From volker.simonis at gmail.com Wed Apr 1 14:55:11 2015 From: volker.simonis at gmail.com (Volker Simonis) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 16:55:11 +0200 Subject: [8u60] request for approval: 8058930: GraphicsEnvironment.getHeadlessProperty() does not work for AIX Message-ID: Hi, could you please approve the backport of the following simple fix to jd8u-dev: 8058930: GraphicsEnvironment.getHeadlessProperty() does not work for AIX Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8058930 Webrev (8u-dev): http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/webrevs/2015/8058930_8u/ Original Webrev (jdk9): http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~luchsh/JDK-8058930.2/ Review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2014-September/008562.html The webrev for 8u-dev just adapts the source location to the structure before the "modular source change". Thanks, Volker From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Apr 1 15:00:10 2015 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 16:00:10 +0100 Subject: [8u60] request for approval: 8058930: GraphicsEnvironment.getHeadlessProperty() does not work for AIX In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <551C07FA.8010904@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 01/04/15 15:55, Volker Simonis wrote: > Hi, > > could you please approve the backport of the following simple fix to jd8u-dev: > > 8058930: GraphicsEnvironment.getHeadlessProperty() does not work for AIX > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8058930 > Webrev (8u-dev): http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/webrevs/2015/8058930_8u/ > Original Webrev (jdk9): http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~luchsh/JDK-8058930.2/ > Review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2014-September/008562.html > > The webrev for 8u-dev just adapts the source location to the structure > before the "modular source change". > > Thanks, > Volker From alexandr.scherbatiy at oracle.com Thu Apr 2 08:33:58 2015 From: alexandr.scherbatiy at oracle.com (Alexander Scherbatiy) Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 11:33:58 +0300 Subject: Subject: CFV: New JDK8u Committer: Pete Brunet Message-ID: <551CFEF6.3070901@oracle.com> I hereby nominate Pete Brunet (ptbrunet) to JDK8u Committer. Here is the list of fixes including the contribution to Java Access Bridge open sourcing [1]: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/search/?rev=ptbrunet&revcount=20 Votes are due by April 16, 2015. Only current JDK8u Committers [2] are eligible to vote on this nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list. For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [3]. Thanks, Alexandr. [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8076183 [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census [3] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote From alexander.zvegintsev at oracle.com Thu Apr 2 10:13:08 2015 From: alexander.zvegintsev at oracle.com (Alexander Zvegintsev) Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 13:13:08 +0300 Subject: Subject: CFV: New JDK8u Committer: Pete Brunet In-Reply-To: <551CFEF6.3070901@oracle.com> References: <551CFEF6.3070901@oracle.com> Message-ID: <551D1634.3050901@oracle.com> Vote: yes Thanks, Alexander. On 04/02/2015 11:33 AM, Alexander Scherbatiy wrote: > > I hereby nominate Pete Brunet (ptbrunet) to JDK8u Committer. > > Here is the list of fixes including the contribution to Java Access > Bridge open sourcing [1]: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/search/?rev=ptbrunet&revcount=20 > > > Votes are due by April 16, 2015. > > Only current JDK8u Committers [2] are eligible to vote > on this nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying > to this mailing list. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [3]. > > Thanks, > Alexandr. > > [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8076183 > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census > [3] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote From vadim.pakhnushev at oracle.com Thu Apr 2 13:14:32 2015 From: vadim.pakhnushev at oracle.com (Vadim Pakhnushev) Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 16:14:32 +0300 Subject: Subject: CFV: New JDK8u Committer: Pete Brunet In-Reply-To: <551CFEF6.3070901@oracle.com> References: <551CFEF6.3070901@oracle.com> Message-ID: <551D40B8.8070800@oracle.com> Vote: yes On 02.04.2015 11:33, Alexander Scherbatiy wrote: > > I hereby nominate Pete Brunet (ptbrunet) to JDK8u Committer. > > Here is the list of fixes including the contribution to Java Access > Bridge open sourcing [1]: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/search/?rev=ptbrunet&revcount=20 > > > Votes are due by April 16, 2015. > > Only current JDK8u Committers [2] are eligible to vote > on this nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying > to this mailing list. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [3]. > > Thanks, > Alexandr. > > [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8076183 > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census > [3] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote From yuri.nesterenko at oracle.com Thu Apr 2 13:17:03 2015 From: yuri.nesterenko at oracle.com (Yuri Nesterenko) Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 16:17:03 +0300 Subject: Subject: CFV: New JDK8u Committer: Pete Brunet In-Reply-To: <551CFEF6.3070901@oracle.com> References: <551CFEF6.3070901@oracle.com> Message-ID: <551D414F.6000500@oracle.com> Vote: yes -yan On 04/02/2015 11:33 AM, Alexander Scherbatiy wrote: > > I hereby nominate Pete Brunet (ptbrunet) to JDK8u Committer. > > Here is the list of fixes including the contribution to Java Access > Bridge open sourcing [1]: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/search/?rev=ptbrunet&revcount=20 > > > Votes are due by April 16, 2015. > > Only current JDK8u Committers [2] are eligible to vote > on this nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying > to this mailing list. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [3]. > > Thanks, > Alexandr. > > [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8076183 > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census > [3] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote From sean.coffey at oracle.com Thu Apr 2 15:18:01 2015 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?windows-1252?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 16:18:01 +0100 Subject: [8u-dev] request for review and approval to backport JDK-8037546, JDK-8054220 and JDK-8058227 In-Reply-To: <551981FC.9000205@oracle.com> References: <54DD181C.30206@oracle.com> <551981FC.9000205@oracle.com> Message-ID: <551D5DA9.4090808@oracle.com> Approved. Since this is a clean backport, no review is necessary. regards, Sean. On 30/03/2015 18:03, Jan Lahoda wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to ask for an approval to backport the following two fixes to > 8u-dev: > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8037546 > jdk9 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/441711fd360d > (this fix is a pre-requisite for the following fix) > > Bugs: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8054220 > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8058227 > jdk9 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/c4a6ba06abeb > > Both fixes apply cleanly to 8u-dev/langtools after unshuffling. > > Thanks, > Jan From alexandr.scherbatiy at oracle.com Thu Apr 2 15:34:34 2015 From: alexandr.scherbatiy at oracle.com (Alexander Scherbatiy) Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 18:34:34 +0300 Subject: Subject: CFV: New JDK8u Committer: Pete Brunet In-Reply-To: <551CFEF6.3070901@oracle.com> References: <551CFEF6.3070901@oracle.com> Message-ID: <551D618A.9090608@oracle.com> Vote: yes Thanks, Alexandr. On 4/2/2015 11:33 AM, Alexander Scherbatiy wrote: > > I hereby nominate Pete Brunet (ptbrunet) to JDK8u Committer. > > Here is the list of fixes including the contribution to Java Access > Bridge open sourcing [1]: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/search/?rev=ptbrunet&revcount=20 > > > Votes are due by April 16, 2015. > > Only current JDK8u Committers [2] are eligible to vote > on this nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying > to this mailing list. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [3]. > > Thanks, > Alexandr. > > [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8076183 > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census > [3] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote From Sergey.Bylokhov at oracle.com Thu Apr 2 15:48:22 2015 From: Sergey.Bylokhov at oracle.com (Sergey Bylokhov) Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 18:48:22 +0300 Subject: Subject: CFV: New JDK8u Committer: Pete Brunet In-Reply-To: <551CFEF6.3070901@oracle.com> References: <551CFEF6.3070901@oracle.com> Message-ID: <551D64C6.3000703@oracle.com> Vote: yes 02.04.15 11:33, Alexander Scherbatiy wrote: > > I hereby nominate Pete Brunet (ptbrunet) to JDK8u Committer. > > Here is the list of fixes including the contribution to Java Access > Bridge open sourcing [1]: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/search/?rev=ptbrunet&revcount=20 > > > Votes are due by April 16, 2015. > > Only current JDK8u Committers [2] are eligible to vote > on this nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying > to this mailing list. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [3]. > > Thanks, > Alexandr. > > [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8076183 > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census > [3] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote -- Best regards, Sergey. From sean.coffey at oracle.com Fri Apr 3 10:28:03 2015 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 11:28:03 +0100 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval : 8059588: deadlock in java/io/PrintStream when verbose java.security.debug flags are set Message-ID: <551E6B33.6080301@oracle.com> Looking to port this to jdk8u-dev. Fix applies cleanly after path shuffling. https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8059588 jdk 9 changeset : http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/109fe80c6e84 jdk 9 review thread : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2015-March/011923.html regards, Sean. From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Fri Apr 3 13:57:58 2015 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 14:57:58 +0100 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval : 8059588: deadlock in java/io/PrintStream when verbose java.security.debug flags are set In-Reply-To: <551E6B33.6080301@oracle.com> References: <551E6B33.6080301@oracle.com> Message-ID: <551E9C66.90800@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 03/04/15 11:28, Se?n Coffey wrote: > Looking to port this to jdk8u-dev. Fix applies cleanly after path > shuffling. > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8059588 > jdk 9 changeset : > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/109fe80c6e84 > jdk 9 review thread : > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2015-March/011923.html > > regards, > Sean. From alejandro.murillo at oracle.com Fri Apr 3 19:38:01 2015 From: alejandro.murillo at oracle.com (Alejandro E Murillo) Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 13:38:01 -0600 Subject: [8u60] Request for approval for bulk integration of hs25.60-b10 Message-ID: <551EEC19.4020807@oracle.com> Requesting approval to integrate hs25.60-b10 into jdk8u60-b10. A webrev is available at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amurillo/8u60/hs25.60-b10-jdk8u60-b10.webrev/ Pre-integration testing is in progress; the integration will proceed only after SQE has analyzed the results and approved. The fixes in the proposed integration are below. All have undergone nightly testing and are already in a jdk9 repository. 8055231: ZERO variant build is broken 8068007: [Findbugs] SA com.sun.java.swing.action.ActionManager.manager should be package protect 8068036: assert(is_available(index)) failed in G1 cset 8076191: new hotspot build - hs25.60-b10 -- Alejandro From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Sat Apr 4 02:21:18 2015 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2015 03:21:18 +0100 Subject: [8u60] Request for approval for bulk integration of hs25.60-b10 In-Reply-To: <551EEC19.4020807@oracle.com> References: <551EEC19.4020807@oracle.com> Message-ID: <551F4A9E.9090908@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 03/04/15 20:38, Alejandro E Murillo wrote: > Requesting approval to integrate hs25.60-b10 into jdk8u60-b10. > > A webrev is available at: > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amurillo/8u60/hs25.60-b10-jdk8u60-b10.webrev/ > > Pre-integration testing is in progress; the integration will proceed > only after SQE has analyzed the results and approved. > > The fixes in the proposed integration are below. All have undergone > nightly testing and are already in a jdk9 repository. > > 8055231: ZERO variant build is broken > 8068007: [Findbugs] SA com.sun.java.swing.action.ActionManager.manager > should be package protect > 8068036: assert(is_available(index)) failed in G1 cset > 8076191: new hotspot build - hs25.60-b10 > From sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com Mon Apr 6 09:33:10 2015 From: sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com (A. Sundararajan) Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2015 15:03:10 +0530 Subject: [8u60] Please approve 8076646: nashorn tests should avoid using package names used by nashorn sources Message-ID: <552252D6.6040707@oracle.com> Please approve. Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8076646 jdk9 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2015-April/004422.html jdk8u-dev webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8076646/8u60/webrev.00/ ParserAPITest.java does not exist in jdk8 (that is jdk9 specific API test). Other than diff on that file, everything else is backported 'as is'. -Sundar From sean.coffey at oracle.com Mon Apr 6 10:37:34 2015 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2015 11:37:34 +0100 Subject: [8u60] Please approve 8076646: nashorn tests should avoid using package names used by nashorn sources In-Reply-To: <552252D6.6040707@oracle.com> References: <552252D6.6040707@oracle.com> Message-ID: Approved. Regards, Sean. On 6 April 2015 10:33:10 GMT+01:00, "A. Sundararajan" wrote: >Please approve. > >Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8076646 >jdk9 review thread: >http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2015-April/004422.html >jdk8u-dev webrev: >http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8076646/8u60/webrev.00/ > >ParserAPITest.java does not exist in jdk8 (that is jdk9 specific API >test). Other than diff on that file, everything else is backported 'as >is'. > >-Sundar From xueming.shen at oracle.com Mon Apr 6 23:35:08 2015 From: xueming.shen at oracle.com (Xueming Shen) Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2015 16:35:08 -0700 Subject: [8u-dev] request for review and approval to backport: JDK-8076641: getNextEntry throws ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException when unzipping file Message-ID: <5523182C.3090701@oracle.com> Hi, I'd like to ask for an approval to backport the following bug fix to 8u-dev Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8076641 jdk9 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/b1eeff4dac1b jdk8u-dev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/8076641_8u/webrev/ This 8u-dev fix is identical to the jdk9 fix. Thanks, Sherman From lana.steuck at oracle.com Tue Apr 7 01:22:07 2015 From: lana.steuck at oracle.com (lana.steuck at oracle.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2015 18:22:07 -0700 (PDT) Subject: jdk8u-b10: jdk8u-dev Message-ID: <201504070122.t371M7Ba029454@sc11152554.us.oracle.com> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/rev/15de749087ee http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/nashorn/rev/7aaa64363e1a http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/langtools/rev/ba758e1ffa69 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/rev/ae448eca6b54 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jaxws/rev/3e7a28ca602b http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jaxp/rev/497d106d476d http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/rev/e7420fd43e50 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/corba/rev/bd691208dfd6 --- All the fixes will be tested during promotion (no PIT testing at this point): List of all fixes: =================== JDK-8039926 client-libs -spash: can't be combined with -xStartOnFirstThread since JDK 7 JDK-8071668 client-libs [macosx] Clipboard does not work with 3rd parties Clipboard Managers JDK-8075244 client-libs [macosx] The fix for JDK-8043869 should be reworked JDK-8072088 client-libs [PIT] NPE in DnD tests apparently because of the fix to JDK-8061636 JDK-8061636 client-libs Fix for JDK-7079254 changes behavior of MouseListener, MouseMotionList JDK-8058930 client-libs GraphicsEnvironment.getHeadlessProperty() does not work for AIX JDK-8074954 client-libs ImageInputStreamImpl.readShort/readInt do not behave correctly at EOF JDK-8033000 client-libs No Horizontal Mouse Wheel Support In BasicScrollPaneUI JDK-8076182 client-libs Open Source Java Access Bridge - Create Patch for JEP C127 8055831 JDK-8074921 client-libs OS X build broken by reference to XToolkit JDK-8056151 client-libs Switching to GTK L&F on-the-fly leads to X Window System error RenderB JDK-8075039 core-libs (sctp) com/sun/nio/sctp/SctpMultiChannel/SendFailed.java fails on Sola JDK-8075173 core-libs DateFormat in german locale returns wrong value for month march JDK-8012190 core-libs Global scope should be initialized lazily JDK-8075604 core-libs jjs exits even when non-daemon threads are still active JDK-8073868 core-libs Regex matching causes java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 64 JDK-8075548 core-libs SimpleDateFormat formatting of "LLLL" in English is incorrect; should JDK-8075366 core-libs Slow scope access to global let/const does not work JDK-8074410 core-libs Startup time: Port shell.js to Java JDK-8075006 core-libs Threads spinning infinitely in WeakHashMap.get running test262parallel JDK-8075927 core-libs toNumber(String) accepts illegal characters JDK-8075231 core-libs Typed array setters are very slow when index exceeds capacity JDK-8074481 deploy [macosx] Menu items are appearing on top of other windows JDK-8074482 deploy [macosx] Menu items disappear and redrawn quickly when moving mouse in JDK-8054037 security-libs Improve tracing for java.security.debug=certpath JDK-8055207 security-libs keystore and truststore debug output could be much better JDK-8058547 security-libs Memory leak in ProtectionDomain cache JDK-8072385 security-libs Only the first DNSName entry is checked for endpoint identification JDK-7065233 security-libs To interpret case-insensitive string locale independently JDK-8054220 tools Debugger doesn't show variables *outside* lambda JDK-8058227 tools Debugger has no access to outer variables inside Lambda JDK-8037546 tools javac -parameters does not emit parameter names for lambda expressions JDK-8069545 tools javac, shouldn't check nested stuck lambdas during overload resolution From sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com Tue Apr 7 05:44:52 2015 From: sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com (A. Sundararajan) Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 11:14:52 +0530 Subject: [8u60] approval request for 8076972: Several nashorn tests failing Message-ID: <55236ED4.5050305@oracle.com> Please approve. Bug: 8076972: Several nashorn tests failing Fix for https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8076646 resulted in a number of jtreg test failures. The current fix is to fix that regression. jdk9 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2015-April/004428.html jdk8 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8076972/8u60/ Apart from backporting fix for 8076972 "as is", I had to include one missing change in 8076446 fix. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8076646/webrev.00/test/src/jdk/nashorn/api/scripting/test/ScriptEngineTest.java.udiff.html @@ -539,11 +540,11 @@ @Test public void scriptObjectAutoConversionTest() throws ScriptException { final ScriptEngineManager m = new ScriptEngineManager(); final ScriptEngine e = m.getEngineByName("nashorn"); e.eval("obj = { foo: 'hello' }"); - e.put("Window", e.eval("Packages.jdk.nashorn.api.scripting.Window")); + e.put("Window", e.eval("Packages.jdk.nashorn.api.scripting.test.Window")); assertEquals(e.eval("Window.funcJSObject(obj)"), "hello"); assertEquals(e.eval("Window.funcScriptObjectMirror(obj)"), "hello"); assertEquals(e.eval("Window.funcMap(obj)"), "hello"); assertEquals(e.eval("Window.funcJSObject(obj)"), "hello"); } was missed. CC'ing nashorn team just in case if additional review is needed. Related fix: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2015-April/003347.html Thanks, -Sundar From sean.coffey at oracle.com Tue Apr 7 06:48:14 2015 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 07:48:14 +0100 Subject: [8u60] approval request for 8076972: Several nashorn tests failing In-Reply-To: <55236ED4.5050305@oracle.com> References: <55236ED4.5050305@oracle.com> Message-ID: <020CD9AE-08F8-4818-9F40-954BCF2A8A9B@oracle.com> Please get a peer review before pushing. Approved. Regards, Sean. On 7 April 2015 06:44:52 GMT+01:00, "A. Sundararajan" wrote: >Please approve. > >Bug: 8076972: Several nashorn tests failing > >Fix for https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8076646 resulted in a >number of jtreg test failures. The current fix is to fix that >regression. > >jdk9 review thread: >http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2015-April/004428.html > >jdk8 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8076972/8u60/ > >Apart from backporting fix for 8076972 "as is", I had to include one >missing change in 8076446 fix. > >http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8076646/webrev.00/test/src/jdk/nashorn/api/scripting/test/ScriptEngineTest.java.udiff.html >@@ -539,11 +540,11 @@ > @Test > public void scriptObjectAutoConversionTest() throws ScriptException { > final ScriptEngineManager m = new ScriptEngineManager(); > final ScriptEngine e = m.getEngineByName("nashorn"); > e.eval("obj = { foo: 'hello' }"); >- e.put("Window", >e.eval("Packages.jdk.nashorn.api.scripting.Window")); >+ e.put("Window", >e.eval("Packages.jdk.nashorn.api.scripting.test.Window")); > assertEquals(e.eval("Window.funcJSObject(obj)"), "hello"); > assertEquals(e.eval("Window.funcScriptObjectMirror(obj)"), >"hello"); > assertEquals(e.eval("Window.funcMap(obj)"), "hello"); > assertEquals(e.eval("Window.funcJSObject(obj)"), "hello"); > } > >was missed. CC'ing nashorn team just in case if additional review is >needed. > >Related fix: >http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2015-April/003347.html > >Thanks, >-Sundar -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. From sean.coffey at oracle.com Tue Apr 7 07:31:22 2015 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 08:31:22 +0100 Subject: [8u-dev] request for review and approval to backport: JDK-8076641: getNextEntry throws ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException when unzipping file In-Reply-To: <5523182C.3090701@oracle.com> References: <5523182C.3090701@oracle.com> Message-ID: <074FF82E-7923-4C9A-AF14-271446D3E8E5@oracle.com> Approved. Regards, Sean. On 7 April 2015 00:35:08 GMT+01:00, Xueming Shen wrote: >Hi, > >I'd like to ask for an approval to backport the following bug fix to >8u-dev > >Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8076641 >jdk9 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/b1eeff4dac1b >jdk8u-dev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/8076641_8u/webrev/ > >This 8u-dev fix is identical to the jdk9 fix. > >Thanks, >Sherman -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. From marcus.lagergren at oracle.com Tue Apr 7 08:17:56 2015 From: marcus.lagergren at oracle.com (Marcus Lagergren) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 10:17:56 +0200 Subject: [8u60] approval request for 8076972: Several nashorn tests failing In-Reply-To: <55236ED4.5050305@oracle.com> References: <55236ED4.5050305@oracle.com> Message-ID: +1. Looks good to me! /M (reviewer) > On 07 Apr 2015, at 07:44, A. Sundararajan wrote: > > Please approve. > > Bug: 8076972: Several nashorn tests failing > > Fix for https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8076646 resulted in a number of jtreg test failures. The current fix is to fix that regression. > > jdk9 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2015-April/004428.html > > jdk8 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8076972/8u60/ > > Apart from backporting fix for 8076972 "as is", I had to include one missing change in 8076446 fix. > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8076646/webrev.00/test/src/jdk/nashorn/api/scripting/test/ScriptEngineTest.java.udiff.html > @@ -539,11 +540,11 @@ > @Test > public void scriptObjectAutoConversionTest() throws ScriptException { > final ScriptEngineManager m = new ScriptEngineManager(); > final ScriptEngine e = m.getEngineByName("nashorn"); > e.eval("obj = { foo: 'hello' }"); > - e.put("Window", e.eval("Packages.jdk.nashorn.api.scripting.Window")); > + e.put("Window", e.eval("Packages.jdk.nashorn.api.scripting.test.Window")); > assertEquals(e.eval("Window.funcJSObject(obj)"), "hello"); > assertEquals(e.eval("Window.funcScriptObjectMirror(obj)"), "hello"); > assertEquals(e.eval("Window.funcMap(obj)"), "hello"); > assertEquals(e.eval("Window.funcJSObject(obj)"), "hello"); > } > > was missed. CC'ing nashorn team just in case if additional review is needed. > > Related fix: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2015-April/003347.html > > Thanks, > -Sundar From hannes.wallnoefer at oracle.com Tue Apr 7 08:54:45 2015 From: hannes.wallnoefer at oracle.com (Hannes Wallnoefer) Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 10:54:45 +0200 Subject: [8u60] approval request for 8076972: Several nashorn tests failing In-Reply-To: <55236ED4.5050305@oracle.com> References: <55236ED4.5050305@oracle.com> Message-ID: <55239B55.1000707@oracle.com> +1 Hannes Am 2015-04-07 um 07:44 schrieb A. Sundararajan: > Please approve. > > Bug: 8076972: Several nashorn tests failing > > Fix for https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8076646 resulted in a > number of jtreg test failures. The current fix is to fix that regression. > > jdk9 review thread: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2015-April/004428.html > > jdk8 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8076972/8u60/ > > Apart from backporting fix for 8076972 "as is", I had to include one > missing change in 8076446 fix. > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8076646/webrev.00/test/src/jdk/nashorn/api/scripting/test/ScriptEngineTest.java.udiff.html > > @@ -539,11 +540,11 @@ > @Test > public void scriptObjectAutoConversionTest() throws ScriptException { > final ScriptEngineManager m = new ScriptEngineManager(); > final ScriptEngine e = m.getEngineByName("nashorn"); > e.eval("obj = { foo: 'hello' }"); > - e.put("Window", > e.eval("Packages.jdk.nashorn.api.scripting.Window")); > + e.put("Window", > e.eval("Packages.jdk.nashorn.api.scripting.test.Window")); > assertEquals(e.eval("Window.funcJSObject(obj)"), "hello"); > assertEquals(e.eval("Window.funcScriptObjectMirror(obj)"), > "hello"); > assertEquals(e.eval("Window.funcMap(obj)"), "hello"); > assertEquals(e.eval("Window.funcJSObject(obj)"), "hello"); > } > > was missed. CC'ing nashorn team just in case if additional review is > needed. > > Related fix: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2015-April/003347.html > > Thanks, > -Sundar From alejandro.murillo at oracle.com Tue Apr 7 18:07:00 2015 From: alejandro.murillo at oracle.com (Alejandro E Murillo) Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 12:07:00 -0600 Subject: jdk8u60-b10: HotSpot Message-ID: <55241CC4.301@oracle.com> hs25.60-b10 has been integrated into jdk8u60-b10. http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/rev/15de749087ee http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/corba/rev/bd691208dfd6 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/rev/8e4518dc2b38 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jaxp/rev/497d106d476d http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jaxws/rev/3e7a28ca602b http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/rev/ae448eca6b54 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/langtools/rev/ba758e1ffa69 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/nashorn/rev/7aaa64363e1a Component : VM Status : 0 major failures, 0 minor failures Date : 2015/04/07, 8:00am Pacific Tested By : STT_VM Cost(total man-days): 1 Workspace : 2015-04-03-170426.amurillo.hs25-60-b10 Bundles : 2015-04-03-170426.amurillo.hs25-60-b10 Platforms : Others Tests : Log : link Browsers : NA Patches : NA Number of Tests Executed : 405604 passed tests, 3805 failed tests (no new failures) Bug verification status: ====================================== Tested, Pass: Tested, Pass (partial fixes): Tested, Fail: Untested bug fixes: 8055231: ZERO variant build is broken 8068007: [Findbugs] SA com.sun.java.swing.action.ActionManager.manager should be package protect 8068036: assert(is_available(index)) failed in G1 cset 8076191: new hotspot build - hs25.60-b10 New bugs filed: Bugs in PIT build: Bugs in earlier promoted build: Number of PIT requested: 1 Integration target J2SE build number: jdk8u60-b10 Issues and Notes: This is PIT for hs25.60-b10 for jdk8u60-b10. Go for integration. -- Alejandro From marcus.larsson at oracle.com Wed Apr 8 15:31:32 2015 From: marcus.larsson at oracle.com (Marcus Larsson) Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 17:31:32 +0200 Subject: [8u60] Request for approval/review: 8077249: Clean up around VM_GC_Operations Message-ID: <552549D4.6060107@oracle.com> Hi, Please review and approve the following backport: JDK-8077249: Clean up around VM_GC_Operations. The backport applied with some fuzzing and a simple manual merge of changes in collectorPolicy.cpp. Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8077249 JDK9 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/hotspot/rev/e993a176f3d7 Backport webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mlarsson/8077249/webrev.00/ Thanks, Marcus From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Apr 8 15:38:10 2015 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 16:38:10 +0100 Subject: [8u60] Request for approval/review: 8077249: Clean up around VM_GC_Operations In-Reply-To: <552549D4.6060107@oracle.com> References: <552549D4.6060107@oracle.com> Message-ID: <55254B62.4060700@oracle.com> Marcus, You seem to have prepared this from the hotspot team forest (hs-dev) - There's no approval necessary as a result if you're pushing to there. Alejandro will handle that part. regards, Sean. On 08/04/15 16:31, Marcus Larsson wrote: > Hi, > > Please review and approve the following backport: JDK-8077249: Clean > up around VM_GC_Operations. > The backport applied with some fuzzing and a simple manual merge of > changes in collectorPolicy.cpp. > > Issue: > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8077249 > > JDK9 fix: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/hotspot/rev/e993a176f3d7 > > Backport webrev: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mlarsson/8077249/webrev.00/ > > Thanks, > Marcus From marcus.larsson at oracle.com Wed Apr 8 15:39:51 2015 From: marcus.larsson at oracle.com (Marcus Larsson) Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 17:39:51 +0200 Subject: [8u60] Request for approval: 8077256: Refactor VM GC operations caused by allocation failure Message-ID: <55254BC7.6060200@oracle.com> Hi, Please approve the following backport. The backport applies cleanly after the backport "8077249: Clean up around VM_GC_Operations" [1] has been applied. Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8077256 JDK9 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/hotspot/rev/ad8ac65b4d77 Backport webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mlarsson/8077256/webrev.00 Thanks, Marcus [1]: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2015-April/003357.html From marcus.larsson at oracle.com Wed Apr 8 15:47:00 2015 From: marcus.larsson at oracle.com (Marcus Larsson) Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 17:47:00 +0200 Subject: [8u60] Request for approval/review: 8077249: Clean up around VM_GC_Operations In-Reply-To: <55254B62.4060700@oracle.com> References: <552549D4.6060107@oracle.com> <55254B62.4060700@oracle.com> Message-ID: <55254D74.3020408@oracle.com> Oh, my bad. I guess that goes for my other request as well then. Thank you for the heads up, Marcus On 04/08/2015 05:38 PM, Se?n Coffey wrote: > Marcus, > > You seem to have prepared this from the hotspot team forest (hs-dev) - > There's no approval necessary as a result if you're pushing to there. > Alejandro will handle that part. > > regards, > Sean. > > On 08/04/15 16:31, Marcus Larsson wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Please review and approve the following backport: JDK-8077249: Clean >> up around VM_GC_Operations. >> The backport applied with some fuzzing and a simple manual merge of >> changes in collectorPolicy.cpp. >> >> Issue: >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8077249 >> >> JDK9 fix: >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/hotspot/rev/e993a176f3d7 >> >> Backport webrev: >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mlarsson/8077249/webrev.00/ >> >> Thanks, >> Marcus > From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Apr 8 15:50:48 2015 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 16:50:48 +0100 Subject: [8u60] Request for approval: 8077256: Refactor VM GC operations caused by allocation failure In-Reply-To: <55254BC7.6060200@oracle.com> References: <55254BC7.6060200@oracle.com> Message-ID: <55254E58.1040606@oracle.com> Hey Marcus, correct - we can ignore approval request for this also. Alejandro will manage that a bulk push time. regards, Sean. On 08/04/15 16:39, Marcus Larsson wrote: > Hi, > > Please approve the following backport. > The backport applies cleanly after the backport "8077249: Clean up > around VM_GC_Operations" [1] has been applied. > > Issue: > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8077256 > > JDK9 fix: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/hotspot/rev/ad8ac65b4d77 > > Backport webrev: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mlarsson/8077256/webrev.00 > > Thanks, > Marcus > > [1]: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2015-April/003357.html From peter.brunet at oracle.com Wed Apr 8 18:58:21 2015 From: peter.brunet at oracle.com (Pete Brunet) Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 13:58:21 -0500 Subject: RfA JDK-8055762 jaccess.packages javadoc build failure Message-ID: <55257A4D.50601@oracle.com> Request to push a fix to fix a nightly build break: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ptbrunet/JDK-8076552/webrev.03/ This has been reviewed by Mandy Chung and Phil Race. A local build doesn't contain the javadoc for com.sun.java.accessibility.util. JPRT jobs have been submitted for Linux, Mac, Solaris, and Windows, but have not yet started. I will report back when they complete. Pete From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Apr 8 19:18:30 2015 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 20:18:30 +0100 Subject: RfA JDK-8076552 jaccess.packages javadoc build failure In-Reply-To: <55257A4D.50601@oracle.com> References: <55257A4D.50601@oracle.com> Message-ID: <55257F06.7000204@oracle.com> Pete, wrong bug ID in subject. I've corrected that. Please add a noreg-build label to bug report. In parallel, please log a new bug which tracks the real jaccess docs fix and link it to 8076552 when ready. I believe Phil will push the fix for you and we can work out how best to get that into master off list. Approved. regards, Sean. On 08/04/2015 19:58, Pete Brunet wrote: > Request to push a fix to fix a nightly build break: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ptbrunet/JDK-8076552/webrev.03/ > > This has been reviewed by Mandy Chung and Phil Race. > > A local build doesn't contain the javadoc for > com.sun.java.accessibility.util. > > JPRT jobs have been submitted for Linux, Mac, Solaris, and Windows, but > have not yet started. I will report back when they complete. > > Pete From peter.brunet at oracle.com Wed Apr 8 21:17:36 2015 From: peter.brunet at oracle.com (Pete Brunet) Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 16:17:36 -0500 Subject: RfA JDK-8055762 jaccess.packages javadoc build failure In-Reply-To: <55257A4D.50601@oracle.com> References: <55257A4D.50601@oracle.com> Message-ID: <55259AF0.20602@oracle.com> All JPRT jobs completed successfully. On 4/8/15 1:58 PM, Pete Brunet wrote: > Request to push a fix to fix a nightly build break: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ptbrunet/JDK-8076552/webrev.03/ > > This has been reviewed by Mandy Chung and Phil Race. > > A local build doesn't contain the javadoc for > com.sun.java.accessibility.util. > > JPRT jobs have been submitted for Linux, Mac, Solaris, and Windows, but > have not yet started. I will report back when they complete. > > Pete From aleksej.efimov at oracle.com Wed Apr 8 21:43:27 2015 From: aleksej.efimov at oracle.com (Aleksej Efimov) Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 00:43:27 +0300 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval: 8075667: (tz) Support tzdata2015b Message-ID: <5525A0FF.5030506@oracle.com> Hi, Can I have an approval for 2015b TZ data integration to JDK8. The JDK9 patch applies cleanly after reshuffling. Testing: JTREG and JPRT shows no failures. JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8075667 JDK9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/581a90480b89 JDK9 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2015-March/032559.html With Best Regards, Aleksej From peter.brunet at oracle.com Wed Apr 8 21:54:21 2015 From: peter.brunet at oracle.com (Pete Brunet) Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 16:54:21 -0500 Subject: RfA JDK-8076552 jaccess.packages javadoc build failure In-Reply-To: <55257F06.7000204@oracle.com> References: <55257A4D.50601@oracle.com> <55257F06.7000204@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5525A38D.9020804@oracle.com> On 4/8/15 2:18 PM, Se?n Coffey wrote: > Pete, > > wrong bug ID in subject. I've corrected that. Thanks. > Please add a noreg-build label to bug report. Done. > In parallel, please log a new bug which tracks the real jaccess docs > fix and link it to 8076552 when ready. I opened JDK-8077296 RE build fails on non-Win builds when attempting to build Win only javadoc. > > I believe Phil will push the fix for you and we can work out how best > to get that into master off list. > > Approved. > > regards, > Sean. > > On 08/04/2015 19:58, Pete Brunet wrote: >> Request to push a fix to fix a nightly build break: >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ptbrunet/JDK-8076552/webrev.03/ >> >> This has been reviewed by Mandy Chung and Phil Race. >> >> A local build doesn't contain the javadoc for >> com.sun.java.accessibility.util. >> >> JPRT jobs have been submitted for Linux, Mac, Solaris, and Windows, but >> have not yet started. I will report back when they complete. >> >> Pete > From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Apr 8 21:57:58 2015 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 22:57:58 +0100 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval: 8075667: (tz) Support tzdata2015b In-Reply-To: <5525A0FF.5030506@oracle.com> References: <5525A0FF.5030506@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5525A466.5070403@oracle.com> Approved. regards, Sean. On 08/04/2015 22:43, Aleksej Efimov wrote: > Hi, > > Can I have an approval for 2015b TZ data integration to JDK8. The JDK9 > patch applies cleanly after reshuffling. > Testing: JTREG and JPRT shows no failures. > > JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8075667 > JDK9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/581a90480b89 > JDK9 review thread: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2015-March/032559.html > > With Best Regards, > Aleksej > From aleksej.efimov at oracle.com Wed Apr 8 22:28:46 2015 From: aleksej.efimov at oracle.com (Aleksej Efimov) Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 01:28:46 +0300 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval: 8075667: (tz) Support tzdata2015b In-Reply-To: <5525A466.5070403@oracle.com> References: <5525A0FF.5030506@oracle.com> <5525A466.5070403@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5525AB9E.5030502@oracle.com> Thank you, Sean! Best Regards, Aleksej On 04/09/2015 12:57 AM, Se?n Coffey wrote: > Approved. > > regards, > Sean. > > On 08/04/2015 22:43, Aleksej Efimov wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Can I have an approval for 2015b TZ data integration to JDK8. The >> JDK9 patch applies cleanly after reshuffling. >> Testing: JTREG and JPRT shows no failures. >> >> JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8075667 >> JDK9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/581a90480b89 >> JDK9 review thread: >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2015-March/032559.html >> >> With Best Regards, >> Aleksej >> > From aleksej.efimov at oracle.com Thu Apr 9 13:11:13 2015 From: aleksej.efimov at oracle.com (Aleksej Efimov) Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 16:11:13 +0300 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval: 8073385: Bad error message on parsing illegal character in XML attribute Message-ID: <55267A71.3010806@oracle.com> Hi, Can I have an approval for backporting 8073385 fix to JDK8. The JDK9 fix applies cleanly after reshuffling. Only one minor difference is that the test was reallocated from 'jaxp' repo to 'jdk' repo (there is no XML tests in JDK8 jaxp repo). Testing with JPRT and JTREG shows no xml related failures. With Best Regards, Aleksej JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8073385 JDK9 changesets: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jaxp/rev/a51d7abedc99 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jaxp/rev/a51d7abedc99 JDK9 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2015-March/032558.html Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/8073385/8/00 From sean.coffey at oracle.com Thu Apr 9 13:18:57 2015 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 14:18:57 +0100 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval: 8073385: Bad error message on parsing illegal character in XML attribute In-Reply-To: <55267A71.3010806@oracle.com> References: <55267A71.3010806@oracle.com> Message-ID: <55267C41.4020209@oracle.com> Approved. Regards, Sean. On 09/04/2015 14:11, Aleksej Efimov wrote: > Hi, > Can I have an approval for backporting 8073385 fix to JDK8. The JDK9 > fix applies cleanly after reshuffling. > Only one minor difference is that the test was reallocated from 'jaxp' > repo to 'jdk' repo (there is no XML tests in JDK8 jaxp repo). > Testing with JPRT and JTREG shows no xml related failures. > > With Best Regards, > Aleksej > > JBS: > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8073385 > > JDK9 changesets: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jaxp/rev/a51d7abedc99 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jaxp/rev/a51d7abedc99 > > JDK9 review thread: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2015-March/032558.html > > > Webrev: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/8073385/8/00 From aleksej.efimov at oracle.com Thu Apr 9 14:56:33 2015 From: aleksej.efimov at oracle.com (Aleksej Efimov) Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 17:56:33 +0300 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval: JDK-8074297 and JDK-8076290 Message-ID: <55269321.1020901@oracle.com> Hi, Please, approve backports of the two following bugs that fixes the XSL substring function behavior with supplementary characters. JDK-8074297 fix had broken a substring function indexing and after that it was repaired by JDK-8076290 . Both fixes applies cleanly after reshuffling. Testing the fix with JCK8/9, JTREG, JPRT shows no xml/xsl related failures. Best Regards, Aleksej JBS: 8074297: substring in XSLT returns wrong character if string contains supplementary chars https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8074297 8076290: JCK test api/xsl/conf/string/string17 starts failing after JDK-8074297 JCK test api/xsl/conf/string/string17 starts failing after JDK-8074297: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8076290 JDK9 changesets: 8074297: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jaxp/rev/8bcecaa32927 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/bffa5fa36c0e 8076290: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jaxp/rev/4952638cf5c2 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/05e152013a87 JDK9 review threads: 8074297: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2015-March/032560.html 8076290: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2015-April/032653.html From sean.coffey at oracle.com Thu Apr 9 17:04:08 2015 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 18:04:08 +0100 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval: JDK-8074297 and JDK-8076290 In-Reply-To: <55269321.1020901@oracle.com> References: <55269321.1020901@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5526B108.5020907@oracle.com> Approved. Regards, Sean. On 09/04/2015 15:56, Aleksej Efimov wrote: > Hi, > Please, approve backports of the two following bugs that fixes the XSL > substring function behavior with supplementary characters. > JDK-8074297 fix had broken a substring function indexing and after > that it was repaired by JDK-8076290 . > Both fixes applies cleanly after reshuffling. > Testing the fix with JCK8/9, JTREG, JPRT shows no xml/xsl related > failures. > > Best Regards, > Aleksej > > JBS: > 8074297: substring in XSLT returns wrong character if string contains > supplementary chars > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8074297 > 8076290: JCK test api/xsl/conf/string/string17 starts failing after > JDK-8074297 > JCK test api/xsl/conf/string/string17 starts failing after > JDK-8074297: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8076290 > > JDK9 changesets: > 8074297: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jaxp/rev/8bcecaa32927 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/bffa5fa36c0e > 8076290: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jaxp/rev/4952638cf5c2 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/05e152013a87 > > JDK9 review threads: > 8074297: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2015-March/032560.html > 8076290: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2015-April/032653.html > From jaroslav.bachorik at oracle.com Fri Apr 10 08:10:22 2015 From: jaroslav.bachorik at oracle.com (Jaroslav Bachorik) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 10:10:22 +0200 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval: 8072908 - com/sun/management/OperatingSystemMXBean/TestTotalSwap.sh fails on OS X with exit code 2 Message-ID: <5527856E.4060803@oracle.com> Please, approve this backport of a JDK9 test fix Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8072908 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/fea5c84f2bbc Review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2015-February/016690.html The patch applies cleanly. Thanks, -JB- From jaroslav.bachorik at oracle.com Fri Apr 10 08:10:26 2015 From: jaroslav.bachorik at oracle.com (Jaroslav Bachorik) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 10:10:26 +0200 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval: 6712222 - Race condition in java/lang/management/ThreadMXBean/AllThreadIds.java Message-ID: <55278572.6020005@oracle.com> Please, approve this backport of a JDK9 test fix Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6712222 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/edf9e77c7196 Review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2015-March/016865.html The patch applies cleanly. Thanks, -JB- From jaroslav.bachorik at oracle.com Fri Apr 10 08:12:07 2015 From: jaroslav.bachorik at oracle.com (Jaroslav Bachorik) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 10:12:07 +0200 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval: 8071641 - java/lang/management/ThreadMXBean/SynchronizationStatistics.java intermittently failed with NPE Message-ID: <552785D7.9080205@oracle.com> Please, approve this backport of a JDK9 test fix Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8071641 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/bb1c15f93829 Review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2015-January/016513.html The patch applies cleanly. Thanks, -JB- From jaroslav.bachorik at oracle.com Fri Apr 10 08:14:46 2015 From: jaroslav.bachorik at oracle.com (Jaroslav Bachorik) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 10:14:46 +0200 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval: 8062450 - Timeout in LowMemoryTest.java Message-ID: <55278676.5010509@oracle.com> Please, approve this backport of a JDK9 test fix Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8062450 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/8131a2fa16df Review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2015-January/016312.html The patch applies cleanly. Thanks, -JB- From sean.coffey at oracle.com Fri Apr 10 08:22:23 2015 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 09:22:23 +0100 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval: 8072908 - com/sun/management/OperatingSystemMXBean/TestTotalSwap.sh fails on OS X with exit code 2 In-Reply-To: <5527856E.4060803@oracle.com> References: <5527856E.4060803@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5527883F.5030709@oracle.com> Approved. Regards, Sean. On 10/04/2015 09:10, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote: > Please, approve this backport of a JDK9 test fix > > Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8072908 > Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/fea5c84f2bbc > Review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2015-February/016690.html > > The patch applies cleanly. > > Thanks, > > -JB- From sean.coffey at oracle.com Fri Apr 10 08:22:30 2015 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 09:22:30 +0100 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval: 6712222 - Race condition in java/lang/management/ThreadMXBean/AllThreadIds.java In-Reply-To: <55278572.6020005@oracle.com> References: <55278572.6020005@oracle.com> Message-ID: <55278846.3050404@oracle.com> Approved Regards, Sean. On 10/04/2015 09:10, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote: > Please, approve this backport of a JDK9 test fix > > Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6712222 > Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/edf9e77c7196 > Review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2015-March/016865.html > > The patch applies cleanly. > > Thanks, > > -JB- From sean.coffey at oracle.com Fri Apr 10 08:22:39 2015 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?windows-1252?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 09:22:39 +0100 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval: 8071641 - java/lang/management/ThreadMXBean/SynchronizationStatistics.java intermittently failed with NPE In-Reply-To: <552785D7.9080205@oracle.com> References: <552785D7.9080205@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5527884F.8050402@oracle.com> Approved. Regards, Sean. On 10/04/2015 09:12, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote: > Please, approve this backport of a JDK9 test fix > > Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8071641 > Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/bb1c15f93829 > Review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2015-January/016513.html > > The patch applies cleanly. > > Thanks, > > -JB- From sean.coffey at oracle.com Fri Apr 10 08:23:06 2015 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 09:23:06 +0100 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval: 8062450 - Timeout in LowMemoryTest.java In-Reply-To: <55278676.5010509@oracle.com> References: <55278676.5010509@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5527886A.3000502@oracle.com> Thanks for bringing these test stabilization issues back to jdk8u-dev. Approved. Regards, Sean. On 10/04/2015 09:14, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote: > Please, approve this backport of a JDK9 test fix > > Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8062450 > Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/8131a2fa16df > Review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2015-January/016312.html > > The patch applies cleanly. > > Thanks, > > -JB- From ivan.gerasimov at oracle.com Fri Apr 10 15:42:40 2015 From: ivan.gerasimov at oracle.com (Ivan Gerasimov) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 18:42:40 +0300 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for Approval to Backport: 8064546: CipherInputStream throws BadPaddingException if stream is not fully read Message-ID: <5527EF70.2040201@oracle.com> Hello! Would you please approve backport of this fix? The patch applies cleanly after unshuffling. Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8064546 Jdk9 change: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/58f4669c75a8 Jdk9 review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2015-April/011953.html There's also a closed part of the change, which consists solely of removal (applies cleanly as well). Sincerely yours, Ivan From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Fri Apr 10 15:51:51 2015 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 16:51:51 +0100 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for Approval to Backport: 8064546: CipherInputStream throws BadPaddingException if stream is not fully read In-Reply-To: <5527EF70.2040201@oracle.com> References: <5527EF70.2040201@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5527F197.3090000@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 10/04/15 16:42, Ivan Gerasimov wrote: > Hello! > > Would you please approve backport of this fix? > The patch applies cleanly after unshuffling. > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8064546 > Jdk9 change: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/58f4669c75a8 > Jdk9 review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2015-April/011953.html > > There's also a closed part of the change, which consists solely of > removal (applies cleanly as well). > > Sincerely yours, > Ivan From mikhail.cherkasov at oracle.com Fri Apr 10 18:04:26 2015 From: mikhail.cherkasov at oracle.com (mikhail cherkasov) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 21:04:26 +0300 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval : 8020443: Frame is not created on the specified GraphicsDevice with two monitors Message-ID: <552810AA.5000105@oracle.com> Hi there, Could you please approve direct backport of 8020443 to jdk 8? bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8020443 review for jdk9: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2014-January/006837.html changeset for jdk8: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mcherkas/8020443/webrev.00/ Thanks, Mikhail. From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Fri Apr 10 18:07:41 2015 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 19:07:41 +0100 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval : 8020443: Frame is not created on the specified GraphicsDevice with two monitors In-Reply-To: <552810AA.5000105@oracle.com> References: <552810AA.5000105@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5528116D.3000303@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 10/04/15 19:04, mikhail cherkasov wrote: > Hi there, > > Could you please approve direct backport of 8020443 to jdk 8? > > bug: > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8020443 > review for jdk9: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2014-January/006837.html > changeset for jdk8: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mcherkas/8020443/webrev.00/ > > Thanks, > Mikhail. From alejandro.murillo at oracle.com Sat Apr 11 19:27:03 2015 From: alejandro.murillo at oracle.com (Alejandro E Murillo) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 13:27:03 -0600 Subject: [8u60] Request for approval for bulk integration of hs25.60-b11 Message-ID: <55297587.5010304@oracle.com> Requesting approval to integrate hs25.60-b11 into jdk8u60-b11. A webrev is available at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amurillo/8u60/hs25.60-b11-jdk8u60-b11.webrev/ Pre-integration testing is in progress; the integration will proceed only after SQE has analyzed the results and approved. The fixes in the proposed integration are below. All have undergone nightly testing and are already in a jdk9 repository. 8044416: serviceability/sa/jmap-hashcode/Test8028623.java fails with AssertionFailure: can not get class data for java/lang/UNIXProcess$Platform$$Lambda 8044531: Event based tracing locks to rank as leafs where possible 8057037: Verification in ClassLoaderData::is_alive is too slow 8065331: Add trace events for failed allocations 8066679: jvmtiRedefineClasses.cpp assert cache ptrs must match 8066771: Refactor VM GC operations caused by allocation failure 8067235: embedded/minvm/checknmt fails on compact1 and compact2 with minimal VM 8067662: "java.lang.NullPointerException: Method name is null" from StackTraceElement. 8067991: [Findbugs] SA com.sun.java.swing.ui.CommonUI some methods need final protect 8069263: assert(fm == NULL || fm->method_holder() == _participants[n]) failed: sanity 8072621: Clean up around VM_GC_Operations 8075587: Compilation of constant array containing different sub classes crashes the JVM 8076760: new hotspot build - hs25.60-b11 -- Alejandro From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Mon Apr 13 13:03:10 2015 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 14:03:10 +0100 Subject: [8u60] Request for approval for bulk integration of hs25.60-b11 In-Reply-To: <55297587.5010304@oracle.com> References: <55297587.5010304@oracle.com> Message-ID: <552BBE8E.6090303@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 11/04/15 20:27, Alejandro E Murillo wrote: > Requesting approval to integrate hs25.60-b11 into jdk8u60-b11. > > A webrev is available at: > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amurillo/8u60/hs25.60-b11-jdk8u60-b11.webrev/ > > Pre-integration testing is in progress; the integration will proceed > only after SQE has analyzed the results and approved. > > The fixes in the proposed integration are below. All have undergone > nightly testing and are already in a jdk9 repository. > > 8044416: serviceability/sa/jmap-hashcode/Test8028623.java fails with > AssertionFailure: can not get class data for > java/lang/UNIXProcess$Platform$$Lambda > 8044531: Event based tracing locks to rank as leafs where possible > 8057037: Verification in ClassLoaderData::is_alive is too slow > 8065331: Add trace events for failed allocations > 8066679: jvmtiRedefineClasses.cpp assert cache ptrs must match > 8066771: Refactor VM GC operations caused by allocation failure > 8067235: embedded/minvm/checknmt fails on compact1 and compact2 with > minimal VM > 8067662: "java.lang.NullPointerException: Method name is null" from > StackTraceElement. > 8067991: [Findbugs] SA com.sun.java.swing.ui.CommonUI some methods > need final protect > 8069263: assert(fm == NULL || fm->method_holder() == _participants[n]) > failed: sanity > 8072621: Clean up around VM_GC_Operations > 8075587: Compilation of constant array containing different sub > classes crashes the JVM > 8076760: new hotspot build - hs25.60-b11 > From ivan.gerasimov at oracle.com Mon Apr 13 18:24:23 2015 From: ivan.gerasimov at oracle.com (Ivan Gerasimov) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 21:24:23 +0300 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for Approval to Backport: 8062264: KeychainStore requires non-null password to be supplied when retrieving a private key Message-ID: <552C09D7.6000101@oracle.com> Hello! Would you please approve to backport this fix? The patch applies cleanly after unshuffling. Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8062264 Jdk9 change: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/139d8c9574a1 Jdk9 review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2014-October/011366.html Sincerely yours, Ivan From sean.coffey at oracle.com Mon Apr 13 18:33:38 2015 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 19:33:38 +0100 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for Approval to Backport: 8062264: KeychainStore requires non-null password to be supplied when retrieving a private key In-Reply-To: <552C09D7.6000101@oracle.com> References: <552C09D7.6000101@oracle.com> Message-ID: <552C0C02.9080906@oracle.com> Approved. Regards, Sean. On 13/04/2015 19:24, Ivan Gerasimov wrote: > Hello! > > Would you please approve to backport this fix? > The patch applies cleanly after unshuffling. > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8062264 > Jdk9 change: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/139d8c9574a1 > Jdk9 review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2014-October/011366.html > > Sincerely yours, > Ivan > From shanliang.jiang at oracle.com Tue Apr 14 08:05:23 2015 From: shanliang.jiang at oracle.com (Shanliang Jiang) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 10:05:23 +0200 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for backport approval: 8077408: javax/management/remote/mandatory/notif/NotSerializableNotifTest.java fails due to Port already in use: 2468 Message-ID: <552CCA43.2000501@oracle.com> Please approve this clean backport to 8u-dev. bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8077408 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sjiang/JDK-8077408/00/ Review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2015-April/017089.html Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/f74cb7813bc5 Thanks, Shanliang From sean.coffey at oracle.com Tue Apr 14 08:09:21 2015 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?windows-1252?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 09:09:21 +0100 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for backport approval: 8077408: javax/management/remote/mandatory/notif/NotSerializableNotifTest.java fails due to Port already in use: 2468 In-Reply-To: <552CCA43.2000501@oracle.com> References: <552CCA43.2000501@oracle.com> Message-ID: <552CCB31.2050301@oracle.com> Approved. Regards, Sean. On 14/04/2015 09:05, Shanliang Jiang wrote: > Please approve this clean backport to 8u-dev. > > bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8077408 > webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sjiang/JDK-8077408/00/ > Review thread: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2015-April/017089.html > Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/f74cb7813bc5 > > Thanks, > Shanliang > From dmitry.markov at oracle.com Tue Apr 14 11:38:24 2015 From: dmitry.markov at oracle.com (dmitry markov) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 14:38:24 +0300 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval 8073453: Focus doesn't move when pressing Shift + Tab keys Message-ID: <552CFC30.7000201@oracle.com> Hello, Could you approve the back-port of the fix for 8073453 to jdk8u-dev, please? The jdk9 patch applies cleanly post modular path unshuffling. The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8073453 The webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dmarkov/8073453/jdk8u/webrev.00/ The review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2015-April/009190.html The jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/5b740cd14ee5 Thanks, Dmitry From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Tue Apr 14 11:41:50 2015 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 12:41:50 +0100 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval 8073453: Focus doesn't move when pressing Shift + Tab keys In-Reply-To: <552CFC30.7000201@oracle.com> References: <552CFC30.7000201@oracle.com> Message-ID: <552CFCFE.9090603@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 14/04/15 12:38, dmitry markov wrote: > Hello, > > Could you approve the back-port of the fix for 8073453 to jdk8u-dev, > please? The jdk9 patch applies cleanly post modular path unshuffling. > > The bug: > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8073453 > The webrev: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dmarkov/8073453/jdk8u/webrev.00/ > The review thread: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2015-April/009190.html > The jdk9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/5b740cd14ee5 > > Thanks, > Dmitry From alejandro.murillo at oracle.com Tue Apr 14 20:32:28 2015 From: alejandro.murillo at oracle.com (Alejandro E Murillo) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 14:32:28 -0600 Subject: jdk8u60-b11: HotSpot Message-ID: <552D795C.2070600@oracle.com> hs25.60-b11 has been integrated into jdk8u60-b11. http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/rev/193f92f7e92f http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/corba/rev/b906e1e3e922 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/rev/459a71db33dc http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jaxp/rev/f6a5c7c6d396 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jaxws/rev/6c8f28adad48 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/rev/038afd0e2b86 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/langtools/rev/c18117bf5a9f http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/nashorn/rev/3668fbc46e2a Component : VM Status : 0 major failure, 2 minor failures Date : 04/14/2015 at 21:30 MSK Tested By : STT_VM Cost(total man-days): 1 Workspace : 2015-04-10-164419.amurillo.hs25-60-b11-snapshot Bundles : 2015-04-10-164419.amurillo.hs25-60-b11-snapshot Platforms : Others Tests : Log : link Browsers : NA Patches : NA Number of Tests Executed : 439367 passed tests, 160 failed tests (new failures) Bug verification status: ====================================== Tested, Pass: Tested, Pass (partial fixes): Tested, Fail: Untested bug fixes: 8044416: serviceability/sa/jmap-hashcode/Test8028623.java fails with AssertionFailure: can not get class data for java/lang/UNIXProcess$Platform$$Lambda 8044531: Event based tracing locks to rank as leafs where possible 8057037: Verification in ClassLoaderData::is_alive is too slow 8065331: Add trace events for failed allocations 8066679: jvmtiRedefineClasses.cpp assert cache ptrs must match 8066771: Refactor VM GC operations caused by allocation failure 8067235: embedded/minvm/checknmt fails on compact1 and compact2 with minimal VM 8067662: "java.lang.NullPointerException: Method name is null" from StackTraceElement. 8067991: [Findbugs] SA com.sun.java.swing.ui.CommonUI some methods need final protect 8069263: assert(fm == NULL || fm->method_holder() == _participants[n]) failed: sanity 8072621: Clean up around VM_GC_Operations 8075587: Compilation of constant array containing different sub classes crashes the JVM 8076760: new hotspot build - hs25.60-b11 New bugs filed: Bugs in PIT build: JDK-8077722: nsk/monitoring/stress/classload/* failed in 8u60b11 PIT JDK-8077728: nsk/jdwp/ThreadReference/ThreadGroup/threadgroup001 fails in 8u60 PIT Bugs in earlier promoted build: Number of PIT requested: 1 Integration target J2SE build number: jdk8u60-b11 Issues and Notes: This is PIT for HS25.60-b11 for jdk8u60-b11. GO for integration. -- Alejandro From abhi.saha at oracle.com Tue Apr 14 21:58:05 2015 From: abhi.saha at oracle.com (Abhijit Saha) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 14:58:05 -0700 Subject: [8u60] Request for approval for bulk changes from Apr 2015 CPU fixes into 8u60 Message-ID: <552D8D6D.1040904@oracle.com> 8u45 was released earlier today [1]. Requesting approval to sync up the changes into the jdk8u60 forest. webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~asaha/openJDK.8u45-8u60.sync/ Thanks Abhijit [1] http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/index.html -- Lead, Java SE Updates Java Platform Group Oracle Corporation. (408)276-7564 From dalibor.topic at oracle.com Tue Apr 14 22:11:43 2015 From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (dalibor.topic at oracle.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 00:11:43 +0200 Subject: [8u60] Request for approval for bulk changes from Apr 2015 CPU fixes into 8u60 In-Reply-To: <552D8D6D.1040904@oracle.com> References: <552D8D6D.1040904@oracle.com> Message-ID: <97FD4491-3C11-4C79-99B3-C8301830AA11@oracle.com> Thanks, Abhijit - approved. -- Oracle Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile:+491737185961 Oracle Java Platform Group ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher Green Oracle Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment > On 14.04.2015, at 23:58, Abhijit Saha wrote: > > 8u45 was released earlier today [1]. Requesting approval to sync up the > changes into the jdk8u60 forest. > > webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~asaha/openJDK.8u45-8u60.sync/ > > > Thanks > Abhijit > > > [1] http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/index.html > > > -- > Lead, Java SE Updates > Java Platform Group > Oracle Corporation. > (408)276-7564 > From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Apr 15 09:54:28 2015 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 10:54:28 +0100 Subject: [8u] RFR: 8076221: Disable RC4 cipher suites In-Reply-To: <552E1EB2.2050704@oracle.com> References: <552E0E12.3020202@oracle.com> <552E164E.5010601@oracle.com> <552E1EB2.2050704@oracle.com> Message-ID: <552E3554.6080507@oracle.com> Looks good. Approved. Regards, Sean. On 15/04/15 09:17, Artem Smotrakov wrote: > cc'ing jdk8u-dev at openjdk.java.net > > Would you please approve this backport to 8u-dev? > > The difference is: > - JDK 9 has a single java.security file, but JDK 8u has java.security > file for each generic platform, so each file needs to be updated. > - Test names are different, but the changes are the same (reset > 'jdk.tls.disabledAlgorithms' security property) > > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~asmotrak/8076221/webrev.8u.00/ > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8076221 > Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/23cde932f139 > > Artem > > On 04/15/2015 10:42 AM, Xuelei Fan wrote: >> Looks fine to me. >> >> Xuelei >> >> On 4/15/2015 3:06 PM, Artem Smotrakov wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> RFC 7465 [1] has been published to prohibit RC4. >>> >>> Please review this fix which disables RC4 cipher suites in JDK 8u by >>> adding "RC4" to "jdk.tls.disabledAlgorithms" security property. >>> >>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~asmotrak/8076221/webrev.8u.00/ >>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8076221 >>> >>> [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7465 >>> >>> Artem >>> > From vladimir.x.ivanov at oracle.com Thu Apr 16 19:51:40 2015 From: vladimir.x.ivanov at oracle.com (Vladimir Ivanov) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 22:51:40 +0300 Subject: [8u60] Bulk request for approval: 8063137, 8069591, 8068915, 8057919, 8074548, 8062280, 8071788, 8077054 Message-ID: <553012CC.6080609@oracle.com> Please, approve backports of the following fixes into 8u60: (1) 8063137: "Never taken branches should be pruned when GWT LambdaForms are shared" https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8063137 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/d8bbc2fb7df8 (2) 8069591: "Customize LambdaForms which are invoked using MH.invoke/invokeExact" https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8069591 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/86fbdebd98af (3) 8068915: "C2: uncommon trap w/ Reason_speculate_class_check causes performance regression due to continuous deoptimizations" https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8068915 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/hotspot/rev/ea802a4750aa (4) 8057919: "Class.getSimpleName() should work for non-JLS compliant class names" https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8057919 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs-comp/hotspot/rev/f90702a3d522 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs-comp/jdk/rev/63e229f7f822 (5) 8074548: "Never-taken branches cause repeated deopts in MHs.GWT case" https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8074548 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs-comp/hotspot/rev/1aa6df528006 (6) 8062280: "C2: inlining failure due to access checks being too strict" https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8062280 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs-comp/hotspot/rev/528423a8c09f (7) 8071788: "CountingWrapper.asType() is broken" https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8071788 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/2dc4afee9a85 (8) 8077054: "DMH LFs should be customizeable" https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8077054 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs-comp/jdk/rev/16381a5f0959 The fixes apply cleanly. Thanks! Best regards, Vladimir Ivanov From sean.coffey at oracle.com Thu Apr 16 20:11:15 2015 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 21:11:15 +0100 Subject: [8u60] Bulk request for approval: 8063137, 8069591, 8068915, 8057919, 8074548, 8062280, 8071788, 8077054 In-Reply-To: <553012CC.6080609@oracle.com> References: <553012CC.6080609@oracle.com> Message-ID: <55301763.80602@oracle.com> Vladimir, comments inline.. On 16/04/2015 20:51, Vladimir Ivanov wrote: > Please, approve backports of the following fixes into 8u60: > > (1) 8063137: "Never taken branches should be pruned when GWT > LambdaForms are shared" > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8063137 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/d8bbc2fb7df8 this needs a no-reg label. > > (2) 8069591: "Customize LambdaForms which are invoked using > MH.invoke/invokeExact" > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8069591 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/86fbdebd98af this needs a no-reg label > > (3) 8068915: "C2: uncommon trap w/ Reason_speculate_class_check causes > performance regression due to continuous deoptimizations" > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8068915 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/hotspot/rev/ea802a4750aa Ideally, this should go to the hotspot team forest. That forest doesn't require integration approval. If you've the fix committed as part of this push, I've no strong objections to jdk8u-dev as long as all jdk and hotspot JPRT tests are green. It requires a noreg label > > (4) 8057919: "Class.getSimpleName() should work for non-JLS compliant > class names" > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8057919 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs-comp/hotspot/rev/f90702a3d522 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs-comp/jdk/rev/63e229f7f822 > > (5) 8074548: "Never-taken branches cause repeated deopts in MHs.GWT case" > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8074548 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs-comp/hotspot/rev/1aa6df528006 Like 8068915 - ideally it should go to the 8u hs-dev team forest first. > > (6) 8062280: "C2: inlining failure due to access checks being too strict" > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8062280 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs-comp/hotspot/rev/528423a8c09f Should go to hs-dev team forest > > (7) 8071788: "CountingWrapper.asType() is broken" > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8071788 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/2dc4afee9a85 > > (8) 8077054: "DMH LFs should be customizeable" > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8077054 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs-comp/jdk/rev/16381a5f0959 Needs a noreg label. Consider these approved but please seek guidance from Alejandro on whether some of the hotspot specific fixes should enter 8u codeline via the 8u hotspot team forest. regards, Sean. > > The fixes apply cleanly. > > Thanks! > > Best regards, > Vladimir Ivanov From vladimir.x.ivanov at oracle.com Thu Apr 16 20:17:17 2015 From: vladimir.x.ivanov at oracle.com (Vladimir Ivanov) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 23:17:17 +0300 Subject: [8u60] Bulk request for approval: 8063137, 8069591, 8068915, 8057919, 8074548, 8062280, 8071788, 8077054 In-Reply-To: <55301763.80602@oracle.com> References: <553012CC.6080609@oracle.com> <55301763.80602@oracle.com> Message-ID: <553018CD.5020903@oracle.com> Sean, thanks! I'll push hotspot-related fixes through hotspot team forest. Best regards, Vladimir Ivanov On 4/16/15 11:11 PM, Se?n Coffey wrote: > Vladimir, > > comments inline.. > > On 16/04/2015 20:51, Vladimir Ivanov wrote: >> Please, approve backports of the following fixes into 8u60: >> >> (1) 8063137: "Never taken branches should be pruned when GWT >> LambdaForms are shared" >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8063137 >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/d8bbc2fb7df8 > this needs a no-reg label. >> >> (2) 8069591: "Customize LambdaForms which are invoked using >> MH.invoke/invokeExact" >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8069591 >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/86fbdebd98af > this needs a no-reg label >> >> (3) 8068915: "C2: uncommon trap w/ Reason_speculate_class_check causes >> performance regression due to continuous deoptimizations" >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8068915 >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/hotspot/rev/ea802a4750aa > Ideally, this should go to the hotspot team forest. That forest doesn't > require integration approval. If you've the fix committed as part of > this push, I've no strong objections to jdk8u-dev as long as all jdk and > hotspot JPRT tests are green. It requires a noreg label >> >> (4) 8057919: "Class.getSimpleName() should work for non-JLS compliant >> class names" >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8057919 >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs-comp/hotspot/rev/f90702a3d522 >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs-comp/jdk/rev/63e229f7f822 >> >> (5) 8074548: "Never-taken branches cause repeated deopts in MHs.GWT case" >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8074548 >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs-comp/hotspot/rev/1aa6df528006 > Like 8068915 - ideally it should go to the 8u hs-dev team forest first. >> >> (6) 8062280: "C2: inlining failure due to access checks being too strict" >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8062280 >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs-comp/hotspot/rev/528423a8c09f > Should go to hs-dev team forest >> >> (7) 8071788: "CountingWrapper.asType() is broken" >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8071788 >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/2dc4afee9a85 >> >> (8) 8077054: "DMH LFs should be customizeable" >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8077054 >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs-comp/jdk/rev/16381a5f0959 > Needs a noreg label. > > Consider these approved but please seek guidance from Alejandro on > whether some of the hotspot specific fixes should enter 8u codeline via > the 8u hotspot team forest. > > regards, > Sean. >> >> The fixes apply cleanly. >> >> Thanks! >> >> Best regards, >> Vladimir Ivanov > From alejandro.murillo at oracle.com Thu Apr 16 20:27:50 2015 From: alejandro.murillo at oracle.com (Alejandro E Murillo) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 14:27:50 -0600 Subject: [8u60] Bulk request for approval: 8063137, 8069591, 8068915, 8057919, 8074548, 8062280, 8071788, 8077054 In-Reply-To: <553018CD.5020903@oracle.com> References: <553012CC.6080609@oracle.com> <55301763.80602@oracle.com> <553018CD.5020903@oracle.com> Message-ID: <55301B46.5020900@oracle.com> you can push all of them through the hotspot team forest in a single jprt job. I will integrate all of them as part of the hotspot snapshot (will save you the need to request this permission, as I'll do that as part of the process). Alejandro On 4/16/2015 2:17 PM, Vladimir Ivanov wrote: > Sean, thanks! > > I'll push hotspot-related fixes through hotspot team forest. > > Best regards, > Vladimir Ivanov > > On 4/16/15 11:11 PM, Se?n Coffey wrote: >> Vladimir, >> >> comments inline.. >> >> On 16/04/2015 20:51, Vladimir Ivanov wrote: >>> Please, approve backports of the following fixes into 8u60: >>> >>> (1) 8063137: "Never taken branches should be pruned when GWT >>> LambdaForms are shared" >>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8063137 >>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/d8bbc2fb7df8 >> this needs a no-reg label. >>> >>> (2) 8069591: "Customize LambdaForms which are invoked using >>> MH.invoke/invokeExact" >>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8069591 >>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/86fbdebd98af >> this needs a no-reg label >>> >>> (3) 8068915: "C2: uncommon trap w/ Reason_speculate_class_check causes >>> performance regression due to continuous deoptimizations" >>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8068915 >>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/hotspot/rev/ea802a4750aa >> Ideally, this should go to the hotspot team forest. That forest doesn't >> require integration approval. If you've the fix committed as part of >> this push, I've no strong objections to jdk8u-dev as long as all jdk and >> hotspot JPRT tests are green. It requires a noreg label >>> >>> (4) 8057919: "Class.getSimpleName() should work for non-JLS compliant >>> class names" >>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8057919 >>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs-comp/hotspot/rev/f90702a3d522 >>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs-comp/jdk/rev/63e229f7f822 >>> >>> (5) 8074548: "Never-taken branches cause repeated deopts in MHs.GWT >>> case" >>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8074548 >>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs-comp/hotspot/rev/1aa6df528006 >> Like 8068915 - ideally it should go to the 8u hs-dev team forest first. >>> >>> (6) 8062280: "C2: inlining failure due to access checks being too >>> strict" >>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8062280 >>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs-comp/hotspot/rev/528423a8c09f >> Should go to hs-dev team forest >>> >>> (7) 8071788: "CountingWrapper.asType() is broken" >>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8071788 >>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/2dc4afee9a85 >>> >>> (8) 8077054: "DMH LFs should be customizeable" >>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8077054 >>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs-comp/jdk/rev/16381a5f0959 >> Needs a noreg label. >> >> Consider these approved but please seek guidance from Alejandro on >> whether some of the hotspot specific fixes should enter 8u codeline via >> the 8u hotspot team forest. >> >> regards, >> Sean. >>> >>> The fixes apply cleanly. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Vladimir Ivanov >> -- Alejandro From hannes.wallnoefer at oracle.com Thu Apr 16 20:47:25 2015 From: hannes.wallnoefer at oracle.com (Hannes Wallnoefer) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 22:47:25 +0200 Subject: [8u60] Request for approval for JDK-8067215 and JDK-8077955 Message-ID: <55301FDD.6080905@oracle.com> Please approve backport of JDK-8067215 and JDK-8077955 to 8u60: Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8067215 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hannesw/8067215/ Review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2015-April/004436.html Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8077955 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hannesw/8077955/ Review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2015-April/004441.html The changes apply cleanly to 8u-dev after reshuffling path names. Thanks, Hannes From sean.coffey at oracle.com Thu Apr 16 20:51:45 2015 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 21:51:45 +0100 Subject: [8u60] Request for approval for JDK-8067215 and JDK-8077955 In-Reply-To: <55301FDD.6080905@oracle.com> References: <55301FDD.6080905@oracle.com> Message-ID: <553020E1.7080305@oracle.com> Approved. Regards, Sean. On 16/04/2015 21:47, Hannes Wallnoefer wrote: > Please approve backport of JDK-8067215 and JDK-8077955 to 8u60: > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8067215 > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hannesw/8067215/ > Review thread: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2015-April/004436.html > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8077955 > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hannesw/8077955/ > Review thread: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2015-April/004441.html > > The changes apply cleanly to 8u-dev after reshuffling path names. > > Thanks, > Hannes From daniel.smith at oracle.com Thu Apr 16 23:28:29 2015 From: daniel.smith at oracle.com (Dan Smith) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 17:28:29 -0600 Subject: [8u60] Request for approval for 8075520: Varargs access check mishandles capture variables Message-ID: <63C61215-6CB2-43BF-A8C4-DEA7F97B4314@oracle.com> Please approve this langtools bug fix. Patch applies cleanly to jdk8u (after renaming paths). Bug report: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8075520 Also fixes: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8077786 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/5cd4dba2e742 jdk9 reviewer: vromero ?Dan From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Fri Apr 17 02:55:37 2015 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 03:55:37 +0100 Subject: [8u60] Request for approval for 8075520: Varargs access check mishandles capture variables In-Reply-To: <63C61215-6CB2-43BF-A8C4-DEA7F97B4314@oracle.com> References: <63C61215-6CB2-43BF-A8C4-DEA7F97B4314@oracle.com> Message-ID: <55307629.50602@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 17/04/15 00:28, Dan Smith wrote: > Please approve this langtools bug fix. Patch applies cleanly to jdk8u (after renaming paths). > > Bug report: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8075520 > Also fixes: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8077786 > Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/5cd4dba2e742 > jdk9 reviewer: vromero > > ?Dan From masayoshi.okutsu at oracle.com Fri Apr 17 08:16:52 2015 From: masayoshi.okutsu at oracle.com (Masayoshi Okutsu) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 17:16:52 +0900 Subject: [8u60] RFR: 7044727: (tz) TimeZone.getDefault() call returns incorrect value in Windows terminal session Message-ID: <5530C174.3000505@oracle.com> Hello, Please review and approve the 8u version of the fix for JDK-7044727. This fix is different from the jdk9 one to be buildable and runnable on Windows XP. issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7044727 8u webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~okutsu/8u/7044727/webrev.00/ jdk9 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/i18n-dev/2015-April/001665.html jdk9 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~okutsu/9/7044727/webrev.00/ jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/ff7cdc646abd Thanks, Masayoshi From alejandro.murillo at oracle.com Fri Apr 17 12:11:39 2015 From: alejandro.murillo at oracle.com (Alejandro E Murillo) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 06:11:39 -0600 Subject: [8u60] Request for approval for bulk integration of hs25.60-b12 Message-ID: <5530F87B.4060507@oracle.com> Requesting approval to integrate hs25.60-b12 into jdk8u60-b12. A webrev is available at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amurillo/8u60/hs25.60-b12-jdk8u60-b12.webrev/ Pre-integration testing is in progress; the integration will proceed only after SQE has analyzed the results and approved. The fixes in the proposed integration are below. All have undergone nightly testing and are already in a jdk9 repository. 8047382: hotspot build failed with gcc version Red Hat 4.4.6-4. 8061259: ParNew promotion failed is serialized on a lock 8062591: SPARC PICL causes significantly longer startup times 8074561: Wrong volatile qualifier for field ClassLoaderDataGraphKlassIteratorAtomic::_next_klass 8076325: java hangs with -XX:ParallelGCThreads=0 -XX:+ExplicitGCInvokesConcurrent options 8076968: PICL based initialization of L2 cache line size on some SPARC systems is incorrect 8077424: new hotspot build - hs25.60-b12 -- Alejandro From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Fri Apr 17 12:24:14 2015 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:24:14 +0100 Subject: [8u60] Request for approval for bulk integration of hs25.60-b12 In-Reply-To: <5530F87B.4060507@oracle.com> References: <5530F87B.4060507@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5530FB6E.4080604@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 17/04/15 13:11, Alejandro E Murillo wrote: > Requesting approval to integrate hs25.60-b12 into jdk8u60-b12. > > A webrev is available at: > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amurillo/8u60/hs25.60-b12-jdk8u60-b12.webrev/ > > Pre-integration testing is in progress; the integration will proceed > only after SQE has analyzed the results and approved. > > The fixes in the proposed integration are below. All have undergone > nightly testing and are already in a jdk9 repository. > > 8047382: hotspot build failed with gcc version Red Hat 4.4.6-4. > 8061259: ParNew promotion failed is serialized on a lock > 8062591: SPARC PICL causes significantly longer startup times > 8074561: Wrong volatile qualifier for field > ClassLoaderDataGraphKlassIteratorAtomic::_next_klass > 8076325: java hangs with -XX:ParallelGCThreads=0 > -XX:+ExplicitGCInvokesConcurrent options > 8076968: PICL based initialization of L2 cache line size on some SPARC > systems is incorrect > 8077424: new hotspot build - hs25.60-b12 > From naoto.sato at oracle.com Fri Apr 17 23:05:55 2015 From: naoto.sato at oracle.com (Naoto Sato) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 16:05:55 -0700 Subject: [8u60] RFR: 7044727: (tz) TimeZone.getDefault() call returns incorrect value in Windows terminal session In-Reply-To: <5530C174.3000505@oracle.com> References: <5530C174.3000505@oracle.com> Message-ID: <553191D3.1050406@oracle.com> My only comment is that it could be confusing to use the same name "getDynamicTimeZoneInfo" for the function name and the proc address variable name (initially I thought if it were a recursive call). Otherwise it looks good to me. Also approving the backport to 8u. Naoto On 4/17/15 1:16 AM, Masayoshi Okutsu wrote: > Hello, > > Please review and approve the 8u version of the fix for JDK-7044727. > This fix is different from the jdk9 one to be buildable and runnable on > Windows XP. > > issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7044727 > 8u webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~okutsu/8u/7044727/webrev.00/ > > jdk9 review thread: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/i18n-dev/2015-April/001665.html > jdk9 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~okutsu/9/7044727/webrev.00/ > jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/ff7cdc646abd > > Thanks, > Masayoshi > From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Fri Apr 17 23:40:16 2015 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 00:40:16 +0100 Subject: [8u60] RFR: 7044727: (tz) TimeZone.getDefault() call returns incorrect value in Windows terminal session In-Reply-To: <553191D3.1050406@oracle.com> References: <5530C174.3000505@oracle.com> <553191D3.1050406@oracle.com> Message-ID: <553199E0.7070505@oracle.com> Approved for push. -Rob On 18/04/15 00:05, Naoto Sato wrote: > My only comment is that it could be confusing to use the same name > "getDynamicTimeZoneInfo" for the function name and the proc address > variable name (initially I thought if it were a recursive call). > Otherwise it looks good to me. > > Also approving the backport to 8u. > > Naoto > > On 4/17/15 1:16 AM, Masayoshi Okutsu wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Please review and approve the 8u version of the fix for JDK-7044727. >> This fix is different from the jdk9 one to be buildable and runnable on >> Windows XP. >> >> issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7044727 >> 8u webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~okutsu/8u/7044727/webrev.00/ >> >> jdk9 review thread: >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/i18n-dev/2015-April/001665.html >> jdk9 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~okutsu/9/7044727/webrev.00/ >> jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/ff7cdc646abd >> >> Thanks, >> Masayoshi >> From masayoshi.okutsu at oracle.com Mon Apr 20 06:27:46 2015 From: masayoshi.okutsu at oracle.com (Masayoshi Okutsu) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 16:27:46 +1000 Subject: [8u60] RFR: 7044727: (tz) TimeZone.getDefault() call returns incorrect value in Windows terminal session In-Reply-To: <553191D3.1050406@oracle.com> References: <5530C174.3000505@oracle.com> <553191D3.1050406@oracle.com> Message-ID: <55349C62.2010604@oracle.com> I've changed the variable name to getDynamicTimeZoneInfoFunc to avoid that confusion. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~okutsu/8u/7044727/webrev.01/ I will push the changed one. Thanks, Masayoshi On 4/18/2015 9:05 AM, Naoto Sato wrote: > My only comment is that it could be confusing to use the same name > "getDynamicTimeZoneInfo" for the function name and the proc address > variable name (initially I thought if it were a recursive call). > Otherwise it looks good to me. > > Also approving the backport to 8u. > > Naoto > > On 4/17/15 1:16 AM, Masayoshi Okutsu wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Please review and approve the 8u version of the fix for JDK-7044727. >> This fix is different from the jdk9 one to be buildable and runnable on >> Windows XP. >> >> issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7044727 >> 8u webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~okutsu/8u/7044727/webrev.00/ >> >> jdk9 review thread: >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/i18n-dev/2015-April/001665.html >> jdk9 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~okutsu/9/7044727/webrev.00/ >> jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/ff7cdc646abd >> >> Thanks, >> Masayoshi >> From alexandr.scherbatiy at oracle.com Mon Apr 20 12:03:36 2015 From: alexandr.scherbatiy at oracle.com (Alexander Scherbatiy) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 15:03:36 +0300 Subject: Result: New JDK8u Committer: Pete Brunet Message-ID: <5534EB18.7080406@oracle.com> Voting for Pete Brunet [1] is now closed. Yes: 5 Veto: 0 Abstain: 0 According to the Bylaws definition of Lazy Consensus, this is sufficient to approve the nomination. [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2015-April/003336.html Thanks, Alexandr. From alexey.ivanov at oracle.com Mon Apr 20 13:00:01 2015 From: alexey.ivanov at oracle.com (Alexey Ivanov) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 16:00:01 +0300 Subject: [8u-60] Request for approval for 8074956: ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException in javax.swing.text.html.parser.ContentModel.first() Message-ID: <5534F851.4090108@oracle.com> Hello, Could you please approve the following backport of the fix to 8u-60? JBS bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8074956 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aivanov/8074956/jdk9/webrev.00/ Review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2015-April/004383.html JDK9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/38d385715177 The changeset applies cleanly to jdk8 after paths reshuffling. Thank you in advance, Alexey From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Mon Apr 20 13:39:45 2015 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 14:39:45 +0100 Subject: [8u-60] Request for approval for 8074956: ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException in javax.swing.text.html.parser.ContentModel.first() In-Reply-To: <5534F851.4090108@oracle.com> References: <5534F851.4090108@oracle.com> Message-ID: <553501A1.6060606@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 20/04/15 14:00, Alexey Ivanov wrote: > Hello, > > Could you please approve the following backport of the fix to 8u-60? > > JBS bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8074956 > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aivanov/8074956/jdk9/webrev.00/ > Review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2015-April/004383.html > > JDK9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/38d385715177 > > The changeset applies cleanly to jdk8 after paths reshuffling. > > Thank you in advance, > Alexey From digulla at hepe.com Mon Apr 20 15:33:45 2015 From: digulla at hepe.com (Aaron Digulla) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 17:33:45 +0200 Subject: Regression in the javac 1.8u40 Message-ID: <579b-55351c80-5b-4b5ec680@148209838> Hello, I've found a regression in generics handling of Java 8. The code can be compiled and works fine with Java 6u45 and 7u75. Basically, I have an interface with this method: > T foo(); where Bar is interface Bar> {} I can implement this method without problem @Override public > T foo() { return null; } but I can't override such a method anymore in Java 8: @Override public > T foo() { T result = super.foo(); return result; } I've a small project which demonstrates the issue. I tried to open a bug but couldn't create a user in the bug database. What should I do, now? Regards, -- Aaron "Optimizer" Digulla a.k.a. Philmann Dark "It's not the universe that's limited, it's our imagination. Follow me and I'll show you something beyond the limits." http://blog.pdark.de/ From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Mon Apr 20 16:03:46 2015 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 17:03:46 +0100 Subject: Regression in the javac 1.8u40 In-Reply-To: <579b-55351c80-5b-4b5ec680@148209838> References: <579b-55351c80-5b-4b5ec680@148209838> Message-ID: <55352362.5060408@oracle.com> Probably better to discuss this on compiler-dev at openjdk.java.net -Rob On 20/04/15 16:33, Aaron Digulla wrote: > Hello, > > I've found a regression in generics handling of Java 8. The code can be compiled and works fine with Java 6u45 and 7u75. > > Basically, I have an interface with this method: > > > T foo(); > > where Bar is > > interface Bar> {} > > I can implement this method without problem > > @Override > public > T foo() { > return null; > } > > but I can't override such a method anymore in Java 8: > > @Override > public > T foo() { > T result = super.foo(); > return result; > } > > > I've a small project which demonstrates the issue. I tried to open a bug but couldn't create a user in the bug database. > > What should I do, now? > > Regards, > From lana.steuck at oracle.com Mon Apr 20 18:55:43 2015 From: lana.steuck at oracle.com (lana.steuck at oracle.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 11:55:43 -0700 (PDT) Subject: jdk8u-b12: jdk8u-dev Message-ID: <201504201855.t3KIthIj013981@sc11152554.us.oracle.com> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/rev/ba0772198525 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/nashorn/rev/d03eb34e4b84 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/langtools/rev/84eb51777733 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/rev/87d4b7551d32 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jaxws/rev/fab06c192b0b http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jaxp/rev/412597b17df8 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/rev/fc3cd1db10e2 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/corba/rev/449f9a900771 --- All the fixes will be tested during promotion (no PIT testing at this point): List of all fixes: =================== JDK-8073453 client-libs Focus doesn't move when pressing Shift + Tab keys JDK-8020443 client-libs Frame is not created on the specified GraphicsDevice with two monitors JDK-8064939 client-libs SwingSet2: Themes are incorrectly enabled when running with Nimbus Loo JDK-8075667 core-libs (tz) Support tzdata2015b JDK-8067215 core-libs Disable dual fields when not using optimistic types JDK-8076641 core-libs getNextEntry throws ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException when unzipping file JDK-8076646 core-libs nashorn tests should avoid using package names used by nashorn sources JDK-8076972 core-libs Several nashorn tests failing JDK-8077955 core-libs Undeclared globals in eval code should not be handled as fast scope JDK-8072908 core-svc com/sun/management/OperatingSystemMXBean/TestTotalSwap.sh fails on OS JDK-8071641 core-svc java/lang/management/ThreadMXBean/SynchronizationStatistics.java inter JDK-8077408 core-svc javax/management/remote/mandatory/notif/NotSerializableNotifTest.java JDK-6712222 core-svc Race condition in java/lang/management/ThreadMXBean/AllThreadIds.java JDK-8062450 hotspot Timeout in LowMemoryTest.java JDK-8059588 security-libs deadlock in java/io/PrintStream when verbose java.security.debug flags JDK-8076221 security-libs Disable RC4 cipher suites JDK-8062264 security-libs KeychainStore requires non-null password to be supplied when retrievin JDK-8073385 xml Bad error message on parsing illegal character in XML attribute JDK-8076290 xml JCK test api/xsl/conf/string/string17 starts failing after JDK-8074297 JDK-8074297 xml substring in XSLT returns wrong character if string contains supplemen From philip.race at oracle.com Mon Apr 20 20:39:17 2015 From: philip.race at oracle.com (Phil Race) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 13:39:17 -0700 Subject: [8u60] Request for approval for 8073699: Memory leak in jdk/src/java/desktop/share/native/libjavajpeg/imageioJPEG.c Message-ID: <553563F5.5070004@oracle.com> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2015-April/005313.html -phil. From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Mon Apr 20 21:16:57 2015 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 22:16:57 +0100 Subject: [8u60] Request for approval for 8073699: Memory leak in jdk/src/java/desktop/share/native/libjavajpeg/imageioJPEG.c In-Reply-To: <553563F5.5070004@oracle.com> References: <553563F5.5070004@oracle.com> Message-ID: <55356CC9.1080702@oracle.com> Approved. Please follow the approval template format for future approval requests: http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8u/approval-template.html -Rob On 20/04/15 21:39, Phil Race wrote: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2015-April/005313.html > > -phil. From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Mon Apr 20 22:03:29 2015 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 23:03:29 +0100 Subject: 8074350: Support ISO 4217 "Current funds codes" table (A.2) Message-ID: <553577B1.2080807@oracle.com> Hi folks, Looking for a review for: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8074350 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~robm/8074350/webrev.01/ -Rob From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Mon Apr 20 22:07:07 2015 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 23:07:07 +0100 Subject: [8u60] Request for review - 8074350: Support ISO 4217 "Current funds codes" table (A.2) In-Reply-To: <553577B1.2080807@oracle.com> References: <553577B1.2080807@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5535788B.5040303@oracle.com> Eesh, corrected subject. -Rob On 20/04/15 23:03, Rob McKenna wrote: > Hi folks, > > Looking for a review for: > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8074350 > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~robm/8074350/webrev.01/ > > -Rob > From naoto.sato at oracle.com Mon Apr 20 22:23:44 2015 From: naoto.sato at oracle.com (Naoto Sato) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 15:23:44 -0700 Subject: [8u60] Request for review - 8074350: Support ISO 4217 "Current funds codes" table (A.2) In-Reply-To: <5535788B.5040303@oracle.com> References: <553577B1.2080807@oracle.com> <5535788B.5040303@oracle.com> Message-ID: <55357C70.8070203@oracle.com> Looks good to me. Naoto On 4/20/15 3:07 PM, Rob McKenna wrote: > Eesh, corrected subject. > > -Rob > > On 20/04/15 23:03, Rob McKenna wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> Looking for a review for: >> >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8074350 >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~robm/8074350/webrev.01/ >> >> -Rob >> > From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Tue Apr 21 00:13:55 2015 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 01:13:55 +0100 Subject: [8u60] Request for approval - 8074350: Support ISO 4217 "Current funds codes" table (A.2) Message-ID: <55359643.5090407@oracle.com> Hi folks, Looking for approval for: https://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/JDK-8074350 http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2015-April/003419.html http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/184ab56da7df Thanks, -Rob From sean.coffey at oracle.com Tue Apr 21 00:38:27 2015 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 17:38:27 -0700 Subject: [8u60] Request for approval - 8074350: Support ISO 4217 "Current funds codes" table (A.2) In-Reply-To: <55359643.5090407@oracle.com> References: <55359643.5090407@oracle.com> Message-ID: Approved. Regards, Sean. On 20 April 2015 17:13:55 GMT-07:00, Rob McKenna wrote: >Hi folks, > >Looking for approval for: > >https://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/JDK-8074350 >http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2015-April/003419.html >http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/184ab56da7df > >Thanks, > > -Rob -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. From alejandro.murillo at oracle.com Tue Apr 21 13:54:04 2015 From: alejandro.murillo at oracle.com (Alejandro E Murillo) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 07:54:04 -0600 Subject: jdk8u60-b12: HotSpot Message-ID: <5536567C.7070204@oracle.com> hs25.60-b12 has been integrated into jdk8u60-b12. http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/rev/ba0772198525 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/corba/rev/449f9a900771 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/rev/ccca7162738e http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jaxp/rev/412597b17df8 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jaxws/rev/fab06c192b0b http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/rev/87d4b7551d32 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/langtools/rev/84eb51777733 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/nashorn/rev/d03eb34e4b84 Component : VM Status : 0 major failures, 0 minor failures Date : 04/21/2015 at 18:00 MSK Tested By : STT_VM Cost(total man-days): 1 Workspace : 2015-04-17-083805.amurillo.hs25-60-b12-snapshot Bundles : 2015-04-17-083805.amurillo.hs25-60-b12-snapshot Platforms : Others Tests : Log : link Browsers : NA Patches : NA Number of Tests Executed : 315429 passed tests, 30 failed tests (no new failures) Bug verification status: ====================================== Tested, Pass: Tested, Pass (partial fixes): Tested, Fail: CRs for testing: 8047382: hotspot build failed with gcc version Red Hat 4.4.6-4. 8061259: ParNew promotion failed is serialized on a lock 8062591: SPARC PICL causes significantly longer startup times 8066593: JEP-JDK-8060092: Test task: Correctness of information about allocations waiting to be fulfilled once a GC is completed 8066596: JEP-JDK-8060092: Test task: Stress tests 8074005: Remove PPC from jprt testset hotspot 8074561: Wrong volatile qualifier for field ClassLoaderDataGraphKlassIteratorAtomic::_next_klass 8076252: ResourceManagement fails to instrument threads with overridden state 8076325: java hangs with -XX:ParallelGCThreads=0 -XX:+ExplicitGCInvokesConcurrent options 8076968: PICL based initialization of L2 cache line size on some SPARC systems is incorrect 8077178: test explicitly run Server VM and it causes failures on ARMv6 platforms 8077424: new hotspot build - hs25.60-b12 New bugs filed: Bugs in PIT build: Bugs in earlier promoted build: Number of PIT requested: 1 Integration target J2SE build number: jdk8u60-b12 Issues and Notes: This is PIT for HS25.60-b12 for jdk8u60-b12. GO for integration. -- Alejandro From alexander.potochkin at oracle.com Tue Apr 21 16:31:59 2015 From: alexander.potochkin at oracle.com (Alexander Potochkin) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 19:31:59 +0300 Subject: CFV: New JDK 8u Committer: Alexey Ivanov Message-ID: <55367B7F.6080203@oracle.com> I hereby nominate Alexey Ivanov to jdk8u Committer. Alexey is a member of the Java SE sustaining team. He has spent most of that time working on the GUI and deployment issues. Alexey contributed 10 changes to JDK8u so far: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/790008bce87d http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/70259911e6b3 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/202d1d06b2c1 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/88e71be7cc40 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/9376d1440257 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/648255c99e84 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/6e1c85a0b6cf http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/655876e27e00 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/08fa623138dc http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/rev/128be758b4ef Votes are due by 5th May 2015 Only current JDK 8u Committers [1] are eligible to vote on this nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list. For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. Thanks alexp [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote From abhi.saha at oracle.com Tue Apr 21 16:40:00 2015 From: abhi.saha at oracle.com (Abhi Saha) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 09:40:00 -0700 Subject: CFV: New JDK 8u Committer: Alexey Ivanov In-Reply-To: <55367B7F.6080203@oracle.com> References: <55367B7F.6080203@oracle.com> Message-ID: <55367D60.7050100@oracle.com> Vote: Yes. On 4/21/2015 9:31 AM, Alexander Potochkin wrote: > I hereby nominate Alexey Ivanov to jdk8u Committer. > > Alexey is a member of the Java SE sustaining team. > He has spent most of that time working on the GUI and deployment issues. > > Alexey contributed 10 changes to JDK8u so far: > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/790008bce87d > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/70259911e6b3 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/202d1d06b2c1 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/88e71be7cc40 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/9376d1440257 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/648255c99e84 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/6e1c85a0b6cf > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/655876e27e00 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/08fa623138dc > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/rev/128be758b4ef > > Votes are due by 5th May 2015 > > Only current JDK 8u Committers [1] are eligible to vote on this > nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this > mailing list. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. > > Thanks > alexp > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote -- Lead, Java SE Updates Java Platform Group Oracle Corporation. (408)276-7564 From Sergey.Bylokhov at oracle.com Tue Apr 21 16:49:04 2015 From: Sergey.Bylokhov at oracle.com (Sergey Bylokhov) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 19:49:04 +0300 Subject: CFV: New JDK 8u Committer: Alexey Ivanov In-Reply-To: <55367B7F.6080203@oracle.com> References: <55367B7F.6080203@oracle.com> Message-ID: <55367F80.9000203@oracle.com> Vote: Yes On 21.04.15 19:31, Alexander Potochkin wrote: > I hereby nominate Alexey Ivanov to jdk8u Committer. > > Alexey is a member of the Java SE sustaining team. > He has spent most of that time working on the GUI and deployment issues. > > Alexey contributed 10 changes to JDK8u so far: > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/790008bce87d > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/70259911e6b3 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/202d1d06b2c1 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/88e71be7cc40 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/9376d1440257 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/648255c99e84 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/6e1c85a0b6cf > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/655876e27e00 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/08fa623138dc > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/rev/128be758b4ef > > Votes are due by 5th May 2015 > > Only current JDK 8u Committers [1] are eligible to vote on this > nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this > mailing list. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. > > Thanks > alexp > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote -- Best regards, Sergey. From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Tue Apr 21 17:15:55 2015 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 18:15:55 +0100 Subject: [8u communication] Upcoming JDK 8 Updates milestone : RDP 1 Message-ID: <553685CB.5050304@oracle.com> As per earlier communication [1], the 8u60 Rampdown 1 milestone is approaching. P1, P2, P3 bug fixes for 8u60 should be prioritized once we enter the rampdown phase in mid May. The 8u60 timeline is available at : http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8u/releases/8u60.html Note: This timeline contains a correction. The GA date should be August. I would also like to bring attention to the Oracle early access binaries, and invite other distributors who build binaries based on the OpenJDK JDK 8 Updates Project to do the same in this thread: https://jdk8.java.net/download.html -Rob [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2015-March/003151.html From pooja.chopra at oracle.com Tue Apr 21 17:33:26 2015 From: pooja.chopra at oracle.com (pooja chopra) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 23:03:26 +0530 Subject: [8u60] Request for Approval : JDK- 8078082 Fix for [TEST_BUG] java/awt/SplashScreen/MultiResolutionSplash/MultiResolutionSplashTest.java fails Message-ID: <553689E6.2050206@oracle.com> Hi, Please approve backport of JDK-8078082 to 8u60. Bug:https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8078082 Webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pchopra/8078082/webrev.00/ Review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2015-April/009282.html Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/6c320b2d9138 The patch applies cleanly to 8u60. Thanks, Pooja From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Tue Apr 21 17:42:17 2015 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 18:42:17 +0100 Subject: [8u60] Request for Approval : JDK- 8078082 Fix for [TEST_BUG] java/awt/SplashScreen/MultiResolutionSplash/MultiResolutionSplashTest.java fails In-Reply-To: <553689E6.2050206@oracle.com> References: <553689E6.2050206@oracle.com> Message-ID: <55368BF9.9010200@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 21/04/15 18:33, pooja chopra wrote: > Hi, > > Please approve backport of JDK-8078082 to 8u60. > > Bug:https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8078082 > Webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pchopra/8078082/webrev.00/ > Review thread: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2015-April/009282.html > Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/6c320b2d9138 > > The patch applies cleanly to 8u60. > > Thanks, > Pooja > From aleksej.efimov at oracle.com Tue Apr 21 19:26:24 2015 From: aleksej.efimov at oracle.com (Aleksej Efimov) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 23:26:24 +0400 Subject: CFV: New JDK 8u Committer: Alexey Ivanov In-Reply-To: <55367B7F.6080203@oracle.com> References: <55367B7F.6080203@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5536A460.60802@oracle.com> Vote: Yes On 21.04.2015 20:31, Alexander Potochkin wrote: > I hereby nominate Alexey Ivanov to jdk8u Committer. > > Alexey is a member of the Java SE sustaining team. > He has spent most of that time working on the GUI and deployment issues. > > Alexey contributed 10 changes to JDK8u so far: > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/790008bce87d > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/70259911e6b3 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/202d1d06b2c1 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/88e71be7cc40 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/9376d1440257 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/648255c99e84 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/6e1c85a0b6cf > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/655876e27e00 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/08fa623138dc > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/rev/128be758b4ef > > Votes are due by 5th May 2015 > > Only current JDK 8u Committers [1] are eligible to vote on this > nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this > mailing list. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. > > Thanks > alexp > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote From artem.ananiev at oracle.com Tue Apr 21 20:27:56 2015 From: artem.ananiev at oracle.com (Artem Ananiev) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 13:27:56 -0700 Subject: CFV: New JDK 8u Committer: Alexey Ivanov In-Reply-To: <55367B7F.6080203@oracle.com> References: <55367B7F.6080203@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5536B2CC.9030801@oracle.com> Vote: yes Artem On 04/21/15 9:31 AM, Alexander Potochkin wrote: > I hereby nominate Alexey Ivanov to jdk8u Committer. > > Alexey is a member of the Java SE sustaining team. > He has spent most of that time working on the GUI and deployment issues. > > Alexey contributed 10 changes to JDK8u so far: > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/790008bce87d > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/70259911e6b3 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/202d1d06b2c1 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/88e71be7cc40 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/9376d1440257 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/648255c99e84 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/6e1c85a0b6cf > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/655876e27e00 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/08fa623138dc > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/rev/128be758b4ef > > Votes are due by 5th May 2015 > > Only current JDK 8u Committers [1] are eligible to vote on this > nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing > list. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. > > Thanks > alexp > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote From yuri.nesterenko at oracle.com Wed Apr 22 07:46:49 2015 From: yuri.nesterenko at oracle.com (Yuri Nesterenko) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 10:46:49 +0300 Subject: CFV: New JDK 8u Committer: Alexey Ivanov In-Reply-To: <55367B7F.6080203@oracle.com> References: <55367B7F.6080203@oracle.com> Message-ID: <553751E9.7020206@oracle.com> Vote: yes -yan On 04/21/2015 07:31 PM, Alexander Potochkin wrote: > I hereby nominate Alexey Ivanov to jdk8u Committer. > > Alexey is a member of the Java SE sustaining team. > He has spent most of that time working on the GUI and deployment issues. > > Alexey contributed 10 changes to JDK8u so far: > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/790008bce87d > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/70259911e6b3 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/202d1d06b2c1 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/88e71be7cc40 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/9376d1440257 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/648255c99e84 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/6e1c85a0b6cf > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/655876e27e00 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/08fa623138dc > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/rev/128be758b4ef > > Votes are due by 5th May 2015 > > Only current JDK 8u Committers [1] are eligible to vote on this > nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing > list. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. > > Thanks > alexp > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote From dmitry.markov at oracle.com Wed Apr 22 08:29:13 2015 From: dmitry.markov at oracle.com (dmitry markov) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 11:29:13 +0300 Subject: CFV: New JDK 8u Committer: Alexey Ivanov In-Reply-To: <55367B7F.6080203@oracle.com> References: <55367B7F.6080203@oracle.com> Message-ID: <55375BD9.3040401@oracle.com> Vote: yes Thanks, Dmitry On 21/04/2015 19:31, Alexander Potochkin wrote: > I hereby nominate Alexey Ivanov to jdk8u Committer. > > Alexey is a member of the Java SE sustaining team. > He has spent most of that time working on the GUI and deployment issues. > > Alexey contributed 10 changes to JDK8u so far: > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/790008bce87d > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/70259911e6b3 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/202d1d06b2c1 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/88e71be7cc40 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/9376d1440257 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/648255c99e84 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/6e1c85a0b6cf > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/655876e27e00 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/08fa623138dc > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/rev/128be758b4ef > > Votes are due by 5th May 2015 > > Only current JDK 8u Committers [1] are eligible to vote on this > nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this > mailing list. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. > > Thanks > alexp > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote From anton.litvinov at oracle.com Wed Apr 22 10:00:18 2015 From: anton.litvinov at oracle.com (Anton Litvinov) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 13:00:18 +0300 Subject: CFV: New JDK 8u Committer: Alexey Ivanov In-Reply-To: <55367B7F.6080203@oracle.com> References: <55367B7F.6080203@oracle.com> Message-ID: <55377132.7060807@oracle.com> Vote: yes Thank you, Anton On 4/21/2015 7:31 PM, Alexander Potochkin wrote: > I hereby nominate Alexey Ivanov to jdk8u Committer. > > Alexey is a member of the Java SE sustaining team. > He has spent most of that time working on the GUI and deployment issues. > > Alexey contributed 10 changes to JDK8u so far: > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/790008bce87d > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/70259911e6b3 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/202d1d06b2c1 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/88e71be7cc40 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/9376d1440257 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/648255c99e84 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/6e1c85a0b6cf > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/655876e27e00 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/08fa623138dc > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/rev/128be758b4ef > > Votes are due by 5th May 2015 > > Only current JDK 8u Committers [1] are eligible to vote on this > nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this > mailing list. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. > > Thanks > alexp > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote From aleksej.efimov at oracle.com Wed Apr 22 14:12:46 2015 From: aleksej.efimov at oracle.com (Aleksej Efimov) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:12:46 +0300 Subject: [8u60] Request for approval: 8073357: schema1.xsd has wrong content. Sequence of the enum values has been changed Message-ID: <5537AC5E.5090507@oracle.com> Hello, Can I ask for approval of the JDK-8073357 [2] bug fix [1] to JDK8. The original fix contains only test modifications, but the jaxws part was introduced during JAXWS synchronization [3] in JDK9. The schemagen changes [4] related to the reported failure were backported from JDK9. This partial (ApNavigator.java changes) backport applies cleanly after reshuffling. Test fix backport applies cleanly. JDK build with proposed changes shows no related tests failures with JPRT (jdk_other test group). In case, if it is a subject of review - adding 'core-libs-dev'. Thank you, Aleksej JDK9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/2dcdce98a176 JDK9 review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2015-April/032931.html JAXWS integration changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jaxws/rev/f31835b59035 [1] Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/8073357/8/00/ [2] JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8073357 [3] JAXWS sync bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8076549 [4] Backported changes: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/8073357/8/00/jaxws/src/share/jaxws_classes/com/sun/tools/internal/jxc/model/nav/ApNavigator.java.patch From ivan.gerasimov at oracle.com Wed Apr 22 14:53:58 2015 From: ivan.gerasimov at oracle.com (Ivan Gerasimov) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:53:58 +0300 Subject: CFV: New JDK 8u Committer: Alexey Ivanov In-Reply-To: <55367B7F.6080203@oracle.com> References: <55367B7F.6080203@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5537B606.7040304@oracle.com> Vote: yes On 21.04.2015 19:31, Alexander Potochkin wrote: > I hereby nominate Alexey Ivanov to jdk8u Committer. > > Alexey is a member of the Java SE sustaining team. > He has spent most of that time working on the GUI and deployment issues. > > Alexey contributed 10 changes to JDK8u so far: > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/790008bce87d > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/70259911e6b3 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/202d1d06b2c1 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/88e71be7cc40 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/9376d1440257 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/648255c99e84 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/6e1c85a0b6cf > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/655876e27e00 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/08fa623138dc > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/rev/128be758b4ef > > Votes are due by 5th May 2015 > > Only current JDK 8u Committers [1] are eligible to vote on this > nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this > mailing list. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. > > Thanks > alexp > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote > > From ivan.gerasimov at oracle.com Wed Apr 22 14:58:24 2015 From: ivan.gerasimov at oracle.com (Ivan Gerasimov) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:58:24 +0300 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for Approval to Backport: 8078348: sun/security/pkcs11/sslecc/ClientJSSEServerJSSE.java fails with BindException Message-ID: <5537B710.5060504@oracle.com> Hi! I'd like to backport this test fix. The patch applies cleanly. Would you please approve it? Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8078348 Jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/d69f84c37474 Review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2015-April/012026.html Sincerely yours, Ivan From weijun.wang at oracle.com Wed Apr 22 15:40:16 2015 From: weijun.wang at oracle.com (Weijun Wang) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 23:40:16 +0800 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval: 8075575/8075576: 2 com/sun/security/auth tests failed in certain env In-Reply-To: <53187EAE-1A44-47E8-8001-E10D2E91AFC8@oracle.com> References: <53187EAE-1A44-47E8-8001-E10D2E91AFC8@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5537C0E0.3050402@oracle.com> Hi All This is a request to backport a jdk9 fix into jdk8u-dev which covers two bugs. 8075575: com/sun/security/auth/login/ConfigFile/InconsistentError.java failed in certain env. 8075576: com/sun/security/auth/module/KeyStoreLoginModule/OptionTest.java failed in certain env. The tests check for certain English text in the output, and cannot find if running in another locale. Tests now forced running in English. The fix is already included in jdk9 as a single changeset at: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/74d3a9e3d076 It was reviewed at http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2015-April/012016.html The patch for jdk8u-dev is identical to the one in jdk9. The fix is test-only. Thanks Weijun From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Apr 22 16:08:44 2015 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 09:08:44 -0700 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for Approval to Backport: 8078348: sun/security/pkcs11/sslecc/ClientJSSEServerJSSE.java fails with BindException In-Reply-To: <5537B710.5060504@oracle.com> References: <5537B710.5060504@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5537C78C.6020803@oracle.com> Approved. Regards, Sean. On 22/04/15 07:58, Ivan Gerasimov wrote: > Hi! > > I'd like to backport this test fix. > The patch applies cleanly. > > Would you please approve it? > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8078348 > Jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/d69f84c37474 > Review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2015-April/012026.html > > Sincerely yours, > Ivan From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Apr 22 16:09:19 2015 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?windows-1252?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 09:09:19 -0700 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval: 8075575/8075576: 2 com/sun/security/auth tests failed in certain env In-Reply-To: <5537C0E0.3050402@oracle.com> References: <53187EAE-1A44-47E8-8001-E10D2E91AFC8@oracle.com> <5537C0E0.3050402@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5537C7AF.70907@oracle.com> Approved. Regards, Sean. On 22/04/15 08:40, Weijun Wang wrote: > Hi All > > This is a request to backport a jdk9 fix into jdk8u-dev which covers > two bugs. > > 8075575: > com/sun/security/auth/login/ConfigFile/InconsistentError.java failed > in certain env. > 8075576: > com/sun/security/auth/module/KeyStoreLoginModule/OptionTest.java > failed in certain env. > > The tests check for certain English text in the output, and cannot > find if running in another locale. Tests now forced running in English. > > The fix is already included in jdk9 as a single changeset at: > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/74d3a9e3d076 > > It was reviewed at > > > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2015-April/012016.html > > > The patch for jdk8u-dev is identical to the one in jdk9. > > The fix is test-only. > > Thanks > Weijun > From daniel.jones at engineerbetter.com Wed Apr 22 12:10:51 2015 From: daniel.jones at engineerbetter.com (Daniel Jones) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 13:10:51 +0100 Subject: Kerberos Bug Introduced in d777e2918a77? Message-ID: Hi all, Apologies if this is the wrong mailing list - please direct me to the correct one if so. I believe I've found a bug in OpenJDK 1.8.0_40, introduced in commit d777e2918a77: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u40/jdk/file/d777e2918a77/src/share/classes/sun/security/jgss/spnego/SpNegoContext.java The change introduced on line 548 means that an authentication mechanism is only accepted if the OID of the mechanism desired is the *first* in the list of mechanisms specified as acceptable in the incoming ticket. In the case of my current client their service tickets are specifying 4 acceptable mechanism OIDs, but the only available mechanism's OID appears second on that list. So whilst the server *can *satisfy the ticket, the code change on line 548 prevents this from happening. Using the same server code, the same Kerberos KDC, and OpenJDK 1.8.0_31, everything works. Changing only the JDK results in the mechContext not being properly populated, which in turn causes a NullPointerException from some Spring Security Kerberos code. Has anyone else experienced this? -- Regards, Daniel Jones EngineerBetter.com From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Wed Apr 22 16:21:22 2015 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:21:22 +0100 Subject: Kerberos Bug Introduced in d777e2918a77? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5537CA82.1060107@oracle.com> Hi Daniel, Thanks for the report, I'm cc'ing the security-dev alias. -Rob On 22/04/15 13:10, Daniel Jones wrote: > Hi all, > > Apologies if this is the wrong mailing list - please direct me to the > correct one if so. > > I believe I've found a bug in OpenJDK 1.8.0_40, introduced in commit > d777e2918a77: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u40/jdk/file/d777e2918a77/src/share/classes/sun/security/jgss/spnego/SpNegoContext.java > > The change introduced on line 548 means that an authentication mechanism is > only accepted if the OID of the mechanism desired is the *first* in the > list of mechanisms specified as acceptable in the incoming ticket. > > In the case of my current client their service tickets are specifying 4 > acceptable mechanism OIDs, but the only available mechanism's OID appears > second on that list. So whilst the server *can *satisfy the ticket, the > code change on line 548 prevents this from happening. > > Using the same server code, the same Kerberos KDC, and OpenJDK 1.8.0_31, > everything works. Changing only the JDK results in the mechContext not > being properly populated, which in turn causes a NullPointerException from > some Spring Security Kerberos code. > > Has anyone else experienced this? > > From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Apr 22 16:27:47 2015 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 09:27:47 -0700 Subject: Kerberos Bug Introduced in d777e2918a77? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5537CC03.9000802@oracle.com> Daniel, thanks for the report. It might be best to report this issue via http://bugreport.java.com/ Your report will be triaged there. You could also mail the security-dev at openjdk.java.net list which has a more suitable audience for such reports. Regards, Sean. On 22/04/15 05:10, Daniel Jones wrote: > Hi all, > > Apologies if this is the wrong mailing list - please direct me to the > correct one if so. > > I believe I've found a bug in OpenJDK 1.8.0_40, introduced in commit > d777e2918a77: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u40/jdk/file/d777e2918a77/src/share/classes/sun/security/jgss/spnego/SpNegoContext.java > > The change introduced on line 548 means that an authentication mechanism is > only accepted if the OID of the mechanism desired is the *first* in the > list of mechanisms specified as acceptable in the incoming ticket. > > In the case of my current client their service tickets are specifying 4 > acceptable mechanism OIDs, but the only available mechanism's OID appears > second on that list. So whilst the server *can *satisfy the ticket, the > code change on line 548 prevents this from happening. > > Using the same server code, the same Kerberos KDC, and OpenJDK 1.8.0_31, > everything works. Changing only the JDK results in the mechContext not > being properly populated, which in turn causes a NullPointerException from > some Spring Security Kerberos code. > > Has anyone else experienced this? > > From sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com Wed Apr 22 16:52:39 2015 From: sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com (A. Sundararajan) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 22:22:39 +0530 Subject: [8u60] approval request for 8078384:Test execution blocker: Nashorn testsuite failing due to compile error in jdk/nashorn/api/scripting/test/ScriptEngineTest.java Message-ID: <5537D1D7.10607@oracle.com> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8078384 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8078384/ Not a backport. Taking care of an issue caused by a recent merge. Removing duplicated code in a test. CC'ing nashorn team. Thanks, -Sundar From sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com Wed Apr 22 16:53:18 2015 From: sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com (A. Sundararajan) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 22:23:18 +0530 Subject: [8u60] approval request for 8078384:Test execution blocker: Nashorn testsuite failing due to compile error in jdk/nashorn/api/scripting/test/ScriptEngineTest.java In-Reply-To: <5537D1D7.10607@oracle.com> References: <5537D1D7.10607@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5537D1FE.7050905@oracle.com> On Wednesday 22 April 2015 10:22 PM, A. Sundararajan wrote: > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8078384 > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8078384/ > > Not a backport. Taking care of an issue caused by a recent merge. > Removing duplicated code in a test. CC'ing nashorn team. > > Thanks, > -Sundar From hannes.wallnoefer at oracle.com Wed Apr 22 17:06:43 2015 From: hannes.wallnoefer at oracle.com (Hannes Wallnoefer) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 19:06:43 +0200 Subject: [8u60] approval request for 8078384:Test execution blocker: Nashorn testsuite failing due to compile error in jdk/nashorn/api/scripting/test/ScriptEngineTest.java In-Reply-To: <5537D1D7.10607@oracle.com> References: <5537D1D7.10607@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5537D523.3080607@oracle.com> +1 Am 2015-04-22 um 18:52 schrieb A. Sundararajan: > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8078384 > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8078384/ > > Not a backport. Taking care of an issue caused by a recent merge. > Removing duplicated code in a test. CC'ing nashorn team. > > Thanks, > -Sundar From james.laskey at oracle.com Wed Apr 22 17:09:58 2015 From: james.laskey at oracle.com (Jim Laskey (Oracle)) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 14:09:58 -0300 Subject: [8u60] approval request for 8078384:Test execution blocker: Nashorn testsuite failing due to compile error in jdk/nashorn/api/scripting/test/ScriptEngineTest.java In-Reply-To: <5537D1D7.10607@oracle.com> References: <5537D1D7.10607@oracle.com> Message-ID: +1 > On Apr 22, 2015, at 1:52 PM, A. Sundararajan wrote: > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8078384 > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8078384/ > > Not a backport. Taking care of an issue caused by a recent merge. Removing duplicated code in a test. CC'ing nashorn team. > > Thanks, > -Sundar From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Wed Apr 22 17:15:06 2015 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 18:15:06 +0100 Subject: [8u60] approval request for 8078384:Test execution blocker: Nashorn testsuite failing due to compile error in jdk/nashorn/api/scripting/test/ScriptEngineTest.java In-Reply-To: References: <5537D1D7.10607@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5537D71A.5080902@oracle.com> Approved for push. -Rob On 22/04/15 18:09, Jim Laskey (Oracle) wrote: > +1 > >> On Apr 22, 2015, at 1:52 PM, A. Sundararajan wrote: >> >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8078384 >> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8078384/ >> >> Not a backport. Taking care of an issue caused by a recent merge. Removing duplicated code in a test. CC'ing nashorn team. >> >> Thanks, >> -Sundar From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Apr 22 17:29:40 2015 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 10:29:40 -0700 Subject: [8u60] Request for approval: 8073357: schema1.xsd has wrong content. Sequence of the enum values has been changed In-Reply-To: <5537AC5E.5090507@oracle.com> References: <5537AC5E.5090507@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5537DA84.3070004@oracle.com> Approved. Please get a peer review before pushing the changes. Regards, Sean. On 22/04/15 07:12, Aleksej Efimov wrote: > Hello, > > Can I ask for approval of the JDK-8073357 [2] bug fix [1] to JDK8. The > original fix contains only test modifications, but the jaxws part was > introduced during JAXWS synchronization [3] in JDK9. The schemagen > changes [4] related to the reported failure were backported from JDK9. > This partial (ApNavigator.java changes) backport applies cleanly after > reshuffling. Test fix backport applies cleanly. > JDK build with proposed changes shows no related tests failures with > JPRT (jdk_other test group). > > In case, if it is a subject of review - adding 'core-libs-dev'. > > Thank you, > Aleksej > > JDK9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/2dcdce98a176 > JDK9 review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2015-April/032931.html > > JAXWS integration changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jaxws/rev/f31835b59035 > > [1] Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/8073357/8/00/ > [2] JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8073357 > [3] JAXWS sync bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8076549 > [4] Backported changes: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/8073357/8/00/jaxws/src/share/jaxws_classes/com/sun/tools/internal/jxc/model/nav/ApNavigator.java.patch > From deejay at binarytweed.com Wed Apr 22 18:39:58 2015 From: deejay at binarytweed.com (Daniel Jones) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 19:39:58 +0100 Subject: Kerberos Bug Introduced in d777e2918a77? In-Reply-To: <5537CC03.9000802@oracle.com> References: <5537CC03.9000802@oracle.com> Message-ID: Thanks for the reply. I've raised it as a bug through the online form, but sadly because of the nature of the bug I couldn't provide a repeatable test in a reasonable amount of time. Do you think it will still get taken seriously? Thanks again. On 22 Apr 2015 17:27, "Se?n Coffey" wrote: > Daniel, > > thanks for the report. It might be best to report this issue via > http://bugreport.java.com/ > Your report will be triaged there. You could also mail the > security-dev at openjdk.java.net list which has a more suitable audience for > such reports. > > Regards, > Sean. > > On 22/04/15 05:10, Daniel Jones wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Apologies if this is the wrong mailing list - please direct me to the >> correct one if so. >> >> I believe I've found a bug in OpenJDK 1.8.0_40, introduced in commit >> d777e2918a77: >> >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u40/jdk/file/d777e2918a77/src/share/classes/sun/security/jgss/spnego/SpNegoContext.java >> >> The change introduced on line 548 means that an authentication mechanism >> is >> only accepted if the OID of the mechanism desired is the *first* in the >> list of mechanisms specified as acceptable in the incoming ticket. >> >> In the case of my current client their service tickets are specifying 4 >> acceptable mechanism OIDs, but the only available mechanism's OID appears >> second on that list. So whilst the server *can *satisfy the ticket, the >> code change on line 548 prevents this from happening. >> >> Using the same server code, the same Kerberos KDC, and OpenJDK 1.8.0_31, >> everything works. Changing only the JDK results in the mechContext not >> being properly populated, which in turn causes a NullPointerException from >> some Spring Security Kerberos code. >> >> Has anyone else experienced this? >> >> >> > From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Apr 22 18:51:33 2015 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 11:51:33 -0700 Subject: Kerberos Bug Introduced in d777e2918a77? In-Reply-To: References: <5537CC03.9000802@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5537EDB5.4090108@oracle.com> Thanks for following through on logging this issue Daniel. I think you've sufficient information in the report to allow it to be evaluated. It's in the security team's queue at https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8078439 Regards, Sean. On 22/04/15 11:39, Daniel Jones wrote: > > Thanks for the reply. > > I've raised it as a bug through the online form, but sadly because of > the nature of the bug I couldn't provide a repeatable test in a > reasonable amount of time. Do you think it will still get taken seriously? > > Thanks again. > > On 22 Apr 2015 17:27, "Se?n Coffey" > wrote: > > Daniel, > > thanks for the report. It might be best to report this issue via > http://bugreport.java.com/ > Your report will be triaged there. You could also mail the > security-dev at openjdk.java.net > list which has a more > suitable audience for such reports. > > Regards, > Sean. > > On 22/04/15 05:10, Daniel Jones wrote: > > Hi all, > > Apologies if this is the wrong mailing list - please direct me > to the > correct one if so. > > I believe I've found a bug in OpenJDK 1.8.0_40, introduced in > commit > d777e2918a77: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u40/jdk/file/d777e2918a77/src/share/classes/sun/security/jgss/spnego/SpNegoContext.java > > The change introduced on line 548 means that an authentication > mechanism is > only accepted if the OID of the mechanism desired is the > *first* in the > list of mechanisms specified as acceptable in the incoming ticket. > > In the case of my current client their service tickets are > specifying 4 > acceptable mechanism OIDs, but the only available mechanism's > OID appears > second on that list. So whilst the server *can *satisfy the > ticket, the > code change on line 548 prevents this from happening. > > Using the same server code, the same Kerberos KDC, and OpenJDK > 1.8.0_31, > everything works. Changing only the JDK results in the > mechContext not > being properly populated, which in turn causes a > NullPointerException from > some Spring Security Kerberos code. > > Has anyone else experienced this? > > > From jan.lahoda at oracle.com Wed Apr 22 19:43:30 2015 From: jan.lahoda at oracle.com (Jan Lahoda) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 21:43:30 +0200 Subject: [8u-dev] request for approval to backport JDK-8061778: Wrong LineNumberTable for default constructors In-Reply-To: <54DD181C.30206@oracle.com> References: <54DD181C.30206@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5537F9E2.7050600@oracle.com> Hello, I'd like to ask for an approval to backport the following fix to 8u-dev: Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8061778 Backport bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8077258 jdk9 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/2e654dfe862e The fix applies cleanly to 8u-dev/langtools after unshuffling. Thanks, Jan From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Apr 22 20:03:47 2015 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?windows-1252?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 13:03:47 -0700 Subject: [8u-dev] request for approval to backport JDK-8061778: Wrong LineNumberTable for default constructors In-Reply-To: <5537F9E2.7050600@oracle.com> References: <54DD181C.30206@oracle.com> <5537F9E2.7050600@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5537FEA3.4060007@oracle.com> Approved. Regards, Sean. On 22/04/15 12:43, Jan Lahoda wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to ask for an approval to backport the following fix to 8u-dev: > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8061778 > Backport bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8077258 > jdk9 fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/2e654dfe862e > > The fix applies cleanly to 8u-dev/langtools after unshuffling. > > Thanks, > Jan From anton.nashatyrev at oracle.com Thu Apr 23 14:36:11 2015 From: anton.nashatyrev at oracle.com (Anton Nashatyrev) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 17:36:11 +0300 Subject: [8u-dev] Backport request: 8078165: [macosx] NPE when attempting to get image from toolkit Message-ID: <5539035B.1070707@oracle.com> Hello, please approve the fix backport from jdk9 to jdk8u-dev. The patch was applied without any modifications. Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8078165 Jdk9 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/78a67d83381b Jdk9 Review Thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2015-April/009290.html Thanks! Anton. From vladimir.kempik at oracle.com Thu Apr 23 14:39:13 2015 From: vladimir.kempik at oracle.com (Vladimir Kempik) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 17:39:13 +0300 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval: 8075331: jdb eval java.util.Arrays.asList(array) shows inconsistent behaviour Message-ID: <55390411.7090003@oracle.com> Hello, Please approve this backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. The patch applies cleanly to jdk8. The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8075331 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vkempik/8075331/webrev.00/ The review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2015-April/017070.html The jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs-rt/jdk/rev/8793c8f29390 Thanks, Vladimir From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Thu Apr 23 14:53:51 2015 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:53:51 +0100 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval: 8075331: jdb eval java.util.Arrays.asList(array) shows inconsistent behaviour In-Reply-To: <55390411.7090003@oracle.com> References: <55390411.7090003@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5539077F.1050005@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 23/04/15 15:39, Vladimir Kempik wrote: > Hello, > > Please approve this backport of the fix to jdk8u-dev. > > The patch applies cleanly to jdk8. > > The bug: > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8075331 > > Webrev: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vkempik/8075331/webrev.00/ > > The review thread: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2015-April/017070.html > > > The jdk9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs-rt/jdk/rev/8793c8f29390 > > > Thanks, > Vladimir > From sgehwolf at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 14:57:21 2015 From: sgehwolf at redhat.com (Severin Gehwolf) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 16:57:21 +0200 Subject: [8u60] Backport request: 6991580: IPv6 Nameservers in resolv.conf throws NumberFormatException Message-ID: <1429801041.3437.20.camel@redhat.com> Hi, Could you please approve the following backport request to jdk8u from 9? I'd also need to a sponsor to push the change once approved. Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6991580 Relevant JDK 9 changesets: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/4be070b8aaba http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/8000249dcb2a JDK 9 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2015-April/032913.html Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-6991580/webrev.jdk8u.01/ The proposed webrev is merely a combination of the two 9 changesets (i.e. includes the rename of the test already) + fixed copyright header as suggested by: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2015-April/032969.html Thanks, Severin From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Thu Apr 23 15:08:30 2015 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 16:08:30 +0100 Subject: [8u60] Backport request: 6991580: IPv6 Nameservers in resolv.conf throws NumberFormatException In-Reply-To: <1429801041.3437.20.camel@redhat.com> References: <1429801041.3437.20.camel@redhat.com> Message-ID: <55390AEE.5090504@oracle.com> Approved. I can get this pushed early next week. -Rob On 23/04/15 15:57, Severin Gehwolf wrote: > Hi, > > Could you please approve the following backport request to jdk8u from 9? > I'd also need to a sponsor to push the change once approved. > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6991580 > > Relevant JDK 9 changesets: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/4be070b8aaba > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/8000249dcb2a > JDK 9 review thread: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2015-April/032913.html > > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-6991580/webrev.jdk8u.01/ > > The proposed webrev is merely a combination of the two 9 changesets > (i.e. includes the rename of the test already) + fixed copyright header > as suggested by: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2015-April/032969.html > > Thanks, > Severin > From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Thu Apr 23 15:37:40 2015 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 16:37:40 +0100 Subject: [8u-dev] Backport request: 8078165: [macosx] NPE when attempting to get image from toolkit In-Reply-To: <5539035B.1070707@oracle.com> References: <5539035B.1070707@oracle.com> Message-ID: <553911C4.2040207@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 23/04/15 15:36, Anton Nashatyrev wrote: > Hello, > > please approve the fix backport from jdk9 to jdk8u-dev. The patch > was applied without any modifications. > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8078165 > Jdk9 Changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/78a67d83381b > Jdk9 Review Thread: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2015-April/009290.html > > Thanks! > Anton. From sgehwolf at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 15:43:49 2015 From: sgehwolf at redhat.com (Severin Gehwolf) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 17:43:49 +0200 Subject: [8u60] Backport request: 6991580: IPv6 Nameservers in resolv.conf throws NumberFormatException In-Reply-To: <55390AEE.5090504@oracle.com> References: <1429801041.3437.20.camel@redhat.com> <55390AEE.5090504@oracle.com> Message-ID: <1429803829.3437.21.camel@redhat.com> On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 16:08 +0100, Rob McKenna wrote: > Approved. I can get this pushed early next week. > > -Rob Thank you, Rob! Much appreciated. Cheers, Severin > On 23/04/15 15:57, Severin Gehwolf wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Could you please approve the following backport request to jdk8u from 9? > > I'd also need to a sponsor to push the change once approved. > > > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6991580 > > > > Relevant JDK 9 changesets: > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/4be070b8aaba > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/8000249dcb2a > > JDK 9 review thread: > > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2015-April/032913.html > > > > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-6991580/webrev.jdk8u.01/ > > > > The proposed webrev is merely a combination of the two 9 changesets > > (i.e. includes the rename of the test already) + fixed copyright header > > as suggested by: > > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2015-April/032969.html > > > > Thanks, > > Severin > > > From huizhe.wang at oracle.com Thu Apr 23 18:46:05 2015 From: huizhe.wang at oracle.com (huizhe wang) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 11:46:05 -0700 Subject: [8u60] Request for approval: 8073357: schema1.xsd has wrong content. Sequence of the enum values has been changed In-Reply-To: <5537AC5E.5090507@oracle.com> References: <5537AC5E.5090507@oracle.com> Message-ID: <55393DED.2000501@oracle.com> Hi Aleksej, The backport looks fine to me. Best, Joe On 4/22/2015 7:12 AM, Aleksej Efimov wrote: > Hello, > > Can I ask for approval of the JDK-8073357 [2] bug fix [1] to JDK8. The > original fix contains only test modifications, but the jaxws part was > introduced during JAXWS synchronization [3] in JDK9. The schemagen > changes [4] related to the reported failure were backported from JDK9. > This partial (ApNavigator.java changes) backport applies cleanly after > reshuffling. Test fix backport applies cleanly. > JDK build with proposed changes shows no related tests failures with > JPRT (jdk_other test group). > > In case, if it is a subject of review - adding 'core-libs-dev'. > > Thank you, > Aleksej > > JDK9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/2dcdce98a176 > JDK9 review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2015-April/032931.html > > JAXWS integration changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jaxws/rev/f31835b59035 > > [1] Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/8073357/8/00/ > [2] JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8073357 > [3] JAXWS sync bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8076549 > [4] Backported changes: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/8073357/8/00/jaxws/src/share/jaxws_classes/com/sun/tools/internal/jxc/model/nav/ApNavigator.java.patch > From david.holmes at oracle.com Fri Apr 24 02:00:40 2015 From: david.holmes at oracle.com (David Holmes) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 12:00:40 +1000 Subject: [8u60] Request for approval for 8050825 - Support running regression tests using jtreg_tests+TESTDIRS from top level Message-ID: <5539A3C8.1050709@oracle.com> Please approve this backport to 8u60, the patch from 9 applied cleanly. Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8050825 JDK 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/rev/de68e6f9139a Original review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-July/027791.html Thanks, David From sean.coffey at oracle.com Fri Apr 24 02:29:34 2015 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 19:29:34 -0700 Subject: [8u60] Request for approval for 8050825 - Support running regression tests using jtreg_tests+TESTDIRS from top level In-Reply-To: <5539A3C8.1050709@oracle.com> References: <5539A3C8.1050709@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5539AA8E.6010807@oracle.com> Approved. Regards, Sean. On 23/04/15 19:00, David Holmes wrote: > Please approve this backport to 8u60, the patch from 9 applied cleanly. > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8050825 > JDK 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/rev/de68e6f9139a > Original review thread: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-July/027791.html > > Thanks, > David From jaroslav.bachorik at oracle.com Fri Apr 24 11:41:48 2015 From: jaroslav.bachorik at oracle.com (Jaroslav Bachorik) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 13:41:48 +0200 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval for CR 8077953 - [TEST_BUG] com/sun/management/OperatingSystemMXBean/TestTotalSwap.java Compilation Message-ID: <553A2BFC.1070300@oracle.com> Please approve this JDK8 only fix aimed at resolving compilation problem introduced while backporting https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8077387. Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8077953 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8077953/webrev.00 Review discussion: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2015-April/017176.html Reviewed-by: sla Thanks, -JB- From Sergey.Bylokhov at oracle.com Fri Apr 24 12:45:31 2015 From: Sergey.Bylokhov at oracle.com (Sergey Bylokhov) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 15:45:31 +0300 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval: 4952954 4958064 6338077 6459798 6459800 6470361 6475361 6515713 6573305 7077826 7180976 8015085 8043393 8066132 8067657 8068412 8073559 8073795 8074500 8076214 8077394 Message-ID: <553A3AEB.7010102@oracle.com> Hello, These are a direct back ports from jdk 9 to jdk 8u-dev. 4952954: abort flag is not cleared for every write operation for JPEG ImageWriter Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-4952954 Webrev can be found at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/4952954/webrev.00 jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/d2efec047c8f Review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2015-February/005047.html Reviewers: Andrew Brygin, Phil Race 4958064: JPGWriter does not throw UnsupportedException when canWriteSequence retuns false Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-4958064 Webrev can be found at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/4958064/webrev%2c01 jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/1f68e092bd7f Review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2015-February/005055.html Reviewers: Phil Race, Andrew Brygin 6338077: link back to self in javadoc JTextArea.replaceRange() Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6338077 Webrev can be found at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/6338077/webrev.00 jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/68a57d6f8c37 Review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2015-January/004115.html Reviewers: Alexander Zvegintsev, Alexander Scherbatiy 6459798: JDesktopPane,JFileChooser violate encapsulation by returning internal Dimensions Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6459798 Webrev can be found at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/6459798/webrev.01 jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/c03007d8ceae Review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2015-January/004134.html Reviewers: Alexander Zvegintsev, Alexander Scherbatiy 6459800: Some Swing classes violate encapsulation by returning internal Insets Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6459800 Webrev can be found at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/6459800/webrev.00 jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/2b0fb4476f32 Review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2015-January/004119.html Reviewers: Alexander Zvegintsev, Alexander Scherbatiy 6470361: Swing's Threading Policy example does not compile Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6470361 Webrev can be found at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/6470361/webrev.01 jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/c95f16cc31bb Review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2014-December/004074.html Reviewers: Alexander Zvegintsev, Alexander Scherbatiy 6475361: Attempting to remove help menu from java.awt.MenuBar throws NullPointerException Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6475361 Webrev can be found at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/6475361/webrev.00 jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/4990a7990af8 Review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2015-January/008832.html Reviewers: Alexander Zvegintsev, Anton Tarasov 6515713: example in JFormattedTextField API docs instantiates abstract class Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6515713 Webrev can be found at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/6515713/webrev.00/ jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/cf912ee8ae0d Review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2015-January/004131.html Reviewers: Alexander Zvegintsev, Alexander Scherbatiy 6573305: Animated icon is not visible by click on menu Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6573305 Webrev can be found at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/6573305/webrev.00 jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/5ae5de9a10c5 Review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2015-January/004120.html Reviewers: Alexander Zvegintsev, Alexander Scherbatiy 7077826: Unset and empty DISPLAY variable is handled differently by JDK Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7077826 Webrev can be found at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/7077826/webrev.01 jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/e0a52d4987aa Review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2014-December/008747.html Reviewers: Alexander Zvegintsev, Anton Tarasov 7180976: Pending String deadlocks UIDefaults Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7180976 Webrev can be found at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/7180976/webrev.00 jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/c00fa04f9799 Review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2014-December/004097.html Reviewers: Alexander Zvegintsev, Alexander Scherbatiy 8015085: [macosx] Label shortening via " ... " broken when String contains combining diaeresis Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8015085 Webrev can be found at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8015085/webrev.02 jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/9c6583e3a5f4 Review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2015-January/004113.html Reviewers: Alexander Scherbatiy, Alexander Zvegintsev 8043393: NullPointerException and no event received when clipboard data flavor changes Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8043393 Webrev can be found at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8043393/webrev.00 jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/95d83afafcb1 Review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2015-February/008960.html Reviewers: Anton Tarasov, Alexander Zvegintsev 8066132: BufferedImage::getPropertyNames() always returns null Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8066132 Webrev can be found at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8066132/webrev.00 jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/e99158876ffd Review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2015-January/005013.html Reviewers: Phil Race, Jim Graham 8067657: Dead/outdated links in Javadoc of package java.beans Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8067657 Webrev can be found at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8067657/webrev.00/ jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/fa40ff9d941b Review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2014-December/004093.html Reviewers: Alexander Zvegintsev, Phil Race 8068412: [macosx] Initialization of Cocoa hangs if CoreAudio was initialized before Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8068412 Webrev can be found at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8068412/webrev.00 jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/5b2dc78c9536 Review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/sound-dev/2015-February/000254.html Reviewers: Alexander Zvegintsev, Phil Race 8073559: Memory leak in jdk/src/windows/native/sun/windows/awt_InputTextInfor.cpp Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8073559 jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/09891e1424e5 Reviewers: Phil Race, Alexander Zvegintsev 8073795: JMenuBar looks bad under retina Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8073795 Webrev can be found at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8073795/webrev.01 jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/c0d81dd14d61 Review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2015-February/004204.html Reviewers: Alexander Scherbatiy, Alexander Zvegintsev 8074500: java.awt.Checkbox.setState() call causes ItemEvent to be filed Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8074500 Webrev can be found at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8074500/webrev.00 jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/bed862e28b7a Review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2015-March/009098.html Reviewers: Alexander Scherbatiy, Alexander Zvegintsev 8076214: [Findbugs]sun.awt.datatransfer.SunClipboard.checkChange(long[]) may expose internal representation Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8076214 jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/ef3abf8e3443 Reviewers: Alexander Zvegintsev, Alexander Scherbatiy 8077394: Uninitialised memory in jdk/src/java/desktop/unix/native/libfontmanager/X11FontScaler.c Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8077394 jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/a5c091b8bee9 Reviewers: Alexander Zvegintsev, Phil Race From andrew.brygin at oracle.com Fri Apr 24 12:56:02 2015 From: andrew.brygin at oracle.com (Andrew Brygin) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 15:56:02 +0300 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval: 8076455: IME Composition Window is displayed on incorrect position Message-ID: <553A3D62.8000809@oracle.com> Hello, could you please approve a direct backport of the fix for 8076455 to 8u-dev? Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8076455 Webrev: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8076455 jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/0e483e64c1e4 Review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2015-April/009265.html Reviewers: Alexander Zvegintsev, Sergey Bylokhov Thanks, Andrew From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Fri Apr 24 13:36:14 2015 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 14:36:14 +0100 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval for CR 8077953 - [TEST_BUG] com/sun/management/OperatingSystemMXBean/TestTotalSwap.java Compilation In-Reply-To: <553A2BFC.1070300@oracle.com> References: <553A2BFC.1070300@oracle.com> Message-ID: <553A46CE.4050204@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 24/04/15 12:41, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote: > Please approve this JDK8 only fix aimed at resolving compilation > problem introduced while backporting > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8077387. > > Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8077953 > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8077953/webrev.00 > Review discussion: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2015-April/017176.html > Reviewed-by: sla > > Thanks, > > -JB- From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Fri Apr 24 13:41:52 2015 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 14:41:52 +0100 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval: 8076455: IME Composition Window is displayed on incorrect position In-Reply-To: <553A3D62.8000809@oracle.com> References: <553A3D62.8000809@oracle.com> Message-ID: <553A4820.3010408@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 24/04/15 13:56, Andrew Brygin wrote: > Hello, > > could you please approve a direct backport of the fix for 8076455 > to 8u-dev? > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8076455 > Webrev: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8076455 > jdk9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/0e483e64c1e4 > Review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2015-April/009265.html > Reviewers: Alexander Zvegintsev, Sergey Bylokhov > > Thanks, > Andrew From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Fri Apr 24 16:08:31 2015 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 17:08:31 +0100 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval: 4952954 4958064 6338077 6459798 6459800 6470361 6475361 6515713 6573305 7077826 7180976 8015085 8043393 8066132 8067657 8068412 8073559 8073795 8074500 8076214 8077394 In-Reply-To: <553A3AEB.7010102@oracle.com> References: <553A3AEB.7010102@oracle.com> Message-ID: <553A6A7F.5020405@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 24/04/15 13:45, Sergey Bylokhov wrote: > Hello, > These are a direct back ports from jdk 9 to jdk 8u-dev. > > 4952954: abort flag is not cleared for every write operation for JPEG > ImageWriter > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-4952954 > Webrev can be found at: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/4952954/webrev.00 > jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/d2efec047c8f > Review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2015-February/005047.html > Reviewers: Andrew Brygin, Phil Race > > > 4958064: JPGWriter does not throw UnsupportedException when > canWriteSequence retuns false > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-4958064 > Webrev can be found at: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/4958064/webrev%2c01 > jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/1f68e092bd7f > Review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2015-February/005055.html > Reviewers: Phil Race, Andrew Brygin > > > 6338077: link back to self in javadoc JTextArea.replaceRange() > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6338077 > Webrev can be found at: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/6338077/webrev.00 > jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/68a57d6f8c37 > Review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2015-January/004115.html > Reviewers: Alexander Zvegintsev, Alexander Scherbatiy > > > 6459798: JDesktopPane,JFileChooser violate encapsulation by returning > internal Dimensions > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6459798 > Webrev can be found at: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/6459798/webrev.01 > jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/c03007d8ceae > Review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2015-January/004134.html > Reviewers: Alexander Zvegintsev, Alexander Scherbatiy > > > 6459800: Some Swing classes violate encapsulation by returning > internal Insets > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6459800 > Webrev can be found at: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/6459800/webrev.00 > jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/2b0fb4476f32 > Review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2015-January/004119.html > Reviewers: Alexander Zvegintsev, Alexander Scherbatiy > > > 6470361: Swing's Threading Policy example does not compile > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6470361 > Webrev can be found at: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/6470361/webrev.01 > jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/c95f16cc31bb > Review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2014-December/004074.html > Reviewers: Alexander Zvegintsev, Alexander Scherbatiy > > > 6475361: Attempting to remove help menu from java.awt.MenuBar throws > NullPointerException > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6475361 > Webrev can be found at: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/6475361/webrev.00 > jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/4990a7990af8 > Review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2015-January/008832.html > Reviewers: Alexander Zvegintsev, Anton Tarasov > > > 6515713: example in JFormattedTextField API docs instantiates abstract > class > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6515713 > Webrev can be found at: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/6515713/webrev.00/ > jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/cf912ee8ae0d > Review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2015-January/004131.html > Reviewers: Alexander Zvegintsev, Alexander Scherbatiy > > > 6573305: Animated icon is not visible by click on menu > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6573305 > Webrev can be found at: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/6573305/webrev.00 > jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/5ae5de9a10c5 > Review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2015-January/004120.html > Reviewers: Alexander Zvegintsev, Alexander Scherbatiy > > > 7077826: Unset and empty DISPLAY variable is handled differently by JDK > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7077826 > Webrev can be found at: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/7077826/webrev.01 > jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/e0a52d4987aa > Review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2014-December/008747.html > Reviewers: Alexander Zvegintsev, Anton Tarasov > > > 7180976: Pending String deadlocks UIDefaults > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7180976 > Webrev can be found at: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/7180976/webrev.00 > jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/c00fa04f9799 > Review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2014-December/004097.html > Reviewers: Alexander Zvegintsev, Alexander Scherbatiy > > > 8015085: [macosx] Label shortening via " ... " broken when String > contains combining diaeresis > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8015085 > Webrev can be found at: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8015085/webrev.02 > jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/9c6583e3a5f4 > Review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2015-January/004113.html > Reviewers: Alexander Scherbatiy, Alexander Zvegintsev > > > 8043393: NullPointerException and no event received when clipboard > data flavor changes > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8043393 > Webrev can be found at: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8043393/webrev.00 > jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/95d83afafcb1 > Review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2015-February/008960.html > Reviewers: Anton Tarasov, Alexander Zvegintsev > > > 8066132: BufferedImage::getPropertyNames() always returns null > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8066132 > Webrev can be found at: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8066132/webrev.00 > jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/e99158876ffd > Review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2015-January/005013.html > Reviewers: Phil Race, Jim Graham > > > 8067657: Dead/outdated links in Javadoc of package java.beans > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8067657 > Webrev can be found at: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8067657/webrev.00/ > jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/fa40ff9d941b > Review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2014-December/004093.html > Reviewers: Alexander Zvegintsev, Phil Race > > > 8068412: [macosx] Initialization of Cocoa hangs if CoreAudio was > initialized before > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8068412 > Webrev can be found at: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8068412/webrev.00 > jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/5b2dc78c9536 > Review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/sound-dev/2015-February/000254.html > Reviewers: Alexander Zvegintsev, Phil Race > > > 8073559: Memory leak in > jdk/src/windows/native/sun/windows/awt_InputTextInfor.cpp > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8073559 > jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/09891e1424e5 > Reviewers: Phil Race, Alexander Zvegintsev > > > 8073795: JMenuBar looks bad under retina > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8073795 > Webrev can be found at: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8073795/webrev.01 > jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/c0d81dd14d61 > Review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2015-February/004204.html > Reviewers: Alexander Scherbatiy, Alexander Zvegintsev > > > 8074500: java.awt.Checkbox.setState() call causes ItemEvent to be filed > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8074500 > Webrev can be found at: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8074500/webrev.00 > jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/bed862e28b7a > Review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2015-March/009098.html > Reviewers: Alexander Scherbatiy, Alexander Zvegintsev > > > 8076214: > [Findbugs]sun.awt.datatransfer.SunClipboard.checkChange(long[]) may > expose internal representation > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8076214 > jdk9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/ef3abf8e3443 > Reviewers: Alexander Zvegintsev, Alexander Scherbatiy > > > 8077394: Uninitialised memory in > jdk/src/java/desktop/unix/native/libfontmanager/X11FontScaler.c > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8077394 > jdk9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/a5c091b8bee9 > Reviewers: Alexander Zvegintsev, Phil Race > > From cheleswer.sahu at oracle.com Mon Apr 27 11:01:28 2015 From: cheleswer.sahu at oracle.com (cheleswer sahu) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 16:31:28 +0530 Subject: [8u60] request for approval: 8072863: Replace fatal() with vm_exit_during_initialization() when an incorrect class is found on the bootclasspath In-Reply-To: <553E1222.9040500@oracle.com> References: <553E1222.9040500@oracle.com> Message-ID: <553E1708.9090301@oracle.com> Hi! May I please have approval to backport this fix from JDK9 to JDK8. I have built the JDK-8 hotspot and tested already. JDK9 fix applies cleanly to JDK8. As I do not have an account for OPENJDK, David Buck will push the fix into jdk8u/hs-dev/hotspot. BUGURL: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8072863 JDK9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs-rt/hotspot/rev/f47b463a95b8 Review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-runtime-dev/2015-April/014392.html Regards, Cheleswer From sean.coffey at oracle.com Mon Apr 27 12:32:24 2015 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 13:32:24 +0100 Subject: [8u60] request for approval: 8072863: Replace fatal() with vm_exit_during_initialization() when an incorrect class is found on the bootclasspath In-Reply-To: <553E1708.9090301@oracle.com> References: <553E1222.9040500@oracle.com> <553E1708.9090301@oracle.com> Message-ID: <553E2C58.700@oracle.com> Cheleswer, No approval necessary for pushes to the hs-dev team forest. Alejandro will manage that at bulk integration time. Regards, Sean. On 27/04/15 12:01, cheleswer sahu wrote: > Hi! > > May I please have approval to backport this fix from JDK9 to JDK8. I > have built the JDK-8 hotspot and tested already. JDK9 fix applies > cleanly to JDK8. As I do not have an account for OPENJDK, David Buck > will push the fix into jdk8u/hs-dev/hotspot. > > BUGURL: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8072863 > > JDK9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs-rt/hotspot/rev/f47b463a95b8 > > Review thread: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-runtime-dev/2015-April/014392.html > > Regards, > Cheleswer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From hannes.wallnoefer at oracle.com Mon Apr 27 13:25:59 2015 From: hannes.wallnoefer at oracle.com (Hannes Wallnoefer) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 15:25:59 +0200 Subject: [8u60] Request for approval for JDK-8066407 and JDK-8053905 Message-ID: <553E38E7.3070806@oracle.com> Please approve backport of JDK-8066407 and JDK-8053905 to 8u60: Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8066407 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hannesw/8066407/ Review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2015-April/004455.html Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8053905 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hannesw/8053905/ Review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2015-April/004458.html The changes apply cleanly to 8u-dev after reshuffling path names. Thanks, Hannes From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Mon Apr 27 13:39:58 2015 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 14:39:58 +0100 Subject: [8u60] Request for approval for JDK-8066407 and JDK-8053905 In-Reply-To: <553E38E7.3070806@oracle.com> References: <553E38E7.3070806@oracle.com> Message-ID: <553E3C2E.6010603@oracle.com> Approved on the condition that they go into 9 first. -Rob On 27/04/15 14:25, Hannes Wallnoefer wrote: > Please approve backport of JDK-8066407 and JDK-8053905 to 8u60: > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8066407 > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hannesw/8066407/ > Review thread: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2015-April/004455.html > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8053905 > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hannesw/8053905/ > Review thread: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2015-April/004458.html > > The changes apply cleanly to 8u-dev after reshuffling path names. > > Thanks, > Hannes From hannes.wallnoefer at oracle.com Mon Apr 27 13:48:30 2015 From: hannes.wallnoefer at oracle.com (Hannes Wallnoefer) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 15:48:30 +0200 Subject: [8u60] Request for approval for JDK-8066407 and JDK-8053905 In-Reply-To: <553E3C2E.6010603@oracle.com> References: <553E38E7.3070806@oracle.com> <553E3C2E.6010603@oracle.com> Message-ID: <553E3E2E.6070805@oracle.com> Thanks Rob. I already pushed them to 9 some time ago. There may be a problem with the hg server scripts. Hannes Am 2015-04-27 um 15:39 schrieb Rob McKenna: > Approved on the condition that they go into 9 first. > > -Rob > > On 27/04/15 14:25, Hannes Wallnoefer wrote: >> Please approve backport of JDK-8066407 and JDK-8053905 to 8u60: >> >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8066407 >> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hannesw/8066407/ >> Review thread: >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2015-April/004455.html >> >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8053905 >> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hannesw/8053905/ >> Review thread: >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2015-April/004458.html >> >> The changes apply cleanly to 8u-dev after reshuffling path names. >> >> Thanks, >> Hannes > From aleksej.efimov at oracle.com Mon Apr 27 20:48:46 2015 From: aleksej.efimov at oracle.com (Aleksej Efimov) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 23:48:46 +0300 Subject: [8u60] Request for approval: 8076287: Performance degradation observed with TimeZone Benchmark Message-ID: <553EA0AE.8010203@oracle.com> Hello, Please, approve a backport of 8076287 fix to JDK8. The patch applies cleanly after reshuffling. JPRT build shows no build/test failures. With Best Regards, Aleksej JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8076287 JDK9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/a80afe354135 From sean.coffey at oracle.com Mon Apr 27 20:52:01 2015 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 21:52:01 +0100 Subject: [8u60] Request for approval: 8076287: Performance degradation observed with TimeZone Benchmark In-Reply-To: <553EA0AE.8010203@oracle.com> References: <553EA0AE.8010203@oracle.com> Message-ID: <553EA171.40307@oracle.com> Approved. Regards, Sean. On 27/04/2015 21:48, Aleksej Efimov wrote: > Hello, > > Please, approve a backport of 8076287 fix to JDK8. The patch applies > cleanly after reshuffling. > JPRT build shows no build/test failures. > > With Best Regards, > Aleksej > > JBS: > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8076287 > JDK9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/a80afe354135 > From sgehwolf at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 07:58:45 2015 From: sgehwolf at redhat.com (Severin Gehwolf) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 09:58:45 +0200 Subject: [8u60] Backport request: 6991580: IPv6 Nameservers in resolv.conf throws NumberFormatException In-Reply-To: <55390AEE.5090504@oracle.com> References: <1429801041.3437.20.camel@redhat.com> <55390AEE.5090504@oracle.com> Message-ID: <1430294325.3356.11.camel@redhat.com> On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 16:08 +0100, Rob McKenna wrote: > Approved. I can get this pushed early next week. > > -Rob Rob, has this been pushed? I'm just trying to make sure it doesn't fall off the radar :) Thanks, Severin > On 23/04/15 15:57, Severin Gehwolf wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Could you please approve the following backport request to jdk8u from 9? > > I'd also need to a sponsor to push the change once approved. > > > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6991580 > > > > Relevant JDK 9 changesets: > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/4be070b8aaba > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/8000249dcb2a > > JDK 9 review thread: > > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2015-April/032913.html > > > > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-6991580/webrev.jdk8u.01/ > > > > The proposed webrev is merely a combination of the two 9 changesets > > (i.e. includes the rename of the test already) + fixed copyright header > > as suggested by: > > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2015-April/032969.html > > > > Thanks, > > Severin > > > From alexander.zvegintsev at oracle.com Wed Apr 29 10:00:57 2015 From: alexander.zvegintsev at oracle.com (Alexander Zvegintsev) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 13:00:57 +0300 Subject: [8u60] Request for approval 8051617: Fullscreen mode is not working properly on Xorg Message-ID: <5540ABD9.3040909@oracle.com> Hello, This is a request for approval to backport a fix from the jdk9 to the jdk8u-dev repository. Changes applies cleanly to jdk8u-dev after path reshuffling. The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8051617 The fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/4af319de0ebe The review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2015-April/009313.html -- Thanks, Alexander. From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Apr 29 10:05:22 2015 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 11:05:22 +0100 Subject: [8u60] Request for approval 8051617: Fullscreen mode is not working properly on Xorg In-Reply-To: <5540ABD9.3040909@oracle.com> References: <5540ABD9.3040909@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5540ACE2.6020709@oracle.com> Approved. Regards, Sean. On 29/04/15 11:00, Alexander Zvegintsev wrote: > Hello, > > This is a request for approval to backport a fix from the jdk9 to the > jdk8u-dev repository. > Changes applies cleanly to jdk8u-dev after path reshuffling. > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8051617 > The fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/4af319de0ebe > The review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2015-April/009313.html > From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Wed Apr 29 13:35:56 2015 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 14:35:56 +0100 Subject: [8u60] Backport request: 6991580: IPv6 Nameservers in resolv.conf throws NumberFormatException In-Reply-To: <1430294325.3356.11.camel@redhat.com> References: <1429801041.3437.20.camel@redhat.com> <55390AEE.5090504@oracle.com> <1430294325.3356.11.camel@redhat.com> Message-ID: <5540DE3C.9040602@oracle.com> Yup - surprised you didn't get a notification from JBS. -Rob On 29/04/15 08:58, Severin Gehwolf wrote: > On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 16:08 +0100, Rob McKenna wrote: >> Approved. I can get this pushed early next week. >> >> -Rob > Rob, has this been pushed? I'm just trying to make sure it doesn't fall > off the radar :) > > Thanks, > Severin > >> On 23/04/15 15:57, Severin Gehwolf wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Could you please approve the following backport request to jdk8u from 9? >>> I'd also need to a sponsor to push the change once approved. >>> >>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6991580 >>> >>> Relevant JDK 9 changesets: >>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/4be070b8aaba >>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/8000249dcb2a >>> JDK 9 review thread: >>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2015-April/032913.html >>> >>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-6991580/webrev.jdk8u.01/ >>> >>> The proposed webrev is merely a combination of the two 9 changesets >>> (i.e. includes the rename of the test already) + fixed copyright header >>> as suggested by: >>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2015-April/032969.html >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Severin >>> > > From philip.race at oracle.com Wed Apr 29 16:22:45 2015 From: philip.race at oracle.com (Phil Race) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 09:22:45 -0700 Subject: [8u60]:Request for approval for 7145508: java.awt.GraphicsDevice.get/setDisplayMode behavior is incorrect when no display is present Message-ID: <55410555.7010201@oracle.com> Bug: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/7145508/ 9-webrev :https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7145508 9 Review : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2015-April/005308.html -phil. From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Apr 29 18:58:55 2015 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?windows-1252?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 19:58:55 +0100 Subject: [8u60]:Request for approval for 7145508: java.awt.GraphicsDevice.get/setDisplayMode behavior is incorrect when no display is present In-Reply-To: <55410555.7010201@oracle.com> References: <55410555.7010201@oracle.com> Message-ID: <554129EF.8070706@oracle.com> Approved. Regards, Sean. On 29/04/2015 17:22, Phil Race wrote: > Bug: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/7145508/ > 9-webrev :https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7145508 > 9 Review : > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2015-April/005308.html > > -phil. From philip.race at oracle.com Wed Apr 29 23:06:13 2015 From: philip.race at oracle.com (Phil Race) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 16:06:13 -0700 Subject: [8u60]: request for approval 8078654: CloseTTFontFileFunc callback should be removed Message-ID: <554163E5.8070402@oracle.com> requesting to backport this fix review thread : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2015-April/005338.html bug : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8078654 JDK 9 changeset : http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/13b1ca669311 -phil. From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Wed Apr 29 23:36:44 2015 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 00:36:44 +0100 Subject: [8u60]: request for approval 8078654: CloseTTFontFileFunc callback should be removed In-Reply-To: <554163E5.8070402@oracle.com> References: <554163E5.8070402@oracle.com> Message-ID: <55416B0C.7050700@oracle.com> Approved. -Rob On 30/04/15 00:06, Phil Race wrote: > requesting to backport this fix > > review thread : > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2015-April/005338.html > bug : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8078654 > JDK 9 changeset : > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/13b1ca669311 > > -phil. From alexandr.scherbatiy at oracle.com Thu Apr 30 10:06:45 2015 From: alexandr.scherbatiy at oracle.com (Alexander Scherbatiy) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 13:06:45 +0300 Subject: [8u60] Request for approval: 8044444 The output's 'Page-n' footer does not show completely. Message-ID: <5541FEB5.8070306@oracle.com> Hello, Could you approve the direct backport of the fix to JDK 8u-dev. The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044444 The webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alexsch/8044444/webrev.04 The review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2015-April/009308.html The JDK 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/8c964679a414 Thanks, Alexandr. From sean.coffey at oracle.com Thu Apr 30 10:10:38 2015 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?windows-1252?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 11:10:38 +0100 Subject: [8u60] Request for approval: 8044444 The output's 'Page-n' footer does not show completely. In-Reply-To: <5541FEB5.8070306@oracle.com> References: <5541FEB5.8070306@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5541FF9E.7020008@oracle.com> Approved. Regards, Sean. On 30/04/2015 11:06, Alexander Scherbatiy wrote: > > Hello, > > Could you approve the direct backport of the fix to JDK 8u-dev. > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044444 > The webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alexsch/8044444/webrev.04 > The review thread: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2015-April/009308.html > The JDK 9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/8c964679a414 > > Thanks, > Alexandr. > > From alexandr.scherbatiy at oracle.com Thu Apr 30 10:11:16 2015 From: alexandr.scherbatiy at oracle.com (Alexander Scherbatiy) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 13:11:16 +0300 Subject: [8u60] Request for approval: 8076106 [macosx] Drag image of TransferHandler does not honor MultiResolutionImage Message-ID: <5541FFC4.1010700@oracle.com> Hello, Could you approve the direct backport of the fix to JDK 8u-dev. The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8076106 The webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alexsch/hendrik-schreiber/8076106/webrev.01 The review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2015-April/009250.html The JDK 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/a1b10dc613a9 Thanks, Alexandr. From sean.coffey at oracle.com Thu Apr 30 10:54:50 2015 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?windows-1252?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 11:54:50 +0100 Subject: [8u60] Request for approval: 8076106 [macosx] Drag image of TransferHandler does not honor MultiResolutionImage In-Reply-To: <5541FFC4.1010700@oracle.com> References: <5541FFC4.1010700@oracle.com> Message-ID: <554209FA.2020700@oracle.com> Approved. Regards, Sean. On 30/04/2015 11:11, Alexander Scherbatiy wrote: > > Hello, > > Could you approve the direct backport of the fix to JDK 8u-dev. > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8076106 > The webrev: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alexsch/hendrik-schreiber/8076106/webrev.01 > The review thread: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2015-April/009250.html > The JDK 9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/a1b10dc613a9 > > Thanks, > Alexandr. > From alexander.zvegintsev at oracle.com Thu Apr 30 13:06:14 2015 From: alexander.zvegintsev at oracle.com (Alexander Zvegintsev) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 16:06:14 +0300 Subject: [8u60] Request for approval 8077982: GIFLIB upgrade Message-ID: <554228C6.6070805@oracle.com> Hello, This is a request for approval to backport a fix from the jdk9 to the jdk8u-dev repository. Changes applies cleanly to jdk8u-dev after path reshuffling. The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8077982 The fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/5bf5794f6193 The review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2015-April/009269.html -- Thanks, Alexander. From andrew.brygin at oracle.com Thu Apr 30 13:50:39 2015 From: andrew.brygin at oracle.com (Andrew Brygin) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 16:50:39 +0300 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval: 8073001: Java's system LnF on OS X: editable JComboBoxes are being rendered incorrectly Message-ID: <5542332F.80108@oracle.com> Hello, could you please approve a direct backport of the fix for 8073001 to 8u-dev? Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8073001 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bae/8073001/9/webrev.01/ jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/063bc66c3e1f Review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2015-April/004425.html Reviewers: Alexander Potochkin, Sergey Bylokhov Thanks, Andrew From sean.coffey at oracle.com Thu Apr 30 13:55:55 2015 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 14:55:55 +0100 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval: 8073001: Java's system LnF on OS X: editable JComboBoxes are being rendered incorrectly In-Reply-To: <5542332F.80108@oracle.com> References: <5542332F.80108@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5542346B.2020100@oracle.com> Approved. Regards, Sean. On 30/04/2015 14:50, Andrew Brygin wrote: > Hello, > > could you please approve a direct backport of the fix for 8073001 > to 8u-dev? > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8073001 > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bae/8073001/9/webrev.01/ > jdk9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/063bc66c3e1f > Review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2015-April/004425.html > Reviewers: Alexander Potochkin, Sergey Bylokhov > > Thanks, > Andrew From sean.coffey at oracle.com Thu Apr 30 15:17:18 2015 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 16:17:18 +0100 Subject: [8u60] Request for approval 8077982: GIFLIB upgrade In-Reply-To: <554228C6.6070805@oracle.com> References: <554228C6.6070805@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5542477E.2080801@oracle.com> Approved. Let's ensure we follow up on updating THIRD_PARTY_README files also. Regards, Sean. On 30/04/2015 14:06, Alexander Zvegintsev wrote: > Hello, > > This is a request for approval to backport a fix from the jdk9 to the > jdk8u-dev repository. > Changes applies cleanly to jdk8u-dev after path reshuffling. > > The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8077982 > The fix: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/5bf5794f6193 > The review: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2015-April/009269.html > From philip.race at oracle.com Thu Apr 30 15:22:03 2015 From: philip.race at oracle.com (Phil Race) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 08:22:03 -0700 Subject: [8u60] Request for approval: 8078331: Upgrade JDK to use LittleCMS 2.7 Message-ID: <5542489B.1080404@oracle.com> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2015-April/005354.html https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8078331 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8078331.8u/