RFR(XS) [8u backport] 8181055: PPC64: "mbind: Invalid argument" still seen after 8175813

[Zhengyu Gu]

Hi Alex,

I saw you updated jdk9 backport JBS.

I wonder if you can help me to push this jdk8u backport? It has been 
reviewed and approved for the backport.

Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/8181055/8u/webrev.00/

Thanks a lot!

-Zhengyu

On 07/17/2017 02:16 PM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This 8u backport of JDK-8181005 has been reviewed by Aleksey [1] and
> approved by Rob [2].
>
> However, it is not clear to me that the only reviewer has to be
> 'R'eviewer. If so, can someone with 'R' to review the backport? It is
> almost the same as JDK9, with very minor conflicts.
>
> I will also need sponsor this backport.
>
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8181055
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/8181055/8u/webrev.00/
>
>
> [1]
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2017-June/027104.html
> [2] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2017-June/006723.html
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Zhengyu
>
>
> On 06/09/2017 11:39 AM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 06/09/2017 10:04 AM, Gustavo Romero wrote:
>>> Hi Zhengyu, Dan
>>>
>>> On 07-06-2017 17:37, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
>>>> Thanks for the clarification, Dan.
>>>>
>>>> -Zhengyu
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 06/07/2017 04:14 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
>>>>> hotspot-dev at ... is the right place for the RFR (which this is).
>>>>>
>>>>> jdk8u-dev at ... is the right place for the RFA (Request For Approval)
>>>>> after the RFR is approved.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dan
>>>
>>> Does it mean that besides Aleksey's review it's still missing one
>>> additional
>>> review in order to proceed with the request for approval in the
>>> jdk8u-dev ML
>>> or this bug? Is my understanding correct?
>>>
>> Hi Gustavo,
>>
>> If backport has the same review process, then it needs a "R"eviwer.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -Zhengyu
>>
>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Gustavo
>>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 6/7/17 12:16 PM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Aleksey,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for the review.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 06/07/2017 02:11 PM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>>>>>>> On 06/07/2017 08:07 PM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
>>>>>>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8181055
>>>>>>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/8181055/8u/webrev.00/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Looks almost the same as 9. Looks good to me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Shouldn't you do this at jdk8-dev?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is not jdk8-dev and jdk8 is read-only. I think jdk8u-dev is
>>>>>> right one.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Zhengyu
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Aleksey
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>