RFR(XS) [8u backport] 8181055: PPC64: "mbind: Invalid argument" still seen after 8175813

[Zhengyu Gu]

Hi Andrew,

On 07/18/2017 09:31 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> On 17 July 2017 at 19:16, Zhengyu Gu <zgu at redhat.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This 8u backport of JDK-8181005 has been reviewed by Aleksey [1] and
>> approved by Rob [2].
>>
>> However, it is not clear to me that the only reviewer has to be 'R'eviewer.
>> If so, can someone with 'R' to review the backport? It is almost the same as
>> JDK9, with very minor conflicts.
>>
>> I will also need sponsor this backport.
>>
>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8181055
>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/8181055/8u/webrev.00/
>>
>>
>> [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2017-June/027104.html
>> [2] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2017-June/006723.html
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -Zhengyu
>
> It looks good to me. The 8u patch matches what we included in our packages
> and matches the patch already in hs/10, bar a slight context difference in one
> case. It built fine.
>
> I'm an 8u reviewer if that's what you're looking for.
Yes, thanks for the reviewing.

>
> I can push it too if needed (I've pushed 8u jdk patches before), but
> not sure if 8u
> HotSpot patches still need to be run through that JPRT thing. Some clarity on
> this would be good.
I assume that it has to go through JPRT, but I am not sure about 8u.

>
> Is there a plan to fix this in 9 as well?

My understanding is that, jdk10 bug will be automatically backported to 
jdk9, no?

Thanks,

-Zhengyu

>
> Thanks,
>