From bhanu.prakash.gopularam at oracle.com Mon Jul 3 12:20:59 2017 From: bhanu.prakash.gopularam at oracle.com (Bhanu Gopularam) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 05:20:59 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [8u] RFA for JDK-8176182: 4 security tests are not run Message-ID: <96e88381-a492-476a-b7d1-dfbbf3962050@default> Hi all, May I get the approval for following backport which applies cleanly to jdk8u "JDK-8176182: 4 security tests are not run" JDK-9 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/9132102b7bb6 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bgopularam/JDK-8176182/webrev.00/ Thanks, Bhanu From jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com Mon Jul 3 15:35:36 2017 From: jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com (Jonathan Gibbons) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 08:35:36 -0700 Subject: [8u] RFA for JDK-8176182: 4 security tests are not run In-Reply-To: <96e88381-a492-476a-b7d1-dfbbf3962050@default> References: <96e88381-a492-476a-b7d1-dfbbf3962050@default> Message-ID: <1e56222d-6495-2957-541e-a853a02e29a4@oracle.com> It's a backport from 9, so OK from that point of view, but I would have to ask why the use of @compile with a relative path to some file in an ancestor directory. This seems like a use for @library. -- Jon On 7/3/17 5:20 AM, Bhanu Gopularam wrote: > Hi all, > > May I get the approval for following backport which applies cleanly to jdk8u "JDK-8176182: 4 security tests are not run" > > JDK-9 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/9132102b7bb6 > > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bgopularam/JDK-8176182/webrev.00/ > > Thanks, > Bhanu From sreeprakash.s at oracle.com Tue Jul 4 15:01:37 2017 From: sreeprakash.s at oracle.com (Sreeprakash Sreedharan) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 08:01:37 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [8u] Request for Approval for backport of JDK-7162125 : [macosx] A font has different behaviour for ligatures depending on its creation mode Message-ID: Hi, Could you please approve the backport for JDK-7162125 to 8u-dev? Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7162125 JDK 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/81619853311c JDK 9 review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2015-November/005848.html The patch from JDK9 was applied cleanly. JPRT and all the relevant JTREG tests passed successfully. Regards, Sreeprakash From sreeprakash.s at oracle.com Tue Jul 4 15:03:37 2017 From: sreeprakash.s at oracle.com (Sreeprakash Sreedharan) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 08:03:37 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [8u] Request for Approval for backport of JDK-8147002 : [macosx] Arabic character cannot be rendered on MacOS X Message-ID: Hi, Could you please approve the backport for JDK-7162125 to 8u-dev? Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8147002 JDK 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/e69569fe2655 JDK 9 review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2017-February/008186.html The patch from JDK9 was applied cleanly. JPRT and all the relevant JTREG tests passed successfully. Regards, Sreeprakash From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Tue Jul 4 16:22:35 2017 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 17:22:35 +0100 Subject: [8u] Request for Approval for backport of JDK-7162125 : [macosx] A font has different behaviour for ligatures depending on its creation mode In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20170704162235.GA2769@vimes> Approved -Rob On 04/07/17 08:01, Sreeprakash Sreedharan wrote: > Hi, > > > > Could you please approve the backport for JDK-7162125 to 8u-dev? > > > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7162125 > > > > JDK 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/81619853311c > > > > JDK 9 review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2015-November/005848.html > > > > The patch from JDK9 was applied cleanly. > > > > JPRT and all the relevant JTREG tests passed successfully. > > > > Regards, > > Sreeprakash From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Tue Jul 4 16:23:30 2017 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 17:23:30 +0100 Subject: [8u] Request for Approval for backport of JDK-8147002 : [macosx] Arabic character cannot be rendered on MacOS X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20170704162330.GB2769@vimes> Approved -Rob On 04/07/17 08:03, Sreeprakash Sreedharan wrote: > Hi, > > > > Could you please approve the backport for JDK-7162125 to 8u-dev? > > > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8147002 > > > > JDK 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/e69569fe2655 > > > > JDK 9 review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2017-February/008186.html > > > > The patch from JDK9 was applied cleanly. > > > > JPRT and all the relevant JTREG tests passed successfully. > > > > Regards, > > Sreeprakash From hannes.wallnoefer at oracle.com Wed Jul 5 08:22:46 2017 From: hannes.wallnoefer at oracle.com (=?utf-8?Q?Hannes_Walln=C3=B6fer?=) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 10:22:46 +0200 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for Approval: 8182996: Incorrect mapping Long type to JavaScript equivalent In-Reply-To: <5FF7D9DC-BEEC-4E70-9823-DC954707321A@oracle.com> References: <5FF7D9DC-BEEC-4E70-9823-DC954707321A@oracle.com> Message-ID: Hi, My backport request from last Friday has probably fallen through the cracks, reposting it here. Thanks, Hannes > Am 30.06.2017 um 15:20 schrieb Hannes Walln?fer : > > Hi, > > please approve backport of this bug fix to 8u-dev: > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8182996 > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hannesw/8182996/webrev/ > Review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2017-June/006964.html > > The jdk10 patch applies cleanly to 8u-dev after path reshuffling > > Thanks, > Hannes From david.buck at oracle.com Wed Jul 5 08:59:50 2017 From: david.buck at oracle.com (David Buck) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 14:29:50 +0530 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for Approval: 8182996: Incorrect mapping Long type to JavaScript equivalent In-Reply-To: References: <5FF7D9DC-BEEC-4E70-9823-DC954707321A@oracle.com> Message-ID: <1e2e6d68-16f6-5df1-8dbf-74e04dc0e1b4@oracle.com> Hi Hannes! I am sorry about the delay in responding to your request. Please be sure to always include a link to the JDK 9/10 hg changeset (as opposed to a webrev) when requesting approval to push a clean (trivial) backport. http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/nashorn/rev/fed3f3298757 For details, please consult the push request template: http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8u/approval-template.html Please consider this backport approved for push. Cheers, -Buck On 2017/07/05 13:52, Hannes Walln?fer wrote: > Hi, > > My backport request from last Friday has probably fallen through the cracks, reposting it here. > > Thanks, > Hannes > >> Am 30.06.2017 um 15:20 schrieb Hannes Walln?fer : >> >> Hi, >> >> please approve backport of this bug fix to 8u-dev: >> >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8182996 >> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hannesw/8182996/webrev/ >> Review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2017-June/006964.html >> >> The jdk10 patch applies cleanly to 8u-dev after path reshuffling >> >> Thanks, >> Hannes > From hannes.wallnoefer at oracle.com Wed Jul 5 10:09:04 2017 From: hannes.wallnoefer at oracle.com (=?utf-8?Q?Hannes_Walln=C3=B6fer?=) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 12:09:04 +0200 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for Approval: 8182996: Incorrect mapping Long type to JavaScript equivalent In-Reply-To: <1e2e6d68-16f6-5df1-8dbf-74e04dc0e1b4@oracle.com> References: <5FF7D9DC-BEEC-4E70-9823-DC954707321A@oracle.com> <1e2e6d68-16f6-5df1-8dbf-74e04dc0e1b4@oracle.com> Message-ID: <866BE257-EEE4-4D50-822D-0F130D442B84@oracle.com> Thanks, David! I didn?t know about that template, will use it from now on. Hannes > Am 05.07.2017 um 10:59 schrieb David Buck : > > Hi Hannes! > > I am sorry about the delay in responding to your request. > > Please be sure to always include a link to the JDK 9/10 hg changeset (as opposed to a webrev) when requesting approval to push a clean (trivial) backport. > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/nashorn/rev/fed3f3298757 > > For details, please consult the push request template: > > http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8u/approval-template.html > > Please consider this backport approved for push. > > Cheers, > -Buck > > > On 2017/07/05 13:52, Hannes Walln?fer wrote: >> Hi, >> My backport request from last Friday has probably fallen through the cracks, reposting it here. >> Thanks, >> Hannes >>> Am 30.06.2017 um 15:20 schrieb Hannes Walln?fer : >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> please approve backport of this bug fix to 8u-dev: >>> >>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8182996 >>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hannesw/8182996/webrev/ >>> Review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2017-June/006964.html >>> >>> The jdk10 patch applies cleanly to 8u-dev after path reshuffling >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Hannes From bhanu.prakash.gopularam at oracle.com Thu Jul 6 06:28:51 2017 From: bhanu.prakash.gopularam at oracle.com (Bhanu Gopularam) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 23:28:51 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [8u] RFA for JDK-8176182: 4 security tests are not run In-Reply-To: <1e56222d-6495-2957-541e-a853a02e29a4@oracle.com> References: <96e88381-a492-476a-b7d1-dfbbf3962050@default> <1e56222d-6495-2957-541e-a853a02e29a4@oracle.com> Message-ID: <1264917f-6d78-4c9c-b5ac-5d901382f598@default> Hi, Here is updated webrev with changes from (8176182 and 8176183) details below. The changes apply cleanly to 8u-dev: Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bgopularam/JDK-8176182/webrev/webrev.01/ (1) 8176182: 4 security tests are not run JDK-9 review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2017-March/015643.html Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/9132102b7bb6 (2) 8176183: sun/security/mscapi/SignedObjectChain.java fails on Windows JDK-9 review (): http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2017-March/015670.html Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/a3276d8711b7 Regarding usage of @compile tag, the test depends on single file (java/security/SignedObject/Chain.java), I have kept the changes similar to original fix. Thanks, Bhanu -----Original Message----- From: Jonathan Gibbons Sent: Monday, July 03, 2017 9:06 PM To: jdk8u-dev at openjdk.java.net Subject: Re: [8u] RFA for JDK-8176182: 4 security tests are not run It's a backport from 9, so OK from that point of view, but I would have to ask why the use of @compile with a relative path to some file in an ancestor directory. This seems like a use for @library. -- Jon On 7/3/17 5:20 AM, Bhanu Gopularam wrote: > Hi all, > > May I get the approval for following backport which applies cleanly to jdk8u "JDK-8176182: 4 security tests are not run" > > JDK-9 Changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/9132102b7bb6 > > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bgopularam/JDK-8176182/webrev.00/ > > Thanks, > Bhanu From dmitry.markov at oracle.com Thu Jul 13 16:37:10 2017 From: dmitry.markov at oracle.com (Dmitry Markov) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 17:37:10 +0100 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval 8078269: Message-ID: <0BDB5C05-FC67-4430-AE49-10C1B11E1D1D@oracle.com> Hello, Can I get an approval to port the fix for 8078269 to jdk8u-dev, please? The jdk9 patch applies cleanly. JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8078269 Review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2015-May/004516.html jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/733caeaa6901 Thanks, Dmitry From dmitry.markov at oracle.com Thu Jul 13 16:39:23 2017 From: dmitry.markov at oracle.com (Dmitry Markov) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 17:39:23 +0100 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval 8078269: JTabbedPane UI Property TabbedPane.tabAreaBackground no longer works In-Reply-To: <0BDB5C05-FC67-4430-AE49-10C1B11E1D1D@oracle.com> References: <0BDB5C05-FC67-4430-AE49-10C1B11E1D1D@oracle.com> Message-ID: Resend with correct subject. Thanks, Dmitry > On 13 Jul 2017, at 17:37, Dmitry Markov wrote: > > Hello, > > Can I get an approval to port the fix for 8078269 to jdk8u-dev, please? The jdk9 patch applies cleanly. > > JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8078269 > Review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2015-May/004516.html > jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/733caeaa6901 > > Thanks, > Dmitry From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Thu Jul 13 19:24:23 2017 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 20:24:23 +0100 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval 8078269: JTabbedPane UI Property TabbedPane.tabAreaBackground no longer works In-Reply-To: References: <0BDB5C05-FC67-4430-AE49-10C1B11E1D1D@oracle.com> Message-ID: <20170713192423.GA3648@vimes> Approved -Rob On 13/07/17 05:39, Dmitry Markov wrote: > Resend with correct subject. > > Thanks, > Dmitry > > On 13 Jul 2017, at 17:37, Dmitry Markov wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > Can I get an approval to port the fix for 8078269 to jdk8u-dev, please? The jdk9 patch applies cleanly. > > > > JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8078269 > > Review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2015-May/004516.html > > jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/733caeaa6901 > > > > Thanks, > > Dmitry > From christoph.langer at sap.com Mon Jul 17 12:35:03 2017 From: christoph.langer at sap.com (Langer, Christoph) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 12:35:03 +0000 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval 8184673: Fix compatibility issue in AlgorithmChecker for 3rd party JCE providers Message-ID: <298150ca32f74331a80e5ff0288c8b25@sap.com> Hi, please approve the backport of this one line fix to 8u-dev. The patch applies cleanly. JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8184673 Review Thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2017-July/016112.html JDK10 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/jdk/rev/46a03a1d296c Thanks and best regards Christoph From sean.coffey at oracle.com Mon Jul 17 13:02:57 2017 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Se=c3=a1n_Coffey?=) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 14:02:57 +0100 Subject: [8u-dev] Request for approval 8184673: Fix compatibility issue in AlgorithmChecker for 3rd party JCE providers In-Reply-To: <298150ca32f74331a80e5ff0288c8b25@sap.com> References: <298150ca32f74331a80e5ff0288c8b25@sap.com> Message-ID: <674ec936-33d6-2411-1ee2-2a741d8aab86@oracle.com> Approved for jdk8u-dev. Regards, Sean. On 17/07/17 13:35, Langer, Christoph wrote: > > Hi, > > please approve the backport of this one line fix to 8u-dev. The patch > applies cleanly. > > JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8184673 > > Review Thread: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2017-July/016112.html > > JDK10 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/jdk/rev/46a03a1d296c > > > Thanks and best regards > > Christoph > From shafi.s.ahmad at oracle.com Tue Jul 18 06:40:17 2017 From: shafi.s.ahmad at oracle.com (Shafi Ahmad) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 23:40:17 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [8u] RFR for backport of JDK-8177958: Possible uninitialized char* in vm_version_solaris_sparc.cpp Message-ID: <55a24e4c-3922-4a0e-983d-433701afa68c@default> Hi, Please review the backport of ' JDK-8177958: Possible uninitialized char* in vm_version_solaris_sparc.cpp' to jdk8u. Please note that this is not a clean backport due to single line conflict. Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shshahma/8177958/jdk8u/webrev.00/ Jdk10 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8177958 Original patch pushed to jdk10: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/hs/hotspot/rev/7295c9c26185 Test: Run jprt. Regards, Shafi From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Tue Jul 18 12:19:09 2017 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 13:19:09 +0100 Subject: [8u] RFR for backport of JDK-8177958: Possible uninitialized char* in vm_version_solaris_sparc.cpp In-Reply-To: <55a24e4c-3922-4a0e-983d-433701afa68c@default> References: <55a24e4c-3922-4a0e-983d-433701afa68c@default> Message-ID: <20170718121909.GB3570@vimes> Appears to be a line shuffling issue. Approved. -Rob On 17/07/17 11:40, Shafi Ahmad wrote: > Hi, > > Please review the backport of ' JDK-8177958: Possible uninitialized char* in vm_version_solaris_sparc.cpp' to jdk8u. > Please note that this is not a clean backport due to single line conflict. > > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shshahma/8177958/jdk8u/webrev.00/ > Jdk10 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8177958 > Original patch pushed to jdk10: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/hs/hotspot/rev/7295c9c26185 > > Test: Run jprt. > > Regards, > Shafi From gnu.andrew at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 13:31:59 2017 From: gnu.andrew at redhat.com (Andrew Hughes) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 14:31:59 +0100 Subject: RFR(XS) [8u backport] 8181055: PPC64: "mbind: Invalid argument" still seen after 8175813 In-Reply-To: References: <5361e308-00e1-3041-c728-b6ebae7586ae@redhat.com> <25ab002d-0728-4aaa-eeb7-d3b9a3ea8254@redhat.com> <62524c62-ded1-6fab-e00c-8666fbff1645@oracle.com> <2239bacf-1760-1f73-20a1-ce792a191741@redhat.com> <593AAB00.4060801@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Message-ID: On 17 July 2017 at 19:16, Zhengyu Gu wrote: > Hi, > > This 8u backport of JDK-8181005 has been reviewed by Aleksey [1] and > approved by Rob [2]. > > However, it is not clear to me that the only reviewer has to be 'R'eviewer. > If so, can someone with 'R' to review the backport? It is almost the same as > JDK9, with very minor conflicts. > > I will also need sponsor this backport. > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8181055 > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/8181055/8u/webrev.00/ > > > [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2017-June/027104.html > [2] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2017-June/006723.html > > Thanks, > > -Zhengyu It looks good to me. The 8u patch matches what we included in our packages and matches the patch already in hs/10, bar a slight context difference in one case. It built fine. I'm an 8u reviewer if that's what you're looking for. I can push it too if needed (I've pushed 8u jdk patches before), but not sure if 8u HotSpot patches still need to be run through that JPRT thing. Some clarity on this would be good. Is there a plan to fix this in 9 as well? Thanks, -- Andrew :) Senior Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) Web Site: http://fuseyism.com Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net) Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04 C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222 From zgu at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 13:39:20 2017 From: zgu at redhat.com (Zhengyu Gu) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:39:20 -0400 Subject: RFR(XS) [8u backport] 8181055: PPC64: "mbind: Invalid argument" still seen after 8175813 In-Reply-To: References: <5361e308-00e1-3041-c728-b6ebae7586ae@redhat.com> <25ab002d-0728-4aaa-eeb7-d3b9a3ea8254@redhat.com> <62524c62-ded1-6fab-e00c-8666fbff1645@oracle.com> <2239bacf-1760-1f73-20a1-ce792a191741@redhat.com> <593AAB00.4060801@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Message-ID: <30776b56-9521-0632-78cd-997fce1827e8@redhat.com> Hi Andrew, On 07/18/2017 09:31 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote: > On 17 July 2017 at 19:16, Zhengyu Gu wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This 8u backport of JDK-8181005 has been reviewed by Aleksey [1] and >> approved by Rob [2]. >> >> However, it is not clear to me that the only reviewer has to be 'R'eviewer. >> If so, can someone with 'R' to review the backport? It is almost the same as >> JDK9, with very minor conflicts. >> >> I will also need sponsor this backport. >> >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8181055 >> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/8181055/8u/webrev.00/ >> >> >> [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2017-June/027104.html >> [2] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2017-June/006723.html >> >> Thanks, >> >> -Zhengyu > > It looks good to me. The 8u patch matches what we included in our packages > and matches the patch already in hs/10, bar a slight context difference in one > case. It built fine. > > I'm an 8u reviewer if that's what you're looking for. Yes, thanks for the reviewing. > > I can push it too if needed (I've pushed 8u jdk patches before), but > not sure if 8u > HotSpot patches still need to be run through that JPRT thing. Some clarity on > this would be good. I assume that it has to go through JPRT, but I am not sure about 8u. > > Is there a plan to fix this in 9 as well? My understanding is that, jdk10 bug will be automatically backported to jdk9, no? Thanks, -Zhengyu > > Thanks, > From vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com Tue Jul 18 15:56:37 2017 From: vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com (Vladimir Kozlov) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 08:56:37 -0700 Subject: [8u] RFR for backport of JDK-8177958: Possible uninitialized char* in vm_version_solaris_sparc.cpp In-Reply-To: <55a24e4c-3922-4a0e-983d-433701afa68c@default> References: <55a24e4c-3922-4a0e-983d-433701afa68c@default> Message-ID: Looks good. Thanks, Vladimir On 7/17/17 11:40 PM, Shafi Ahmad wrote: > Hi, > > Please review the backport of ' JDK-8177958: Possible uninitialized char* in vm_version_solaris_sparc.cpp' to jdk8u. > Please note that this is not a clean backport due to single line conflict. > > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shshahma/8177958/jdk8u/webrev.00/ > Jdk10 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8177958 > Original patch pushed to jdk10: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/hs/hotspot/rev/7295c9c26185 > > Test: Run jprt. > > Regards, > Shafi > From abhi.saha at oracle.com Tue Jul 18 19:48:10 2017 From: abhi.saha at oracle.com (Abhijit Saha) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 12:48:10 -0700 Subject: [8u] Request for approval for bulk changes from Jul 2017 CPU 8u141 fixes into 8u Message-ID: <6028d65b-b78c-cd9c-0bd6-fa36a1e5ad9f@oracle.com> 8u141 has been released earlier today [1]. Requesting approval to sync up the 8u141 changes into the jdk8u forest. webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~asaha/openJDK.8u141-8u162.sync/webrev Thanks Abhijit [1] http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/index.html -- Java Platform Group Oracle Corporation. (408)276-7564 From dalibor.topic at oracle.com Tue Jul 18 20:18:20 2017 From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (dalibor topic) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 22:18:20 +0200 Subject: [8u] Request for approval for bulk changes from Jul 2017 CPU 8u141 fixes into 8u In-Reply-To: <6028d65b-b78c-cd9c-0bd6-fa36a1e5ad9f@oracle.com> References: <6028d65b-b78c-cd9c-0bd6-fa36a1e5ad9f@oracle.com> Message-ID: <1aedc8c3-3585-0e90-3909-ae4780dab49e@oracle.com> Thanks, Abhijit - approved! cheers, dalibor topic On 18.07.2017 21:48, Abhijit Saha wrote: > 8u141 has been released earlier today [1]. Requesting approval to sync > up the 8u141 changes into the jdk8u forest. > > webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~asaha/openJDK.8u141-8u162.sync/webrev > > > Thanks > Abhijit > > > [1] http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/index.html > > -- Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Tue Jul 18 22:36:09 2017 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 23:36:09 +0100 Subject: [8u] Request for approval for bulk changes from Jul 2017 CPU 8u141 fixes into 8u In-Reply-To: <6028d65b-b78c-cd9c-0bd6-fa36a1e5ad9f@oracle.com> References: <6028d65b-b78c-cd9c-0bd6-fa36a1e5ad9f@oracle.com> Message-ID: <20170718223609.GD3570@vimes> Approved -Rob On 18/07/17 12:48, Abhijit Saha wrote: > 8u141 has been released earlier today [1]. Requesting approval to sync up > the 8u141 changes into the jdk8u forest. > > webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~asaha/openJDK.8u141-8u162.sync/webrev > > > Thanks > Abhijit > > > [1] http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/index.html > > > -- > Java Platform Group > Oracle Corporation. > (408)276-7564 > From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Tue Jul 18 22:37:10 2017 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 23:37:10 +0100 Subject: [8u] RFR for backport of JDK-8177958: Possible uninitialized char* in vm_version_solaris_sparc.cpp In-Reply-To: <20170718121909.GB3570@vimes> References: <55a24e4c-3922-4a0e-983d-433701afa68c@default> <20170718121909.GB3570@vimes> Message-ID: <20170718223710.GE3570@vimes> Ah, apologies, I took this for a request for approval. -Rob On 18/07/17 01:19, Rob McKenna wrote: > Appears to be a line shuffling issue. Approved. > > -Rob > > On 17/07/17 11:40, Shafi Ahmad wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Please review the backport of ' JDK-8177958: Possible uninitialized char* in vm_version_solaris_sparc.cpp' to jdk8u. > > Please note that this is not a clean backport due to single line conflict. > > > > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shshahma/8177958/jdk8u/webrev.00/ > > Jdk10 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8177958 > > Original patch pushed to jdk10: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/hs/hotspot/rev/7295c9c26185 > > > > Test: Run jprt. > > > > Regards, > > Shafi From shafi.s.ahmad at oracle.com Wed Jul 19 05:10:20 2017 From: shafi.s.ahmad at oracle.com (Shafi Ahmad) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 22:10:20 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [8u] RFR for backport of JDK-8177958: Possible uninitialized char* in vm_version_solaris_sparc.cpp In-Reply-To: References: <55a24e4c-3922-4a0e-983d-433701afa68c@default> Message-ID: <2c2fe91a-5d8c-46eb-82c0-6bec827687a9@default> Hi Vladimir, Thank you for the review. Regards, Shafi > -----Original Message----- > From: Vladimir Kozlov > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 9:27 PM > To: Shafi Ahmad ; jdk8u-dev at openjdk.java.net > Subject: Re: [8u] RFR for backport of JDK-8177958: Possible uninitialized char* > in vm_version_solaris_sparc.cpp > > Looks good. > > Thanks, > Vladimir > > On 7/17/17 11:40 PM, Shafi Ahmad wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Please review the backport of ' JDK-8177958: Possible uninitialized char* in > vm_version_solaris_sparc.cpp' to jdk8u. > > Please note that this is not a clean backport due to single line conflict. > > > > Webrev: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shshahma/8177958/jdk8u/webrev.00/ > > Jdk10 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8177958 > > Original patch pushed to jdk10: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/hs/hotspot/rev/7295c9c26185 > > > > Test: Run jprt. > > > > Regards, > > Shafi > > From sgehwolf at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 10:09:49 2017 From: sgehwolf at redhat.com (Severin Gehwolf) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 12:09:49 +0200 Subject: RFR(XS) [8u backport] 8181055: PPC64: "mbind: Invalid argument" still seen after 8175813 In-Reply-To: <30776b56-9521-0632-78cd-997fce1827e8@redhat.com> References: <5361e308-00e1-3041-c728-b6ebae7586ae@redhat.com> <25ab002d-0728-4aaa-eeb7-d3b9a3ea8254@redhat.com> <62524c62-ded1-6fab-e00c-8666fbff1645@oracle.com> <2239bacf-1760-1f73-20a1-ce792a191741@redhat.com> <593AAB00.4060801@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <30776b56-9521-0632-78cd-997fce1827e8@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1500458989.3922.3.camel@redhat.com> On Tue, 2017-07-18 at 09:39 -0400, Zhengyu Gu wrote: > > > > Is there a plan to fix this in 9 as well? > > My understanding is that, jdk10 bug will be automatically backported to? > jdk9, no? Not necessarily. See: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2017-July/021531.html Thanks, Severin From gnu.andrew at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 15:12:20 2017 From: gnu.andrew at redhat.com (Andrew Hughes) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 16:12:20 +0100 Subject: RFR(XS) [8u backport] 8181055: PPC64: "mbind: Invalid argument" still seen after 8175813 In-Reply-To: <1500458989.3922.3.camel@redhat.com> References: <5361e308-00e1-3041-c728-b6ebae7586ae@redhat.com> <25ab002d-0728-4aaa-eeb7-d3b9a3ea8254@redhat.com> <62524c62-ded1-6fab-e00c-8666fbff1645@oracle.com> <2239bacf-1760-1f73-20a1-ce792a191741@redhat.com> <593AAB00.4060801@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <30776b56-9521-0632-78cd-997fce1827e8@redhat.com> <1500458989.3922.3.camel@redhat.com> Message-ID: On 19 July 2017 at 11:09, Severin Gehwolf wrote: > On Tue, 2017-07-18 at 09:39 -0400, Zhengyu Gu wrote: >> > >> > Is there a plan to fix this in 9 as well? >> >> My understanding is that, jdk10 bug will be automatically backported to >> jdk9, no? > > Not necessarily. See: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2017-July/021531.html > > Thanks, > Severin I see Zhengyu added the 9-pool backport. If someone from Oracle can confirm I'm allowed to, I can push this fix. -- Andrew :) Senior Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) Web Site: http://fuseyism.com Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net) Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04 C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222 From zgu at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 17:49:58 2017 From: zgu at redhat.com (Zhengyu Gu) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 13:49:58 -0400 Subject: RFR(XS) [8u backport] 8181055: PPC64: "mbind: Invalid argument" still seen after 8175813 In-Reply-To: References: <5361e308-00e1-3041-c728-b6ebae7586ae@redhat.com> <25ab002d-0728-4aaa-eeb7-d3b9a3ea8254@redhat.com> <62524c62-ded1-6fab-e00c-8666fbff1645@oracle.com> <2239bacf-1760-1f73-20a1-ce792a191741@redhat.com> <593AAB00.4060801@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Message-ID: <8b7c8aec-fe64-4fbd-1714-aa0e320d0add@redhat.com> Hi Alex, I saw you updated jdk9 backport JBS. I wonder if you can help me to push this jdk8u backport? It has been reviewed and approved for the backport. Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/8181055/8u/webrev.00/ Thanks a lot! -Zhengyu On 07/17/2017 02:16 PM, Zhengyu Gu wrote: > Hi, > > This 8u backport of JDK-8181005 has been reviewed by Aleksey [1] and > approved by Rob [2]. > > However, it is not clear to me that the only reviewer has to be > 'R'eviewer. If so, can someone with 'R' to review the backport? It is > almost the same as JDK9, with very minor conflicts. > > I will also need sponsor this backport. > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8181055 > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/8181055/8u/webrev.00/ > > > [1] > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2017-June/027104.html > [2] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2017-June/006723.html > > Thanks, > > -Zhengyu > > > On 06/09/2017 11:39 AM, Zhengyu Gu wrote: >> >> >> On 06/09/2017 10:04 AM, Gustavo Romero wrote: >>> Hi Zhengyu, Dan >>> >>> On 07-06-2017 17:37, Zhengyu Gu wrote: >>>> Thanks for the clarification, Dan. >>>> >>>> -Zhengyu >>>> >>>> >>>> On 06/07/2017 04:14 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote: >>>>> hotspot-dev at ... is the right place for the RFR (which this is). >>>>> >>>>> jdk8u-dev at ... is the right place for the RFA (Request For Approval) >>>>> after the RFR is approved. >>>>> >>>>> Dan >>> >>> Does it mean that besides Aleksey's review it's still missing one >>> additional >>> review in order to proceed with the request for approval in the >>> jdk8u-dev ML >>> or this bug? Is my understanding correct? >>> >> Hi Gustavo, >> >> If backport has the same review process, then it needs a "R"eviwer. >> >> Thanks, >> >> -Zhengyu >> >> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Regards, >>> Gustavo >>> >>> >>>>> >>>>> On 6/7/17 12:16 PM, Zhengyu Gu wrote: >>>>>> Hi Aleksey, >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for the review. >>>>>> >>>>>> On 06/07/2017 02:11 PM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote: >>>>>>> On 06/07/2017 08:07 PM, Zhengyu Gu wrote: >>>>>>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8181055 >>>>>>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/8181055/8u/webrev.00/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Looks almost the same as 9. Looks good to me. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Shouldn't you do this at jdk8-dev? >>>>>>> >>>>>> There is not jdk8-dev and jdk8 is read-only. I think jdk8u-dev is >>>>>> right one. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> >>>>>> -Zhengyu >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> -Aleksey >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Wed Jul 19 18:33:50 2017 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 19:33:50 +0100 Subject: RFR(XS) [8u backport] 8181055: PPC64: "mbind: Invalid argument" still seen after 8175813 In-Reply-To: References: <62524c62-ded1-6fab-e00c-8666fbff1645@oracle.com> <2239bacf-1760-1f73-20a1-ce792a191741@redhat.com> <593AAB00.4060801@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <30776b56-9521-0632-78cd-997fce1827e8@redhat.com> <1500458989.3922.3.camel@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20170719183350.GB3742@vimes> Hi folks, I'll take care of the push. Thanks, -Rob On 19/07/17 04:12, Andrew Hughes wrote: > On 19 July 2017 at 11:09, Severin Gehwolf wrote: > > On Tue, 2017-07-18 at 09:39 -0400, Zhengyu Gu wrote: > >> > > >> > Is there a plan to fix this in 9 as well? > >> > >> My understanding is that, jdk10 bug will be automatically backported to > >> jdk9, no? > > > > Not necessarily. See: > > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2017-July/021531.html > > > > Thanks, > > Severin > > > I see Zhengyu added the 9-pool backport. > > If someone from Oracle can confirm I'm allowed to, I can push this fix. > -- > Andrew :) > > Senior Free Java Software Engineer > Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) > > Web Site: http://fuseyism.com > Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java > PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net) > Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04 C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222 From zgu at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 18:38:30 2017 From: zgu at redhat.com (Zhengyu Gu) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 14:38:30 -0400 Subject: RFR(XS) [8u backport] 8181055: PPC64: "mbind: Invalid argument" still seen after 8175813 In-Reply-To: <20170719183350.GB3742@vimes> References: <62524c62-ded1-6fab-e00c-8666fbff1645@oracle.com> <2239bacf-1760-1f73-20a1-ce792a191741@redhat.com> <593AAB00.4060801@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <30776b56-9521-0632-78cd-997fce1827e8@redhat.com> <1500458989.3922.3.camel@redhat.com> <20170719183350.GB3742@vimes> Message-ID: Thanks, Rob. -Zhengyu On 07/19/2017 02:33 PM, Rob McKenna wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'll take care of the push. Thanks, > > -Rob > > On 19/07/17 04:12, Andrew Hughes wrote: >> On 19 July 2017 at 11:09, Severin Gehwolf wrote: >>> On Tue, 2017-07-18 at 09:39 -0400, Zhengyu Gu wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Is there a plan to fix this in 9 as well? >>>> >>>> My understanding is that, jdk10 bug will be automatically backported to >>>> jdk9, no? >>> >>> Not necessarily. See: >>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2017-July/021531.html >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Severin >> >> >> I see Zhengyu added the 9-pool backport. >> >> If someone from Oracle can confirm I'm allowed to, I can push this fix. >> -- >> Andrew :) >> >> Senior Free Java Software Engineer >> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) >> >> Web Site: http://fuseyism.com >> Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java >> PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net) >> Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04 C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222 From mathiske at amazon.com Wed Jul 19 21:10:40 2017 From: mathiske at amazon.com (Mathiske, Bernd) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 21:10:40 +0000 Subject: Why did com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.resolver.* get added to list of restricted packages? Message-ID: <9E6BC793-3459-4A46-8322-3825542ADB78@amazon.com> Is there any particular reason why these additional entries can be found in ?java.security? in u141 as opposed to say u131? package.access=sun.,\ ... com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.resolver.helpers.,\ com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.resolver.readers.,\ ... package.definition=sun.,\ ... com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.resolver.helpers.,\ com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.resolver.readers.,\ ... Is this just forced API sanity cleanup or is there a more severe reason? Bernd From gnu.andrew at redhat.com Thu Jul 20 04:28:15 2017 From: gnu.andrew at redhat.com (Andrew Hughes) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 05:28:15 +0100 Subject: RFR(XS) [8u backport] 8181055: PPC64: "mbind: Invalid argument" still seen after 8175813 In-Reply-To: <20170719183350.GB3742@vimes> References: <62524c62-ded1-6fab-e00c-8666fbff1645@oracle.com> <2239bacf-1760-1f73-20a1-ce792a191741@redhat.com> <593AAB00.4060801@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <30776b56-9521-0632-78cd-997fce1827e8@redhat.com> <1500458989.3922.3.camel@redhat.com> <20170719183350.GB3742@vimes> Message-ID: On 19 July 2017 at 19:33, Rob McKenna wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'll take care of the push. Thanks, > > -Rob > So does it need to be pushed through JPRT or not? Thanks, -- Andrew :) Senior Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) Web Site: http://fuseyism.com Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net) Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04 C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222 From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Thu Jul 20 15:25:22 2017 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 16:25:22 +0100 Subject: RFR(XS) [8u backport] 8181055: PPC64: "mbind: Invalid argument" still seen after 8175813 In-Reply-To: References: <2239bacf-1760-1f73-20a1-ce792a191741@redhat.com> <593AAB00.4060801@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <30776b56-9521-0632-78cd-997fce1827e8@redhat.com> <1500458989.3922.3.camel@redhat.com> <20170719183350.GB3742@vimes> Message-ID: <20170720152522.GB3054@vimes> There is no such requirement for openjdk 8u contributions currently. If you're satisfied that your fix is tested and stable you're free to push once all of the appropriate approvals have been obtained. -Rob On 20/07/17 05:28, Andrew Hughes wrote: > On 19 July 2017 at 19:33, Rob McKenna wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > I'll take care of the push. Thanks, > > > > -Rob > > > > So does it need to be pushed through JPRT or not? > > Thanks, > -- > Andrew :) > > Senior Free Java Software Engineer > Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) > > Web Site: http://fuseyism.com > Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java > PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net) > Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04 C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222 From gnu.andrew at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 01:32:05 2017 From: gnu.andrew at redhat.com (Andrew Hughes) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 02:32:05 +0100 Subject: RFR(XS) [8u backport] 8181055: PPC64: "mbind: Invalid argument" still seen after 8175813 In-Reply-To: <20170720152522.GB3054@vimes> References: <2239bacf-1760-1f73-20a1-ce792a191741@redhat.com> <593AAB00.4060801@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <30776b56-9521-0632-78cd-997fce1827e8@redhat.com> <1500458989.3922.3.camel@redhat.com> <20170719183350.GB3742@vimes> <20170720152522.GB3054@vimes> Message-ID: On 20 July 2017 at 16:25, Rob McKenna wrote: > There is no such requirement for openjdk 8u contributions currently. If > you're satisfied that your fix is tested and stable you're free to push > once all of the appropriate approvals have been obtained. > > -Rob > Thanks for the clarification. I've pushed changes to 8u before, but I think they were all jdk changesets. -- Andrew :) Senior Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) Web Site: http://fuseyism.com Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net) Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04 C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222 From shafi.s.ahmad at oracle.com Mon Jul 24 06:05:26 2017 From: shafi.s.ahmad at oracle.com (Shafi Ahmad) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2017 23:05:26 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [8u] RFA for backport of JDK-8181500: [TESTBUG] com/sun/jdi/LineNumberInfo.java fails with jArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException Message-ID: Hi, May I get the approval of clean backport of ' JDK- 8181500: [TESTBUG] com/sun/jdi/LineNumberInfo.java fails with jArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException' to jdk8u. Jdk10 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8181500 Jdk10 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/compiler-dev/2017-July/011021.html Regards, Shafi From shafi.s.ahmad at oracle.com Mon Jul 24 06:14:30 2017 From: shafi.s.ahmad at oracle.com (Shafi Ahmad) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2017 23:14:30 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [8u] RFA for backport of JDK-8177958: Possible uninitialized char* in vm_version_solaris_sparc.cpp Message-ID: <07211ff3-b5f5-467f-b450-0299e6ffadaa@default> Hi, May I get the approval of backport of 'JDK-8177958: Possible uninitialized char* in vm_version_solaris_sparc.cpp' to jdk8u. Jdk10 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8177958 Jdk10 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2017-April/026703.html Jdk8 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2017-July/006758.html http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2017-July/027550.html Wbrev link: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shshahma/8177958/jdk8u/webrev.00/ Regards, Shafi From david.buck at oracle.com Mon Jul 24 07:28:22 2017 From: david.buck at oracle.com (David Buck) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 16:28:22 +0900 Subject: [8u] RFA for backport of JDK-8177958: Possible uninitialized char* in vm_version_solaris_sparc.cpp In-Reply-To: <07211ff3-b5f5-467f-b450-0299e6ffadaa@default> References: <07211ff3-b5f5-467f-b450-0299e6ffadaa@default> Message-ID: <9f983573-dc97-ef58-ea27-5550602b27f6@oracle.com> approved for push to 8u-dev Cheers, -Buck On 2017/07/24 15:14, Shafi Ahmad wrote: > Hi, > > May I get the approval of backport of 'JDK-8177958: Possible uninitialized char* in vm_version_solaris_sparc.cpp' to jdk8u. > > Jdk10 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8177958 > Jdk10 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2017-April/026703.html > Jdk8 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2017-July/006758.html > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2017-July/027550.html > Wbrev link: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shshahma/8177958/jdk8u/webrev.00/ > > Regards, > Shafi > From shafi.s.ahmad at oracle.com Mon Jul 24 08:17:39 2017 From: shafi.s.ahmad at oracle.com (Shafi Ahmad) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 01:17:39 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [8u] RFA for backport of JDK-8181500: [TESTBUG] com/sun/jdi/LineNumberInfo.java fails with jArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <429851e8-1c02-4438-a101-e08c168530a1@default> Hi, I am sorry I missed to put the link of original changeset in my previous mail. Jdk10 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8181500 Jdk10 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/compiler-dev/2017-July/011021.html Jdk10 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/jdk/rev/5da856eb4da1 Regards, Shafi > -----Original Message----- > From: Shafi Ahmad > Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 11:35 AM > To: jdk8u-dev at openjdk.java.net > Subject: [8u] RFA for backport of JDK-8181500: [TESTBUG] > com/sun/jdi/LineNumberInfo.java fails with > jArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException > > Hi, > > May I get the approval of clean backport of ' JDK- 8181500: [TESTBUG] > com/sun/jdi/LineNumberInfo.java fails with > jArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException' to jdk8u. > > Jdk10 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8181500 > Jdk10 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/compiler- > dev/2017-July/011021.html > > Regards, > Shafi From shafi.s.ahmad at oracle.com Mon Jul 24 08:19:00 2017 From: shafi.s.ahmad at oracle.com (Shafi Ahmad) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 01:19:00 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [8u] RFA for backport of JDK-8177958: Possible uninitialized char* in vm_version_solaris_sparc.cpp In-Reply-To: <9f983573-dc97-ef58-ea27-5550602b27f6@oracle.com> References: <07211ff3-b5f5-467f-b450-0299e6ffadaa@default> <9f983573-dc97-ef58-ea27-5550602b27f6@oracle.com> Message-ID: <200e7bf9-a88b-4ade-a75a-eb84820e65db@default> Thank you Buck. Regards, Shafi > -----Original Message----- > From: David Buck > Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 12:58 PM > To: Shafi Ahmad ; jdk8u-dev at openjdk.java.net > Subject: Re: [8u] RFA for backport of JDK-8177958: Possible uninitialized > char* in vm_version_solaris_sparc.cpp > > approved for push to 8u-dev > > Cheers, > -Buck > > On 2017/07/24 15:14, Shafi Ahmad wrote: > > Hi, > > > > May I get the approval of backport of 'JDK-8177958: Possible uninitialized > char* in vm_version_solaris_sparc.cpp' to jdk8u. > > > > Jdk10 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8177958 > > Jdk10 review thread: > > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2017-April/026703.h > > tml > > Jdk8 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u- > dev/2017-July/006758.html > > > > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2017-July/027550.ht > > ml Wbrev link: > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shshahma/8177958/jdk8u/webrev.00/ > > > > Regards, > > Shafi > > From shafi.s.ahmad at oracle.com Mon Jul 24 11:14:57 2017 From: shafi.s.ahmad at oracle.com (Shafi Ahmad) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 04:14:57 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [8u] RFA for backport of JDK-8175340: Possible invalid memory accesses due to ciMethodData::bci_to_data() returning NULL to jdk8u Message-ID: Hi, May I get the approval of clean backport of 'JDK-8175340: Possible invalid memory accesses due to ciMethodData::bci_to_data() returning NULL' to jdk8u. Jdk9 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8175340 Jdk9 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-compiler-dev/2017-March/025785.html Jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/hotspot/rev/83906886441f Regards, Shafi From david.buck at oracle.com Mon Jul 24 11:52:32 2017 From: david.buck at oracle.com (David Buck) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 20:52:32 +0900 Subject: [8u] RFA for backport of JDK-8175340: Possible invalid memory accesses due to ciMethodData::bci_to_data() returning NULL to jdk8u In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1237bc6e-0bf0-d4a9-8553-9eabfdc01c26@oracle.com> approved for backport to 8u-dev Cheers, -Buck On 2017/07/24 20:14, Shafi Ahmad wrote: > Hi, > > May I get the approval of clean backport of 'JDK-8175340: Possible invalid memory accesses due to ciMethodData::bci_to_data() returning NULL' to jdk8u. > > Jdk9 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8175340 > Jdk9 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-compiler-dev/2017-March/025785.html > Jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/hotspot/rev/83906886441f > > Regards, > Shafi > From shafi.s.ahmad at oracle.com Mon Jul 24 11:53:45 2017 From: shafi.s.ahmad at oracle.com (Shafi Ahmad) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 04:53:45 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [8u] RFA for backport of JDK-8175340: Possible invalid memory accesses due to ciMethodData::bci_to_data() returning NULL to jdk8u In-Reply-To: <1237bc6e-0bf0-d4a9-8553-9eabfdc01c26@oracle.com> References: <1237bc6e-0bf0-d4a9-8553-9eabfdc01c26@oracle.com> Message-ID: <20b5f1e0-1ca9-4fa9-82ca-45afb7d1600b@default> Thank you Buck for approving. Regards, Shafi > -----Original Message----- > From: David Buck > Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 5:23 PM > To: Shafi Ahmad ; jdk8u-dev at openjdk.java.net > Subject: Re: [8u] RFA for backport of JDK-8175340: Possible invalid memory > accesses due to ciMethodData::bci_to_data() returning NULL to jdk8u > > approved for backport to 8u-dev > > Cheers, > -Buck > > On 2017/07/24 20:14, Shafi Ahmad wrote: > > Hi, > > > > May I get the approval of clean backport of 'JDK-8175340: Possible invalid > memory accesses due to ciMethodData::bci_to_data() returning NULL' to > jdk8u. > > > > Jdk9 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8175340 > > Jdk9 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot- > compiler-dev/2017-March/025785.html > > Jdk9 changeset: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/hotspot/rev/83906886441f > > > > Regards, > > Shafi > > From david.buck at oracle.com Tue Jul 25 13:33:23 2017 From: david.buck at oracle.com (David Buck) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 22:33:23 +0900 Subject: [8u-dev] RFA: 8178047: Aliasing problem with raw memory accesses Message-ID: <1e94e833-9f2b-d506-5355-fefd9c63ae0b@oracle.com> Hi! May I please have approval to push this backport to 8u-dev? bug report: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8178047 JDK 9 push: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/hotspot/rev/b7690ac63aa5 proposed JDK 8 change: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dbuck/8178047_jdk8_ver01/ code review of backport: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-compiler-dev/2017-July/026725.html Cheers, -Buck From rob.mckenna at oracle.com Tue Jul 25 13:55:46 2017 From: rob.mckenna at oracle.com (Rob McKenna) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 14:55:46 +0100 Subject: [8u-dev] RFA: 8178047: Aliasing problem with raw memory accesses In-Reply-To: <1e94e833-9f2b-d506-5355-fefd9c63ae0b@oracle.com> References: <1e94e833-9f2b-d506-5355-fefd9c63ae0b@oracle.com> Message-ID: <20170725135546.GA3065@vimes> Approved -Rob On 25/07/17 10:33, David Buck wrote: > Hi! > > May I please have approval to push this backport to 8u-dev? > > bug report: > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8178047 > > JDK 9 push: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/hotspot/rev/b7690ac63aa5 > > proposed JDK 8 change: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dbuck/8178047_jdk8_ver01/ > > code review of backport: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-compiler-dev/2017-July/026725.html > > Cheers, > -Buck From david.buck at oracle.com Tue Jul 25 14:16:03 2017 From: david.buck at oracle.com (David Buck) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 23:16:03 +0900 Subject: [8u] RFA for backport of JDK-8181500: [TESTBUG] com/sun/jdi/LineNumberInfo.java fails with jArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException In-Reply-To: <429851e8-1c02-4438-a101-e08c168530a1@default> References: <429851e8-1c02-4438-a101-e08c168530a1@default> Message-ID: <8dd5d1d4-79c2-6285-2298-700d30b4c104@oracle.com> approved for backport to 8u-dev Cheers, -Buck On 2017/07/24 17:17, Shafi Ahmad wrote: > Hi, > > I am sorry I missed to put the link of original changeset in my previous mail. > > Jdk10 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8181500 > Jdk10 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/compiler-dev/2017-July/011021.html > Jdk10 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/jdk/rev/5da856eb4da1 > > > Regards, > Shafi > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Shafi Ahmad >> Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 11:35 AM >> To: jdk8u-dev at openjdk.java.net >> Subject: [8u] RFA for backport of JDK-8181500: [TESTBUG] >> com/sun/jdi/LineNumberInfo.java fails with >> jArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException >> >> Hi, >> >> May I get the approval of clean backport of ' JDK- 8181500: [TESTBUG] >> com/sun/jdi/LineNumberInfo.java fails with >> jArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException' to jdk8u. >> >> Jdk10 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8181500 >> Jdk10 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/compiler- >> dev/2017-July/011021.html >> >> Regards, >> Shafi From shafi.s.ahmad at oracle.com Tue Jul 25 14:27:20 2017 From: shafi.s.ahmad at oracle.com (Shafi Ahmad) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 07:27:20 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [8u] RFA for backport of JDK-8181500: [TESTBUG] com/sun/jdi/LineNumberInfo.java fails with jArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException In-Reply-To: <8dd5d1d4-79c2-6285-2298-700d30b4c104@oracle.com> References: <429851e8-1c02-4438-a101-e08c168530a1@default> <8dd5d1d4-79c2-6285-2298-700d30b4c104@oracle.com> Message-ID: Thank you Buck for the approval. Regards, Shafi > -----Original Message----- > From: David Buck > Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 7:46 PM > To: Shafi Ahmad ; jdk8u-dev at openjdk.java.net > Subject: Re: [8u] RFA for backport of JDK-8181500: [TESTBUG] > com/sun/jdi/LineNumberInfo.java fails with > jArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException > > approved for backport to 8u-dev > > Cheers, > -Buck > > On 2017/07/24 17:17, Shafi Ahmad wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am sorry I missed to put the link of original changeset in my previous mail. > > > > Jdk10 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8181500 > > Jdk10 review thread: > > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/compiler-dev/2017-July/011021.h > > tml > > Jdk10 changeset: > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/jdk/rev/5da856eb4da1 > > > > > > Regards, > > Shafi > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Shafi Ahmad > >> Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 11:35 AM > >> To: jdk8u-dev at openjdk.java.net > >> Subject: [8u] RFA for backport of JDK-8181500: [TESTBUG] > >> com/sun/jdi/LineNumberInfo.java fails with > >> jArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> May I get the approval of clean backport of ' JDK- 8181500: [TESTBUG] > >> com/sun/jdi/LineNumberInfo.java fails with > >> jArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException' to jdk8u. > >> > >> Jdk10 bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8181500 > >> Jdk10 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/compiler- > >> dev/2017-July/011021.html > >> > >> Regards, > >> Shafi From felix.yang at linaro.org Wed Jul 26 10:45:48 2017 From: felix.yang at linaro.org (Felix Yang) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 18:45:48 +0800 Subject: RFR(XS): 8185320: jdk/test/java/lang/SecurityManager/CheckPackageAccess.java failed after u141 update Message-ID: Hi, Please review: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~fyang/8185320/webrev.01/ This fixed one jtreg test jdk/test/java/lang/SecurityManager/CheckPackageAccess.java for 8173286 Related commit of u141: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/rev/ b3e7354e6ae8 Please help push it if it's OK. Thanks, Felix From sean.mullan at oracle.com Wed Jul 26 10:58:05 2017 From: sean.mullan at oracle.com (Sean Mullan) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 06:58:05 -0400 Subject: RFR(XS): 8185320: jdk/test/java/lang/SecurityManager/CheckPackageAccess.java failed after u141 update In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <9f34379a-6956-ea39-c0f8-8edce53c5d30@oracle.com> Please update the copyright date and add a noreg-self label to the bug, otherwise looks fine. --Sean On 7/26/17 6:45 AM, Felix Yang wrote: > Hi, > > Please review: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~fyang/8185320/webrev.01/ > This fixed one jtreg test > jdk/test/java/lang/SecurityManager/CheckPackageAccess.java for 8173286 > Related commit of u141: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/rev/ > b3e7354e6ae8 > Please help push it if it's OK. > > Thanks, > Felix > From abhi.saha at oracle.com Wed Jul 26 20:14:43 2017 From: abhi.saha at oracle.com (Abhijit Saha) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 13:14:43 -0700 Subject: [8u] Request for approval for bulk changes from 8u144 fixes into 8u Message-ID: <87adff6e-1b87-b2b6-fc34-71c8aafeab78@oracle.com> 8u144 has been released earlier today [1]. Requesting approval to sync up the 8u144 changes into the jdk8u forest. webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~asaha/openJDK.8u144-8u162.sync/webrev Thanks Abhijit [1] http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/index.html -- Java Platform Group Oracle Corporation. (408)276-7564 From dalibor.topic at oracle.com Wed Jul 26 20:18:35 2017 From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (dalibor topic) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 22:18:35 +0200 Subject: [8u] Request for approval for bulk changes from 8u144 fixes into 8u In-Reply-To: <87adff6e-1b87-b2b6-fc34-71c8aafeab78@oracle.com> References: <87adff6e-1b87-b2b6-fc34-71c8aafeab78@oracle.com> Message-ID: Thanks, Abhijit - approved! cheers, dalibor topic On 26.07.2017 22:14, Abhijit Saha wrote: > 8u144 has been released earlier today [1]. Requesting approval to sync > up the 8u144 changes into the jdk8u forest. > > webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~asaha/openJDK.8u144-8u162.sync/webrev > > > Thanks > Abhijit > > > [1] http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/index.html > > -- Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment From dalibor.topic at oracle.com Wed Jul 26 20:32:20 2017 From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (dalibor topic) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 22:32:20 +0200 Subject: [8u-communication] 8u144 is now available! Message-ID: Hi, JDK 8u144 was released [0] on July 26th. It addressed a regression introduced in JDK 8u141 [1]. That fix has been sync'ed into the jdk8u-dev forest to ensure that it gets included in the upcoming JDK 8u152 release [2]. Please note that 8u152 has now entered rampdown phase 2 and early access binaries from Oracle are available for testing. [3] cheers, Dalibor Topic [0] http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/index.html [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8184993 [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8u/releases/8u152.html [3] http://jdk.java.net/8/ -- Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment From felix.yang at linaro.org Thu Jul 27 05:45:16 2017 From: felix.yang at linaro.org (Felix Yang) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 13:45:16 +0800 Subject: RFR(XS): 8185320: jdk/test/java/lang/SecurityManager/CheckPackageAccess.java failed after u141 update In-Reply-To: <9f34379a-6956-ea39-c0f8-8edce53c5d30@oracle.com> References: <9f34379a-6956-ea39-c0f8-8edce53c5d30@oracle.com> Message-ID: Done. New webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~fyang/8185320/webrev.02/ Thanks for reviewing this. Felix On 26 July 2017 at 18:58, Sean Mullan wrote: > Please update the copyright date and add a noreg-self label to the bug, > otherwise looks fine. > > --Sean > > > On 7/26/17 6:45 AM, Felix Yang wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Please review: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~fyang/8185320/webrev.01/ >> This fixed one jtreg test >> jdk/test/java/lang/SecurityManager/CheckPackageAccess.java for 8173286 >> Related commit of u141: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk >> 8u/jdk8u/jdk/rev/ >> b3e7354e6ae8 >> Please help push it if it's OK. >> >> Thanks, >> Felix >> >> From sean.mullan at oracle.com Thu Jul 27 11:41:57 2017 From: sean.mullan at oracle.com (Sean Mullan) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 07:41:57 -0400 Subject: RFR(XS): 8185320: jdk/test/java/lang/SecurityManager/CheckPackageAccess.java failed after u141 update In-Reply-To: References: <9f34379a-6956-ea39-c0f8-8edce53c5d30@oracle.com> Message-ID: Looks fine. --Sean On 7/27/17 1:45 AM, Felix Yang wrote: > Done. > New webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~fyang/8185320/webrev.02/ > Thanks for reviewing this. > > Felix > > On 26 July 2017 at 18:58, Sean Mullan > wrote: > > Please update the copyright date and add a noreg-self label to the > bug, otherwise looks fine. > > --Sean > > > On 7/26/17 6:45 AM, Felix Yang wrote: > > Hi, > > Please review: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~fyang/8185320/webrev.01/ > > This fixed one jtreg test > jdk/test/java/lang/SecurityManager/CheckPackageAccess.java for > 8173286 > Related commit of u141: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/rev/ > > b3e7354e6ae8 > Please help push it if it's OK. > > Thanks, > Felix > >