[8u] RFA: 8201495: [Zero] Reduce limits of max heap size for boot JDK on s390

Severin Gehwolf sgehwolf at redhat.com
Fri May 4 07:35:35 UTC 2018


Hi Sean,

On Thu, 2018-05-03 at 18:53 +0100, Seán Coffey wrote:
> Approved. Please add noreg-build label to this bug also.

I've added the noreg-build label.

> I can push this patch for you.

Thank you, much appreciated!

Cheers,
Severin

> regards,
> Sean.
> 
> 
> On 03/05/2018 09:16, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Please approve this backport of JDK-8201495 which reduces the max heap
> > requirement for the boot JDK of 32bit JVMs. It causes build failures of
> > the Zero variant JVM on s390 (31 bit, takes the 32bit branch). The fix
> > is in JDK 11, has been requested for JDK 10. The JDK 8 fix has been
> > reviewed on build-dev as the JDK 11 fix is slightly different due to
> > the different build systems.
> > 
> > Once approved, I'd need an Oracle sponsor to push this for me since it
> > requires re-generation of generated-configure.sh.
> > 
> > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8201495
> > webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-8201495/webrev.jdk8/
> > JDK 8 changeset (without generated-configure.sh):
> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-8201495/JDK-8201495.jdk8.export.patch
> > 
> > JDK 8 review thread:
> > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2018-May/021918.html
> > 
> > JDK 11 review thread was:
> > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2018-April/021754.html
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Severin
> > 
> > 
> 
> 


More information about the jdk8u-dev mailing list