[8u communication] Changes to JDK 8u122 plans

[Seán Coffey]

David,

Please label the original (master) record only with such a label. For 
clarity, I suggest that we change the label to be 
'8u-CPU-critical-request'. I'll update the documentation [1] to reflect 
this minor change.

[1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8u/criticalcpufixes.html

Regards,
Sean.

On 15/12/16 04:23, David Holmes wrote:
> Hi Dalibor,
>
> On 14/12/2016 2:37 AM, dalibor topic wrote:
>> Oracle no longer plans to create a separate JDK 8u122 PSU release. As
>> such, the proposed schedule for JDK 8u122 in this Project is no longer
>> accurate.
>>
>> Given the very small amount of changes that were destined specifically
>> for 8u122 (and not for 8u121 as well), the process to propose critical
>> fixes for inclusion in JDK 8u CPU releases [0] should be used instead,
>> where applicable.
>
> Do we label the original JBS issue, or the 8u backport issue?
>
> Thanks,
> David
> -----
>
>> This holds for future changes to be integrated into jdk8u-dev forest, as
>> well as for already integrated changes that were destined for JDK 8u122.
>>
>> If you have questions or concerns, please share them on the jdk8u-dev
>> mailing list.
>>
>> cheers,
>> dalibor topic
>>
>> [0] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8u/criticalcpufixes.html