[8u] RFA for JDK-8176182: 4 security tests are not run

[Bhanu Gopularam]

Hi,

Here is updated webrev with changes from (8176182 and 8176183) details below. The changes apply cleanly to 8u-dev:

Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bgopularam/JDK-8176182/webrev/webrev.01/

(1) 8176182: 4 security tests are not run
JDK-9 review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2017-March/015643.html
Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/9132102b7bb6 

(2) 8176183: sun/security/mscapi/SignedObjectChain.java fails on Windows
JDK-9 review (): http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2017-March/015670.html
Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/a3276d8711b7

Regarding usage of @compile tag, the test depends on single file (java/security/SignedObject/Chain.java), I have kept the changes similar to original fix.

Thanks,
Bhanu

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Gibbons 
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2017 9:06 PM
To: jdk8u-dev at openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: [8u] RFA for JDK-8176182: 4 security tests are not run

It's a backport from 9, so OK from that point of view, but I would have to ask why the use of @compile with a relative path to some file in an ancestor directory. This seems like a use for @library.

-- Jon


On 7/3/17 5:20 AM, Bhanu Gopularam wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> May I get the approval for following backport which applies cleanly to jdk8u "JDK-8176182: 4 security tests are not run"
>
> JDK-9 Changeset: 
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/9132102b7bb6
>
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bgopularam/JDK-8176182/webrev.00/
>
> Thanks,
> Bhanu