[8u40] Request for Approval: 6853696, 8038333, 8038982

[Seán Coffey]

Approved.

regards,
Sean.

On 06/11/2014 22:44, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Would you please approve backport of these three fixes?
> The first one fixes an issue with ReferenceQueue.remove returning 
> early, and the next two make the regression test created for the first 
> fix more robust.
> The fixes apply cleanly when applied in that order.
>
> Title: (ref) ReferenceQueue.remove(timeout) may return null even if 
> timeout has not expired
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6853696
> Jdk9 change: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/0731952efb10
> Review: 
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-February/025279.html
>
> Title: TEST_BUG: java/lang/ref/EarlyTimeout.java fails with a 
> non-adequate message
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038333
> Jdk9 change: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/e419e57a2426
> Review: 
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-March/026060.html
>
> Title: java/lang/ref/EarlyTimeout.java: elapsed time 981 is less than 
> timeout 1000
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038982
> Jdk9 change: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/a311c31fc622
> Review: 
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-April/026422.html
>
> Sincerely yours,
> Ivan