RFR: JDK-8171151 - JDK8u ProblemList.txt Updation

Seán Coffey sean.coffey at oracle.com
Mon Feb 6 09:06:41 UTC 2017


This looks ok Nikita.

You've opened some new bug IDs to record some of these failures. I think 
it would have been better to either open backports of JDK 9 issues or 
link them to older JBS issues where applicable.

e.g. you've logged JDK-8173182 even though other bugs with same issue 
exist on sun/security/pkcs11/MessageDigest/TestCloning.java - In a 
related bug we have a clear reason as to why the issue is not a JDK 
issue [1]. Opening new bugs adds a tail to capturing bug history. We can 
clean this up post your push. For now, the updated ProblemList looks ok.

regards,
Sean.

[1] 
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8043951?focusedCommentId=14037458&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14037458

On 02/02/2017 13:07, Nikita Jain wrote:
>
> Hi Sean,
>
> > -tools/pack200/Pack200Test.java solaris-all, macosx-all
>
> As suggested backport is done and waiting for push
>
> >+ sun/security/pkcs11/rsa/TestKeyPairGenerator.java   solaris-sparcv9
>
> Done, modified as solaris-all
>
> >+ sun/security/tools/jarsigner/TsacertOptionTest.java linux-x64, 
> macosx-x64 :
>
> As suggested backported the fix and hence now not adding into the 
> ProblemList.txt
>
> Updated the webrev: 
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rpatil/8171151/webrev.02/ 
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Erpatil/8171151/webrev.02/>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nikita Jain
>
> *From:*Seán Coffey
> *Sent:* Monday, January 23, 2017 10:47 PM
> *To:* Ivan Gerasimov <ivan.gerasimov at oracle.com>; Nikita Jain 
> <nikita.j.jain at oracle.com>; jdk8u-dev at openjdk.java.net
> *Subject:* Re: RFR: JDK-8171151 - JDK8u ProblemList.txt Updation
>
> Nikita,
>
> a few comments.
>
> The Pack200Test.java test was probably stabilized via the JDK-8166248 
> test fix. It stipulates that the test run on a with max memory > 4g - 
> That might be useful for JDK 8u also.
>
>
>     *+ # 8129560*
>
>     *+ sun/security/pkcs11/rsa/TestKeyPairGenerator.java              
>     solaris-sparcv9*
>
> This seems applicable to solaris x64 also, Should the arch be 
> solaris-all ?
>
> Would it be better to port the 1 line fix rather than add this to the 
> exclude list ?
>
>
>     *+ # 8168374, 8130041*
>
>     *+ sun/security/tools/jarsigner/TsacertOptionTest.java            
>     linux-x64, macosx-x64*
>
> 8168374 is a JDK 9 (only) modules issue. Please remove the id reference.
> 813004 [1] is a simple enough backport. I'd recommend porting that to 
> 8u-dev.
>
> For new tests & bug IDs being added to the problem list, do you plan 
> to open a backport reference for test fixes that should be ported ?
>
> [1] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/78fcb2e094db
>
> Regards,
> Sean.
>
> On 23/01/17 10:44, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
>
>     Thanks Nikita!
>
>     The fix now looks good to me.
>     Please get another review from a jdk8u-dev Reviewer before pushing
>     it.
>
>     With kind regards,
>     Ivan
>
>     On 23.01.2017 11:19, Nikita Jain wrote:
>
>
>         Hi All,
>
>         Updated the webrev. May I have a reviewer to review this:
>
>         http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rpatil/8171151/webrev.01/
>         <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Erpatil/8171151/webrev.01/>
>         <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Erpatil/8171151/webrev.01/>
>         <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Erpatil/8171151/webrev.01/>
>
>         Thank you Ivan for looking into this, created new bugs for the
>         same.
>
>
>         Thanks,
>
>         Nikita Jain
>
>         *From:*Ivan Gerasimov
>         *Sent:* Sunday, January 22, 2017 3:43 AM
>         *To:* Nikita Jain <nikita.j.jain at oracle.com>
>         <mailto:nikita.j.jain at oracle.com>; jdk8u-dev at openjdk.java.net
>         <mailto:jdk8u-dev at openjdk.java.net>
>         *Subject:* Re: RFR: JDK-8171151 - JDK8u ProblemList.txt Updation
>
>         Hi Nikita!
>
>         Thanks for working on this!
>         Reducing the noise from failing tests should greatly help to
>         focus on the important failures.
>
>         Your patch looks good in general.
>
>         A couple of comments:
>         1)
>          223 # 8158274
>          224 java/nio/file/Files/probeContentType/Basic.java solaris-x64
>
>         The bug JDK-8158274 was about Solaris Sparc and is now closed
>         with "Won't fix" resolution.
>         If the test is going to be fixed, then a new bug should be filed.
>
>         2)
>          283 # 8043951
>          284 sun/security/pkcs11/MessageDigest/TestCloning.java
>         solaris-x64
>
>         The bug JDK-8043951 was closed as "Won't fix".
>         If we're going to fix the test, either the bug should be
>         reopened, or a new bug should be filed.
>
>
>         Please not that I'm not a Reviewer, so you'll need to get an
>         approval from one.
>
>         With kind regards,
>         Ivan
>
>         On 18.01.2017 16:47, Nikita Jain wrote:
>
>             Hi All,
>
>             Please review this fix for JDK-8171151 - JDK8u
>         ProblemList.txt Updation
>
>             Bug:https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8171151
>
>             JDK8u
>         Webrev:http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rpatil/8171151/webrev.00/
>         <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Erpatil/8171151/webrev.00/>
>         <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Erpatil/8171151/webrev.00/>
>         <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Erpatil/8171151/webrev.00/>
>
>             Testing: Passes JPRT.
>
>
>             --------------
>
>             Summary
>
>             Test cases inserted
>
>             -> New test failures for JDK8u-dev have been added in the
>         list with their associated bug id.
>
>             -> 8171208, The bug has been closed because of the Infra
>         issue. However, its reference is used here just to track the
>         INFRA bug id.
>
>             java/net/CookieHandler/CookieManagerTest.java
>
>             java/net/HttpURLConnection/UnmodifiableMaps.java
>
>             sun/net/www/protocol/http/B6299712.java
>
>             Test cases updated/deleted
>
>             -> Removing the test as per the bug id 8027973 [bug is fixed]
>
>         javax/xml/jaxp/transform/jdk8004476/XSLTExFuncTest.java
>
>
>             -> Removing the test as per the bug id 7052625 [change is
>         backported]
>
>             com/sun/net/httpserver/bugs/6725892/Test.java
>
>             -> Removing the test as per the bug id 7148829 [No more
>         failure seen, reopen if seen again]
>
>             sun/net/InetAddress/nameservice/simple/CacheTest.java
>
>         sun/net/InetAddress/nameservice/simple/DefaultCaching.java
>
>             -> The test was seen as failure in solaris_x64 and
>         solaris_sparcv9 also. Platform, Bug id has also been added for
>         the same.
>
>             java/net/MulticastSocket/SetLoopbackMode.java
>
>
>             -> The test was seen as failure in solaris_x64. Platform,
>         Bug id has also been added for the same.
>
>             java/net/MulticastSocket/Test.java
>
>             -> Updating bug id from (JDK-7157786 to JDK-8026976), as
>         '7157786' is closed as duplicate
>
>             sun/security/pkcs11/ec/TestKeyFactory.java
>
>             -> Removing the test as per the bug id 6988842 [bug is
>         fixed but entry is not removed from the ProblemList.txt]
>
>             sun/security/pkcs11/Secmod/AddPrivateKey.java
>
>             sun/security/pkcs11/ec/ReadCertificates.java
>
>             sun/security/pkcs11/ec/ReadPKCS12.java
>
>             -> According to this bug id: 6988842, test is not falling
>         on solaris-all. The test was seen as failure on linux_i586 and
>         linux_x64. Hence, the bug id and affected platform has been
>         updated.
>
>             sun/security/pkcs11/sslecc/ClientJSSEServerJSSE.java
>
>             -> Removing these tests as per the comment in Bug 7143279.
>         [No failure reported since 2013/06. Reopen if seen again]
>
>             tools/pack200/CommandLineTests.java
>
>             tools/pack200/Pack200Test.java
>
>             -> The test was seen as failure in windows _all. Platform,
>         Bug id has also been added for the same.
>
>             tools/launcher/FXLauncherTest.java
>
>             Thanks,
>
>             Nikita Jain
>



More information about the jdk8u-dev mailing list