[8u] RFA for JDK-6515172: Runtime.availableProcessors() ignores Linux taskset command

[Seán Coffey]

OK - thanks for clarifying.

Shafi, in that case, you'll also need to backport 8165153 with this fix. 
(you can document both bug fixes in your commit comment)

Regards,
Sean.

On 21/09/16 11:14, David Holmes wrote:
> On 21/09/2016 7:02 PM, Shafi Ahmad wrote:
>> Hi Sean,
>>
>> David has already replied to the similar query raised by 'Chris 
>> Plummer' in review thread 
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2016-September/024550.html
>
> Yes and I made a big mistake, as I assumed Chris was referring to 
> JDK-8148987.
>
> Sorry.
>
> David
>
>> Regards,
>> Shafi
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Sean Coffey
>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 1:35 PM
>>> To: Shafi Ahmad; jdk8u-dev at openjdk.java.net; DAVID
>>> Subject: Re: [8u] RFA for JDK-6515172: Runtime.availableProcessors() 
>>> ignores
>>> Linux taskset command
>>>
>>> Shafi, David,
>>>
>>> Is JDK-8165153 [1] an issue for this port? I'm not sure but would 
>>> like to know
>>> that it's been assessed for purpose of this backport.
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> Sean.
>>>
>>> [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8165153
>>>
>>>
>>> On 21/09/2016 07:21, Shafi Ahmad wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Please approve this backport of ' JDK-6515172:
>>> Runtime.availableProcessors() ignores Linux taskset command' to 8u-dev.
>>>>
>>>> Jdk9 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6515172
>>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shshahma/8154324/webrev.02/
>>>> Jdk8 review link:
>>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2016-
>>> September/0245
>>>> 40.html
>>>> Jdk9 review thread:
>>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-runtime-dev/2016-Januar
>>>> y/017692.html
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Shafi
>>>