Backport request for JDK-8059321

[Marcus Lagergren]

It was reviewed and checked into 9 instead of 8u40, but intended for 8u40. The bug was tagged 8u40 but the bot closed it when I put it into nine. What is the correct procedure here? Clone it as nother bug? It is a clean backport. What noreg labels should I put where? Sorry about the confusion, I am quite the n00b at this kind of thing.

/M

On 30 Sep 2014, at 01:53, Seán Coffey <sean.coffey at oracle.com> wrote:

> Marcus,
> 
> Is this an approval request ?  The master bug is unassigned and has no noreg- label. Can you fix up records there ?
> Is this a clean backport for JDK 8u ? Approved if so -  Otherwise please get a code review before pushing.
> 
> regards,
> Sean.
> 
> On 29/09/2014 22:48, Marcus Lagergren wrote:
>> And the webrev is here:
>> 
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~lagergren/8059321.4/
>> 
>> /M
>> 
>> On 29 Sep 2014, at 14:45, Marcus Lagergren <marcus.lagergren at oracle.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> The introduction of optimistic types in 8u40 led to numerous performance regressions in startup, because of repeated computations of types and regexp syntax validation.
>>> 
>>> Bug was reviewed and put into 9, thread is here: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2014-September/003544.html
>>> JIRA entry: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8059321
>>> 
>>> /M
>>> 
>