Request for Approval: Backport of JDK-8188030: AWT java apps fail to start when some minimal fonts are present
Mario Torre
neugens at redhat.com
Wed Jun 13 13:58:17 UTC 2018
Hi Rob,
Thanks, I just merged.
I added a noreg-hard label, not sure if that's what you wanted, please
let me know if I should change that.
Thanks again!
Cheers,
Mario
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 3:09 PM, Rob McKenna <rob.mckenna at oracle.com> wrote:
> No problem at all Mario.
>
> Looks like Phil is happy to proceed.
>
> Phil, I assume the issues that Mario has raised are on your radar and
> you're happy to proceed as per the codereview.
>
> Please add an appropriate noreg label to the master bug.
>
> Approved.
>
> -Rob
>
> On 13/06/18 14:39, Mario Torre wrote:
>> Hello Rob,
>>
>> Sorry to resurrect this old thread.
>>
>> I would like to ask permission to push the following change to jdk8u-dev:
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~neugens/8188030/webrev-jdk8.01/
>>
>> The discussion is here (it spans multiple months, I apologise in
>> advance, but I'm linking the final decision):
>>
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2018-June/009297.html
>>
>> The original bug is here:
>>
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8188030
>>
>> There may be some additional work necessary for the closed JDK, but I
>> have no way to test that, in that case there may be a follow up bug to
>> address the missing part and I'll be happy to assist if necessary
>> where possible.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Mario
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Rob McKenna <rob.mckenna at oracle.com> wrote:
>> > Hi Mario,
>> >
>> > Given that there are changes you'll need to get the new fix reviewed
>> > first.
>> >
>> > Once that is done the request will be processed.
>> >
>> > If approved you can then push using the master bug id.
>> >
>> > -Rob
>> >
>> > On 15/11/17 18:17, Mario Torre wrote:
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
>> >> I would like to backport the fix for:
>> >>
>> >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8188030
>> >>
>> >> To OpenJDK8 updates dev:
>> >>
>> >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev
>> >>
>> >> The fix is slightly different than the fix for 10 [1] since we want to
>> >> preserve the status for the Oracle build that I'm told does not
>> >> support the CFF fonts in 8:
>> >>
>> >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~neugens/8188030/webrev-jdk8.01/
>> >>
>> >> I apologise for continually asking this, I promise I'll write this
>> >> down this time, but I don't remember what's the next step after that,
>> >> just push the fix after approval with the same bug id, right?
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Mario
>> >>
>> >> [1] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/client/rev/d5a1cde89944
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mario Torre
>> Associate Manager, Software Engineering
>> Red Hat GmbH <https://www.redhat.com>
>> 9704 A60C B4BE A8B8 0F30 9205 5D7E 4952 3F65 7898
--
Mario Torre
Associate Manager, Software Engineering
Red Hat GmbH <https://www.redhat.com>
9704 A60C B4BE A8B8 0F30 9205 5D7E 4952 3F65 7898
More information about the jdk8u-dev
mailing list