) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 18:08:12 +0400 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for CR 8002148 - [TEST_BUG] The four lines printed are not the bold typeface. Message-ID: <533976CC.3020508@oracle.com> Hello, please approve the backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8002148 The JDK 9 changesets: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/7f98f7c79bc5 http://closedjdk.us.oracle.com/jdk9/client/jdk/test/closed/rev/3ad0d1e2b367 Reviews attached Thanks, Konstantin -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Sergey Bylokhov <Sergey.Bylokhov at oracle.com> Subject: Re: [9] Review request : 8002148 [TEST_BUG] The four lines printed are not the bold typeface. Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 15:10:11 +0400 Size: 1635 URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/attachments/20140331/b742cb51/AttachedMessage.mht> -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Petr Pchelko <petr.pchelko at oracle.com> Subject: Re: [9] Review request : 8002148 [TEST_BUG] The four lines printed are not the bold typeface. Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 14:20:16 +0400 Size: 1393 URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/attachments/20140331/b742cb51/AttachedMessage-0001.mht> From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Mon Mar 31 14:41:19 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 15:41:19 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for CR 8002148 - [TEST_BUG] The four lines printed are not the bold typeface. In-Reply-To: <533976CC.3020508@oracle.com> References: <533976CC.3020508@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53397E8F.9090708@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 31/03/14 15:08, Konstantin Shefov wrote: > Hello, > > please approve the backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8002148 > > The JDK 9 changesets: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/7f98f7c79bc5 > http://closedjdk.us.oracle.com/jdk9/client/jdk/test/closed/rev/3ad0d1e2b367 > > > Reviews attached > > Thanks, > Konstantin From philip.race at oracle.com Mon Mar 31 18:23:28 2014 From: philip.race at oracle.com (Phil Race) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 11:23:28 -0700 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for CR: 8029008: JNI warning in sun/font Message-ID: <5339B2A0.9090501@oracle.com> Review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2014-March/004355.html Code : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8029008.8u20/ <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eprr/8029008.8u20/> Bug https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029008 From vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com Mon Mar 31 22:03:38 2014 From: vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com (Vladimir Kozlov) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 15:03:38 -0700 Subject: CFV: New jdk8u Committer: Goetz Lindenmaier Message-ID: <5339E63A.3010004@oracle.com> I hereby nominate Goetz Lindenmaier (goetz) to jdk8u Committer. Goetz is an engineer at SAP directly involved for long time in developing and porting HotSpot to the many platforms that they support. He is Committer in jdk9 Project and is also Committer in OpenJDK ppc-aix-port Project which was recently merged into jdk9 and jdk8u Hotspot sources. He contributed 59 changesets into Hotspot, including 50 in ppc-aix project. It is a lot more than 8 significant changesets required for Committer status. Votes are due by Monday, April 14 Only current jdk8u Committers [1] are eligible to vote on this nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list. For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. Vladimir Kozlov [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Mon Mar 31 22:05:10 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 23:05:10 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for CR: 8029008: JNI warning in sun/font In-Reply-To: <5339B2A0.9090501@oracle.com> References: <5339B2A0.9090501@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5339E696.8020000@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 31/03/14 19:23, Phil Race wrote: > Review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2014-March/004355.html > Code : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8029008.8u20/ > <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eprr/8029008.8u20/> > Bug https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029008 From philip.race at oracle.com Mon Mar 31 22:23:33 2014 From: philip.race at oracle.com (Phil Race) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 15:23:33 -0700 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for 6 OS X JNI correctness backports Message-ID: <5339EAE5.6060708@oracle.com> Hi, I have what's almost a 'bulk' approval request .. one per file. http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2014-March/004358.html They are all OS X, all similar in focus and I think its more efficient to approve the backports in one go :- For completeness here's the same info provided there Bug Link : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8034030 Synopsis: [parfait] JNI exception pending in jdk/src/macosx/native/sun/awt/ImageSurfaceData.m 9 changeset : http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/8fd7da69fd82 8 backport : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8034030.8u/ Bug Link : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8034095 Synopsis : [parfait] JNI exception pending in src/jdk/src/macosx/native/sun/awt/QuartzRenderer.m 9 changeset : http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/d699d10a2c77 8 backport : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8034095.8u/ Bug Link : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8034097 Synopsis : [parfait] JNI exception pending in jdk/src/macosx/native/sun/awt/QuartzSurfaceData.m 9 changeset : http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/3d377cb25cdb 8 backport : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8034097.8u/ Bug Link : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8034104 Synopsis : [parfait] warnings from jdk/src/macosx/native/sun/awt/CTextPipe.m: JNI exception pending, JNI critical region violation 9 changeset : http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/8b206653d196 8 backport : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8034104.8u/ Bug Link : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8034113 Synopsis : [parfait] JNI exception pending in jdk/src/macosx/native/sun/font/AWTStrike.m 9 changeset : http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/202a6d931f7e 8 backport : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8034113.8u/ Bug Link : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8034119 Synopsis : [parfait] JNI exception pending in jdk/src/macosx/native/sun/font/CCharToGlyphMapper.m 9 changeset : http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/c4c337ae24e5 8 backport : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8034119.8u/ From vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com Mon Mar 31 22:24:51 2014 From: vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com (Vladimir Kozlov) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 15:24:51 -0700 Subject: CFV: New jdk8u Committer: Goetz Lindenmaier In-Reply-To: <5339E63A.3010004@oracle.com> References: <5339E63A.3010004@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5339EB33.2000609@oracle.com> Vote: yes On 3/31/14 3:03 PM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote: > I hereby nominate Goetz Lindenmaier (goetz) to jdk8u Committer. > > Goetz is an engineer at SAP directly involved for long time in > developing and porting HotSpot to the many platforms that they support. > He is Committer in jdk9 Project and is also Committer in OpenJDK > ppc-aix-port Project which was recently merged into jdk9 and > jdk8u Hotspot sources. > > He contributed 59 changesets into Hotspot, including 50 in ppc-aix > project. It is a lot more than 8 significant changesets required > for Committer status. > > Votes are due by Monday, April 14 > > Only current jdk8u Committers [1] are eligible to vote on this > nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing > list. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. > > Vladimir Kozlov > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote > > From vladimir.x.ivanov at oracle.com Mon Mar 31 22:34:09 2014 From: vladimir.x.ivanov at oracle.com (Vladimir Ivanov) Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 02:34:09 +0400 Subject: CFV: New jdk8u Committer: Goetz Lindenmaier In-Reply-To: <5339E63A.3010004@oracle.com> References: <5339E63A.3010004@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5339ED61.8050300@oracle.com> Vote: yes Best regards, Vladimir Ivanov On 4/1/14 2:03 AM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote: > I hereby nominate Goetz Lindenmaier (goetz) to jdk8u Committer. > > Goetz is an engineer at SAP directly involved for long time in > developing and porting HotSpot to the many platforms that they support. > He is Committer in jdk9 Project and is also Committer in OpenJDK > ppc-aix-port Project which was recently merged into jdk9 and > jdk8u Hotspot sources. > > He contributed 59 changesets into Hotspot, including 50 in ppc-aix > project. It is a lot more than 8 significant changesets required > for Committer status. > > Votes are due by Monday, April 14 > > Only current jdk8u Committers [1] are eligible to vote on this > nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing > list. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. > > Vladimir Kozlov > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote > > From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Mon Mar 31 22:45:01 2014 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 23:45:01 +0100 Subject: [8u20] Request for approval for 6 OS X JNI correctness backports In-Reply-To: <5339EAE5.6060708@oracle.com> References: <5339EAE5.6060708@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5339EFED.7060505@oracle.com> Thanks Phil. Approved. -Rob On 31/03/14 23:23, Phil Race wrote: > Hi, > > I have what's almost a 'bulk' approval request .. one per file. > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2014-March/004358.html > They are all OS X, all similar in focus and I think its more efficient > to approve > the backports in one go :- > > For completeness here's the same info provided there > > Bug Link : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8034030 > Synopsis: [parfait] JNI exception pending in > jdk/src/macosx/native/sun/awt/ImageSurfaceData.m > 9 changeset : http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/8fd7da69fd82 > 8 backport : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8034030.8u/ > > Bug Link : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8034095 > Synopsis : [parfait] JNI exception pending in > src/jdk/src/macosx/native/sun/awt/QuartzRenderer.m > 9 changeset : http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/d699d10a2c77 > 8 backport : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8034095.8u/ > > Bug Link : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8034097 > Synopsis : [parfait] JNI exception pending in > jdk/src/macosx/native/sun/awt/QuartzSurfaceData.m > 9 changeset : http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/3d377cb25cdb > 8 backport : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8034097.8u/ > > Bug Link : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8034104 > Synopsis : [parfait] warnings from > jdk/src/macosx/native/sun/awt/CTextPipe.m: JNI exception pending, JNI > critical region violation > 9 changeset : http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/8b206653d196 > 8 backport : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8034104.8u/ > > Bug Link : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8034113 > Synopsis : [parfait] JNI exception pending in > jdk/src/macosx/native/sun/font/AWTStrike.m > 9 changeset : http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/202a6d931f7e > 8 backport : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8034113.8u/ > > Bug Link : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8034119 > Synopsis : [parfait] JNI exception pending in > jdk/src/macosx/native/sun/font/CCharToGlyphMapper.m > 9 changeset : http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/c4c337ae24e5 > 8 backport : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8034119.8u/ > From serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com Mon Mar 31 23:57:55 2014 From: serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com (serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 16:57:55 -0700 Subject: CFV: New jdk8u Committer: Goetz Lindenmaier In-Reply-To: <5339EB33.2000609@oracle.com> References: <5339E63A.3010004@oracle.com> <5339EB33.2000609@oracle.com> Message-ID: <533A0103.8020804@oracle.com> vote: yes