[8u60] RFA 8129120 Terminal operation properties should not be back-propagated to upstream operations
Seán Coffey
sean.coffey at oracle.com
Tue Jun 23 08:53:24 UTC 2015
Hi Paul,
Best to get a peer review on this before pushing to jdk8u-dev.
Approved. If you get this into jdk8u-dev before Friday it should make
the pre-RDP2 integration slot. After this week, an 8u60-dev
stabilization forest will be created for ramp down purposes.
Regards,
Sean.
On 23/06/2015 09:32, Paul Sandoz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to backport:
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8129120
>
> 9 changeset
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/d9eadfd5659d
>
> Review:
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2015-June/034203.html
>
> The 9 changeset does not apply cleanly to the following source:
>
> src/share/classes/java/util/stream/AbstractPipeline.java
> test/java/util/stream/test/org/openjdk/tests/java/util/stream/DistinctOpTest.java
>
> The 8u patch is here:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~psandoz/jdk8u/JDK-8129120-flag-back-propagation/webrev/
>
> For 8u AbstractPipeline.java the update was simply to remove the method parallelPrepare and replace the 8u method
> sourceSpliterator with the equivalent 9 method.
>
> For 8u DistinctOpTest.java the expansion of the imports and reformatting result in failure to apply all the patch cleanly.
>
> All stream tests pass locally.
>
> A JPRT job is underway.
>
> I would like to wait a day or two to let the 9 changeset get tested by the infrastructure (i don't anticipate any issues). But wanted to ask for approval now assuming there are no issues with 9 and the JPRT job pass.
>
> Paul.
More information about the jdk8u-dev
mailing list