[8u] RFA for JDK-6515172: Runtime.availableProcessors() ignores Linux taskset command

[Seán Coffey]

Shafi, David,

thanks for the extra detail. I hadn't read all review replies. OK, so 
looks like your 6515172 push takes care of everything for this then. 
Please add a comment to JDK-8165153 stating how the 6515172 8u port 
addresses this issue for that family release.

Approved for jdk8u-dev.

Regards,
Sean.

On 21/09/16 10:02, Shafi Ahmad wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
> David has already replied to the similar query raised by 'Chris Plummer' in review thread http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2016-September/024550.html
>
> Regards,
> Shafi
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sean Coffey
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 1:35 PM
>> To: Shafi Ahmad; jdk8u-dev at openjdk.java.net; DAVID
>> Subject: Re: [8u] RFA for JDK-6515172: Runtime.availableProcessors() ignores
>> Linux taskset command
>>
>> Shafi, David,
>>
>> Is JDK-8165153 [1] an issue for this port? I'm not sure but would like to know
>> that it's been assessed for purpose of this backport.
>>
>> regards,
>> Sean.
>>
>> [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8165153
>>
>>
>> On 21/09/2016 07:21, Shafi Ahmad wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Please approve this backport of ' JDK-6515172:
>> Runtime.availableProcessors() ignores Linux taskset command' to 8u-dev.
>>> Jdk9 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6515172
>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shshahma/8154324/webrev.02/
>>> Jdk8 review link:
>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2016-
>> September/0245
>>> 40.html
>>> Jdk9 review thread:
>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-runtime-dev/2016-Januar
>>> y/017692.html
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Shafi