RFR(XSS): 8035752: Some tmtools binaries reference JDK 7 on Mac

Seán Coffey sean.coffey at oracle.com
Fri May 23 16:02:46 UTC 2014


On 23/05/14 17:00, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
> On 05/23/2014 05:55 PM, Seán Coffey wrote:
>> Katja, Jaroslav,
>>
>> this is another push without an approval request. Why is this being
>> fixed in 8u-dev without first being addressed in JDK 9 ?
>
> These were 8 specific. Eg. it does not make sense to fix this 
> particular issue in 9 because the version string will be different.
In that case, the bug report needs an '9-na' label. You can add a 
comment also.
>
> I'm sorry, I probably messed up. I didn't find a special process for 
> non-backports (eg. release specific fixes) and did suppose we were to 
> follow the standard approval process. Will know better in the future.
It's all documented at 
http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8u/groundrules.html - let us know if 
it needs clarifying.

regards,
Sean.
>
>> Please log an approval request.
>
> Katja, please, file approval requests for these changes in 8u20.
>
> -JB-
>
>>
>> regards,
>> Sean.
>>
>> On 23/05/14 15:49, Yekaterina Kantserova wrote:
>>> Jaroslav, Peter, Staffan, thanks for the reviews!
>>>
>>> Jaroslav, could you please be my sponsor and push the change?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Katja
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 05/23/2014 04:04 PM, Staffan Larsen wrote:
>>>> Looks good!
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> /Staffan
>>>>
>>>> On 23 maj 2014, at 12:48, Yekaterina Kantserova
>>>> <yekaterina.kantserova at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Could I please have a review of this fix.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035752
>>>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ykantser/8035752/webrev.00/
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Katja
>>>
>>
>



More information about the jdk8u-dev mailing list