[8u-dev] RFA: 8206075: On x86, assert on unbound assembler Labels used as branch targets

[Hohensee, Paul]

Yes. I've filed jdk11u requests for both, as well as JDK-8208647, which latter is necessary to build with the latest jtreg that I've got installed on my laptop.

Thanks,

Paul

On 12/3/18, 4:15 AM, "Seán Coffey" <sean.coffey at oracle.com> wrote:

    Let's put the 8206075/8208480 request together for porting purposes.
    
    Can this be fixed in the JDK 11 Updates repository first ?
    
    Regards,
    Sean.
    
    On 08/11/18 00:29, Hohensee, Paul wrote:
    > Email is asynchronous and this message lost the race. :)
    >
    > On 11/7/18, 4:25 PM, "jdk8u-dev on behalf of Hohensee, Paul" <jdk8u-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net on behalf of hohensee at amazon.com> wrote:
    >
    >      Please approve this small backport to jdk8u. The original patch had a bug that was fixed by
    >      8208480: Fix for test failure: assert(is_bound() || is_unused()) after JDK-8206075 in C1
    >      for which a backport request immediately follows this one.
    >      JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8206075
    >      Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~phh/8206075/webrev.8u.00/
    >      Review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-runtime-dev/2018-July/029136.html
    >      
    >      The patch applies cleanly net of line number changes and file locations.
    >      
    >      Webrev combined with 8208480: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~phh/8206075/webrev.8u.8208480.combined/
    >      
    >      Thanks,
    >      
    >      Paul
    >      
    >      
    >