[8u] Request for approval for 8170153: PPC64/s390x/aarch64: Poor StrictMath performance due to non-optimized compilation

Volker Simonis volker.simonis at gmail.com
Mon Dec 19 16:56:45 UTC 2016


Thanks Rob, Gustavo,

I've just pushed the changes to jdk8u-dev.

Regards,
Volker


On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Gustavo Romero
<gromero at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> Thanks. I added the no regression test label since it only affects build
> infrastructure as you requested.
>
> Gustavo
>
> On 15-12-2016 19:41, Rob McKenna wrote:
>> Please add the appropriate noreg label to the bug. (noreg-build?)
>>
>> Approved.
>>
>>     -Rob
>>
>> On 15/12/16 07:12, Gustavo Romero wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Re-submitting it for approval as it's now reviewed on 8u:
>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2016-December/006248.html
>>>
>>> Could you please approve the backport to jdk8u-dev of the following fix:
>>>
>>> 8170153: PPC64/s390x/aarch64: Poor StrictMath performance due to non-optimized
>>> compilation
>>>
>>> Bug       : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8170153
>>> Webrev 1/2: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gromero/8170153/v2/
>>> Webreb 2/2: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gromero/8170153/v2/jdk/
>>> Review    : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2016-November/025348.html
>>> URL 1/2   : http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/rev/3c7b02f5fa7c
>>> URL 2/2   : http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/b6bad6302dc8
>>>
>>> The original change affects s390x and aarch64 as well but since both
>>> architectures are not present on 8u, it's a ppc-only fix on 8u:
>>>
>>> webrev 1/2: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gromero/8170153/v2
>>> webrev 2/2: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gromero/8170153/v2/jdk
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Gustavo
>>>
>>
>


More information about the jdk8u-dev mailing list