Re: Proposal for back-porting JFR to OpenJDK8u

guangyu.zhu guangyu.zhu at aliyun.com
Fri Dec 7 10:21:36 UTC 2018


thanks, it makes sense. 
------------------------------------------------------------------
Sender:Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com>
Sent at:2018 Dec 7 (Fri) 17:57
To:guangyu.zhu <guangyu.zhu at aliyun.com>; Mario Torre <neugens at redhat.com>
Cc:jdk8u-dev <jdk8u-dev at openjdk.java.net>; kingsum.chow <kingsum.chow at gmail.com>
Subject:Re: Proposal for back-porting JFR to OpenJDK8u

On 07/12/2018 02:52, guangyu.zhu wrote:
> I still don't understand why feature backport is the right approach. What's the difference between feature backport and JEP? Can you give more comments?

JEPs are proposals for new Java features. This isn't one.
This is an already-existing Java feature being backported.
A JEP is a waste of time. Why do you want one?

-- 
Andrew Haley
Java Platform Lead Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671



More information about the jdk8u-dev mailing list